scholarly journals Most Cited Articles in Head and Neck Oncology

2020 ◽  
pp. 014556132093492
Author(s):  
Necati Enver ◽  
Akın Şahin ◽  
Said Sönmez ◽  
Semra Demokan
Keyword(s):  
New England ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Oncology ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Human Participant ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Journal Impact ◽  
Insight Into

Objectives: The number of citations an article receives is an important indication of its impact. The main objectives of this investigation provide readers with a practical guide in evaluating head and neck oncology literature and determine the characteristics of trends in ORL. Methods: This was a retrospective bibliometric analysis that did not involve human participant. The Thomson Reuters Web of Science was searched to determine the citations of all published HNO articles. Most cited 300 article analyzed and a total of 100 articles were included in our investigation under the topic search “Head AND NECK AND (cancer OR carcinoma OR oncology).” Articles include malignancies other than head and neck are excluded. The top 100 cited articles were selected and analyzed by 2 independent investigators. Country, Institution, First Author, Journal name, study design, cites per year information gathered and analyzed. Results: The journal with the highest number of top 100 cited articles was New England Journal Of Medicine with 19 paper, followed by The Journal of Clinical Oncology(17) and Cancer Research (12). The top article on the list (Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck-NEJM) has 2243 citations. A statistically significant association was found between the journal impact factor and the number of top 100 cited articles ( P < .05). The United States had the highest number of articles (63). John Hopkins is differed from other institutions with 15 contributing articles. Conclusion: Our analysis provides an insight into the citation frequency of top cited articles published in HNO to help recognize the quality of the works, discoveries and the trends steering the study of HNO. This is also a modern reading list for young HNO scientist.

scholarly journals The 100 most cited papers in spinal deformity surgery: a bibliometric analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane C. O’Neill ◽  
Joseph S. Butler ◽  
Niall McGoldrick ◽  
Robert O'Leary ◽  
Keith Synnott
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Further Development

Spinal deformity is a condition that has been recognized for many millennia. There have been major advances in the treatment of spinal deformity in recent years and studies outlining new ideas can inspire others to further advance the speciality. The number of citations a paper receives may indicate the influence of that paper. It is therefore important that we evaluate and analyze the most cited works in our field. The aim of this study is to identify the 100 most cited papers relevant to spinal deformity surgery in the literature. A search through the Thomson Reuters Web of ScienceTM for citations related to spinal deformity surgery was performed. The number of citations, mean citation number (total number citations/years since publication), journal, authors, year of publication and country of origin of the top 100 papers was recorded. The top 100 papers were cited a combined 17,646 times, ranging from 453 to 112. The majority of papers originated from the United States (71) and were published in 20 different journals. The decade 1990-1999 was the most prolific, with 36 of the 100 papers published during this time. Papers pertaining to the management of scoliosis (49) were the most common. This study identifies the top 100 most cited papers in the field of spinal deformity surgery. While citation is not a specific marker of the scientific quality of a paper, it is a surrogate for the influence a paper has had on the orthopedic community. This list of papers provides an invaluable resource for both those in training and those actively practicing and involved in the further development of spinal deformity surgery.

The 100 most cited manuscripts in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (11) ◽  
pp. 936-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
T S M Chu ◽  
H T Kwok ◽  
J Chan ◽  
F Y F Tse
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
New England ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to highlight the key studies that have led to the current understanding and treatment of head and neck cancer.MethodThe Thomson Reuters Web of Science database was used to identify relevant manuscripts. The results were ranked according to the number of citations. The 100 most cited papers were analysed.ResultsA total of 63 538 eligible papers were returned. The median number of citations was 626. The most cited paper compared radiotherapy with and without cetuximab (3205 citations). The New England Journal of Medicine had the most citations (23 514), and the USA had the greatest number of publications (n = 66). The most common topics of publication were the treatment (n = 45) and basic science (n = 19) of head and neck cancer, followed by the role of human papillomavirus (n = 16).ConclusionThis analysis highlighted key articles that influenced head and neck cancer research and treatment. It serves as a guide as to what makes a ‘citable’ paper in this field.

The 100 Most-Cited Articles Focused on Ultrasound Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (03) ◽  
pp. 311-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Moon ◽  
E. Yun ◽  
D. Yoon ◽  
C. Choi ◽  
Y. Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Observation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Search Term ◽  
Detailed List ◽  
Prolific Authors ◽  
The University ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Journal Impact ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Purpose The number of citations that an article has received reflects its impact on a particular research area. The aim of this study was to identify the 100 most-cited articles focused on ultrasound (US) imaging and to analyze the characteristics of these articles. Methods We determined the 100 most-cited articles on US imaging via the Web of Science database, using the search term. The following parameters were used to analyze the characteristics of the 100 most-cited articles: publication year, journal, journal impact factor, number of citations and annual citations, authors, department, institution, country, type of article, and topic. Results The number of citations for the 100 most-cited articles ranged from 1849 to 341 (median: 442.0) and the number of annual citations ranged from 108.0 to 8.1 (median: 22.1). The majority of articles were published in 1990 – 1999 (39 %), published in radiology journals (20 %), originated in the United States (45 %), were clinical observation studies (67 %), and dealt with the vessels (35 %). The Department of Internal Medicine at the University of California and the Research Institute of Public Health at the University of Kuopio (n = 4 each) were the leading institutions and Salonen JT and Salonen R (n = 4 each) were the most prolific authors. Conclusion Our study presents a detailed list and analysis of the 100 most-cited US articles, which provides a unique insight into the historical development in this field.

scholarly journals Supervising Students in Scientific Writing for Peer Review & Possible Publication

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-161
Author(s):  
Diyora Abdukhakimova ◽  
Yingqiu Xie
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Early Career ◽  
Impact Factor Journal ◽  
Course Assessment ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Biology Learning ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Journal Impact

Innovation in assessment of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) courses in subjects such as biology and biochemistry is a widely discussed topic. We report the use of a novel, research-integrated course assessment designed to increase students' self-motivation and improve their learning outcomes. We encouraged submissions to peer-reviewed journals, supported by stepwise supervision on writing by the instructor, which led to possible publication of some student-written articles. We compared the results from two classes in 2015 and 2016, assessing the quality of the published articles on the basis of journal impact factor, journal Scopus score, and number of citations of each article, using supervised assignments to fulfill this goal. Assessment of research-integrated biology learning via potential publishing may motivate students to actively learn a biochemistry topic and encourage early-career professional development.

scholarly journals Value and Quality of Care in Head and Neck Oncology

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Takes ◽  
Gyorgy B. Halmos ◽  
John A. Ridge ◽  
Paolo Bossi ◽  
Matthias A.W. Merkx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Head And Neck Oncology

Predicting Long-Term Citation Impact of Articles in Social and Personality Psychology

2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Haslam ◽  
Peter Koval
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
The United States ◽  
Personality Psychology ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Journal Impact ◽  
Citation Advantage

The citation impact of a comprehensive sample of articles published in social and personality psychology journals in 1998 was evaluated. Potential predictors of the 10-yr. citation impact of 1,580 articles from 37 journals were investigated, including number of authors, number of references, journal impact factor, author nationality, and article length, using linear regression. The impact factor of the journal in which articles appeared was the primary predictor of the citations that they accrued, accounting for 30% of the total variance. Articles with greater length, more references, and more authors were cited relatively often, although the citation advantage of longer articles was not proportionate to their length. A citation advantage was also enjoyed by authors from the United States of America, Canada, and the United Kingdom. 37% of the variance in the total number of citations was accounted for by the study variables.

scholarly journals Analysis of the top 100 most influential papers in benign prostatic hyperplasia

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Shah ◽  
Jasmine Kashkoush ◽  
Ahmed Kashkoush ◽  
Trushar Patel
Keyword(s):  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Journal Impact

Introduction: The fund of knowledge on benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) has been growing since the 1970s. Citation analysis is a tool by which we can quantify influence of specific articles and assess the growth of a certain topic. This paper seeks to identify trends, as well as draw attention to the most influential papers, authors, and journals. Many analogous studies have been done, but none have been done in the field of BPH. Methods: We used Thomson Reuters Web of Science to collect articles pertaining to BPH in a two-step fashion. We identified 117 keywords relevant to BPH and using these 117 words, we were able to identify 7302 total articles. These articles were organized by number of citations. Of the top 200 articles, 100 articles were excluded based on title and abstract analysis. One hundred articles were included for final analysis, as this is the standard of citation analysis. Results: Overall, total citations were slightly correlated with journal impact factor. Author analysis revealed no significant difference between authorship and average citations. Topic analysis showed the most cited topic was surgical management with 657.35 citations per year. Study design analysis showed the predominant study design was the randomized control trial. Conclusions: By using the two-step methodology, we were able to create a list of the top 100 most influential articles in the field of BPH. In doing so, we illustrated the growth of the field over time and paid tribute to the myriad of papers, authors, and journals that have shaped the field to this day.

A Dashboard-based Comparison of Author Impact Factors in JMIR Serious Games: A Bibliometric Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsair-Wei Chien ◽  
Willy Cho ◽  
Hsien-Yi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Serious Games ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Google Maps ◽  
Academic Fields ◽  
Journal Impact ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Highly Cited

BACKGROUND Much emphasis continues to be placed on the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) typically used as a surrogate marker of quality of both the article and journal. The most pernicious aspect of this culture has been a practice of using journal impact factors as a basis for assessment of individual researchers’ achievements. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to develop a scheme for quantifying author contributions which can be applied to calculate the author impact factor (AIF). METHODS We obtained 85 abstracts since 2013 from Medline by searching the keywords of ("JMIR Serious Games[Journal]) (JSG for short) on June 30, 2018. An authorship-weighted scheme (AWS) was used for quantifying coauthor contributions and calculating AIF. We plotted the clusters, including (i) international author collaborations, (ii) the most highly-cited authors who published in JSG, and (iii) the AIFs for all authors located on dashboards using social network analysis(SNA) and Google Maps to display, RESULTS This study found that (i) the most number of papers are from the U.S.( 28, 32.9%) and the U.K. (11,12.9 %), (ii) the AWS can be easily applied to JSG for calculating AIF, (iii) the most cited author in JSG is Alaa AlMarshedi (=11.44=weighted publications), two authors(i.e., Abdulrahman Abdulla El-Hilly and Andreas BEl-Hilly Eisingerich) have the highest AIF(=13.75), and (iv) the AWS-based AIF can be easily displayed on Google Maps in comparison. CONCLUSIONS The AIFs incorporated with SNA shown on Google Maps provide insight into the relationships between citable and cited achievements for authors. The AWS-based AIF can be applied to other academic fields for understanding the most highly cited authors in a discipline. CLINICALTRIAL Not available

Introduction

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Francis J. Bremer
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New England ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lay Leadership ◽  
Cultural Institutions ◽  
Standard Interpretation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Insight Into

This book makes a series of arguments that challenge the standard interpretation of the Pilgrim story and the influence of Plymouth on the colonization of New England and the history of the United States. Those who are commonly referred to as Pilgrims are presented as members of the broader English puritan movement. Lay leadership such as that of William Brewster was central to the forming and conduct of congregational churches. These believers recognized that “further light” might always provide further insight into God’s designs. And Plymouth’s role in shaping the religious and cultural institutions of Massachusetts were more significant than previously realized.

TOCQUEVILLE IN THE POLITICAL ARENA ACTOR OR ANALYST?

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-278
Author(s):  
MICHAEL BURRAGE
Keyword(s):  
Political Theory ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
Deep Insight ◽  
Political Arena ◽  
Major Work ◽  
American Character ◽  
Insight Into

The blurbs on the jacket of this book are unusually misleading. A U.S. senator avers that it ‘conveys a sweep of historical analysis that gives us deep insight… into the American character’, and ‘sheds light on America's present and possible future as well as its past’. Since it contains virtually no historical or sociological evidence about the United States, it is hard to see how it might do this. One Harvard professor calls it ‘a major work of political theory’, and another ‘an enduring work of political theory in its own right’. But while the author conveys his disaffection with contemporary American democracy, he nowhere clearly and succinctly formulates anything that might reasonably be called a theory. A Johns Hopkins professor thinks that it ‘shows us how pertinent Tocqueville remains for democrats today’. Incidentally, it may perhaps do this, though this is hardly the author's intent, since he emphasizes the archaic and feudal quality of Tocqueville's final account of democracy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document