scholarly journals The Interplay of Inflammation and Coagulation in COVID-19 Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Perfusion ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 026765912110575
Author(s):  
Akram Zaaqoq ◽  
Tariq Sallam ◽  
Caitlin Merley ◽  
Lan Anh Galloway ◽  
Sameer Desale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Markers Of Inflammation ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Digital Ischemia ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Objective Bleeding and thrombosis are common complications during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19 patients. We sought to examine the relationship between inflammatory status, coagulation effects, and observed bleeding and thrombosis in patients receiving venovenous (VV) ECMO for COVID-19 respiratory failure. Study Design Cross-sectional cohort study Settings Quaternary care institution. Patients The study period from April 1, 2020, to January 1, 2021, we included all patients with confirmed COVID-19 who received VV ECMO support. Intervention None. Measurements and Main Results Thirty-two patients were supported with VV ECMO during the study period, and 17 patients (53%) survived to hospital discharge. The ECMO nonsurvivors mean lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were markedly elevated in comparison to survivors (1046 u/L [IQR = 509, 1305] vs 489 u/L [385 658], p = 0.003). Platelet/fibrinogen dysfunction, as reflected by the low Maximum Amplitude (MA) on viscoelastic testing, was worse in nonsurvivors (65.25 mm [60.68, 67.67] vs 74.80 mm [73.10, 78.40], p = 0.01). Time-group interaction for the first seven days of ECMO support, showed significantly lower platelet count in the nonsurvivors (140 k/ul [103, 170] vs 189.5 k/ul [ 146, 315], p < 0.001) and higher D-dimer in (21 μg/mL [13, 21] vs 14 μg/mL [3, 21], p < 0.001) in comparison to the survivors. Finally, we found profound statistically significant correlations between the clinical markers of inflammation and markers of coagulation in the nonsurvivors group. The ECMO nonsurvivors experienced higher rate of bleeding (73.3% vs 35.3%, p = 0.03), digital ischemia (46.7% vs 11.8%, p = 0.02), acute renal failure (60% vs 11.8%, p = 0.01) and bloodstream infection (60% vs 23.5%, p = 0.03). Conclusion The correlation between inflammation and coagulation in the nonsurvivors supported with VV ECMO could indicate dysregulated inflammatory response and worse clinical outcomes.

The effects of propofol on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation oxygenator exchange

2021 ◽  
pp. 039139882110160
Author(s):  
Kelsey L Browder ◽  
Ayesha Ather ◽  
Komal A Pandya
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cumulative Dose ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Vv Ecmo

The objective of this study was to determine if propofol administration to veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients was associated with more incidents of oxygenator failure when compared to patients who did not receive propofol. This was a single center, retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome of the study is oxygenator exchanges per ECMO day in patients who received propofol versus those who did not receive propofol. Patients were 18 years or older on VV-ECMO support between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2018. Patients were excluded if they required ECMO support for less than 48 h or greater than 21 days. There were five patients in the propofol arm that required oxygenator exchanges and seven patients in the control arm. The total number of oxygenator exchanges per ECMO day was not significantly different between groups ( p = 0.50). When comparing those who required an oxygenator exchange and those who did not, there was no difference in the cumulative dose of propofol received per ECMO hour (0.64 mg/kg/h vs 0.96 mg/kg/h; p = 0.16). Propofol use in patients on VV-ECMO does not appear to increase the number of oxygenator exchanges.

Traumatic respiratory failure and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110128
Author(s):  
Ismael A Salas De Armas ◽  
Bindu Akkanti ◽  
Pratik B Doshi ◽  
Manish Patel ◽  
Sachin Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Background: Respiratory failure (RF) is a common cause of death and morbid complication in trauma patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in adults with RF refractory to invasive mechanical ventilation. However, use of ECMO remains limited for this patient population as they often have contraindications for anticoagulation. Study design: Medical records were retroactively searched for all adult patients who were admitted to the trauma service and received veno-venous ECMO (VV ECMO) support between June 2015 and August 2018. Survival to discharge and ECMO-related complications were collected and analyzed. Results: Fifteen patients from a large Level I trauma center met the criteria. The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 53.0 (IQR, 27.0–76.0), median injury severity score was 34.0 (IQR, 27.0–43.0), and the median duration of ECMO support was 11 days (IQR, 7.5–20.0). For this cohort, the survival-to-discharge rate was 87% (13/15). The incidence of neurologic complications was 13%, and deep vein thrombosis was reported in two cases (13%). Conclusions: Survival rates of trauma patients in this study are equivalent to, or may exceed, those of non-trauma patients who receive ECMO support for other types of RF. With the employment of a multidisciplinary team assessment and proper patient selection, early cannulation, traumatic RF may be safely supported with VV ECMO in experienced centers.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Pulmonary Failure and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: First Experience from Three European Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Centers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Abraham Yankah ◽  
Richard Trimlett ◽  
Elena Sandoval ◽  
Christopher Lotz ◽  
Stephane Ledot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Multiorgan Failure ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
International Experts ◽  
Vv Ecmo

AbstractOn April 17, 2020, a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) webinar was held by selected international experts in the field of intensive care and specialized respiratory ECMO centers from Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, which was hosted by the German Heart Centre Berlin/Charité. The experts shared their experience about the treatment of 42 patients with severe acute respiratory failure requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Patients were predominantly male (male-to-female ratio: 3:1), with a mean age of 51 years (range: 25–73 years). VV-ECMO support was indicated in 30% of the ventilated COVID-19 patients. The mean time requiring mechanical ventilation was 16.5 days, with a mean duration of ECMO support of 10.6 days. At the time of the webinar, a total of 17 patients had already been decannulated from ECMO, whereas six died with multiorgan failure. 18 patients remained on ECMO, with their final outcomes unknown at the time of the webinar. Hospital mortality was 25.6% (as of April 17, 2020). In this respect, VV-ECMO, provided by expert centers, is a recognized and validated mode of advanced life-support during the recent COVID-19 pandemic with good outcomes.

scholarly journals CRITICAL CARE ECHO ROUNDS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. D1-D11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Victor ◽  
Nicholas A Barrett ◽  
Stuart Gillon ◽  
Abigail Gowland ◽  
Christopher I S Meadows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Respiratory Physiology ◽  
Organ Support ◽  
Septic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Significant Past Medical History ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced form of organ support indicated in selected cases of severe cardiovascular and respiratory failure. Echocardiography is an invaluable diagnostic and monitoring tool in all aspects of ECMO support. The unique nature of ECMO, and its distinct effects upon cardio-respiratory physiology, requires the echocardiographer to have a sound understanding of the technology and its interaction with the patient. In this article, we introduce the key concepts underpinning commonly used modes of ECMO and discuss the role of echocardiography.CaseA 38-year-old lady, with no significant past medical history, was admitted to her local hospital with group A Streptococcal pneumonia. Rapidly progressive respiratory failure ensued and, despite intubation and maximal ventilatory support, adequate oxygenation proved impossible. She was attended by the regional severe respiratory failure service who established her on veno-venous (VV)-ECMO for respiratory support. Systemic oxygenation improved; however, significant cardiovascular compromise was encountered and echocardiography demonstrated a severe septic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction <15%, aortic velocity time integral 5.9 cm and mitral regurgitation dP/dt 672 mmHg/s). Her ECMO support was consequently converted to a veno-veno-arterial configuration, thus providing additional haemodynamic support. As the sepsis resolved, arterial ECMO support was weaned under echocardiographic guidance; subsequent resolution of intrinsic respiratory function allowed the weaning of VV-ECMO support. The patient was liberated from ECMO 7 days after hospital admission.

Approach to Sedation and Analgesia in COVID-19 Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110107
Author(s):  
Diane Dreucean ◽  
Jesse E. Harris ◽  
Prakruthi Voore ◽  
Kevin R. Donahue
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Objective: To describe clinically pertinent challenges of managing sedation in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and describe considerations for enhanced safety and efficacy of pharmacological agents used. Data Sources: A PubMed search was performed using the following search terms: ECMO, ARDS, sedation, COVID-19, coronavirus, opioids, analgesia, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, methadone, ketamine, propofol, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, benzodiazepines, midazolam, lorazepam, and diazepam. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant clinical and pharmacokinetic studies were considered. All studies included were published between January 1988 and March 2021. Data Synthesis: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 may progress to requiring VV-ECMO support. Agents frequently used for sedation and analgesia in these patients have been shown to have significant adsorption to ECMO circuitry, leading to possible diminished clinical efficacy. Use of hydromorphone-based analgesia has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients on VV-ECMO. However, safety and efficacy regarding use of other agents in this patient population remains an area of further research. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review addresses clinical challenges associated with sedation management in COVID-19 patients requiring VV-ECMO support and provides potential strategies to overcome these challenges. Conclusions: Historically, sedation and analgesia management in patients requiring ECMO support have posed a challenge for bedside clinicians given the unique physiological and pharmacokinetic changes in this patient population. A multimodal strategy to managing analgesia and sedation should be used, and the use of enteral agents may play a role in reducing parenteral agent requirements.

scholarly journals Stroke During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Timing, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harim Kim ◽  
Jeong Hoon Yang ◽  
Chi Ryang Chung ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Gee Young Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stroke Group ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Abstract Background Among various complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), stroke continues to be a major factor that worsens the clinical outcome because it is associated with mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes. Appropriate risk evaluation, screening, and management of neurologic injury under ECMO support has not yet been established and requires further investigation. Thus, this study analyzes the stroke related risk factors and outcomes in order to determine the appropriate intervention to minimize neurologic sequalae while on ECMO. Method Total 1039 patients who underwent ECMO from January 2012 to September 2019 at the Samsung Medical Center were reviewed and 759 subjects were selected for the analysis. The exclusion criteria were age < 18y, failure of successful ECMO initiation, multiple ECMO runs, underlying severe brain injury, and incomplete medical records. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of strokes on ECMO support using cox proportional hazard regression. In order to analyze the timing of stroke after ECMO initiation, the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test were performed.Results Among The overall incidence of stroke was 5.1% (n = 39) without a significant difference between venoarterial (VA) and venovenous(VV) ECMO (5.3% and 4.8%, respectively, p = 0.480). Independent risk factors for stroke were intraaortic balloon pump (IABP, p = 0.0008) and a history of stroke (p = 0.0354). Most hypoxic brain injuries were found in the VA ECMO (93.3%), and 54.5% of intracranial hemorrhage were in the VV ECMO. Most patients with strokes (61.5%) were diagnosed within 72hours after ECMO initiation. The time taken for stroke event from the time of ECMO insertion was shorter in the VA ECMO than in the VV ECMO (median 1.5 vs. 3 days). The stroke group had a higher mortality rate than the non-stroke group (64.1% and 44.7%, respectively, p = 0.014). Conclusion Concurrent ECMO and IABP use may increase the incidence of stroke during ECMO support. Evaluation for stroke that includes CT within 72 hours of ECMO insertion may enable early diagnosis, allowing timely intervention.

scholarly journals Massive aspiration syndrome: a possible indication for “emergent” veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliano Gamberini ◽  
Venerino Poletti ◽  
Emanuele Russo ◽  
Alessandro Circelli ◽  
Marco Benni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
White Male ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Lung Protective Ventilation ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Abstract Background Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lung injury. If circulatory failure coexists, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be preferred over VV-ECMO because of its potential for circulatory support. In VA-ECMO, the respiratory contribution is less effective and the complication rate is higher than in the VV configuration. Case presentation The authors present a case in which VV-ECMO was performed in an emergency setting to treat a 68-year-old White male patient who experienced acute respiratory failure after massive aspiration. Despite intubation and intensive care unit admission, multiple organ failure occurred suddenly, thus prompting referral to a level-1 trauma center with an ECMO facility. The patient’s condition slowly improved with VV-ECMO support along with standard treatment for hemodynamic impairment. VV-ECMO was discontinued on day 8. The patient was extubated on day 14 and discharged home fully recovered 34 days after the event. Conclusions Attention was focused on the decision to initiate VV-ECMO support even in the presence of severe hemodynamic derangement, although VA-ECMO could have provided better hemodynamic support but less effective respiratory support.

scholarly journals Application of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lymphoma patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113
Author(s):  
Dorian Tokmadžić ◽  
Kazimir Juričić ◽  
Matilda Novosel ◽  
Alen Protić
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Aim: To report the clinical courses of two patients, one with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and one with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), who developed severe refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and were treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Case report: Both patients developed chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia followed by pneumonia and ARDS, after which they were transferred to the intensive care unit. Their respiratory failure deteriorated despite endotracheal intubation with protective mechanical ventilation, at which point a decision for VV ECMO initiation was made. Both patients had complicated treatment courses and developed severe ECMO-associated complications. The most important complications of ECMO support in our HL patient were cardiac arrest; right atrial laceration with pericardial tamponade which needed surgical treatment; right leg ischemia which required transfemoral amputation; thrombosis within the membrane oxygenator; several septic episodes with severe hemodynamic instability; and right sided tension pneumothorax. Despite all difficulties, the patient was successfully weaned from ECMO. Unfortunately, he died prior to hospital discharge as a result of sepsis with multiple organ failure. The most significant ECMO-induced complications in our NHL patient were severe bleeding incidents, most notably diffuse oropharyngeal and continuous bilateral pulmonary hemorrhage; superimposed bacterial pneumonia; extensive pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema. Despite all therapeutic efforts, the patient died during ECMO treatment because of respiratory decompensation. Conclusions: The patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) undergoing ECMO support have poor outcomes, with high rates of severe ECMO-induced complications. Further studies focusing on patient selection and issues concerning prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ECMO-associated complications are needed.

scholarly journals Effects of Steroids and Tocilizumab on the Immune Response Profile of Patients with COVID-19-Associated ARDS Requiring or Not Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 603
Author(s):  
Vito Fanelli ◽  
Giorgia Montrucchio ◽  
Gabriele Sales ◽  
Umberto Simonetti ◽  
Chiara Bonetto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Lymphocyte Subpopulation ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Cell Subpopulation ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Th Cell ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a life-saving rescue therapy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). ECMO has been associated with development of lymphocytopenia that is also common in COVID-19. Hyperinflammation may complicate SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, prompting therapy with steroids and immunomodulatory drugs. We aimed to evaluate the association of therapies such as steroids and Tocilizumab with trajectories of the total leukocytes, lymphocyte subpopulation count, and inflammatory and fibrinolysis markers in COVID-19-related ARDS, requiring or not VV-ECMO support. The association of the trajectories of the leukocytes, lymphocyte subpopulation count, and inflammatory and fibrinolysis markers with treatment with steroids (Steroids), Tocilizumab (Tocilizumab), both drugs (Steroids + Tocilizumab), and absence of treatment (No Treatment) were analyzed using mixed effects regression models, where ECMO was considered as a potential effect modifier. One hundred and thirty-nine leukocyte and eighty-one lymphocyte subpopulation counts were obtained from thirty-one patients who required (VV-ECMO, N = 13) or not (no VV-ECMO, N = 18) extracorporeal support. In both groups, treatment with Steroids + Tocilizumab was independently associated with a significant reduction of 46% and 67% in total lymphocytes, 22% and 60% in CD3+, and 61% and 91% in CD19+ (B lymphocytes) compared to those obtained without treatment, respectively. In the no VV-ECMO group, Tocilizumab was associated with a 79% increase in total lymphocytes and with a reduction in procalcitonin compared to no treatment. CD45+, CD3+CD4+ (Th cell), CD3+CD8+, CD4+/CD8+, the NK cell subpopulation, neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils were significantly reduced by Steroids + Tocilizumab without an effect modification by VV-ECMO support. In critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, concomitant therapies with steroids and Tocilizumab, beside mitigating the inflammation and fibrinolysis, could reduce the total leukocyte, lymphocyte, and subpopulation count. Moreover, the effect of Tocilizumab in increasing the total lymphocytes and reducing procalcitonin might be blunted by VV-ECMO.

scholarly journals Lung transplant after long-term veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Yoshiyasu ◽  
Masaaki Sato ◽  
Masaki Anraku ◽  
Shingo Ichiba ◽  
Jun Nakajima
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Lung Transplantation ◽  
Ecmo Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Bilateral Lung Transplantation ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bilateral Lung ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Abstract Background Although the number of patients who undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation is increasing worldwide, there are few reports on lung transplantation after long-term ECMO (more than 1 month). We report a rare case of successful bilateral lung transplantation in a Japanese patient after 5 months of veno-venous (VV)-ECMO support. Case presentation A 27-year-old man who underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMTx) with fully matched human leukocyte antigen typing was diagnosed with bronchiolitis obliterans caused by chronic graft-versus-host disease 3 years after the BMTx. One year later, his respiratory condition had exacerbated, with carbon dioxide retention that required conventional mechanical ventilation. He was then deemed a suitable candidate for lung transplantation by a multidisciplinary transplantation selection committee. While waiting for donor lungs, his hypercapnia and acidosis became barely manageable under care with mechanical ventilation and ultimately he was switched to VV-ECMO. He remained on VV-ECMO for the next 5 months, during which period the circuit was switched nine times. In addition, sophisticated intensive care was required to manage multiple episodes of sepsis and coagulopathy. A suitable donor was identified 5 months later, and bilateral lung transplantation was initiated with continuous VV-ECMO. The procedure itself was extremely challenging owing to severe adhesions resulting from previous thoracotomy, inflammation, infection, and intrapulmonary hemorrhage. The operative time for the transplantation was about 19 h. Currently, at 2 years 8 months postoperatively, the patient is alive and well. Conclusion Transplant surgery in this patient was extremely challenging because of the presence of severe pleural adhesions and stiff native lungs secondary to hemorrhagic complications due to the prolonged ECMO support. Surgeons must recognize that lung transplantation after long-term ECMO bridging can be technically more complicated and challenging than shorter-term ECMO.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document