scholarly journals The Value of High-Resolution Met Office Regional Climate Models in the Simulation of Multihourly Precipitation Extremes

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (16) ◽  
pp. 6155-6174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Chan ◽  
Elizabeth J. Kendon ◽  
Hayley J. Fowler ◽  
Stephen Blenkinsop ◽  
Nigel M. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Return Period ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Value Theory ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Return Levels

Abstract Extreme value theory is used as a diagnostic for two high-resolution (12-km parameterized convection and 1.5-km explicit convection) Met Office regional climate model (RCM) simulations. On subdaily time scales, the 12-km simulation has weaker June–August (JJA) short-return-period return levels than the 1.5-km RCM, yet the 12-km RCM has overly large high return levels. Comparisons with observations indicate that the 1.5-km RCM is more successful than the 12-km RCM in representing (multi)hourly JJA very extreme events. As accumulation periods increase toward daily time scales, the erroneous 12-km precipitation extremes become more comparable with the observations and the 1.5-km RCM. The 12-km RCM fails to capture the observed low sensitivity of the growth rate to accumulation period changes, which is successfully captured by the 1.5-km RCM. Both simulations have comparable December–February (DJF) extremes, but the DJF extremes are generally weaker than in JJA at daily or shorter time scales. Case studies indicate that “gridpoint storms” are one of the causes of unrealistic very extreme events in the 12-km RCM. Caution is needed in interpreting the realism of 12-km RCM JJA extremes, including short-return-period events, which have return values closer to observations. There is clear evidence that the 1.5-km RCM has a higher degree of realism than the 12-km RCM in the simulation of JJA extremes.

Future response of precipitation extremes over the Nordic region in a convection-permitting regional climate model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Lind ◽  
Danijel Belušić ◽  
Erik Kjellström ◽  
Fuxing Wang ◽  
Erika Toivonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Boundary Data ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Grid Spacing ◽  
Local Climate ◽  
Nordic Region

<p>There is an increased need for more detailed climate information from impact researchers, stakeholders and policy makers for regional-to-local climate change assessments. In order to design relevant and informative planning strategies on these scales it is important to have reliable climate data and information on high spatial O(1km) and temporal (daily to sub-daily) scales. Such high-resolution data is also beneficial for climate impact modellers as input to their models, e.g. hydrological or urban models that operate on regional to local scales. It has been established that regional climate models (RCMs) provide added value compared to coarser global climate models (GCMs) or re-analysis (e.g. ERA-Interim). However, RCMs with standard spatial resolution O(10 − 50km) still suffer from inadequacies in representing important regional-to-local climate phenomena and characteristics, both from the implied ”smoothening” effect within each grid cell which limits the representation of fine scale surface forcings, and the need to parameterize small-scale processes like atmospheric convection. The latter particularly invokes uncertainties in future climate responses of short-duration precipitation extremes such as flash-floods. Here, we compare 20-year simulations with a very high resolution (3 km grid spacing) convection permitting regional climate model (CPRCM) with a standard high-resolution (12 km grid spacing) convection parameterized RCM and their abilities to simulate the climate characteristics of the Nordic region in Europe, with particular focus on precipitation extremes. The study covers both recent past (with boundary data from ERA-Interim and the EC-Earth GCM) and the end of the 21st century (boundary data from EC-Earth using the RCP8.5 radiative forcing scenario). The high model grid resolution combined with the extensive simulated time period which enables assessment on climatological time scales makes this study one of very few for this region.</p>

scholarly journals Using high-resolution regional climate models to estimate return levels of daily extreme precipitation over Bavaria

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3573-3598
Author(s):  
Benjamin Poschlod
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Return Level ◽  
Gev Distribution ◽  
Return Levels

Abstract. Extreme daily rainfall is an important trigger for floods in Bavaria. The dimensioning of water management structures as well as building codes is based on observational rainfall return levels. In this study, three high-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) are employed to produce 10- and 100-year daily rainfall return levels and their performance is evaluated by comparison to observational return levels. The study area is governed by different types of precipitation (stratiform, orographic, convectional) and a complex terrain, with convective precipitation also contributing to daily rainfall levels. The Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5) at a 12 km spatial resolution and the Weather and Forecasting Research (WRF) model at a 5 km resolution both driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data use parametrization schemes to simulate convection. WRF at a 1.5 km resolution driven by ERA5 reanalysis data explicitly resolves convectional processes. Applying the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution, the CRCM5 setup can reproduce the observational 10-year return levels with an areal average bias of +6.6 % and a spatial Spearman rank correlation of ρ=0.72. The higher-resolution 5 km WRF setup is found to improve the performance in terms of bias (+4.7 %) and spatial correlation (ρ=0.82). However, the finer topographic details of the WRF-ERA5 return levels cannot be evaluated with the observation data because their spatial resolution is too low. Hence, this comparison shows no further improvement in the spatial correlation (ρ=0.82) but a small improvement in the bias (2.7 %) compared to the 5 km resolution setup. Uncertainties due to extreme value theory are explored by employing three further approaches. Applied to the WRF-ERA5 data, the GEV distributions with a fixed shape parameter (bias is +2.5 %; ρ=0.79) and the generalized Pareto (GP) distributions (bias is +2.9 %; ρ=0.81) show almost equivalent results for the 10-year return period, whereas the metastatistical extreme value (MEV) distribution leads to a slight underestimation (bias is −7.8 %; ρ=0.84). For the 100-year return level, however, the MEV distribution (bias is +2.7 %; ρ=0.73) outperforms the GEV distribution (bias is +13.3 %; ρ=0.66), the GEV distribution with fixed shape parameter (bias is +12.9 %; ρ=0.70), and the GP distribution (bias is +11.9 %; ρ=0.63). Hence, for applications where the return period is extrapolated, the MEV framework is recommended. From these results, it follows that high-resolution regional climate models are suitable for generating spatially homogeneous rainfall return level products. In regions with a sparse rain gauge density or low spatial representativeness of the stations due to complex topography, RCMs can support the observational data. Further, RCMs driven by global climate models with emission scenarios can project climate-change-induced alterations in rainfall return levels at regional to local scales. This can allow adjustment of structural design and, therefore, adaption to future precipitation conditions.

Evaluation of extreme precipitation over the Nordic region using a convection-permitting regional climate model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Toivonen ◽  
Danijel Belušić ◽  
Emma Dybro Thomassen ◽  
Peter Berg ◽  
Ole Bøssing Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Nordic Region ◽  
Mesh Resolution ◽  
Grid Mesh

<p>Extreme precipitation events have a major impact upon our society. Although many studies have indicated that it is likely that the frequency of such events will increase in a warmer climate, little has been done to assess changes in extreme precipitation at a sub-daily scale. Recently, there is more and more evidence that <span>high-resolution convection-permitting models </span><span>(CPMs)</span> (grid-mesh typically < 4 km) can represent especially short-duration precipitation extremes more accurately when compared with coarser-resolution <span>regional climate model</span><span>s </span><span>(RCMs)</span><span>.</span></p><p>This study investigates sub-daily and daily precipitation characteristics based on hourly <span>output data from the HARMONIE-Climate model </span>at 3-km and 12-km grid-mesh resolution over the Nordic region between 1998 and 2018. The RCM modelling chain uses the ERA-Interim reanalysis to drive a 12-km grid-mesh simulation which is further downscaled to 3-km grid-mesh resolution using a non-hydrostatic model set-up.</p><p>The statistical properties of the modeled extreme precipitation are compared to several sub-daily and daily observational products, including gridded and in-situ gauge data, from April to September. We investigate the skill of the model to represent different aspects of the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation as well as intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves that are commonly used to investigate short duration extremes from an urban planning perspective. The high grid resolution combined with the 20-year-long simulation period allows for a robust assessment at a climatological time scale <span>and enables us to examine the added value of high-resolution </span><span>CPM</span><span> in reproducing precipitation extremes over the Nordic </span><span>region</span><span>. </span><span>Based on the tentative results, the high-resolution CPM can realistically capture the </span><span>characteristics </span><span>of precipitation extremes, </span><span>for instance, </span><span>in terms of improved diurnal cycle and maximum intensities of sub-daily precipitation.</span></p>

scholarly journals Comparison of Statistical and Dynamic Downscaling Techniques in Generating High-Resolution Temperatures in China from CMIP5 GCMs

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
YinLong Xu ◽  
ChunChun Meng ◽  
XinHua Li ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Maximum Temperature ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Dynamic Downscaling

AbstractIn aiming for better access to climate change information and for providing climate service, it is important to obtain reliable high-resolution temperature simulations. Systematic comparisons are still deficient between statistical and dynamic downscaling techniques because of their inherent unavoidable uncertainties. In this paper, 20 global climate models (GCMs) and one regional climate model [Providing Regional Climates to Impact Studies (PRECIS)] are employed to evaluate their capabilities in reproducing average trends of mean temperature (Tm), maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), and extreme events represented by frost days (FD) and heat-wave days (HD) across China. It is shown generally that bias of temperatures from GCMs relative to observations is over ±1°C across more than one-half of mainland China. PRECIS demonstrates better representation of temperatures (except for HD) relative to GCMs. There is relatively better performance in Huanghuai, Jianghuai, Jianghan, south Yangzi River, and South China, whereas estimation is not as good in Xinjiang, the eastern part of northwest China, and the Tibetan Plateau. Bias-correction spatial disaggregation is used to downscale GCMs outputs, and bias correction is applied for PRECIS outputs, which demonstrate better improvement to a bias within ±0.2°C for Tm, Tmax, Tmin, and DTR and ±2 days for FD and HD. Furthermore, such improvement is also verified by the evidence of increased spatial correlation coefficient and symmetrical uncertainty, decreased root-mean-square error, and lower standard deviation for reproductions. It is seen from comprehensive ranking metrics that different downscaled models show the most improvement across different climatic regions, implying that optional ensembles of models should be adopted to provide sufficient high-quality climate information.

Canadian RCM Projected Changes to Extreme Precipitation Characteristics over Canada

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2565-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Mladjic ◽  
L. Sushama ◽  
M. N. Khaliq ◽  
R. Laprise ◽  
D. Caya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Regional Frequency Analysis ◽  
Climatic Regions ◽  
Return Levels ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Projected Changes

Abstract Changes to the intensity and frequency of hydroclimatic extremes can have significant impacts on sectors associated with water resources, and therefore it is relevant to assess their vulnerabilities in a changing climate. This study focuses on the assessment of projected changes to selected return levels of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-day annual (April–September) maximum precipitation amounts, over Canada, using an ensemble of five 30-yr integrations each for current reference (1961–90) and future (2040–71) periods performed with the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM); the future simulations correspond to the A2 Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) scenario. Two methods, the regional frequency analysis (RFA), which operates at the scale of statistically homogenous units of predefined climatic regions, with the possibility of downscaling to gridcell level, and the individual gridbox analysis (GBA), are used in this study, with the time-slice stationarity assumption. Validation of model simulated 20-, 50- and 100-yr return levels of single- and multiday precipitation extremes against those observed for the 1961–90 period using both the RFA and GBA methods suggest an underestimation of extreme events by the CRCM over most of Canada. The CRCM projected changes, realized with the RFA method at regional scale, to selected return levels for the future (2041–70) period, in comparison to the reference (1961–90) period, suggest statistically significant increases in event magnitudes for 7 out of 10 studied climatic regions. Though the results of the RFA and GBA methods at gridcell level suggest positive changes to studied return levels for most parts of Canada, the results corresponding to the 20-yr return period for the two methods agree better, while the agreement abates with increasing return periods, that is, 50 and 100 yr. It is expected that the increase in return levels of short and longer duration precipitation extremes will have severe implications for various water resource–related development and management activities.

scholarly journals Response of extreme precipitation to uniform surface warming in quasi-global aquaplanet simulations at high resolution

2021 ◽  
Vol 379 (2195) ◽  
pp. 20190543
Author(s):  
P. A. O’Gorman ◽  
Z. Li ◽  
W. R. Boos ◽  
J. Yuval
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
The Tropics

Projections of precipitation extremes in simulations with global climate models are very uncertain in the tropics, in part because of the use of parameterizations of deep convection and model deficiencies in simulating convective organization. Here, we analyse precipitation extremes in high-resolution simulations that are run without a convective parameterization on a quasi-global aquaplanet. The frequency distributions of precipitation rates and precipitation cluster sizes in the tropics of a control simulation are similar to the observed distributions. In response to climate warming, 3 h precipitation extremes increase at rates of up to 9 %   K − 1 in the tropics because of a combination of positive thermodynamic and dynamic contributions. The dynamic contribution at different latitudes is connected to the vertical structure of warming using a moist static stability. When the precipitation rates are first averaged to a daily timescale and coarse-grained to a typical global climate-model resolution prior to calculating the precipitation extremes, the response of the precipitation extremes to warming becomes more similar to what was found previously in coarse-resolution aquaplanet studies. However, the simulations studied here do not exhibit the high rates of increase of tropical precipitation extremes found in projections with some global climate models. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes and implications for flash flood risks’.

scholarly journals Local impact analysis of climate change on precipitation extremes: are high-resolution climate models needed for realistic simulations?

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Tabari ◽  
Rozemien De Troch ◽  
Olivier Giot ◽  
Rafiq Hamdi ◽  
Piet Termonia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Added Value

Abstract. This study explores whether climate models with higher spatial resolution provide higher accuracy for precipitation simulations and/or different climate change signals. The outputs from two convection-permitting climate models (ALARO and CCLM) with a spatial resolution of 3–4 km are compared with those from the coarse scale driving models or reanalysis data for simulating/projecting daily and sub-daily precipitation quantiles. The high-resolution ALARO and CCLM models reveal an added value to capture sub-daily precipitation extremes during summer compared to the driving GCMs and reanalysis data. Further validation of historical climate simulations based on design precipitation statistics derived from intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves shows a better match of the convection-permitting model results with the observations-based IDF statistics. Results moreover indicate that one has to be careful in assuming spatial scale independency of climate change signals for the delta change downscaling method, as high-resolution models may show larger changes in extreme precipitation. These larger changes appear to be dependent on the climate model, since such intensification is not observed for the ALARO model.

scholarly journals Using high-resolution regional climate models to estimate return levels of daily extreme precipitation over Bavaria

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Poschlod
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Gev Distribution ◽  
Return Levels

Abstract. Extreme daily rainfall is an important trigger for floods in Bavaria. The dimensioning of water management structures as well as building codes are based on observational rainfall return levels. In this study, three high-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) are employed to produce 10-year daily rainfall return levels and their performance is evaluated by comparison to observational return levels. The study area is governed by different types of precipitation (stratiform, orographic, convectional) and a complex terrain, with convective precipitation also contributing to daily rainfall levels. The Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5) at 12 km spatial resolution and the Weather and Forecasting Research model (WRF) at 5 km resolution both driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data use parametrization schemes to simulate convection. The WRF at 1.5 km resolution driven by ERA5 reanalysis data explicitly resolves convectional processes. Applying the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution, all three model setups can reproduce the observational return levels with an areal average bias of +6.6 % or less and a spatial Spearman rank correlation of ρ > 0.72. The increase of spatial resolution between the 12 km CRCM5 and the 5 km WRF setup is found to improve the performance in terms of bias (+6.6 % and +3.2 %) and spatial correlation (ρ = 0.72 and ρ = 0.82). However, the finer topographic details of the WRF-ERA5 return levels cannot be evaluated with the observation data because their spatial resolution is too low. Hence, this comparison shows no great further improvement (bias = +1.1 %, ρ = 0.82) of the overall performance compared to the 5 km resolution setup. Uncertainties due to extreme value theory are explored by employing three different approaches for the highest-resolution WRF-ERA5 setup. The GEV distribution with fixed shape parameter (bias = +0.9 %, ρ = 0.79) and the Generalized Pareto (GP: bias = +1.3 %, ρ = 0.81) show almost equivalent results for the 10-year return period, whereas the Metastatistical Extreme Value (MEV) distribution leads to a slight underestimation (bias = -6.2 %, ρ = 0.86). From these results, it follows that high-resolution regional climate models are suitable for generating spatially homogeneous rainfall return level products. In regions with a sparse rain gauge density or low spatial representativeness of the stations due to complex topography, RCMs can support the observational data. Further, RCMs driven by global climate models with emission scenarios can project climate change-induced alterations in rainfall return levels at regional to local scales. This would allow adjustment of structural design and, therefore, adaption to future precipitation conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document