scholarly journals Saharan Heat Low Biases in CMIP5 Models

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 2867-2884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross D. Dixon ◽  
Anne Sophie Daloz ◽  
Daniel J. Vimont ◽  
Michela Biasutti
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
West African Monsoon ◽  
West African ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
African Climate ◽  
Heat Low

Representing the West African monsoon (WAM) is a major challenge in climate modeling because of the complex interaction between local and large-scale mechanisms. This study focuses on the representation of a key aspect of West African climate, namely the Saharan heat low (SHL), in 22 global climate models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) multimodel dataset. Comparison of the CMIP5 simulations with reanalyses shows large biases in the strength and location of the mean SHL. CMIP5 models tend to develop weaker climatological heat lows than the reanalyses and place them too far southwest. Models that place the climatological heat low farther to the north produce more mean precipitation across the Sahel, while models that place the heat low farther to the east produce stronger African easterly wave (AEW) activity. These mean-state biases are seen in model ensembles with both coupled and fixed sea surface temperatures (SSTs). The importance of SSTs on West African climate variability is well documented, but this research suggests SSTs are secondary to atmospheric biases for understanding the climatological SHL bias. SHL biases are correlated across the models to local radiative terms, large-scale tropical precipitation, and large-scale pressure and wind across the Atlantic, suggesting that local mechanisms that control the SHL may be connected to climate model biases at a much larger scale.

scholarly journals Influence of the representation of convection on the mid-Holocene West African Monsoon

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1665-1684
Author(s):  
Leonore Jungandreas ◽  
Cathy Hohenegger ◽  
Martin Claussen
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
West African Monsoon ◽  
West African ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
African Monsoon ◽  
Monsoonal Precipitation

Abstract. Global climate models experience difficulties in simulating the northward extension of the monsoonal precipitation over north Africa during the mid-Holocene as revealed by proxy data. A common feature of these models is that they usually operate on grids that are too coarse to explicitly resolve convection, but convection is the most essential mechanism leading to precipitation in the West African Monsoon region. Here, we investigate how the representation of tropical deep convection in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) climate model affects the meridional distribution of monsoonal precipitation during the mid-Holocene by comparing regional simulations of the summer monsoon season (July to September; JAS) with parameterized and explicitly resolved convection. In the explicitly resolved convection simulation, the more localized nature of precipitation and the absence of permanent light precipitation as compared to the parameterized convection simulation is closer to expectations. However, in the JAS mean, the parameterized convection simulation produces more precipitation and extends further north than the explicitly resolved convection simulation, especially between 12 and 17∘ N. The higher precipitation rates in the parameterized convection simulation are consistent with a stronger monsoonal circulation over land. Furthermore, the atmosphere in the parameterized convection simulation is less stably stratified and notably moister. The differences in atmospheric water vapor are the result of substantial differences in the probability distribution function of precipitation and its resulting interactions with the land surface. The parametrization of convection produces light and large-scale precipitation, keeping the soils moist and supporting the development of convection. In contrast, less frequent but locally intense precipitation events lead to high amounts of runoff in the explicitly resolved convection simulations. The stronger runoff inhibits the moistening of the soil during the monsoon season and limits the amount of water available to evaporation in the explicitly resolved convection simulation.

scholarly journals Influence of the representation of convection on the mid-Holocene West African Monsoon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonore Jungandreas ◽  
Cathy Hohenegger ◽  
Martin Claussen
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
West African Monsoon ◽  
West African ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
African Monsoon ◽  
Monsoonal Precipitation

Abstract. Global climate models have difficulties to simulate the northward extension of the monsoonal precipitation over north Africa during the mid-Holocene as revealed by proxy data. A common feature of these models is that they usually operate on too coarse grids to explicitly resolve convection, but convection is the most essential mechanism leading to precipitation in the west African monsoon region. Here, we investigate how the representation of tropical deep convection in the ICON climate model affects the meridional distribution of monsoonal precipitation during the mid-Holocene, by comparing regional simulations of the summer monsoon season (July to September, JAS) with parameterized (40 km-P) and explicitly resolved convection (5 km-E). The spatial distribution and intensity of precipitation, are more realistic in the explicitly resolved convection simulations than in the simulations with parameterized convection. However, in the JAS-mean the 40 km-P simulation produces more precipitation and extents further north than the 5 km-E simulation, especially between 12° N and 17° N. The higher precipitation rates in the 40 km-P simulation are consistent with a stronger monsoonal circulation over land. Furthermore, the atmosphere in the 40 km-P simulation is less stably stratified and notably moister. The differences in atmospheric water vapor are the result of substantial differences in the probability distribution function of precipitation and its resulting interactions with the land surface. The parametrization of convection produces light and large-scale precipitation, keeping the soils moist and supporting the development of convection. In contrast, less frequent but locally intense precipitation events lead to high amounts of runoff in explicitly resolved convection simulations. The stronger runoff inhibits the moistening of the soil during the monsoon season and limits the amount of water available to evaporation.

Influence of the representation of convection on the mid-Holocene West African Monsoon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonore Jungandreas ◽  
Cathy Hohenegger ◽  
Martin Claussen
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Monsoon Season ◽  
West African Monsoon ◽  
West African ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
African Monsoon ◽  
Monsoonal Precipitation

<p>Global climate models have difficulties to simulate the northward extension of the monsoonal precipitation over north Africa during the mid-Holocene as revealed by proxy data. A common feature of these models is that they usually operate on too coarse grids to explicitly resolve convection, but convection is the most essential mechanism leading to precipitation in the west African monsoon region. Here, we investigate how the representation of tropical deep convection in the ICON climate model affects the meridional distribution of monsoonal precipitation during the mid-Holocene, by comparing regional simulations of the summer monsoon season (July to September, JAS) with parameterized (40km-P) and explicitly resolved convection (5km-E). <br>The spatial distribution and intensity of precipitation, are more realistic in the explicitly resolved convection simulations than in the simulations with parameterized convection.<br>However, in the JAS-mean the 40km-P simulation produces more precipitation and extents further north than the 5km-E simulation, especially between 12° N and 17° N. The higher precipitation rates in the 40km-P simulation are consistent with a stronger monsoonal circulation over land. <br>Furthermore, the atmosphere in the 40km-P simulation is less stably stratified and notably moister. The differences in atmospheric water vapor are the result of substantial differences in the probability distribution function of precipitation and its resulting interactions with the land surface. The parametrization of convection produces light and large-scale precipitation, keeping the soils moist and supporting the development of convection. <br>In contrast, less frequent but locally intense precipitation events lead to high amounts of runoff in explicitly resolved convection simulations. The stronger runoff inhibits the moistening of the soil during the monsoon season and limits the amount of water available to evaporation. </p>

scholarly journals Fidelity of the Observational/Reanalysis Datasets and Global Climate Models in Representation of Extreme Precipitation in East China

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicheng He ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Qing Bao ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Yangtze River Basin ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
East China ◽  
Cmip5 Models

AbstractRealistic reproduction of historical extreme precipitation has been challenging for both reanalysis and global climate model (GCM) simulations. This work assessed the fidelities of the combined gridded observational datasets, reanalysis datasets, and GCMs [CMIP5 and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Flexible Global Ocean–Atmospheric Land System Model–Finite-Volume Atmospheric Model, version 2 (FGOALS-f2)] in representing extreme precipitation over East China. The assessment used 552 stations’ rain gauge data as ground truth and focused on the probability distribution function of daily precipitation and spatial structure of extreme precipitation days. The TRMM observation displays similar rainfall intensity–frequency distributions as the stations. However, three combined gridded observational datasets, four reanalysis datasets, and most of the CMIP5 models cannot capture extreme precipitation exceeding 150 mm day−1, and all underestimate extreme precipitation frequency. The observed spatial distribution of extreme precipitation exhibits two maximum centers, located over the lower-middle reach of Yangtze River basin and the deep South China region, respectively. Combined gridded observations and JRA-55 capture these two centers, but ERA-Interim, MERRA, and CFSR and almost all CMIP5 models fail to capture them. The percentage of extreme rainfall in the total rainfall amount is generally underestimated by 25%–75% in all CMIP5 models. Higher-resolution models tend to have better performance, and physical parameterization may be crucial for simulating correct extreme precipitation. The performances are significantly improved in the newly released FGOALS-f2 as a result of increased resolution and a more realistic simulation of moisture and heating profiles. This work pinpoints the common biases in the combined gridded observational datasets and reanalysis datasets and helps to improve models’ simulation of extreme precipitation, which is critically important for reliable projection of future changes in extreme precipitation.

Regionally Varying Assessments of Upper-Level Tropical Width in Reanalyses and CMIP5 Models Using a Tropopause Break Metric

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (14) ◽  
pp. 5885-5903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elinor R. Martin ◽  
Cameron R. Homeyer ◽  
Roarke A. McKinzie ◽  
Kevin M. McCarthy ◽  
Tao Xian
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
The Past ◽  
East Pacific ◽  
Change Climate ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
The Tropics

AbstractChanges in tropical width can have important consequences in sectors including ecosystems, agriculture, and health. Observations suggest tropical expansion over the past 30 years although studies have not agreed on the magnitude of this change. Climate model projections have also indicated an expansion and show similar uncertainty in its magnitude. This study utilizes an objective, longitudinally varying, tropopause break method to define the extent of the tropics at upper levels. The location of the tropopause break is associated with enhanced stratosphere–troposphere exchange and thus its structure influences the chemical composition of the stratosphere. The method shows regional variations in the width of the upper-level tropics in the past and future. Four modern reanalyses show significant contraction of the tropics over the eastern Pacific between 1981 and 2015, and slight but significant expansion in other regions. The east Pacific narrowing contributes to zonal mean narrowing, contradicting prior work, and is attributed to the use of monthly and zonal mean data in prior studies. Six global climate models perform well in representing the climatological location of the tropical boundary. Future projections show a spread in the width trend (from ~0.5° decade−1 of narrowing to ~0.4° decade−1 of widening), with a narrowing projected across the east Pacific and Northern Hemisphere Americas. This study illustrates that this objective tropopause break method that uses instantaneous data and does not require zonal averaging is appropriate for identifying upper-level tropical width trends and the break location is connected with local and regional changes in precipitation.

scholarly journals Process-oriented analysis of aircraft soot-cirrus interactions constrains the climate impact of aviation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Kärcher ◽  
Fabian Mahrt ◽  
Claudia Marcolli
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Climate Impact ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Soot Particles ◽  
Cloud Ice ◽  
The Impact

AbstractFully accounting for the climate impact of aviation requires a process-level understanding of the impact of aircraft soot particle emissions on the formation of ice clouds. Assessing this impact with the help of global climate models remains elusive and direct observations are lacking. Here we use a high-resolution cirrus column model to investigate how aircraft-emitted soot particles, released after ice crystals sublimate at the end of the lifetime of contrails and contrail cirrus, perturb the formation of cirrus. By allying cloud simulations with a measurement-based description of soot-induced ice formation, we find that only a small fraction (<1%) of the soot particles succeeds in forming cloud ice alongside homogeneous freezing of liquid aerosol droplets. Thus, soot-perturbed and homogeneously-formed cirrus fundamentally do not differ in optical depth. Our results imply that climate model estimates of global radiative forcing from interactions between aircraft soot and large-scale cirrus may be overestimates. The improved scientific understanding reported here provides a process-based underpinning for improved climate model parametrizations and targeted field observations.

scholarly journals Why Do Global Climate Models Struggle to Represent Low-Level Clouds in the West African Summer Monsoon?

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1665-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Hannak ◽  
Peter Knippertz ◽  
Andreas H. Fink ◽  
Anke Kniffka ◽  
Gregor Pante
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
West African Monsoon ◽  
High Elevation ◽  
West African ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
The West ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Low Level ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Climate models struggle to realistically represent the West African monsoon (WAM), which hinders reliable future projections and the development of adequate adaption measures. Low-level clouds over southern West Africa (5°–10°N, 8°W–8°E) during July–September are an integral part of the WAM through their effect on the surface energy balance and precipitation, but their representation in climate models has received little attention. Here 30 (20) years of output from 18 (8) models participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (Year of Tropical Convection) are used to identify cloud biases and their causes. Compared to ERA-Interim reanalyses, many models show large biases in low-level cloudiness of both signs and a tendency to too high elevation and too weak diurnal cycles. At the same time, these models tend to have too strong low-level jets, the impact of which is unclear because of concomitant effects on temperature and moisture advection as well as turbulent mixing. Part of the differences between the models and ERA-Interim appear to be related to the different subgrid cloud schemes used. While nighttime tendencies in temperature and humidity are broadly realistic in most models, daytime tendencies show large problems with the vertical transport of heat and moisture. Many models simulate too low near-surface relative humidities, leading to insufficient low cloud cover and abundant solar radiation, and thus a too large diurnal cycle in temperature and relative humidity. In the future, targeted model sensitivity experiments will be needed to test possible feedback mechanisms between low clouds, radiation, boundary layer dynamics, precipitation, and the WAM circulation.

Model Uncertainty in Cloud–Circulation Coupling, and Cloud-Radiative Response to Increasing CO2, Linked to Biases in Climatological Circulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (24) ◽  
pp. 10013-10020
Author(s):  
Bernard R. Lipat ◽  
Aiko Voigt ◽  
George Tselioudis ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Model Uncertainty ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Temperature Structure ◽  
Climatological Circulation

Recent analyses of global climate models suggest that uncertainty in the coupling between midlatitude clouds and the atmospheric circulation contributes to uncertainty in climate sensitivity. However, the reasons behind model differences in the cloud–circulation coupling have remained unclear. Here, we use a global climate model in an idealized aquaplanet setup to show that the Southern Hemisphere climatological circulation, which in many models is biased equatorward, contributes to the model differences in the cloud–circulation coupling. For the same poleward shift of the Hadley cell (HC) edge, models with narrower climatological HCs exhibit stronger midlatitude cloud-induced shortwave warming than models with wider climatological HCs. This cloud-induced radiative warming results predominantly from a subsidence warming that decreases cloud fraction and is stronger for narrower HCs because of a larger meridional gradient in the vertical velocity. A comparison of our aquaplanet results with comprehensive climate models suggests that about half of the model uncertainty in the midlatitude cloud–circulation coupling stems from this impact of the circulation on the large-scale temperature structure of the atmosphere, and thus could be removed by improving the climatological circulation in models. This illustrates how understanding of large-scale dynamics can help reduce uncertainty in clouds and their response to climate change.

scholarly journals The representation of Northern Hemisphere blocking in current global climate models

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Schiemann ◽  
Panos Athanasiadis ◽  
David Barriopedro ◽  
Francisco Doblas-Reyes ◽  
Katja Lohmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Blocking Index

Abstract. Global Climate Models (GCMs) are known to suffer from biases in the simulation of atmospheric blocking, and this study provides an assessment of how blocking is represented by the latest generation of GCMs. It is evaluated (i) how historical CMIP6 (Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) simulations perform compared to CMIP5 simulations, and (ii) how horizontal model resolution affects the simulation of blocking in the CMIP6-HighResMIP (PRIMAVERA) model ensemble, which is designed to address this type of question. Two blocking indices are used to evaluate the simulated mean blocking frequency and blocking persistence for the Euro-Atlantic and Pacific regions in winter and summer against the corresponding estimates from atmospheric reanalysis data. There is robust evidence that CMIP6 models simulate blocking frequency and persistence better than CMIP5 models in the Atlantic and Pacific and in winter and summer. This improvement is sizeable so that, for example, winter blocking frequency in the median CMIP5 model in a large Euro-Atlantic domain is underestimated by 32 % using the absolute geopotential height (AGP) blocking index, whereas the same number is 19 % for the median CMIP6 model. As for the sensitivity of simulated blocking to resolution, it is found that the resolution increase, from typically 100 km to 20 km grid spacing, in the PRIMAVERA models, which are not re-tuned at the higher resolutions, benefits the mean blocking frequency in the Atlantic in winter and summer, and in the Pacific in summer. Simulated blocking persistence, however, is not seen to improve with resolution. Our results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that resolution is one of a number of interacting factors necessary for an adequate simulation of blocking in GCMs. The improvements reported in this study hold promise for further reductions in blocking biases as model development continues.

scholarly journals Northern Hemisphere blocking simulation in current climate models: evaluating progress from the Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 to 6 and sensitivity to resolution

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Schiemann ◽  
Panos Athanasiadis ◽  
David Barriopedro ◽  
Francisco Doblas-Reyes ◽  
Katja Lohmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Climate Simulation ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. Global climate models (GCMs) are known to suffer from biases in the simulation of atmospheric blocking, and this study provides an assessment of how blocking is represented by the latest generation of GCMs. It is evaluated (i) how historical CMIP6 (Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6) simulations perform compared to CMIP5 simulations and (ii) how horizontal model resolution affects the simulation of blocking in the CMIP6-HighResMIP (PRIMAVERA – PRocess-based climate sIMulation: AdVances in high-resolution modelling and European climate Risk Assessment) model ensemble, which is designed to address this type of question. Two blocking indices are used to evaluate the simulated mean blocking frequency and blocking persistence for the Euro-Atlantic and Pacific regions in winter and summer against the corresponding estimates from atmospheric reanalysis data. There is robust evidence that CMIP6 models simulate blocking frequency and persistence better than CMIP5 models in the Atlantic and Pacific and during winter and summer. This improvement is sizeable so that, for example, winter blocking frequency in the median CMIP5 model in a large Euro-Atlantic domain is underestimated by 33 % using the absolute geopotential height (AGP) blocking index, whereas the same number is 18 % for the median CMIP6 model. As for the sensitivity of simulated blocking to resolution, it is found that the resolution increase, from typically 100 to 20 km grid spacing, in most of the PRIMAVERA models, which are not re-tuned at the higher resolutions, benefits the mean blocking frequency in the Atlantic in winter and summer and in the Pacific in summer. Simulated blocking persistence, however, is not seen to improve with resolution. Our results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that resolution is one of a number of interacting factors necessary for an adequate simulation of blocking in GCMs. The improvements reported in this study hold promise for further reductions in blocking biases as model development continues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document