scholarly journals Clinical Pharmacist Impact on Intensive Care Unit Delirium: Intervention and Monitoring

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myaa Lightfoot ◽  
Adam Sanders ◽  
Christopher Burke ◽  
Jessica Patton
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Icu Delirium ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist monitoring with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) on clinical outcomes related to intensive care unit (ICU) delirium. Methods: This was a single-center, before-and-after study. This study compares patient outcomes of the preintervention group, which is the standard of care of pharmacist rounding, and the intervention group of pharmacy rounding with the CDSS rules. Using a CDSS, specific delirium risk factor rules were created to alert pharmacists to patients who have an increased risk of developing ICU delirium. Patients were included in the study if they were ⩾18 years of age, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (TICU), and had one of the CDSS rule alerts. The CDSS notified pharmacists in real time to patients in the intervention group that met these criteria to provide timely recommendations in an effort to prevent ICU delirium. Results: Compared with the preintervention group receiving the standard of care (n = 28), the intervention CDSS group (n = 33) had a nonsignificant trend in decreased incidence of delirium (33.3% vs 24.1%, P = .45), ICU length of stay (LOS) (10.11 vs 7.55 days, P = .26), and ventilator duration (7.11 vs 5.03 days, P = .26). The intervention group had a significantly shorter hospital LOS (14.74 vs 9.98 days, P = .04). There was a nonsignificant increase in mortality with the intervention group from nondelirium causes (24.2% vs 7%, P = .07). Conclusion: The utilization of a CDSS by clinical pharmacists to monitor for delirium-specific risk factors led to a significantly shorter hospital LOS. Further studies using this model are warranted to see the impact on the ICU population.

scholarly journals A Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention To Improve Blood Culture Use among Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients: the DISTRIBUTE Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Fabre ◽  
Eili Klein ◽  
Alejandra B. Salinas ◽  
George Jones ◽  
Karen C. Carroll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Control Units ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Interventions to optimize blood culture (BCx) practices in adult inpatients are limited. We conducted a before-after study evaluating the impact of a diagnostic stewardship program that aimed to optimize BCx use in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and five medicine units at a large academic center. The program included implementation of an evidence-based algorithm detailing indications for BCx use and education and feedback to providers about BCx rates and indication inappropriateness. Neutropenic patients were excluded. BCx rates from contemporary control units were obtained for comparison. The primary outcome was the change in BCxs ordered with the intervention. Secondary outcomes included proportion of inappropriate BCx, solitary BCx, and positive BCx. Balancing metrics included compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) SEP-1 BCx component, 30-day readmission, and all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality. After the intervention, BCx rates decreased from 27.7 to 22.8 BCx/100 patient-days (PDs) in the MICU (P = 0.001) and from 10.9 to 7.7 BCx/100 PD for the 5 medicine units combined (P < 0.001). BCx rates in the control units did not decrease significantly (surgical intensive care unit [ICU], P = 0.06; surgical units, P = 0.15). The proportion of inappropriate BCxs did not significantly change with the intervention (30% in the MICU and 50% in medicine units). BCx positivity increased in the MICU (from 8% to 11%, P < 0.001). Solitary BCxs decreased by 21% in the medicine units (P < 0.001). Balancing metrics were similar before and after the intervention. BCx use can be optimized with clinician education and practice guidance without affecting sepsis quality metrics or mortality.

scholarly journals Protecting Sleep to Reduce Delirium in an Adult Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Heather Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Practice Change ◽  
Adult Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Project Outcome ◽  
The Hours ◽  
Practice Problem ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Icu Delirium

Practice Problem: Delirium is a common, yet often preventable complication in hospitalized patients. It is often caused by fragmented sleep, medications, environmental stimuli, and treatment therapies. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this evidence-based practice change project was: For patients in an adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU), does using a nurse-initiated, non-pharmacological sleep-enhancement protocol, versus no sleep-enhancement protocol, reduce the incidence of ICU-delirium over a period of 2 months? Evidence: The reviewed literature supported the evidence for effective use of a nurse-initiated protocol in reducing delirium in the ICU. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria for the review of literature that supported the DNP project. Intervention: A nurse-initiated sleep-enhancement protocol was implemented, which reduced interruptions during the hours between midnight and 0400. Outcome: While there was a 50% reduction in delirious patients after the protocol was initiated, the data pool was small and was not proven to be statistically significant. Due to the Covid-19 outbreak, there were far fewer eligible patients than originally anticipated. Conclusion: Although a clinically significant project outcome was not realized, staff felt that the protocol improved patient care and advocated for its use on all patients as a standard of care. Unit-based shared governance councils on other acute care floors have also adopted the sleep enhancement protocol

scholarly journals Improving physical distancing among healthcare workers in a pediatric intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Anna C. Sick-Samuels ◽  
Sara Cosgrove ◽  
Clare Rock ◽  
Alejandra Salinas ◽  
Opeyemi Oladapo-Shittu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Small Decline ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) not adhering to physical distancing recommendations is a risk factor for acquisition of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The study objective was to assess the impact of interventions to improve HCW physical distancing on actual distance between HCWs in a real-life setting. Methods: HCWs voluntarily wore proximity beacons to measure the number and intensity of physical distancing interactions between each other in a pediatric intensive care unit. We compared interactions before and after implementing a bundle of interventions including changes to the layout of workstations, cognitive aids, and individual feedback from wearable proximity beacons. Results: Overall, we recorded 10,788 interactions within 6 feet (∼2 m) and lasting >5 seconds. The number of HCWs wearing beacons fluctuated daily and increased over the study period. On average, 13 beacons were worn daily (32% of possible staff; range, 2–32 per day). We recorded 3,218 interactions before the interventions and 7,570 interactions after the interventions began. Using regression analysis accounting for the maximum number of potential interactions if all staff had worn beacons on a given day, there was a 1% decline in the number of interactions per possible interactions in the postintervention period (incident rate ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–1.00; P = .02) with fewer interactions occurring at nursing stations, in workrooms and during morning rounds. Conclusions: Using quantitative data from wearable proximity beacons, we found an overall small decline in interactions within 6 feet between HCWs in a busy intensive care unit after a multifaceted bundle of interventions was implemented to improve physical distancing.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for operating room to intensive care unit handoffs

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2020-012474
Author(s):  
Joanna Abraham ◽  
Alicia Meng ◽  
Sanjna Tripathy ◽  
Michael S Avidan ◽  
Thomas Kannampallil
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the impact of operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoff interventions on process-based and clinical outcomes.MethodWe included all English language, prospective evaluation studies of OR to ICU handoff interventions published as original research articles in peer-reviewed journals. The search was conducted on 11 November 2019 on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, with no prespecified criteria for the type of comparison or outcome. A meta-analysis of similar outcomes was conducted using a random effects model. Quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black (D&B) checklist.Results32 studies were included for review. 31 studies were conducted at a single site and 28 studies used an observational study design with a control. Most studies (n=28) evaluated bundled interventions which comprised information transfer/communication checklists and protocols. Meta-analysis showed that the handoff intervention group had statistically significant improvements in time to analgesia dosing (mean difference (MD)=−42.51 min, 95% CI −60.39 to −24.64), fewer information omissions (MD=−2.22, 95% CI −3.68 to –0.77), fewer technical errors (MD=−2.38, 95% CI −4.10 to –0.66) and greater information sharing scores (MD=30.03%, 95% CI 19.67% to 40.40%). Only 15 of the 32 studies scored above 9 points on the modified D&B checklist, indicating a lack of high-quality studies.DiscussionBundled interventions were commonly used to support OR to ICU handoff standardisation. Although the meta-analysis showed significant improvements for a number of clinical and process outcomes, the statistical and clinical heterogeneity must be accounted for when interpreting these findings. Implications for OR to ICU handoff practice and future research are discussed.

Evaluation of the Impact of Prior-to-Admission Sleep Aid Prescribing Practices on Sleep and Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110426
Author(s):  
Melissa Chudow ◽  
Vittorio Paradiso ◽  
Nicole Silva ◽  
Jillian Collette
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Time Point ◽  
Similar Incidence

Background: Sleep disruptions in the intensive care unit (ICU) may lead to complications such as delirium. There is limited evidence addressing how sleep aid use before and during ICU admission affects outcomes. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of prior-to-admission sleep aid prescribing practices in the ICU on delirium and sleep outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients admitted to any ICU from January to June 2018 receiving a sleep aid prior to admission. Patients were categorized based on sleep aid continuation, discontinuation, or alteration during the ICU admission. The primary end point was the incidence of delirium. Secondary end points included the incidence of sleep-wake cycle disturbances, delirium scores, and ICU length of stay. Results: A total of 291 patients were included with 109 in the continued group, 121 in the discontinued group, and 61 in the altered group. There was a similar incidence of delirium at 24 hours ( P = 0.71), 48 hours ( P = 0.60), 72 hours ( P = 0.25), and 5 days ( P = 0.48) after ICU admission. There was also no statistical difference in sleep-wake cycle disturbances or delirium scores at any time point. ICU length of stay was similar between the groups. Conclusion and Relevance: The incidence of delirium and sleep-wake cycle disturbances was not affected by differences in prior-to-admission sleep aid prescribing patterns during ICU admission.

scholarly journals Computerized nursing process in the Intensive Care Unit: ergonomics and usability

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sônia Regina Wagner de Almeida ◽  
◽  
Grace Teresinha Marcon Dal Sasso ◽  
Daniela Couto Carvalho Barra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nursing Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nursing Process ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Usability Criteria

Abstract OBJECTIVE Analyzing the ergonomics and usability criteria of the Computerized Nursing Process based on the International Classification for Nursing Practice in the Intensive Care Unit according to International Organization for Standardization(ISO). METHOD A quantitative, quasi-experimental, before-and-after study with a sample of 16 participants performed in an Intensive Care Unit. Data collection was performed through the application of five simulated clinical cases and an evaluation instrument. Data analysis was performed by descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS The organization, content and technical criteria were considered "excellent", and the interface criteria were considered "very good", obtaining means of 4.54, 4.60, 4.64 and 4.39, respectively. The analyzed standards obtained means above 4.0, being considered "very good" by the participants. CONCLUSION The Computerized Nursing Processmet ergonomic and usability standards according to the standards set by ISO. This technology supports nurses' clinical decision-making by providing complete and up-to-date content for Nursing practice in the Intensive Care Unit.

scholarly journals Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wong ◽  
Mary G Amato ◽  
Diane L Seger ◽  
Christine Rehr ◽  
Adam Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Adjusted Logistic Regression

BackgroundClinical decision support (CDS) displayed in electronic health records has been found to reduce the incidence of medication errors and adverse drug events (ADE). Recent data suggested that medication-related CDS alerts were frequently over-ridden, often inappropriately. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk of ADEs; however, limited data exist on the benefits of CDS in the ICU. This study aims to evaluate potential harm associated with medication-related CDS over-rides in the ICU.MethodsThis was a prospective observational study of adults admitted to any of six ICUs between July 2016 and April 2017 at our institution. Patients with provider-overridden CDS for dose (orders for scheduled frequency and not pro re nata), drug allergy, drug–drug interaction, geriatric and renal alerts (contraindicated medications for renal function or renal dosing) were included. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of over-rides, which were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes included incidence of ADEs following alert over-ride and risk of ADEs based on over-ride appropriateness.ResultsA total of 2448 over-ridden alerts from 712 unique patient encounters met inclusion criteria. The overall appropriateness rate for over-rides was 81.6% and varied by alert type. More ADEs (potential and definite) were identified following inappropriate over-rides compared with appropriate over-rides (16.5 vs 2.74 per 100 over-ridden alerts, Fisher’s exact test P<0.001). An adjusted logistic regression model showed that inappropriate over-rides were associated with an increased risk of ADEs (OR 6.14, 95% CI 4.63 to 7.71, P<0.001).ConclusionsApproximately four of five identified CDS over-rides were appropriately over-ridden, with the rate varying by alert type. However, inappropriate over-rides were six times as likely to be associated with potential and definite ADEs, compared with appropriate over-rides. Further efforts should be targeted at improving the positive predictive value of CDS such as by suppressing alerts that are appropriately over-ridden.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Telemedicine Programs in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 383-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Chen ◽  
Dalong Sun ◽  
Weiming Yang ◽  
Mingli Liu ◽  
Shufan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To evaluate the impact of telemedicine programs in intensive care unit (Tele-ICU) on ICU or hospital mortality or ICU or hospital length of stay and to summarize available data on implementation cost of Tele-ICU. Methods: Controlled trails or observational studies assessing outcomes of interest were identified by searching 7 electronic databases from inception to July 2016 and related journals and conference literatures between 2000 and 2016. Two reviewers independently screened searched records, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Random-effect models were applied to meta-analyses and sensitivity analysis. Results: Nineteen of 1035 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled effects demonstrated that Tele-ICU programs were associated with reductions in ICU mortality (15 studies; risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.96; P = .01), hospital mortality (13 studies; RR, 0.74; 95% CIs, 0.58 to 0.96; P = .02), and ICU length of stay (9 studies; mean difference [MD], −0.63; 95% CI, −0.28 to 0.17; P = .007). However, there is no significant association between the reduction in hospital length of stay and Tele-ICU programs. Summary data concerning costs suggested approximately US$50 000 to US$100 000 per Tele-ICU bed was required to implement Tele-ICU programs for the first year. Hospital costs of US$2600 reduction to US$5600 increase per patient were estimated using Tele-ICU programs. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provided limited evidence that Tele-ICU approaches may reduce the ICU and hospital mortality, shorten the ICU length of stay, but have no significant effect in hospital length of stay. Implementation of Tele-ICU programs substantially costs and its long-term cost-effectiveness is still unclear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document