scholarly journals Transhepatic hilar approach for Bismuth types III and IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with long-term outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110083
Author(s):  
Xinsen Xu ◽  
Linhua Yang ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Min He

Objective To compare the outcomes of the transhepatic hilar approach and conventional approach for surgical treatment of Bismuth types III and IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 82 patients who underwent surgical resection of Bismuth types III and IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from 2008 to 2016. The transhepatic hilar approach and conventional approach was used in 36 (43.9%) and 46 (56.1%) patients, respectively. Postoperative complications and overall survival were compared between the two approaches. Results Similar clinical features were observed between the patients treated by the conventional approach and those treated by the transhepatic hilar approach. The transhepatic hilar approach was associated with less intraoperative bleeding and a lower percentage of Clavien grade 0 to II complications than the conventional approach. However, the transhepatic hilar approach was associated with a higher R0 resection rate and better overall survival. Multivariate analysis showed that using the transhepatic hilar approach, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center classification, and R0 resection were independent risk factors for patient survival. Conclusion The transhepatic hilar approach might be the better choice for surgical resection of Bismuth types III and IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma because it is associated with lower mortality and improved survival.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 280-280
Author(s):  
Jose Mario Pimiento ◽  
Tai Hutchinson ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Pamela Joy Hodul ◽  
...  

280 Background: Multimodality therapy has been advocated for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRCP); however, specific regimens vary widely by institution. Outcomes of these interventions need to be examined to inform future investigation of the optimal therapy for these patients. This study represents the experience of multimodality therapy for BRPC at an NCI designated cancer center. Methods: We identified all patients (pts) with operable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) from 2006 to 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: resectable group and BRPC group as per the NCCN and AHPBA consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were resection rate, microscopic negative margin (R0) resection rate, overall survival (OS), and disease free survival (DFS). Fisher's exact and chi-square were used for group comparison while Kaplan-Meier estimates was used for survival analysis. Results: 160pts were identified with operable PDA. 100 (63%) pts had resectable tumors, and 60 (37%) pts had borderline resectable tumors. Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) was administered to 0% in the group with resectable tumors, and 100% in the group with borderline resectable tumors. The resection rate was 100% in pts with resectable tumors and 58% in pts with borderline resectable tumors. R0 resection rates were 80% in the resectable tumors and 97% in the borderline resectable tumors following NT. Perioperative mortality was <1% (1/125) for resectable tumors and 0% in borderline resectable tumors. Median OS was 22.6 months (m) for pts that had resectable tumors and 13.9m for all pts with borderline resectable tumors (p=0.017); however, the median OS for resected pts with borderline resectable tumors was 21.5m (p=0.6). Improved DFS was seen in patients with resectable tumors when compared with resected borderline resectable tumors (15 vs. 9.5m; p=0.04). Conclusions: Multimodality therapy leads to high rates of R0 resections in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; however 42% of patients progressed during NT. The overall survival for patients with resected borderline resectable pancreatic cancer following NT is similar to patients who undergo resection for resectable pancreatic cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 144-144
Author(s):  
Boo Gyeong Kim ◽  
Byung-Wook Kim ◽  
Joon Sung Kim ◽  
Sung Min Park ◽  
Keun Joon Lim ◽  
...  

144 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and oncologic outcome of ESD for differentiated EGC of an expanded indication compared to surgical resection. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed in patients who underwent ESD or surgical resection for EGC of an expanded indication from 2006 and 2008 in Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, and St. Paul’s Hospital. First arm study was performed according to pre-ESD diagnosis including pathologic diagnosis and endoscopic findings. Second arm study was obtained from post-ESD final pathologic result. All the patients were checked with endoscopy and stomach CT regularly at least 5 years. Clinical outcomes, disease free survival and overall survival were compared between the ESD group and surgical resection group in each arm. Results: In first arm study, 41 patients who received ESD and 106 patients who received surgical resection were enrolled. Metachronous recur was found in 4 patients among ESD group and in 2 patients among surgical resection group during the follow up period. There was no local recurrence in both groups. The disease free survival was not different between the two groups (ESD vs surgical resection; 87.8 vs 95.3%, p=0.291). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in both groups. In second arm study, 74 patients who received ESD and 165 patients who received surgical resection were enrolled. Metachronous recur was found in 5 patients among ESD group and in 2 patients among surgical resection group during the follow up period. Local recurrence did not occur in both groups. Surgical resection group was superior to ESD group in disease free survival (97.6% vs 87.6%, p=0.002). The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% in both groups. Conclusions: ESD for EGC might be acceptable considering the overall survival rates. However, intensive surveillance should be performed to find the metachronous recur after ESD.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3719-3725 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Kelsen ◽  
Katryn A. Winter ◽  
Leonard L. Gunderson ◽  
Joanne Mortimer ◽  
Norman C. Estes ◽  
...  

Purpose We update Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113), a comparison of chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with localized esophageal cancer. The relationship between resection type and between tumor response and outcome were also analyzed. Patients and Methods The chemotherapy group received preoperative cisplatin plus fluorouracil. Outcome based on the type of resection (R0, R1, R2, or no resection) was evaluated. The main end point was overall survival. Disease-free survival, relapse pattern, the influence of postoperative treatment, and the relationship between response to preoperative chemotherapy and outcome were also evaluated. Results Two hundred sixteen patients received preoperative chemotherapy, 227 underwent immediate surgery. Fifty-nine percent of surgery only and 63% of chemotherapy plus surgery patients underwent R0 resections (P = .5137). Patients undergoing less than an R0 resection had an ominous prognosis; 32% of patients with R0 resections were alive and free of disease at 5 years, only 5% of patients undergoing an R1 resection survived for longer than 5 years. The median survival rates for patients with R1, R2, or no resections were not significantly different. While, as initially reported, there was no difference in overall survival for patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy compared with the surgery only group, patients with objective tumor regression after preoperative chemotherapy had improved survival. Conclusion For patients with localized esophageal cancer, whether or not preoperative chemotherapy is administered, only an R0 resection results in substantial long-term survival. Even microscopically positive margins are an ominous prognostic factor. After a R1 resection, postoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy offers the possibility of long-term disease-free survival to a small percentage of patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 440-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Peretti ◽  
Dana M Radu ◽  
Karel Pfeuty ◽  
Antoine Dujon ◽  
Marc Riquet ◽  
...  

Background Pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors are rare lesions that remain problematic in several aspects, especially regarding the therapeutic strategy. The goal of this study was to evaluate long-term survival in a multicenter series of patients who required surgery for pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors. Methods Thirty-six cases of pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors, operated on in 3 French thoracic surgery departments between 1989 and 2015, were studied retrospectively. We recorded pre-, peri- and postoperative data for each patient, and long-term survival was analyzed. Results There were 22 men and 14 women. Mean age was 53.5 years (range 14–81 years). Three pneumonectomies, 1 bilobectomy, 19 lobectomies, 2 segmentectomies, 10 wedge resections, and 1 biopsy were performed. Complete resection was carried out in 32 (88.8%) patients. Median follow-up was 76 months. Five-year and 10-year survival rates were respectively 86.8% and 81.7% (96% and 90% for patients with R0 resection). Conclusions Long-term survival was excellent for patients with pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors who benefited from surgery, especially when surgical resection was complete. These results confirm that surgical resection must be proposed as the first-line treatment for patients with pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors.


Esophagus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Kudou ◽  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Yuichiro Nakashima ◽  
Yasue Kimura ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several studies have reported the efficacy of resection for recurrent lesions. However, they involved a limited number of subjects. This study aimed to identify a subset of patients who benefit from surgical resection of recurrent lesions after curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Clinicopathological features of 186 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment for postoperative recurrent lesions at 37 accredited institutions of the Japanese Esophageal Society were evaluated. Results The most common recurrence site was the lymph node (106 cases; 58.6%), followed by the lung (40 cases; 22.1%). Univariate analyses revealed that pN 0–1 at esophagectomy (P = 0.0348), recurrence-free interval of ≥ 550 days (P = 0.0306), R0 resection (P < 0.0001), and absence of severe complications after resection for recurrent lesions (Clavien–Dindo grade < IIIa) (P = 0.0472) were associated with better overall survival after surgical resection. According to multivariate analyses, pN 0–1 (P = 0.0146), lung metastasis (P = 0.0274), recurrence-free interval after curative esophagectomy of ≥ 550 days (P = 0.0266), R0 resection (P = 0.0009), and absence of severe complications after resection for recurrent lesions (Clavien–Dindo grade < IIIa) (P = 0.0420) were independent predictive factors for better overall survival. Conclusions Surgical resection of recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lesions is a useful option, especially for cases involving lower pN stage, lung metastasis, long recurrence-free intervals after esophagectomy, and technically resectable lesions. Surgical risks should be minimized as much as possible.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
OSCAR RICARDO PAREDES TORRES ◽  
Yoshikuni Kawaguchi ◽  
Eloy Ruiz Figueroa ◽  
Eduardo Payet Meza ◽  
Francisco Berrospi Espinoza

Abstract Purpose Pancreas tumors are extremely rare in pediatric and adolescent patients. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment; however, the data is limited with respect to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent surgical resection of pancreatic tumors. Methods Patients \(\le\) 18 years old who underwent resection of pancreas tumor at the National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases INEN during 2000–2020 were included. Results Thirty-four patients were diagnosed; 28 patients were female and 6 were male. The median age was 13.4 years old. Histological diagnosis was solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) (n = 29,85.3%), pancreatoblastoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 1), and insulinoma (n = 1). No patient experienced postoperative mortality and 15 (44.1%) patients developed postoperative complications including pancreatic fistula as the most frequent. Under a median follow-up period of 33.8 (0.5–138) months, 4 (11.8%) patients died. Of the 29 patients with SPN, the 3-and-5-year OS was 100% and 83.1%, respectively. Conclusions SPN was the most frequent cause of surgical treatment for pediatric and adolescent patients in the high-volume cancer center in Peru and was associated with favorable survival. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was safely performed in this patient group with acceptable morbidity and zero mortality.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14032-e14032
Author(s):  
Fayez A. Quereshy ◽  
Jensen T.C. Poon ◽  
Wai Lun Law

e14032 Background: Stenting as a bridge to surgery has been increasingly applied in cases of acute left-sided colonic obstruction. This study aims to evaluate both the short and long-term outcomes associated with colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructing adenocarcinoma of the colon. Methods: Patients with potentially curable acute left-sided colonic obstruction treated with stenting as a bridge to surgery (28) or with emergency surgical resection (39) from January 1998 to December 2008 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Short-term data on post-operative mortality, morbidity, necessity of intensive care, and length of hospital stay were compared. Disease-free and overall survival data were also analyzed. Results: Patients within the two study arms had similar demographic profiles. Patients receiving preoperative stenting had a higher likelihood of a laparoscopic resection (p<0.001). Further, the emergency surgery group had a higher rate of post-operative complications (p=0.024), rate of ICU admission (p=0.013), and longer total length of stay (9 vs. 12 days, p=0.001). With a median follow-up of 26.5 and 31.3 months for the stenting and surgical resection groups respectively, there was no difference in overall and disease-free survival (overall survival = 30 vs. 31 months, p=0.858; DFS = 13 vs. 12 months, p=0.989). As well, there was no difference in the rate of systemic recurrences (8 vs. 13, p=0.991). Conclusions: Stenting as a bridge to surgery is a safe treatment strategy in the management of patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction with improved short-term outcomes and comparable long-term oncologic results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Hui Sim ◽  
Byung-Wook Kim ◽  
Ji Hee Kim ◽  
Jin-Jo Kim

120 Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now accepted as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, long-term clinical outcome of ESD for EGC compared to surgical resection has not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of ESD for EGC compared to surgical resection. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 152 patients who underwent ESD or surgical resection for EGC according to Gotoda’s extended criteria from 2006 and 2008 in Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital and Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea. Overall survival and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 56 patients underwent surgical gastrectomy and 96 patients underwent ESD. The medial follow-up was 76 months in surgical resection group and 71 months in ESD group. Metachronous recurrences including dysplasia were found in 9 patients in ESD group and none in surgical resection group (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in overall survival. Conclusions: Gotoda’s extended criteria for ESD might be acceptable for the treatment of EGC considering the oval survival. However, meticulous surveillance program should be established because metachronous recurrence is more common after ESD.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 1189-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Ramacciato ◽  
Paolo Mercantini ◽  
Niccolò Petrucciani ◽  
Matteo Ravaioli ◽  
Alessandro Cucchetti ◽  
...  

Several effective treatments are available for patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Conversely, the management of patients with large or multinodular HCCs is controversial, and the role of surgical resection is not well defined. Between 2000 and 2006, 51 patients with large or multinodular HCC underwent liver resection. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted. Although 20 patients had multinodular HCCs, 31 had large solitary tumors. Perioperative mortality occurred in eight patients and complications in 15. In patients with large solitary tumors, 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 41.3 per cent and 56.1 per cent, respectively. Those with multinodular HCCs demonstrated 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 0 per cent and 33.6 per cent, respectively. Liver resection can result in long-term survival in select patients with large or multinodular HCCs, even in select patients with impaired liver function. Large solitary HCCs seem to have better prognoses than multinodular tumors, with lower recurrence and higher survival rates after surgery. Randomized controlled trials comparing resection to other treatment modalities are indicated to determine optimal patient management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document