Old and Undertriaged: A Lethal Combination

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Rogers ◽  
Frederick Rogers ◽  
Eric Bradburn ◽  
Margaret Krasne ◽  
John Lee ◽  
...  

The geriatric trauma patient poses unique challenges to the trauma surgeon due to occult injuries and occult hypoperfusion. We hypothesized that those elderly patients with significant injuries, who were not initially evaluated via trauma activation, would suffer worse outcomes. All cases of elderly (age ≥ 65) admitted to the trauma service from the years 2000 to 2010 were included. Our trauma activation system encompasses anatomic, physiologic, and mechanism of injury criteria. We defined patients as undertriaged (UT) if they had an ISS > 15 and did not undergo a trauma team activation, but had a regular workup by an emergency department physician and trauma team consultation. Factors that contributed to being UT in the emergency department were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 4534 elderly patients constitute this analysis, of which 15.1 per cent were UT. The UT patients were more likely to die, when adjusted for Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma score, the occurrence of $1 complication, and whether the patient was on Coumadin. UT has a high risk of death in elderly patients. Trauma triage guidelines need to be better tailored to identify the high-risk geriatric trauma patient.

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-202
Author(s):  
Renuka S Bindraban ◽  
◽  
Maarten J ten Berg ◽  
Saskia Haitjema ◽  
Imo E Hoefer ◽  
...  

Of the warning scores in use for recognition of high-risk patients at the Emergency Department (ED), few incorporate laboratory results. Although hematological characteristics have shown prognostic value in small studies, large studies in elderly ED populations are lacking. We studied the association between blood cell and platelet counts and characteristics as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) at ED presentation with mortality in non-multitrauma patients ≥ 65 years. Comparison between survivors and non-survivors showed small, significant differences with AUROCs ranging between 56.6% and 65.2% for 30-day mortality. Combining parameters yielded an evident improvement (AUROC of 70.4%). Efforts should be pursued to study the added value of hematological parameters on top of clinical data when assessing patient risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Grammatico-Guillon ◽  
C Hermetet ◽  
C Gaborit ◽  
L Laporte ◽  
A Guillon

Abstract Background The consequences of the ageing population concerning ICU-hospitalization need to be adequately described, especially acute respiratory infections (ARI) strongly associated with Elderly. The study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of ARI surviving ICU hospitalization in patients over 80 yo. Methods A retrospective multicentre cohort study was performed, based on hospital discharge databases in one French region (2.5 million inhabitants). Patients with ARI in ICU were selected according to specific ICD-10 diagnosis codes recorded and matched with a control population (patient undergoing a cataract surgery), using a propensity score (matching algorithm 1:1 ratio, caliper 0.002) with the matching variables (age, sex, frailty score, chronic heart disease, chronic pulmonary disease and cancer). Analyzes of this matched population were performed to determine their 2-year in-hospital mortality, healthcare utilization and evolution of the frailty score during the 2-year period before/after the inclusion stay. Results A total of 1,658 hospital stays for ARI after 80 yo were identified, with 438 dead (26%) during the initial stay. After matching with the cataract population, 988 patients were selected in each group without difference in the propensity score. ARI lead to an important increase of healthcare use during the 2 years after discharge. The patients that were discharged from hospital after ARI requiring ICU, had a 23-fold increase of death at 90 days and 4-fold at 2 years and the evolution of the frailty score was 1.6 fold higher than the cataract population. Conclusions Elderly patients with severe ARI survived from their ICU stay in 75%, but have a major risk of death in the following months, and an important increase in healthcare consumption. Our findings provide data for more informed goals-of-care discussions and may help target post-ICU discharge services for these high-risk groups. Key messages Elderly patients with severe acute respiratory infection survived ICU in 75%, but had a major risk of death in the following months, added to a substantial increase in healthcare consumption. These findings provide data for more informed goals-of-care discussions and may help target interventions for these high-risk groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forrest B Fernandez ◽  
Adrian Ong ◽  
Anthony P Martin ◽  
C William Schwab ◽  
Tom Wasser ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Coslovsky ◽  
Jukka Takala ◽  
Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos ◽  
Luca Martinolli ◽  
Tobias M. Merz

1998 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Roujeau ◽  
Catherine Lok ◽  
Sylvie Bastuji-Garin ◽  
Sami Mhalla ◽  
Véronique Enginger ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-329
Author(s):  
Ivanilda Lacerda Pedrosa ◽  
Djacyr Magna Cabral Freire ◽  
Rodolfo Herberto Schneider

Abstract Objective: To create an instrument for the prognostic evaluation of elderly patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Methods: A cohort study, with prospective data collection, which included elderly persons aged 60 years or older, was carried out in the city of João Pessoa, in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Data collection was performed using an instrument created from a pilot study and the Katz Index. Poisson’s regression was used for data analysis. This technique estimates relative risk, retaining variables with p≤0.10 in the instrument, and ensures biological plausibility. The classification of risk of death was performed using quartile analysis, confirmed by the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: 205 elderly patients with an average age of 74.6 years and a 59% risk of mortality, were included. Of the total sample and based on the scores, 16.6% of elderly persons had a low risk of developing death, 23.9% were at moderate risk, 40% had a high risk, and 19.5% exhibited a very high risk of death. The positive predictive value of the instrument was 77% and the negative value was 67.5%, with a concordance index of 0.78. The cutoff score of the instrument was 9 points or over. The sensitivity was 77.7% and the specificity was 66.7%. Conclusions: The instrument developed may be useful in the identification of elderly people with risk factors who require increased care. The instrument described can therefore be applied in Brazilian intensive care units.


2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Sandy Widder ◽  
Kristine Morch ◽  
Nori Bradley ◽  
Lauren Ternan ◽  
Ni Lam

Geriatric Recovery and Enhancement Alliance in Trauma (GREAT) multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative: improving rates of successful resuscitation, rehabilitation and reintegration of geriatric trauma patients across the trauma spectrum of care. Sandy Widder, Kristin E. Morch, Nori L Bradley, Lauren Ternan, Ni Thuyen Lam Background: Traumatic injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly, with the risk of poor outcomes increasing with advanced age. Using a multidisciplinary geriatric trauma care approach, led by a dedicated nursing coordinator, standardized order sets were implemented to reduce in-hospital complications and screening tools applied early to identify patient specific care needs. Specifically, early trauma consult, identification of injuries, appropriate opioid ordering, polypharmacy avoidance, delirium prevention, mental health issues, and mobility needs were addressed The goal was to improve geriatric trauma awareness, decrease in-hospital complications and improve the likelihood of return to home and baseline function Implementation: Through stakeholder consultation process, it was recognized that the hospital needed a coordinated, geriatric trauma team process. The geriatric trauma navigator (GTN) role was created to lead these quality improvement initiatives. This included the development of educational strategies for frontline staff and physicians to highlight the unique challenges of trauma patient management and to introduce the GREAT study for optimized patient care. Patients 65 years of age or older with a traumatic mechanism were enrolled. GREAT patients then followed a protocol designed for tracking and implementing standardized processes, including early ED and in-patient order sets, engagement of trauma services, and the application of screening tools and specialty consultations. Screening tools (Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Mini-Cog, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test- Concise (AUDIT-C), Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST), Clinical Frailty Scale, ADL/IDLs) were administered to identify at-risk patients and to inform consultation with geriatrics and psychiatry, and allied health services (occupation therapy, physical therapy, nutrition services, pharmacy). The study team evaluated data on a monthly basis and met quarterly to evaluate and implement changes. Evaluation Methods: Data was prospectively collected and compared to control data from the Alberta Trauma Registry and Trauma Quality Improvement Program (American College of Surgeons). Data tabulation and statistical analysis was performed using Stat59 (STAT59 Services Ltd, Edmonton, AB, Canada). Outcome measures-provision of timely and comprehensive care: rates of trauma team activations, emergencydepartment and in-hospital length of stay-reduction of hospital complications: UTI, DVT/PE, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, ICUadmission, unexpected readmission to hospital-improvement of functionality upon discharge: in-hospital and 30 day mortality rates,return to function, disposition (home versus long term care) Process measures-time to diet and ambulation-tracking of number of days of urinary catheter in situ-compliance with GOC discussions-use of assessment screening tools-spinal clearance <24 hours Results: Enrollment of patients into GREAT based on study criteria lowered the threshold for triggering a trauma team consult, improving the recognition rate of geriatric trauma. This was reflected in the decreased average ISS scores and higher rate of trauma consults. Ground level falls, which previously did not typically activate a trauma consult, are now be recognized as major trauma. With the GTN, we determined that gaps exist in the current monitoring of key performance measures. Through the GREAT data collection process, we were able to establish baseline data and target PDSA changes to address these gaps. Advice and Lessons Learned: This quality initiative was designed as a proof of concept model for early identification of the geriatric trauma patient and a collaborative team approach to optimize care processes, and in turn minimize complications. The GTN role was vital to identify patients, implement screening tools, and coordinate care. With limited resources and increasing work loads for all programs, the additional GTN role required site leadership and stakeholder support. Ideally, a protocolized geriatric trauma team activation and admission process would ensure all patients receive screening tools as part of their in-patient orders for early assessments and interventions. Further educational campaigns will need to be developed to increase awareness of the importance of geriatric trauma. Additionally, processes need to be streamlined for data gathering and monitoring of performance measures. Access to screening tools and order sets need to be user friendly, built into currently existing workflows, and evaluated for optimization.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1149-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance E. Stuke ◽  
Juan C. Duchesne ◽  
John P. Hunt ◽  
Alan B. Marr ◽  
Peter C. Meade ◽  
...  

Most trauma systems use mechanism of injury (MOI) as an indicator for trauma center transport, often overburdening the system as a result of significant overtriage. Before 2005 our trauma center accepted all MOI. After 2005 we accepted only those patients meeting anatomic and physiologic (A&P) triage criteria. Patients entered into the trauma center database were divided into two groups: 2001 to 2005 (Group 1) and 2007 to 2010 (Group 2) and also categorized based on trauma team activation for either A&P or MOI criteria. Overtriage was defined as patient discharge from the emergency department within 6 hours of trauma activation. A total of 9899 patients were reviewed. Group 1 had 6584 patients with 3613 (55%) activated for A&P criteria and 2971 (45%) for MOI. Group 2 had 3315 patients with 3149 (95%) activated for A&P criteria and 166 (5%) for MOI. Accepting only those patients meeting A&P criteria resulted in a decrease in the overtriage rate from 66 to 9 per cent. By accepting only those patients meeting A&P criteria, we significantly reduced our overtriage rate. Patients meeting MOI criteria were transported to community hospitals and transferred to the trauma center if major injuries were identified. Trauma center transport for MOI results in significant overtriage and may not be justified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document