Intraoperative Methadone Reduces Postoperative Opioid Requirements in Nuss Procedure for Pectus Excavatum

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110540
Author(s):  
Nadia M. Froehling ◽  
James A. Martin ◽  
M. Victoria P. Miles ◽  
Andrew W. Wilson ◽  
Brynn Byers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pectus Excavatum ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Solid Food ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Nuss Procedure ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Surgical correction of pectus excavatum by Nuss procedure, commonly referred to as minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE), often results in significant postoperative pain. This study investigated whether adding intraoperative methadone would reduce the postoperative opioid requirement during admission for patients undergoing MIRPE. Methods A retrospective cohort chart review was conducted for 40 MIRPE patients between 2018 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those who received multimodal anesthesia (MM, n = 20) and those who received multimodal anesthesia with the addition of intraoperative methadone (MM + M, n = 20). Data collected included total opioid consumption during hospital stay (morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]), hospital length of stay (LOS), pain scores, time to ambulation, and time to tolerating solid food. Results Addition of intraoperative methadone for patients undergoing MIRPE significantly reduced postoperative opioid requirements (MME/kg) during admission ( P = .007). On average, patients in the MM group received 1.61 ± .55 MME/kg while patients in the MM + M group received 1.16 ± .44 MME/kg. Hospital opioid (non-methadone) total was also significantly reduced between the MM (1.87 ± .54) and MM + M group (1.37 ± .46), P = .003. There was no significant difference in hospital opioid total MME/kg administered between the groups. There were no significant differences observed in hospital LOS, pain scores, time to ambulation, or time to toleration of solid food. Discussion Incorporating intraoperative methadone for patients undergoing MIRPE reduced postoperative opioid requirements and hospital opioid (non-methadone) totals without a significant change in pain scores. Patients undergoing the Nuss procedure may benefit from the administration of intraoperative methadone.

Repetitive Imaging following Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum Is Unnecessary

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Sola ◽  
Yangyang R. Yu ◽  
Tyler C. Friske ◽  
Abdur R. Jamal ◽  
Eric H. Rosenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Pectus Excavatum ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Haller Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Imaging

Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the necessity of repeat imaging after an initial chest radiograph (CXR) following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent MIRPE from January 2012 to July 2016 at two academic children's hospitals. Data collected included demographics, severity of pectus defect (Haller index [HI]), utilization of CXRs, outpatient follow-up, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 360 patients (171 at Hospital 1 and 189 at Hospital 2) underwent MIRPE. Median age was 15.6 years and 84% were males. The median HI was 4.0. Median postoperative hospital length of stay was 4.2 days and median time to bar removal was 34 months. There was significant variation in postoperative imaging between the hospitals, including frequency of immediate postoperative CXR, total number of CXRs during hospitalization, and number of postoperative outpatient CXRs prior to bar removal. However, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the hospitals, including postoperative pneumothorax, postoperative chest tube placement, and complications. Conclusion These data suggest that increased repetitive imaging after an initial postoperative CXR does not affect clinical outcomes and may not be necessary after MIRPE.

Comparative Effectiveness of Dalteparin and Enoxaparin in a Hospital Setting

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Carson ◽  
Blane Schilling ◽  
W. Robert Simons ◽  
Connie Parks ◽  
Yoonhee Choe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Billing Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients At Risk

Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of a change from enoxaparin to dalteparin for the prophylaxis of patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: A retrospective cohort study identified hospitalized patients with VTE risk admitted at Wellmont Health System between August 1, 2008 and July 31, 2009. On February 1, 2009, a therapeutic interchange from enoxaparin to dalteparin occurred. All patient records were reviewed from billing data collected 6 months prior and following conversion. Statistical tests of heterogeneity compared distributions of demography between study cohorts and Cochran tests were used to compare pre- versus postchange in the outcomes. Results: A total of 3557 and 3465 patient discharges were analyzed in the 6 months prior and following the interchange, respectively. Of these discharges, 1870 were administered enoxaparin and 1639 dalteparin. VTE rates were similar between the 2 groups. Data showed no significant difference in-hospital length of stay (LOS), readmittance, and bleeding rates in the populations. The system achieved a $40 788 savings over 6 months following the conversion using approved prophylactic dosing per patient indication. Conclusions: Dalteparin is similarly effective as enoxaparin and an alternative for the prophylaxis of VTE in a hospital setting while providing cost savings.

Microtia Reconstruction and Erector Spinae Block in Children: A Case Series With Chart Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110183
Author(s):  
Gabriel Gomez ◽  
Beth Osterbauer ◽  
Robert Nguyen ◽  
Choo Phei Wee ◽  
Amit Kochhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores

Objectives Autologous reconstruction of microtia is advantageous due to its inherent biocompatibility and long-term stability, but postoperative pain associated with costal harvest is a significant issue. A well-planned pain management approach is imperative. Our objective is to introduce the novel application of erector spinae block anesthesia in pediatric microtia reconstruction and evaluate its impact on pain scores, use of opioids, and hospital length of stay. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Patients undergoing stage 1 microtia reconstruction at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Methods Data collected included demographics, opioid amounts, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale scores, opioid-related side effects, and hospital length of stay. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the effect of erector spinae block use on total opioid use and pain scores and a linear regression model to assess the effect on hospital stay. Results Forty-seven patients were included: 14 in the erector spinae block group and 33 in the continuous wound pump group. The mean age was 8.3 years (SD, 2; range, 6-13), and 13 (32%) were female. Patients in the erector spinae block group had a 65.44% decrease in adjusted total opioid use (95% CI, –79.72% to –41.10%; P < .0001), a decrease in length of hospital stay (β = −1.69 [95% CI, −2.11 to −1.26], P < .0001), and no difference in reported pain scores when compared with patients in the continuous wound pump group. Conclusions This study demonstrates that early experience with an erector spinae block resulted in decreased opioid use and shorter hospital stay as compared with continuous wound infiltration with local anesthetic.

scholarly journals Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion for Perioperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mitchell T. Seman ◽  
Shawn H. Malan ◽  
Matthew R. Buras ◽  
Richard J. Butterfield ◽  
Kristi L. Harold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ketamine Infusion ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Adverse Respiratory Events

Introduction. Obesity is a common comorbidity seen in the perioperative setting and is associated with many diseases including cardiovascular disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the gold standard surgical treatment for patients whose weight is refractory to diet and exercise. Caring for these patients perioperatively presents unique challenges to anesthesiologists and is associated with an increased risk of adverse respiratory events. In our study, we hypothesize that a low-dose perioperative ketamine infusion will reduce opioid consumption and improve analgesia when compared to standard therapy. Methods. This is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled study enrolling 35 patients in total. Patients were randomized equally into the ketamine and control group. Preop, intraop, and postop management regimens were standardized. The ketamine group received a 0.3 mg/kg ideal body weight ketamine bolus after induction followed by a 0.2 mg/kg/hr ketamine infusion continued into the postop setting for up to 24 hours. Data collected included total perioperative opioids used converted to oral morphine equivalents (ME), pain scores, side effects, hospital length of stay, and patient satisfaction captured via postoperative questionnaires. Results. The use of perioperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the ketamine group when compared with the control group (179.9 ME versus 248.7 ME, P = 0.03 ). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores or hospital length of stay postoperatively between the two groups. There were also no reported adverse respiratory events, prolonged sedation, agitation, or other side effects reported in either group. The patient satisfaction questionnaires showed a significant difference with the ketamine group reporting lower maximum pain scores, a decrease in how pain limited activities of daily living once discharged, and increased hospital pain management satisfaction scores. Conclusions. Perioperative low-dose ketamine infusions significantly reduced opioid consumption in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.

Stereotactic Electroencephalography Is Associated With Reduced Pain and Opioid Use When Compared with Subdural Grids: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P Scoville ◽  
Evan Joyce ◽  
Joshua Hunsaker ◽  
Jared Reese ◽  
Herschel Wilde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and opioid use. OBJECTIVE To identify whether surgery for epilepsy mapping via MIS stereotactically placed electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes decreased overall opioid use when compared with craniotomy for EEG grid placement (ECoG). METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy mapping, either SEEG or ECoG, were identified through retrospective chart review from 2015 through 2018. The hospital stay was separated into specific time periods to distinguish opioid use immediately postoperatively, throughout the rest of the stay and at discharge. The total amount of opioids consumed during each period was calculated by transforming all types of opioids into their morphine equivalents (ME). Pain scores were also collected using a modification of the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) scale. The 2 surgical groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The study identified 43 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 36 underwent SEEG placement and 17 underwent craniotomy grid placement. There was a statistically significant difference in median opioid consumption per hospital stay between the ECoG and the SEEG placement groups, 307.8 vs 71.5 ME, respectively (P = .0011). There was also a significant difference in CAPA scales between the 2 groups (P = .0117). CONCLUSION Opioid use is significantly lower in patients who undergo MIS epilepsy mapping via SEEG compared with those who undergo the more invasive ECoG procedure. As part of efforts to decrease the overall opioid burden, these results should be considered by patients and surgeons when deciding on surgical methods.

scholarly journals Mortality after cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a medical ICU

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rezar ◽  
Bernhard Wernly ◽  
Michael Haslinger ◽  
Clemens Seelmaier ◽  
Philipp Schwaiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Postresuscitation Care ◽  
Significant Difference

Summary Background Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and postresuscitation care in the intensive care unit (ICU) are standardized procedures; however, there is evidence suggesting sex-dependent differences in clinical management and outcome variables after cardiac arrest (CA). Methods A prospective analysis of patients who were hospitalized at a medical ICU after CPR between December 2018 and March 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, hospital length of stay < 24 h and traumatic CA. The primary study endpoint was mortality after 6 months and the secondary endpoint neurological outcome assessed by cerebral performance category (CPC). Differences between groups were calculated by using U‑tests and χ2-tests, for survival analysis both univariate and multivariable Cox regression were fitted. Results A total of 106 patients were included and the majority were male (71.7%). No statistically significant difference regarding 6‑month mortality between sexes could be shown (hazard risk, HR 0.68, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35–1.34; p = 0.27). Neurological outcome was also similar between both groups (CPC 1 88% in both sexes after 6 months; p = 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences regarding general characteristics, pre-existing diseases, as well as the majority of clinical and laboratory parameters or measures performed on the ICU. Conclusion In a single center CPR database no statistically significant sex-specific differences regarding post-resuscitation care, survival and neurological outcome after 6 months were observed.

589 Methadone in Procedural Care for Burn Injuries of 20–30% Total Burn Surface Area: A Retrospective Chart Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S146-S146
Author(s):  
Loryn Taylor ◽  
Kimberly Maynell ◽  
Thanh Tran ◽  
David J Smith
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Methadone Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Prolonged opioid usage remains a concern in pain management in procedural care. Recent evidence also suggests that a considerable number of patients who were prescribed opioids struggle with transitioning to non-opioid pain medications. As a continuous effort to reduce opioid consumption following burn surgical procedures, our institution recently evaluated methadone administration for burn procedural care in patients with 20–30% total burn surface area (TBSA) requiring excision and grafting. Methods After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent excision and grafting procedure for 20–30% TBSA burn injuries between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020. The following data was evaluated: postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity (rated as “No Pain” [NRS=0], “Minor Pain” [NRS 1 to 3], “Moderate Pain” [NRS 4 to 6], “Severe Pain” [NRS 7 to 10]), time to physical therapy and time to hospital discharge. Data was analyzed using chi square/Fisher exact test for categorical variables and t-test/Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Results Our preliminary data included 12 patients who met inclusion criteria, of which two patients received methadone administration. Our patient sample consisted of average age of 43 years, 75% male, and 24% TBSA (92% were flame burns). Patients in both methadone and non-methadone groups had no significant differences in medical histories and TBSA (23% TBSA in methadone, 25% TBSA in non-methadone). There was no significant difference in reported preoperative pain intensity between the two groups, rating moderate to severe. Postoperative pain intensity remained the same, rating moderate to severe and controlled with fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine and non-opioid analgesics. While there was no difference in postoperative fentanyl, opioid and non-opioid analgesic consumptions between the two groups, morphine consumption was significantly lower in the methadone group compared to non-methadone group (2±2 mg vs 51±54 mg, respectively, p=0.02). There was no significant difference between average time from surgery to first physical therapy session and time to hospital discharge (about 21 days after surgery) between the two groups. Conclusions This evaluation shows a potential trend in reduction of inpatient postoperative opioid consumption with the conjunctive administration of methadone, although a bigger sample size is needed for further assessment.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document