Predictors of Mortality in Trauma Patients Aged 80 years or Older

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 926-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Mock ◽  
Jessica Keeley ◽  
Ashkan Moazzez ◽  
David S. Plurad ◽  
Brant Putnam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Trauma Outcome ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

The population of the United States is predicted to age dramatically over the next few decades; as such older patients will comprise an increasing proportion of the injured populations. Due to multiple comorbidities and frailty, the old and very old are at greater risk for mortality than younger patients. To identify predictors of inhospital mortality in these patients, we performed a retrospective cohort study at our Level 1 trauma center. Between April 2009 and October 2014, we identified 193 trauma patients aged 80 years and older admitted to the intensive care unit. The mean age was 86 years old (4.9) and a majority of patients were white (57%) and male (54%). Univariate analysis found Injury Severity Score ( P < 0.01), initial Glasgow Coma Scale ( P < 0.01), admission pH ( P = <0.01), admission lactate ( P < 0.01), the need for mechanical ventilation ( P < 0.01), and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score ( P < 0.01) to be predictors of mortality. Multivariate analysis identified length of mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.60–0.90, P < 0.01], admission lactate (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.21–2.51, P < 0.01), and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR = 18.2, 95% CI = 3.33–99.8, P < 0.01) as independent predictors of mortality. These predictors can help guide clinical decisions and should prompt early discussion of goals of care. The association between mechanical ventilation and mortality is confounded by withdrawal of care.

Cannabis Use is Associated with Increased Mechanical Ventilation and Polysubstance Use in Trauma Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kian Banks ◽  
Subarna Biswas ◽  
Monica Wong ◽  
Saskya Byerly ◽  
Damon Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Cannabis Use ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Polysubstance Use

Recent policy changes in California regarding cannabis use underscore the need to study outcomes and prevalence of this drug in trauma. Our study aims to study the prevalence of cannabis use and associations with injury types and outcomes in Los Angeles County trauma patients. Data were reviewed from 21,276 adult patients from a Los Angeles countywide database spanning five years (2012–2016), who underwent urine toxicology testing in the ED after sustaining a traumatic injury. The percentage of trauma patients using marijuana increased from 36 to 43 per cent over the five-year period. On univariate analysis, cannabis-positive patients were significantly younger and more likely male, with lower median systolic blood pressure and heart rate on arrival in the ED. A higher proportion of cannabis users had penetrating trauma, and 48 per cent of cannabis users also tested positive for amphetamines, cocaine, opioids, or Phencyclidine. On multivariate analysis, cannabis was associated with an increase in need for mechanical ventilation after adjusting for age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, gender, polysubstance use, blunt or penetrating mechanism, and Injury Severity Score, and was not associated with increases in mortality or ICU length of stay.

Location of Injury and Other Factors Associated With Increased Survival Among Severely Injured Geriatric Trauma Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110505
Author(s):  
Paige C. Newman ◽  
Tawnya M. Vernon ◽  
Kellie E. Bresz ◽  
Jennifer A. T. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Benzodiazepine Use ◽  
Trauma Outcome ◽  
Trauma Injury ◽  
Trauma Activation

Background Patients with a Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) < .5 are termed “unexpected survivors.” There is scarce information published on this subset of geriatric patients whose survival is an anomaly. Methods This is a retrospective case-control study examining all geriatric patients (age ≥65) not expected to survive (TRISS<.5) in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study (PTOS) database from 2013 to 2017. Primary outcome was survival to discharge. We selected 10 clinically important variables for logistic regression analysis as possible factors that may improve survival. Results 1336 patients were included, 395 (29.6%) were unexpected survivors. Factors that improved survival odds are the following: Place of injury: street/highway (AOR:0.51; 95% CI: .36-.73, P < .001) and residential institution (AOR:0.46; 95% CI: .21-.98, P = .043); and presence of Benzodiazepines (AOR:0.49; 95% CI: .31-.77, P = .002) or ethanol (AOR:0.57; 95% CI: .34-.97, P = .040). Factors that decreased survival odds are the following: Hypotension (AOR: 8.59; 95% CI: 4.33-17.01, P < .001) and hypothermia (AOR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.10-2.28, P = .014). Gender, race/ethnicity, blood transfusion in first 24 hours, shift of presentation to Emergency Department, place of injury (farm, industrial, recreational, or public building), use of Tetrahydrocannabinol, amphetamines or opioids, and level of trauma activation did not impact survival. Discussion Location of injury (street/highway and residential institution) and ethanol or benzodiazepine use led to a significant increased survival in severely injured geriatric patients. Hypotension and hypothermia led to decreased survival. Future studies should determine possible reasons these factors lead to survival (and identify additional factors) to focus efforts in these areas to improve outcomes in geriatric trauma.

scholarly journals Independent Predictors of Mortality in Torso Trauma Injuries

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3202
Author(s):  
Roberto Bini ◽  
Caterina Accardo ◽  
Stefano Granieri ◽  
Fabrizio Sammartano ◽  
Stefania Cimbanassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Related Condition ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
Torso Trauma ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography

Noncompressible torso injuries (NCTIs) represent a trauma-related condition with high lethality. This study’s aim was to identify potential prediction factors of mortality in this group of trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center in Italy. Materials and Methods: A total of 777 patients who had sustained a noncompressible torso injury (NCTI) and were admitted to the Niguarda Trauma Center in Milan from 2010 to 2019 were included. Of these, 166 patients with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg were considered to have a noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH). Demographic data, mechanism of trauma, pre-hospital and in-hospital clinical conditions, diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, and survival outcome were retrospectively recorded. Results: Among the 777 patients, 69% were male and 90.2% sustained a blunt trauma with a median age of 43 years. The comparison between survivors and non-survivors pointed out a significantly lower pre-hospital Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and SBP (p < 0.001) in the latter group. The multivariate backward regression model identified age, pre-hospital GCS and injury severity score (ISS) (p < 0.001), pre-hospital SBP (p = 0.03), emergency department SBP (p = 0.039), performance of torso contrast enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) (p = 0.029), and base excess (BE) (p = 0.008) as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Torso trauma patients who were hemodynamically unstable in both pre- and in-hospital phases with impaired GCS and BE had a greater risk of death. The detection of independent predictors of mortality allows for the timely identification of a subgroup of patients whose chances of survival are reduced.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Suburban geriatric trauma: the experiences of a level I trauma center

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
F DeKeyser ◽  
D Carolan ◽  
A Trask
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Trauma Scores

BACKGROUND: As the mean age of the US population increases, so does the incidence of geriatric trauma. Investigators have shown that the elderly have high morbidity and mortality rates associated with traumatic injuries. OBJECTIVE: To compare the severity of injury, mortality, and functional outcomes of geriatric patients with younger patients admitted to a suburban trauma center. METHOD: A convenience sample of trauma patients who were 65 years old or older was compared with trauma patients who were 35 to 45 and 55 to 64 years old. Demographic data, injury data, Injury Severity Scores, Revised Trauma Scores, length of stay, and functional ability outcomes were abstracted from a trauma registry in aggregate form and then analyzed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 766 subjects (age 35-45, n = 223; age 55-64, n = 135; age 65 and older, n = 408) with a mean age of 64.6 years. A larger percentage of the elderly were victims of falls; younger trauma patients were more likely to be victims of motor vehicle crashes. Significant differences were found between age groups on Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Revised Trauma Scores, and length of stay. Significant differences were not found on Injury Severity Scores, mortality rates, or functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although anatomic injury severity of elderly patients was similar to that of younger patients, the elderly demonstrated greater physiologic compromise and longer hospital stays. Mortality rates were lower for the elderly group, but this result might be because a larger proportion of elderly patients were hospitalized with minor or moderate injuries.

Perils of Rib Fractures

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Om P. Sharma ◽  
Michael F. Oswanski ◽  
Shashank Jolly ◽  
Sherry K. Lauer ◽  
Rhonda Dressel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Blunt Chest Trauma ◽  
Chest Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Rib Fractures ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Close Observation ◽  
Motorcycle Crashes ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Rib fractures (RF) are noted in 4 to 12 per cent of trauma admissions. To define RF risks at a Level 1 trauma center, investigators conducted a 10-year (1995–2004) retrospective analysis of all trauma patients. Blunt chest trauma was seen in 13 per cent (1,475/11,533) of patients and RF in 808 patients (55% blunt chest trauma, 7% blunt trauma). RF were observed in 26 per cent of children (<18 years), 56 per cent of adults (18–64 years), and 65 per cent of elderly patients (≥65 years). RF were caused by motorcycle crashes (16%, 57/347), motor vehicle crashes (12%, 411/3493), pedestrian-auto collisions (8%, 31/404), and falls (5%, 227/5018). Mortality was 12 per cent (97/808; children 17%, 8/46; adults 9%, 46/522; elderly 18%, 43/240) and was linearly associated with a higher number of RF (5% 1–2 RF, 15% 3–5 RF, 34% ≥6 RF). Elderly patients had the highest mortality in each RF category. Patients with an injury severity score ≥15 had 20 per cent mortality versus 2.7 per cent with ISS <15 ( P < 0.0001). Increasing age and number of RF were inversely related to the percentage of patients discharged home. ISS, age, number of RF, and injury mechanism determine patients’ course and outcome. Patients with associated injuries, extremes of age, and ≥3 RF should be admitted for close observation.

Delays in Transfer of Elderly Less-injured Trauma Patients Can Have Deadly Consequences

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 1132-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Fischer ◽  
Paul D. Colavita ◽  
Gregory P. Fleming ◽  
Toan T. Huynh ◽  
A. Britton Christmas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Severely Injured Patients ◽  
Local Trauma ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Transfer of severely injured patients to regional trauma centers is often expedited; however, transfer of less-injured, older patients may not evoke the same urgency. We examined referring hospitals’ length of stay (LOS) and compared the subsequent outcomes in less-injured transfer patients (TP) with patients presenting directly (DP) to the trauma center. We reviewed the medical records of less-injured (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 9 or less), older (age older than 60 years) patients transferred to a regional Level 1 trauma center to determine the referring facility LOS, demographics, and injury information. Outcomes of the TP were then compared with similarly injured DP using local trauma registry data. In 2011, there were 1657 transfers; the referring facility LOS averaged greater than 3 hours. In the less-injured patients (ISS 9 or less), the average referring facility LOS was 3 hours 20 minutes compared with 2 hours 24 minutes in more severely injured patients (ISS 25 or greater, P < 0.05). The mortality was significantly lower in the DP patients (5.8% TP vs 2.6% DP, P = 0.035). Delays in transfer of less-injured, older trauma patients can result in poor outcomes including increased mortality. Geographic challenges do not allow for every patient to be transported directly to a trauma center. As a result, we propose further outreach efforts to identify potential causes for delay and to promote compliance with regional referral guidelines.

Helicopter Transport Use for Trauma Patients Is Decreasing Significantly Nationwide but Remains Overutilized

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1630-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navpreet K. Dhillon ◽  
Nikhil T. Linaval ◽  
Kavita A. Patel ◽  
Christos Colovos ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
The United States ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Effective Utilization ◽  
National Trauma ◽  
National Trauma Data Bank ◽  
Minor Injuries ◽  
Helicopter Transportation ◽  
Rapid Transfer

Rapid transfer of trauma patients to a trauma center for definitive management is essential to increase survival. The utilization of helicopter transportation for this purpose remains heavily debated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the trends in helicopter transportations of trauma patients in the United States over the last decade. Subjects with a primary mode of either ground or helicopter transportation were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007 to 2015. Over this period, the proportion of patients transported by a helicopter decreased significantly in a linear fashion from 17 per cent in 2007 to 10.2 per cent in 2015 ( P < 0.001). The overall mortality of this population was 7.6 per cent and remained unchanged over the study period ( P = 0.545). Almost 3 of 10 subjects (29.4%) transported by a helicopter had an Injury Severity Score <9. The proportion of elderly (>65 years) patients requiring helicopter transportation increased by 69.1 per cent, whereas their associated mortality decreased by 21.5 per cent. The use of a helicopter for the transportation of trauma patients has significantly decreased over the last decade without any significant change in mortality, possibly indicating more effective utilization of available resources. Overtriage of patients with minor injuries remained relatively unchanged.

Management and Outcomes of Traumatic Colon Injury in Civilian and Military Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 1685-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitra N. Sambasivan ◽  
Samantha J. Underwood ◽  
Reed B. Kuehn ◽  
S. D. Cho ◽  
Laszlo N. Kiraly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Colon Injury ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Civilian Trauma ◽  
Level I

Divergent injury patterns may indicate the need for differing strategies in combat and civilian trauma patients. This study aims to compare outcomes of colon injury management in these two populations. Parallel retrospective reviews were conducted comparing warfighters (n = 59) injured downrange and subsequently transferred to the United States with civilians (n = 30) treated at a United States Level I trauma center. Patient characteristics, mechanisms of injury, treatment course, and complications were compared. The civilian (CP) and military (MP) populations did not differ in Injury Severity Score (MP 20 vs CP 26; P = 0.41). The MP experienced primarily blast injuries (51%) as opposed to blunt trauma (70%; P < 0.01) in the CP. The site of colon injury did not differ between groups ( P = 0.15). Initial management was via primary repair (53%) and resection and anastomosis (27%) in the CP versus colostomy creation (47%) and stapled ends (32%) in the MP ( P < 0.001). Ultimately, the CP and MP experienced equivalent continuity rates (90%). Overall complications (MP 68% vs CP 53%; P = 0.18) and mortality (MP 3% vs CP 3%; P = 0.99) did not differ between the two groups. The CP and MP experience different mechanisms and initial management of colon injury. Ultimately, continuity is restored in the majority of both populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document