scholarly journals Family Planning Provider Referral, Facilitation Behavior, and Patient Follow-up for Abnormal Pap Smears

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly C. Felix ◽  
Janet Bronstein ◽  
Zoran Bursac ◽  
M. Kathryn Stewart ◽  
H. Russell Foushee ◽  
...  

Objectives. Family planning (FP) clinics are important access points for cervical cancer screening and referrals for follow-up care for abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears for a substantial number of U.S. women. Because little is known about referral and facilitation practices in these clinics or client action based on referrals, we sought to determine FP provider referral and facilitation practices when seeing FP clients with abnormal Pap smear results, and FP client follow-up for abnormal Pap smears due to FP provider referrals. Methods. We conducted a mail survey of Medicaid-enrolled FP providers in Arkansas and Alabama, and conducted a telephone survey with a sample of FP clients of those providers responding to the provider survey. Results. Major provider factors associated with referral included rural location, health department and clinic institutional setting, large Title X practice/clinic size, and high FP clinic focus. Major factors associated with facilitation included rural location, non-physician specialty, health department and clinic institutional setting, and small Title X clinic size. Of women reporting abnormal results, 62.4% reported follow-up care. Of those who received follow-up care, 40.0% received some care and a referral from their FP provider. A major factor associated with clients seeking follow-up care was being told by their FP provider where to go for follow-up care. Age was a major factor associated with clients actually obtaining follow-up care. Conclusions. Where follow-up care is not available at the FP site, referrals are critical and are a major factor associated with whether women seek care for the condition. Interventions to increase follow-up rates should focus on provider and system features, rather than clients.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5582-5582
Author(s):  
C. Chen ◽  
F. Campbell ◽  
J. Patruno ◽  
S. Kimmel ◽  
R. Boulay ◽  
...  

5582 Background: Sexually active adolescents have high rates of infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) and abnormal pap smears. They are considered a special population as they are likely to regress to normal cytology. The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with regression of cervical dysplasia in adolescents. Methods: We identified adolescent patients (aged 12–21 years) who had abnormal pap smears at the Center for Women's Medicine at Lehigh Valley Hospital in Allentown, PA, by CPT code from a database between Jan 2004 and Dec 2006. A chart review was performed to capture demographic data, cytology, smoking history, number of sexual partners, parity, race, contraceptive choice, use of barrier contraception. Chi-square analysis with logistic regression and multivariate analysis were used to identify factors associated with regression of cervical dysplasia. Results: Two-hundred two patients were identified. Mean age was 18.84 years (14–22 years). One hundred twenty-two (57.8%) were Hispanic, 71 (33.6%) Caucasian, and 16 (7.6%) Black. Fifty-two (24.6%) were pregnant at the time of diagnosis. Seventy-six (36%) were smokers. There were 125 (61.9%) cases of ASCUS, 33.7% (68 cases) LGSIL and 4.5% (9 cases) HGSIL on initial pap smear. One hundred eighteen (55.9%) patients had colposcopy, and of these, 32 (15.2%) had surgical intervention. Follow-up demonstrated that 72 (57.6%) patients had disease regression, 24 (19.2%) persistence and 29 (23.2%) progression. On multivariate analysis, patients who did not smoke were significantly more likely to show regression of cervical dysplasia on pap smear than women who smoked (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03–4.55, p = 0.039). Other factors were not statistically significant in predicting regression of cervical dysplasia. Conclusions: Adolescents who smoke were more likely to have persistent cervical dysplasia than non-smoking adolescents, putting smokers at an increased risk of advanced disease. We suggest that this subset have follow-up at shorter intervals and be enrolled in a smoking cessation program. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (32) ◽  
pp. 2635-2643
Author(s):  
Samantha L Freije ◽  
Jordan A Holmes ◽  
Saleh Rachidi ◽  
Susannah G Ellsworth ◽  
Richard C Zellars ◽  
...  

Aim: To identify demographic predictors of patients who miss oncology follow-up, considering that missed follow-up has not been well studies in cancer patients. Methods: Patients with solid tumors diagnosed from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 16,080). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine predictors of missed follow-up. Results: Our study revealed that 21.2% of patients missed ≥1 follow-up appointment. African–American race (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% CI: 1.17–1.51), Medicaid insurance (OR 1.59; 1.36–1.87), no insurance (OR 1.66; 1.32–2.10) and rural residence (OR 1.78; 1.49–2.13) were associated with missed follow-up. Conclusion: Many cancer patients miss follow-up, and inadequate follow-up may influence cancer outcomes. Further research is needed on how to address disparities in follow-up care in high-risk patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-25
Author(s):  
Soleil Chahine ◽  
Gordon Walsh ◽  
Robin Urquhart

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the psychosocial needs of cancer survivors and examine whether sociodemographic factors and health care providers accessed are associated with needs being met. Methods: All Nova Scotia survivors meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria are identified from the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry and sent an 83-item survey to assess psychosocial concerns and whether and how their needs were met. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages) and Chi-square analyses are used to examine associations between sociodemographic and provider factors and outcomes. Results: Anxiety and fear of recurrence, depression, and changes in sexual intimacy are major areas of concern for survivors. Various sociodemographic factors, such as immigration status, education, employment, and internet use, are associated with reported psychosocial health and having one’s needs met. Having both a specialist and primary care provider in charge of follow-up care is associated with a significantly (p < 0.05) higher degree of psychosocial and informational needs met compared to only one physician or no follow-up physician in charge. Accessing a patient navigator also is significantly associated with a higher degree of needs met. Conclusions: Our study identifies the most prevalent psychosocial needs of cancer survivors and the factors associated with having a higher degree of needs met, including certain sociodemographic factors, follow-up care by both a primary care practitioner and specialist, and accessing a patient navigator.


Burns ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camerin A. Rencken ◽  
Nikki Allorto ◽  
Abigail D. Harrison ◽  
Stephen T. McGarvey ◽  
Adam R. Aluisio

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 193-193
Author(s):  
Deanna Gek Koon Teoh ◽  
Lisa A. Fall ◽  
Erin A. Beitelspacher ◽  
Charles W. Lais

193 Background: Cervical cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic cancer worldwide, but is third in the U.S. due to pap smear screening. However, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines are complex and frequently changed, resulting in guideline adherence as low as 33-44%. We describe a centralized pap smear tracking system (“pap hub”) and report preliminary results. Methods: On 1/1/13 we implemented the pap hub, routing all screening pap smear results to a dedicated OB/Gyn nursing staff with a new Epic workbench. Epic Health Maintenance Modifier updated to recommend pap smears for women age 21-65 years (not younger or older per guidelines). Screening Pap/HPV results auto routed to Pap Pool Epic inbasket (not to individual providers). Centralized nurse reviews results alongside past pap results on Pathology flowsheet in Epic If normal Normal history -> appropriate follow-up interval per screening guidelines If abnormal history -> repeat pap as determined by previous history and treatment If abnormal -> manage per ASCCP guidelines Document plan in Epic Result Note Update Epic problems list If Normal: document “Pap Hub Normal History” If Abnormal: document “Pap Hub Abnormal History” with specifics in Overview History Communicate results/plan to the patient. Update Health Maintenance Modifier with next step. Review abnormal results to ensure proper follow-up, with reminders as indicated. Results: Guideline recommendations against pap smears for patients <21 years and >65 years have not changed since 2009. Comparison of first-quarter data for 2010 (pre-Pap Hub) to 2013 (post-Pap Hub) have shown a 63.86% reduction in pap smears in women <21 years. Pap smears in women >65 years has always been low, but has decreased slightly from 2.4% of all pap smears in 2010 to 1.5% of all pap smears in 2013. The 2012 ASCCP guidelines have changed recommended pap smear frequency and abnormal pap smear follow-up, and compliance with these new recommendations is being collected. Conclusions: Pap smear screening has decreased the incidence of invasive cervical cancer in the United States. The Pap Hub, a centralized pap smear tracking system, improves compliance with pap smear screening guidelines.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Keating ◽  
Mary Beth Landrum ◽  
Edward Guadagnoli ◽  
Eric P. Winer ◽  
John Z. Ayanian

Purpose Many older breast cancer survivors do not undergo annual mammography despite guideline recommendations. We identified factors associated with underuse of surveillance mammography and examined whether variation was explained by differences in follow-up care. Patients and Methods We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data to identify a population-based sample of 44,511 women fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged ≥ 65 years who were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer in 1992 to 1999 who underwent primary surgical therapy. We assessed factors associated with mammography during months 7 to 18, 19 to 30, and 31 to 42 after breast cancer diagnosis using repeated-measures logistic regression; and we examined whether follow-up care with providers of various specialties explained variation in mammography use. Results Only three quarters of women (77.6%) underwent mammography during months 7 to 18 after diagnosis, and only 56.7% had mammography yearly over 3 years. In multivariable analyses, women who were older, black, unmarried, and living in certain regions were less likely than other women to undergo surveillance mammography (all P < .05). Patients with more visits and patients who continued to see a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, or surgeon were most likely to have mammograms (P < .001); however, adjusting for visits with providers did not explain the lower mammography rates based on age, race, marital status, and geographic region. Conclusion Many elderly breast cancer survivors do not undergo annual surveillance mammography, particularly women who are older, black, and unmarried, and this underuse was not explained by access to follow-up care. New strategies are needed to increase use of surveillance mammography and decrease variations based on nonclinical factors that are likely unrelated to appropriateness of medical care.


2012 ◽  
Vol 215 (3) ◽  
pp. S82-S83
Author(s):  
Amelia W. Maiga ◽  
Dunya Atisha ◽  
David Nolen ◽  
Ryan Kellogg ◽  
Brian Christie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document