scholarly journals Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1182-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Lin Ruan
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mini Mental State Examination ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Methodologic Quality ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
State Examination

Objective We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and Google Scholar to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the influence of dexmedetomidine on POCD in elderly adults who had undergone general anaesthesia. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated methodologic quality against inclusion and exclusion criteria. We used RevMan 5.2 to undertake our meta-analysis. Results Thirteen RCTs were included. Compared with controls, dexmedetomidine: 1) significantly reduced the incidence of POCD (relative risk = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–2.95) and improved Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (mean difference, MD = 1.74, 95% CI 0.43–3.05) on the first postoperative day; and 2) reduced the incidence of POCD after the first postoperative day (MD = 2.73, 95% CI 1.33–4.12). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence of POCD and improves postoperative MMSE score.

scholarly journals The effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on cognitive dysfunction after surgery: a updated meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianli Li ◽  
Qifan Yin ◽  
Xuejiao Xun ◽  
Jinhua He ◽  
Dongdong Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
General Anaesthetic ◽  
Neuroprotective Effects ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is one of the most common. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) are reported in previous studies but evidence regarding the POCD is still unclear. In order to gain latest evidence, the present study analyzes the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which utilized DEX with general anaesthesia perioperatively. Method Four online databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI) were used to find relevant RCTs to conduct systematic analysis. All studies comparing the incidence of POCD or MMSE score between the DEX group and the placebo or comparator group in patients undergoing general anaesthetic surgery were eligible for inclusion. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the studies were selected. This meta-analysis was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs for continuous data as effective measures. Results In total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the incidence of POCD in DEX group was significantly lower than the control group on the first (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.24–0.54),third (OR = 0.45,95% CI 0.33–0.61) and seventh (OR = 0.40,95% CI 0.26–0.60) postoperative days; the MMSE scores in DEX group were higher than the control group on the first (SMD = 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.41), third(SMD = 1.09, 95%CI 0.94–1.24) and seventh (SMD = 3.28, 95% CI 1.51–5.04) postoperative days. Conclusions Intraoperative DEX use can ameliorate the POCD of patients who received surgical operations under general anesthesia, and effectively reduce the incidence of POCD and improve MMSE score.

scholarly journals The Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Cognitive Dysfunction After Surgery: A Updated Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qifan Yin ◽  
Jianli Li ◽  
Xuejiao Xun ◽  
Jinhua He ◽  
Dongdong Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
General Anaesthetic ◽  
Neuroprotective Effects ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Dichotomous Data ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract BackgroundPostoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is one of the most common. Neuroprotective effects of dexmedetomidine(DEX) are reported in previous studies but evidence regarding the POCD is still unclear. In order to gain latest evidence, the present study analyzes the outcomes of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) which utilized DEX with general anaesthesia perioperatively.MethodFour online databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI) were used to find relevant RCTs to conduct systematic analysis. All studies comparing the incidence of POCD or MMSE score between the DEX group and the placebo or comparator group in patients undergoing general anaesthetic surgery were eligible for inclusion. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the studies were selected. This meta-analysis was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs for continuous data as effective measures.ResultsIn total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the incidence of POCD in DEX group was significantly lower than the control group on the first (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.24-0.54),third (OR=0.45,95% CI 0.33–0.61) and seventh (OR=0.40,95% CI 0.26–0.60) postoperative days; the MMSE scores in DEX group were higher than the control group on the first (SMD=1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.41), third(SMD= 1.09, 95%CI 0.94-1.24) and seventh (SMD=3.28, 95% CI 1.51-5.04) postoperative days. ConclusionsIntraoperative DEX use can ameliorate the POCD of patients who received surgical operations under general anesthesia, and effectively reduce the incidence of POCD and improve MMSE score.

scholarly journals Study of cognitive functions in major idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed W. Zakaria ◽  
Reem I. El-Korashy ◽  
Mostafa O. Shaheen ◽  
Samah Selim ◽  
Kwashi J. Amum
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mini Mental State Examination ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Impaired Lung Function ◽  
State Examination

Abstract Background Cognitive dysfunction in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is an important clinical co-morbidity that is associated with impaired lung function. The aim of the work is to assess cognitive function in major IIP and to find out the relation between cognitive dysfunction and the oxygenation parameters. Results Fifty individuals were involved in the study; 30 patients with major IIP and 20 healthy individuals. Patients with IIP had significantly lower mini mental state examination (MMSE) score compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Wechsler Deterioration Index (WDI) revealed that 33.3% (n = 10) of the patients with IIP had sure cognitive impairment and 26.6% (n = 8) had ongoing cognitive deterioration. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) had lower cognitive function than other IIP. Conclusion There is an impairment of cognitive function in patients with major IIP, particularly in IPF, as measured by WDI and MMSE. Further large studies are needed to assess the possible predictors of cognitive impairment and their effects on the patients’ outcome.

scholarly journals Does propofol ameliorate occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after general anaesthesia? A protocol of systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zhao ◽  
Ze-qing Huang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure

Abstract Background Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common condition after general anesthesia (GA). Previous studies have reported that propofol can ameliorate the occurrence of such disorder. However, its results are still inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review will assess the efficacy and safety of propofol on POCD after GA. Methods Literature sources will be sought from inception to the present in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the administration of propofol on POCD after GA. All searches will be carried out without limitations to language and publication status. Outcomes comprise of cognitive impairments changes, impairments in short-term memory, concentration, language comprehension, social integration, quality of life, and adverse events. Cochrane risk of bias tool will be utilized to assess study quality. We will evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A narrative synthesis or a meta-analysis will be undertaken as appropriate. Discussion This study will systematically and comprehensively search literature and integrate evidence on the efficacy and safety of propofol on POCD after GA. Our findings will be of interest to clinicians and health-related policy makers. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020164096

scholarly journals Definition and application of neuropsychological test battery to evaluate postoperative cognitive dysfunction

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lívia Stocco Sanches Valentin ◽  
Ricardo Pietrobon ◽  
Wagner de Aguiar Junior ◽  
Ruth Pinto Camarão Rios ◽  
Mariane Galzerano Stahlberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mental State ◽  
Mini Mental State Examination ◽  
Neuropsychological Test ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Test Battery ◽  
Cutoff Point ◽  
Neuropsychological Test Battery ◽  
State Examination

Objective To investigate the adequacy of the neuropsychological test battery proposed by the International Study of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction to evaluate this disorder in Brazilian elderly patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Methods A neuropsychological assessment was made in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, aged over 65 years, literate, with no history of psychiatric or neurological problems and score on the Mini Mental State Examination at or above the cutoff point for the Brazilian population (>18 or >23) according to the schooling level of the subject. Eighty patients were evaluated by a trained team of neuropsychologists up to 24 hours before elective surgery. Results Among the patients evaluated, one was excluded due to score below the cutoff point in the Mini Mental State Examination and two did not complete the test battery, thus remaining 77 patients in the study. The mean age was 69±7.5 years, and 62.34% of the subjects had ±4 years of study. The subjects had significantly lower averages than expected (p<0.001) for normative tables on neuropsychological tests. Conclusion The study demonstrated the applicability of the instruments in the Brazilian elderly and low schooling level population, but suggested the need to determine cutoff points appropriate for these individuals, ensuring the correct interpretation of results. This battery is relevant to postoperative follow-up evaluations, favoring the diagnosis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing different types of surgery and anesthetic techniques.

Tracking Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease Using the Mini-Mental State Examination: A Meta-Analysis

2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Han ◽  
Martin Cole ◽  
Francois Bellavance ◽  
Jane McCusker ◽  
Francois Primeau
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Mini Mental State Examination ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Study Population ◽  
State Examination

Objectives: To estimate the annual rate of change scores (ARC) on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to identify study or population characteristics that may affect the ARC estimation. Methods: MEDLINE was searched for articles published from January 1981 to November 1997 using the following keywords: AD and longitudinal study or prognosis or cognitive decline. The bibliographies of review articles and relevant papers were searched for additional references. All retrieved articles were screened to meet the following inclusion criteria: (a) original study; (b) addressed cognitive decline or prognosis or course of AD; (c) published in English; (d) study population included AD patients with ascertainable sample size; (e) used either clinical or pathological diagnostic criteria; (f) longitudinal study design; and (g) used the MMSE as one of the outcome measures. Data were systematically abstracted from the included studies, and a random effects regression model was employed to synthesize relevant data across studies and to evaluate the effects of study methodology on ARC estimation and its effect size. Results: Of the 439 studies screened, 43 met all the inclusion criteria. After 6 studies with inadequate or overlapping data were excluded, 37 studies involving 3,492 AD patients followed over an average of 2 years were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of ARC was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9-3.7). The observed variability in ARC across studies could not be explained with the covariates we studied, whereas part of the variability in the effect size of ARC could be explained by the minimum MMSE score at entry and number of assessments. Conclusions: A pooled average estimate of ARC in AD patients was 3.3 points (95% CI: 2.9-3.7) on the MMSE. Significant heterogeneity of ARC estimates existed across the studies and cannot be explained by the study or population characteristics investigated. Effect size of ARC was related to the initial MMSE score of the study population and the number of assessments.

scholarly journals Processed Electroencephalogram Monitoring and Postoperative Delirium

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen K. MacKenzie ◽  
Angelitta M. Britt-Spells ◽  
Laura P. Sands ◽  
Jacqueline M. Leung
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Postoperative Delirium ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Google Search ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Postoperative delirium complicates approximately 15 to 20% of major operations in patients at least 65 yr old and is associated with adverse outcomes and increased resource utilization. Furthermore, patients with postoperative delirium might also be at risk of developing long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction. One potentially modifiable variable is use of intraoperative processed electroencephalogram to guide anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the relationship between processed electroencephalogram monitoring and postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Methods A systematic search for randomized controlled trials was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google search using the keywords processed electroencephalogram, Bispectral Index, postoperative delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Screening and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed. Postoperative delirium combined-effect estimates calculated with a fixed-effects model were expressed as odds ratios with 95% CIs. Results Thirteen of 369 search results met inclusion criteria. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction data were excluded in meta-analysis because of heterogeneity of outcome measurements; results were discussed descriptively. Five studies were included in the quantitative postoperative delirium analysis, with data pooled from 2,654 patients. The risk of bias was low in three studies and unclear for the other two. The use of processed electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia was associated with a 38% reduction in odds for developing postoperative delirium (odds ratio = 0.62; P &lt; 0.001; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.76). Conclusions Processed electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia was associated with a decrease in postoperative delirium. The mechanism explaining this association, however, is yet to be determined. The data are insufficient to assess the relationship between processed electroencephalogram monitoring and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

scholarly journals Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium in adults following general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Qin Li ◽  
Cong Wang ◽  
Mei-Dan Fang ◽  
Hong-Yu Xu ◽  
Hong-Liu Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background Several studies have investigated the effects of dexamethasone on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) or postoperative delirium (POD); however, their conclusions have not been consistent. So we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effects of dexamethasone on POCD/POD in adults following general anesthesia. Methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2018, Issue 11 of 12) in the Cochrane Library (searched November 17, 2018); MEDLINE OvidSP (1946 to November 16, 2018); and Embase OvidSP (1974 to November 16, 2018) were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of POCD/POD following dexamethasone administration, in adults (age ≥18 years) under general anesthesia. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework to assess the quality of evidence. Results Five studies were included (three studies/1393 participants for the incidence of POCD, and two studies/809 participants for the incidence of POD). There was no significant difference between the dexamethasone group and the placebo group in terms of the incidence of POCD in 30 days after surgery (RR 1.00; 95% CI [0.51, 1.96], P = 1.00, I2 = 77%) or in the incidence of POD (RR 0.95; 95% CI [0.60, 1.50], P = 0.81, I2 = 0%). However, both analyses had some limitations, and we considered the quality of the evidence for the postoperative incidence of POCD and POD to be very low. Conclusions This meta-analysis revealed that prophylactic dexamethasone did not reduce the incidence of POCD and POD. However, additional large high-quality trials are still needed to determine the effects of dexamethasone on the incidence of POCD/POD in patients undergoing surgery.

scholarly journals Effect of Ulinastatin in the Treatment of Postperative Cognitive Dysfunction: Review of Current Literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-tao Lv ◽  
Jun-ming Huang ◽  
Jin-ming Zhang ◽  
Jia-ming Zhang ◽  
Jin-feng Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
And Control ◽  
Surgical Operations

Background.Ulinastatin, identified as a urinary trypsin inhibitor, has been widely used in patients with inflammatory disorders. However, little is known about its effect on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). The aim of our current work is to review the current body of literature.Methods.A systematic literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify randomized controlled trials. Incidence of POCD, MMSE score, and laboratory indicators (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, and S100β) were selected as outcomes.Results.Five RCTs involving 461 elderly patients that underwent surgical operations were identified. The meta-analysis suggested no statistical difference of incidence of POCD between ulinastatin and control groups on postoperative day 1; but ulinastatin could significantly decrease the incidence of POCD on postoperative day 3 and day 7 when compared with control treatment. Ulinastatin was effective in improving the MMSE score on day 1, day 3, and day 7 after operation. IL-6 and S100βconcentrations were lower up to postoperative day 2. The incidences of postoperative complications in ulinastatin groups were lower than control.Conclusion.Ulinastatin administration was effective in treating early POCD (postoperative day 3 and day 7) and reducing IL-6 and S100βconcentrations within two days after operations. Studies with larger-scale and rigorous design are urgently needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document