Male Breast Cancer: 13-Year Single Institution Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1345-1350
Author(s):  
Marissa K. Srour ◽  
Farin Amersi ◽  
James Mirocha ◽  
Armando E. Giuliano ◽  
Alice Chung

Due to the low incidence of male breast cancer (BC), there are few studies evaluating outcomes. We evaluated the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of male BC. Male patients with BC from January 2006 to December 2018 were identified. Of 49 patients, mean age was 64 (range 33-94) years. Of the 27 (55.1%) patients who had genetic testing, 9 (33.3%) had a Breast Cancer gene (BRCA) 1 or 2 mutation. The majority of patients had a mastectomy (n = 43/49, 87.8%) and had invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 47/49, 95.9%). 20 patients (n = 20/43, 46.5%) had positive lymph nodes. 41 (n = 41/47, 87.2%) patients had estrogen receptor positive disease. The majority of patients were pathologic stage 2 (n = 21/46, 45.7%), followed by stage 1 (n = 15/46, 32.6%), stage 3 (n = 6/46, 13.0%), and stage 4 (n = 4/46, 8.7%). Eight patients had the 21-gene recurrence score performed. Of patients with stage 1-3 BC, 10 (n = 10/43, 23.3%) patients had recurrence. With median follow-up of 4.1 (range .6-10.6) years, 5-year overall survival was 82.9% and 5-year disease-free survival was 65.9%. In conclusion, our cohort of patients with male BC had a high incidence of BRCA mutations and most commonly had high-grade estrogen positive stage 2 tumors. Breast conserving surgery was utilized in 4% of patients and genomic testing utilized in 55% of patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Rayne ◽  
Kathryn Schnippel ◽  
John Thomson ◽  
Joanna Reid ◽  
Carol Benn

The purpose of the current study was to describe male breast cancer in Johannesburg, South Africa, and assess whether male breast cancer patients’ perception of their own masculinity was affected by having a cancer commonly seen in women. A retrospective file review was carried out at two hospitals, one private and one government, of male breast cancer patients from 2007 to 2012 followed by a telephone survey of patients identified during review. Of approximately 3,000 breast cancer patients seen in the 5 years reviewed, 23 cases of male breast cancer were identified. Most were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma ( n = 19, 83%). Stage at presentation was from stages 0 to 3 (Stage 0 [ n = 2, 9%], Stage 1 [ n = 3, 13%], Stage 2 [ n = 12, 52%], Stage 3 [ n = 6, 26%]) and no patients were metastatic at presentation. The telephonic survey was completed by 18 patients (78%). Nearly all ( n = 17/18) shared their diagnosis with family and close friends. Two thirds of patients delayed presentation and government hospital patients were more likely to present later than private sector hospital patients. Although most male breast cancer patients sampled did not perceive the breast cancer diagnosis as affecting their masculinity, Black men and those treated in government hospitals were less likely to be aware of male breast cancer, and were more likely to have their perception of their own masculinity affected.


Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Grenader ◽  
Rinat Yerushalmi ◽  
Margarita Tokar ◽  
Georgeta Fried ◽  
Bella Kaufman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Meyer ◽  
Patrick Borgen ◽  
Kristen Rojas

Abstract The rarity of male breast cancer continues to limit its study despite increasing incidence rates, particularly within the past decade [Speirs V, Shaaban AM. The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115:429–30]. Although this trend appears to be substantially documented, male patients with breast cancer have been and continue to be excluded from landmark breast cancer trials. Currently, there are no standardized breast cancer screening protocols in place for men, including those with pathogenic BRCA mutations. As a result, men with breast cancer typically present at a later stage, and on average, 8–10 years later than females [Ruddy KJ, Winer EP. Male breast cancer: risk factors, biology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Ann Oncol 2013;24:1434–43]. As the incidence of disease continues to rise, the need for algorithmic standardization with regards to screening, diagnosing, treating and managing male breast cancer has become imperative. We report the case of a 71-year-old male who presented with spontaneous bloody nipple discharge and was found to have bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly S. Stone ◽  
Irene L Wapnir

This is a contemporary review of risk factors and genetic predisposition associated with breast cancer in men. The workup and evaluation of breast masses and surgical management of cancer in this population are detailed. In addition, systemic therapies for the treatment of breast cancer in men are reviewed and compared with the therapeutic approaches used for women.    This reviews contains 5 figures, 2 tables and 50 references.  Key words: breast-conserving surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, genetic predisposition testing, genomic profiling, lymphadenectomy, male breast cancer, mastectomy, radiotherapy, sentinel lymph node biopsy


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11630-e11630
Author(s):  
N. Gercovich ◽  
E. Gil Deza ◽  
M. Russo ◽  
C. Garcia Gerardi ◽  
C. Diaz ◽  
...  

e11630 Introduction: Male breast cancer is very rare, representing only between 0.7% and 1% of all breast cancers, and only half of them are early stage cases. Objective: The present study has been designed with the aim of studying retrospectively the clinical onset and evolution of male invasive breast cancer patients (stages I and II) treated at IOHM between 1997 and 2008. Methods: The records of 3,000 breast cancer cases followed between 1997 and 2008 were searched, looking for male stage I and II breast cancer patients. A database was designed following the recommendations of the Directors of Surgical Pathology of the USA. The information registered encompassed: adjuvant treatments, recurrence date and date of final consultation or death. Results: Twelve pts were identified. Mean age (range)= 66 yo (50–89 yo). Tumoral type= Invasive Ductal Carcinoma 12 pt. Tumoral subtype= NOS 9 pt (75%) Apocrine 2 pt (17%) Micropapillar 1 pt (8%). Nottingham´s grade= Grade 2: 8 pt, Grade 3: 3 pt, N/A=1 pt. Stage= I= 6 pt, II=6 pt. ER (Positve= 9 pt, Negative=1 pt, N/A= 2 pt). PR (Positve= 8 pt, Negative= 2 pt, N/A=2 pt). Her2neu (0+= 3 pt, 1+= 3 pt, 2+= 2 pt, N/A= 4 pt). Surgery= Mastectomy= 11 pt, Lumpectomy 1= pt. Radiotherapy=5 pt. Adjuvance= No=2 pt, Hormonotherapy (HT)= 3 pt, Chemotherapy (CHT) = 3 pt, CHT+HT= 4 pt. Recurrence= Yes= 2 pt, No= 10 pt. Survival: Dead= 1 pt, Alive =11 pt. Mean Time To Progression= Stage I =66 months, Stage II =42 months. Global survival: Stage I =66 months, Stage II =52 months. Conclusions: 1. Twelve stage I and II male breast cancer patients were identified out of 3000 (0.4%) breast cancer cases diagnosed and followed in the past 10 years at the IOHM. 2. Mastectomy was the surgical procedure in 11 of the 12 cases 3. Ten pt underwent adjuvant treatment. 4. With a mean follow up time of 60 months, all stage I patients are alive and there were no recurrences. Two of the 6 stage II pts progressed and one died. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 549-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Shak ◽  
G. Palmer ◽  
F. L. Baehner ◽  
C. Millward ◽  
D. Watson ◽  
...  

549 Background: Because male breast cancer (BC) is rare, there is little known about the disease and treatment is extrapolated from female BC. Newer molecular technologies have not been used to profile male BC. We report here a study of quantitative gene expression by gender status in tumor specimens submitted for Recurrence Score testing. Methods: All estrogen receptor positive tumor specimens successfully examined in the Genomic Health laboratory from June 2004 through December 2008 were included. Quantitative expression for each gene was measured by the 21 gene oncotype DX assay on a scale from 0 to 15 (relative to reference genes), where a one unit increment is associated with a 2-fold change in expression. Results: There were 347 male and 82,434 female BCs. The males were older (mean age 63.8 vs 57.4 yrs). Standard histopathology was similar, although slightly more male BCs were ductal (83% vs 78%). Like female BC, there was a wide variation in gene expression in male BC. The distribution of RS in males and females was similar - RS mean (±SD) 18.1 (±11.2) in males and 19.1 (±10.2) in females (p = NS). The proportion of tumors with RS <18, 18 - 30, and ≥ 31 was 53.6%, 35.2%, and 11.2% in males and 53.4%, 36.3%, and 10.3% in females. Although the patterns of expression of the Oncotype DX genes were more similar than different in males and females some differences were notable. Mean expression of ER, PR, and SCUBE2 were 0.5 units higher in males. Mean expression of the proliferation genes, Ki-67, MYBL2, Survivin, Cyclin B1, and STK15, were 0.5 units higher in males. Mean expression of STMY3 was 0.9 units higher in males. Of note, whereas the level of quantitative ER significantly increased with increasing patient age in females (0.4 units per decade), little increase was observed in males (<0.1 units per decade). Conclusions: This large genomic study of male BC reveals a heterogeneous biology as measured by the standardized quantitative oncotype DX breast cancer assay, similar to that observed in female BC. Some differences, which may reflect the differences in hormone biology between males and females, were noted and deserve further study. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-679
Author(s):  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Shuning Ding ◽  
Lin Lin ◽  
Xiaochun Fei ◽  
Caijin Lin ◽  
...  

PurposeThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the distribution pattern and prognostic value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in Chinese patients with mucinous breast cancer (MC) and compared with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC).Materials and MethodsPatients diagnosed with MC or IDC from January 2010 to January 2017 were retrospectively recruited. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay of 21 genes was conducted to calculate the RS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between RS and clinicopathological factors. Survival outcomes including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.ResultsThe MC cohort included 128 patients and the IDC cohort included 707 patients. The proportions of patients with a low (RS < 18), intermediate (18-30), or high risk (RS > 30) were 32.0%, 48.4%, and 19.5% in MC cohort, and 26.9%, 46.8% and 26.3% in IDC cohort. The distribution of RS varied significantly according to different Ki-67 index and molecular subtype in both cohorts. Moreover, the receipt of chemotherapy was associated with RS in both cohorts. Among patients with MC, tumor stage was related to the DFS (p=0.040). No significant differences in DFS and OS were found among MC patients in different RS risk groups (OS, p=0.695; DFS, p=0.926).ConclusionRS was significantly related to Ki-67 index and molecular subtypes in MC patients, which is similar in IDC patients. However, RS was not able to predict DFS and OS in patients with MC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e236223
Author(s):  
Karan N Ramakrishna ◽  
Justin Durland ◽  
Christopher Ramos ◽  
Amit Singh Dhamoon

A 69-year-old man without a family history of breast cancer presented to his primary care physician with a 1-year history of clear, unilateral nipple discharge (ND) without an associated palpable breast mass. His laboratory findings were significant for hyperprolactinaemia at 28 ng/mL. Diagnostic work up including mammography, ultrasound and core needle biopsy ultimately revealed a ductal carcinoma in situ and a rare papillary variant of invasive ductal carcinoma. The patient was referred to a multidisciplinary oncology team and underwent a right total mastectomy followed by adjuvant hormonal therapy. The patient made a good postoperative recovery and remains without evidence of recurrence 6 months from surgery. Male breast cancer is rare, but its incidence is increasing. Male breast cancer presenting as ND without a palpable mass is uncommon. Early recognition of breast symptoms in men can lead to earlier diagnoses and improved outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document