A Pharmacy-Managed Intravenous to Enteral Proton-Pump Inhibitor Conversion Program

2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 753-757
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Turco

This article describes a pharmacy-managed, intravenous (IV) to enteral proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) program at a 377-bed tertiary care, teaching community hospital. IV pantoprazole was not restricted by indication, service, or patient location. Pharmacy converted any eligible patient prescribed an IV PPI to either pantoprazole tablets or lansoprazole capsules, packets, or enteral suspension according to protocol. Over a four-month evaluation period, 113 patients (mean age of 66 years) were prescribed IV PPIs for primarily suspected or documented GI bleeding. Gastroenterology specialists initiated 85% of IV PPI therapy. The most common dosage of IV PPI was 40 mg, once or twice daily with a median duration of 3 to 4 days. Continuous infusion IV PPI therapy was used for only two patients, both with GI bleeding. IV pantoprazole was converted to an enteral PPI in 73 of 113 patients in dosages of pantoprazole 40 mg or lansoprazole 30 or 60 mg administered once (32%) or twice (68%) daily. Pharmacists initiated 34% of the conversions. The total PPI expenditure was $6200 during the evaluation period. Daily acquisition cost savings, based on nominal pricing, ranged from approximately $5 to $25. Initial evaluation of the conversion program resulted in protocol revision and education of the medical staff, in an effort to minimize days of IV PPI use and encourage transition to enteral therapy. The protocol conversion dosage of lansoprazole 60 mg twice daily was changed to 30 mg twice daily and enteral pantoprazole tablets were deleted from the protocol (all IV PPI is converted to lansoprazole, 30 mg twice daily). Although IV pantoprazole remained on the hospital formulary, the medical staff were educated about the relative effectiveness of IV and enteral PPI therapy and the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists for various indications. Prescribers of IV pantoprazole are now required to document the rationale for use. The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee will continue to explore the role IV PPI therapy, based on efficacy, safety, and cost.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-96
Author(s):  
Su Li Wong ◽  
Norharlina Sulaiman ◽  
Kar Mun Ng ◽  
Zhe Yen Lee

Introduction: In the primary care setting, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) overutilisation often stems from the failure to discontinue prophylaxis treatment prior to tertiary care discharge and consider step-down therapy following discharge. Long-term PPI use can result in potential drug-related problems and unnecessary drug expenditure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-structured review in reducing inappropriate PPI prescriptions and estimate the potential cost saving. Methods: This non-randomised controlled study was conducted for 16 weeks at 17 government health clinics in Selangor, Malaysia. Eligible patients attending the outpatient pharmacies of intervention clinics were recruited consecutively and their consent was obtained. A structured review of PPIs was performed in which pharmacists identified patient demographics, indications and the length of PPI therapy using a PPI intervention form. Recommendations were discussed with physicians before prescription changes were made and documented. Moreover, standard management was conducted in the control clinics. Results: A total of 568 patients with prescriptions containing PPIs were sampled, with a total of 284 patients being placed into the control and intervention groups, respectively. Compared to the control group, inappropriate PPI utilisation in the intervention group significantly decreased from 79.9 to 30.4% (p<0.05). The changes to PPI prescriptions observed in the intervention group included: stop PPI therapy (30.8%), step-down therapy (22.9%), start substitution therapy (15.9%) and no change (30.4%). The physicians’ acceptance rate for pharmacist intervention was 67.8%. A 66.1% reduction in monthly PPI pill count and a 72.0% reduction in monthly medication expenditure (RM44.85/patient/year) were observed. Conclusion: The pharmacist-structured review was effective in increasing appropriate PPI utilisation and led to substantial cost savings.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Gun Kwack

Abstract Background: Gastroscopy is a useful procedure for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. No definite clinical guidelines recommend on the choice of gastroscopy implementation in the intensive care unit (ICU) patient with suspected GI bleeding. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of gastroscopy in critically ill patients using high-dose proton pump inhibitor for suspected bleeding.Methods: ICU patients using a high-does proton pump inhibitor for suspected GI bleeding from January 2015 to February 2020 were retrospectively included. Massive GI bleeding, such as hematemesis and hematochezia, were excluded. After propensity score matching (PSM) between the gastroscopy and no gastroscopy groups, the change in hemoglobin level, requirement of RBC transfusion, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality were compared. Results: Of the 116 subjects included, 34 patients had gastroscopy during ICU stay. Among the gastroscopy group, 13 (38.2%) patients showed normal findings, and the most frequent abnormal finding was gastric ulcer (n = 9, 26.5%), and 12 patients (35.3%) had a hemostatic procedure. After PSM, the gastroscopy group needed more red blood cell transfusion than the no-gastroscopy group (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the change in hemoglobin level (P = 0.10), length of ICU stay (P = 0.64), and ICU mortality (P = 0.55).Conclusion: This retrospective study showed that gastroscopy had no definite clinical benefit in ICU patients using high-dose proton pump inhibitor for suspected GI bleeding.


2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A1237
Author(s):  
Roger L. Gebhard ◽  
Samuel B. Ho ◽  
John P. Toscano ◽  
Kathleen J. Ellingson ◽  
Cheryl Schultz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Agrawal ◽  
R Yadlapati ◽  
N Shabeeb ◽  
C PE Price ◽  
A Lidder ◽  
...  

Summary Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a clinical entity diagnosed by history laryngoscopic findings that has a variable response to empiric proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. While the reflux finding score (RFS), an endoscopic scoring scheme, has been advanced as a measure of LPR, it has not been externally validated against symptom severity in practice. Extralaryngeal pharyngeal endoscopic findings may have diagnostic utility but remain underexplored. This study assesses the correlation between extralaryngeal findings and (1) 24-hour oropharyngeal pH & (2) PPI response in patients with suspected LPR. Subjects presented to a tertiary care center with laryngeal symptoms ≥1 month and reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥13. Following baseline questionnaires, laryngoscopy, and a 24-hour oropharyngeal pH probe study, subjects were prescribed 8–12 week omeprazole trials. Baseline endoscopic findings were scored in a blinded fashion using the RFS and extralaryngeal score criteria, summatively the ‘ELS.’ PPI response was defined as ≥50% improvement in RSI. Thirty-three subjects with flexible endoscopic recordings completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. The cohort's baseline mean RSI was 23.0 ± 7.2 with a ΔRSI = 9.8 after PPI therapy. The baseline RFS score averaged 5.3 ± 2.7. 45% of our subjects was found to be PPI responsive. The Cohen's kappa for the ELS but not the RFS was significant. There were no significant differences between the RFS (P = 0.10) or ELS (P = 0.07) for PPI responders & nonresponders. Oropharyngeal pH measures did not correlate with the RFS or ELS. In conclusion, endoscopic scores of laryngeal and extralaryngeal findings did not predict PPI response or oropharyngeal acid exposure in suspected LPR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document