An Empirical Contribution to the Identification of Second Language Skills
Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about the nature of second language skills are investigated. Hypothesis 1 (H1) states that second language skill is separable into components related to linguistically defined categories. Hypothesis 2 (H2) is that second language ability is mainly a unitary factor so that once the common variance on a variety of language tasks is explained, essentially no meaningful unique variance attributable to separate components will remain. Previous studies suggest greater support for H2. However, studies of first language abilities favour H1. Data from 547 first-year students at teacher training schools of the Department of Education and Training do not give unambiguous support to either hypothesis. The results suggest that the differentiation of second language ability into separately identifiable skills is related to the level of proficiency attained. The higher level of proficiency results in greater differentiation of separate language skills. Results are regarded as suggestive of further research, but in no way definitive.