A Multicentre Study Comparing Mazindol and Placebo in Obese Patients

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry R Walker ◽  
Ian M Ballard ◽  
Jerome A Gold
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Behavioural Modification ◽  
Drop Out Rate

Mazindol is chemically unrelated to the phenethylamines and has not shown the side-effects or abuse potential of the amphetamine anorectics. To further define its potential for causing weight loss, a six-week double-blind placebo controlled study was undertaken in four centres. A common protocol was used except that in one centre, behavioural modification also was employed, whereas in the other centres, no additional measures were used to cause weight loss. Two hundred and forty-five obese patients were assigned randomly to two mazindol groups and one placebo group in each centre. Ninety-eight and forty patients receiving mazindol and placebo respectively completed the protocol. The conclusions were: (a) no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities occurred from mazindol therapy, (b) the placebo therapy patients did not lose weight without behavioural modification, (c) the placebo therapy group had a higher drop-out rate compared to the mazindol therapy group attributable to the patients' dissatisfaction with failure to lose weight, (d) mazindol therapy without behavioural modification and behavioural modification alone both resulted in a statistically significant mean weight loss of 1 pound/patient/week and (e) mazindol plus behavioural modification resulted in a greater mean weight loss of 1/2 pound/patient/week than with behavioural modification alone. Hence, mazindol is of value in the initial therapy of obesity.

A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lenvatinib (E7080) in patients with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (SELECT).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA6008-LBA6008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schlumberger ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Bruce Robinson ◽  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

LBA6008 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRβ, RET, and KIT signaling networks. Based on efficacy results of the phase 2 study of patients (pts) with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), this phase 3 Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) was developed. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study enrolled pts with RR-DTC with documented disease progression within 13 months (mo). Pts were stratified by age (≤65, >65 years), region and ≤1 prior VEGFR-targeted therapies and randomized 2:1 to LEN or PBO (24mg/d, 28-d cycle). Upon progression, pts receiving PBO could crossover to open-label LEN. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by Independent Radiologic Review; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + PR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 392 pts (63.0 years median age; 51.0% male) were randomized. Pts on LEN had a significantly prolonged PFS vs PBO (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.31; P <.0001); median PFS was LEN: 18.3 mo (95% CI 15.1–not evaluable), PBO: 3.6 mo (95% CI 2.2–3.7). A LEN PFS benefit was observed in all predefined subgroups; median LEN PFS for pts with prior vs no prior VEGF-therapy was 15.1 mo (n=66) and 18.7 mo (n=195), respectively. Rates (n) of CRs were LEN: 1.5% (4), PBO: 0; PRs were LEN: 63.2% (165), PBO: 1.5% (2).Median exposure duration was LEN: 13.8 mo, PBO: 3.9 mo; median time to LEN response was 2.0 mo. Median OS has not been reached; deaths per arm were LEN: 71 (27.2%), PBO: 47 (35.9%). The 5 most common LEN treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; any grade) were hypertension (68%), diarrhea (59%), appetite decreased (50%), weight loss (46%), nausea (41%). LEN grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥5%) were hypertension (42%), proteinuria (10%), weight loss (10%), diarrhea (8%), appetite decreased (5%). The dose was reduced in 78.5% of pts and discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in 14.2% of pts. Conclusions: LEN significantly improved PFS compared with PBO in pts with progressive RR-DTC. There were no unexpected toxicities and AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT01321554.

The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and serotonin-receptor agonist NXN-188 during the aura phase of migraine with aura: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Hougaard ◽  
Anne Werner Hauge ◽  
Song Guo ◽  
Peer Tfelt-Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Nitric Oxide Synthase ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Receptor Agonist ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Oxide Synthase ◽  
Nnos Inhibition

AbstractBackground and aimsNXN-188 is a combined neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor and 5HT-1B/1D receptor agonist which has previously shown efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the pathogenesis of migraine pain and is formed after cortical spreading depression. Therefore NXN-188 could perhaps prevent the development of the headache phase in migraine with aura if taken during the aura. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 600mg NXN-188 in the acute treatment of migraine when dosed during the aura.MethodsA single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial. The study medication was taken during the aura and the patients kept a study diary for 48h post-dose.ResultsOf 615 patients screened, 50 patients were included in the study and randomized. Only 18 patients completed both treatments in compliance with the study procedures. 22% of patients reported freedom of headache at 2h after intake of NXN-188 compared with only 11% of patients after placebo.ConclusionsThe dual-action drug NXN-188 with 5HT-1B/1D agonism and nNOS inhibition, taken orally during the aura phase did not have a statistically substantial effect on migraine headache in this study. This study was limited by a high drop-out rate and small sample of included patients who were able to complete the cross-over protocol. Therefore, efficacy of the treatment cannot be refuted with certainty.ImplicationsThis study illustrates the difficulties of doing well controlled studies in migraine patients with aura. nNOS inhibition is expected to be effective mostly in the aura phase, i.e. the oral administration may have had too slow pharmacokinetics to have effect. Parenteral administration may overcome this obstacle. 5HT-1B/1D agonism is not effective when dosed during migraine aura. Repeated dosing of the NXN-188 during and immediately following the aura may have exploited more the dualaction. The high drop-out rate may be reduced in future studies by having the patients familiarize themselves with the study procedure by filling out the attack report form while treating one attack with their own medication before entering the trial. A parallel group comparison may be a more effective trial design for treatment during an aura.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document