Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till D. Lerch ◽  
Inga A.S. Todorski ◽  
Simon D. Steppacher ◽  
Florian Schmaranzer ◽  
Stefan F. Werlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Acetabular Version ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Center Edge

Background: Variations in femoral and acetabular version are becoming increasingly recognized as contributing factors to the development of hip pain in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. It is still unknown what the true prevalence of these rotational abnormalities is in this patient population. Purpose: To determine (1) the prevalence of femoral version abnormalities in symptomatic hips with FAI and hip dysplasia, (2) the prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral and acetabular version in these patients, and (3) which specific hip morphologies are associated with abnormalities of femoral version. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 462 symptomatic patients (538 hips) were included who had hip pain attributed to FAI or hip dysplasia and who presented to our tertiary referral center for hip preservation surgery between 2011 and 2015. We retrospectively examined femoral and acetabular version among 11 subgroups with predefined hip morphologies and compared findings with a control group. The allocation to each subgroup was based on morphologic reference values for femoral head coverage, lateral center edge angle, alpha angle, and neck-shaft angle calculated on plain radiographs. Results: Of the 538 hips included, 52% were found to have abnormal femoral version; severe abnormalities were found in 17%. Severely decreased femoral version (<0°) was found in 5%; moderately decreased femoral version (0°-10°), in 17%; moderately increased femoral version (26°-35°), in 18%; and severely increased femoral version (>35°), in 12%. The most frequent abnormal combination was increased femoral version combined with normal acetabular version (22%). We found significantly lower mean femoral version for the cam-type FAI group (15°) and significantly higher mean femoral version for the Perthes hips (32°; ie, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease) as compared with the control group (22°). The mean femoral version of the study group was 19°; for male patients, 15°; and for female patients, 22°. Conclusion: Abnormalities in femoral version are highly prevalent in patients with hip pain who are eligible for hip preservation surgery, and severe abnormalities are prevalent in 1 of 6 patients (17%). Based on these results, the evaluation of young patients with hip pain should always include an assessment of femoral version and acetabular version to best decide what treatment approach should be undertaken to optimize outcomes.

The Prevalence of Radiographic Findings of Structural Hip Deformities for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Hip Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zhou ◽  
Heath P. Melugin ◽  
Rena F. Hale ◽  
Devin P. Leland ◽  
Christopher D. Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Mixed Type ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Radiographic Finding ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Protrusio Acetabuli ◽  
Center Edge

Background: Radiography is the initial imaging modality used to evaluate femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and diagnostic radiographic findings are well-established. However, the prevalence of these radiographic findings in patients with hip pain is unknown. Purpose: The purpose was 3-fold: (1) to determine the overall prevalence of radiographic FAI deformities in young patients presenting with hip pain, (2) to identify the most common radiographic findings in patients with cam-type FAI, and (3) to identify the most common radiographic findings in patients with pincer-type FAI. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A geographic database was used to identify patients aged 14 to 50 years with hip pain between the years 2000 to 2016. The following were evaluated on radiographs: cam type: typical pistol grip deformity, alpha angle >55°; pincer type: crossover sign (COS), coxa profunda or protrusio acetabuli, lateral center edge angle (LCEA) ≥40°, Tönnis angle <0°; and mixed type: both cam- and pincer-type features. Posterior wall sign (PWS) and ischial spine sign (ISS) were also evaluated. The prevalence of each was determined. Descriptive statistics were performed on all radiographic variables. Results: There were 1893 patients evaluated, and 1145 patients (60.5%; 1371 hips; 374 male and 771 female; mean age, 28.8 ± 8.4 years) had radiographic findings consistent with FAI. Of these hips, 139 (10.1%) had cam type, 245 (17.9%) had pincer type, and 987 (72.0%) had mixed type. The prevalence of a pistol grip deformity and an alpha angle >55° was 577 (42.1%) and 1069 (78.0%), respectively. The mean alpha angle was 66.9°± 10.5°. The prevalence of pincer-type radiographic findings was the following: COS, 1062 (77.5%); coxa profunda, 844 (61.6%); ISS, 765 (55.8%); PWS, 764 (55.7%); Tönnis angle <0°, 312 (22.8%); LCEA ≥40°, 170 (12.4%); and protrusio acetabuli, 7 (0.5%). Conclusion: The overall prevalence of radiographic findings consistent with FAI in young patients with hip pain was 60.5%. Radiographic findings for mixed-type FAI were the most prevalent. The most common radiographic finding for cam-type FAI was an alpha angle >55°. The most common radiographic finding for pincer-type FAI was the COS.

scholarly journals Is Hip Arthroscopy an Adequate Therapy for the Borderline Dysplastic Hip? Correlation Between Radiologic Findings and Clinical Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712092085
Author(s):  
Alexander Zimmerer ◽  
Marco M. Schneider ◽  
Rainer Nietschke ◽  
Wolfgang Miehlke ◽  
Christian Sobau
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Fear Index ◽  
Cluster 2

Background: Recent studies have shown that assessment of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25° is not sufficient to adequately classify mildly dysplastic hips and that further radiological features should be considered. However, no correlation between different morphologic features and clinical outcomes has been investigated so far. Purpose: To analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with different subtypes of borderline dysplastic hips who underwent arthroscopic surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We examined patients with an LCEA between 18° and 25° who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between January 2015 and December 2016. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify hip morphologic subtypes according to radiographic parameters, including the LCEA, femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, anterior and posterior wall indices (AWI and PWI), Tönnis angle, alpha angle, and femoral neck-shaft angle. In addition, the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were applied preoperatively and at follow-up, and the results were compared among the different clusters. Previously reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values were used to determine clinically significant improvements. Results: A total of 40 patients were identified. Of these, 36 patients were available for evaluation at a mean follow-up of 43.8 months. In total, 4 sex-independent clusters with different morphologic patterns of the hip were identified: cluster 1, unstable anterolateral deficiency (FEAR index >2°, AWI <0.35); cluster 2, stable anterolateral deficiency (FEAR index <2°, AWI <0.35); cluster 3, stable lateral deficiency (FEAR index >2°, normal AWI and PWI); and cluster 4, stable posterolateral deficiency (FEAR index <2°, PWI <0.85). At follow-up, clusters 1, 2, and 3 showed significantly improved iHOT-12 ( P < .0001) and VAS pain ( P < .0001) scores, and cluster 4 showed no significant improvements. The MCID of 15.2 points was achieved by all patients in clusters 2 and 3, by 63% of patients in cluster 1, and by 23% of patients in cluster 4. Clusters 2 and 3 differed significantly from clusters 1 and 4 ( P = .02). A postoperative PASS score of 60 was achieved by all patients in cluster 3, by 86% of patients in cluster 2, by 63% of patients in cluster 1, and by 20% of patients in cluster 4. The differences between the groups were statistically significant ( P = .01). Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery yielded good results in the treatment of stable borderline hip dysplasia with anterolateral and lateral deficiency. In contrast, borderline hip dysplasia with acetabular retroversion showed no improvements after arthroscopic therapy. This study underlines the need for an accurate analysis of all possible radiological signs to adequately classify borderline dysplastic hips.

scholarly journals BORDERLINE ACETABULAR DYSPLASIA: THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEFORMITY PREDICTORS OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF SYMPTOMATIC INSTABILITY TREATED WITH PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0016
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Graesser ◽  
Maria Schwabe ◽  
Cecilia Pascual Garrido ◽  
John C. Clohisy ◽  
Jeffrey J. Nepple
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Periacetabular Osteotomy ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Acetabular Coverage ◽  
Low Dose Ct ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Hip Morphology

Introduction: Borderline acetabular dysplasia is classically defined as a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) of 20-25 degrees. The optimal treatment strategy in this patient group remains controversial, with some patients having primarily hip instability-based symptoms, while others have primarily impingement-based symptoms (non-instability). The purpose of the current study was to define the 3D characteristics on low-dose CT that differentiate patients with instability symptoms from those without instability in the setting of borderline acetabular dysplasia. Methods: Seventy consecutive hips with borderline acetabular dysplasia undergoing surgical treatment were included in the current study. All patients underwent low-dose pelvic CT with femoral version assessment for preoperative planning. CT measurements included alpha angle and radial acetabular coverage (RAC) at standardized clockface positions (9:00-posterior to 3:00-anterior), central and cranial acetabular version. RAC was assessed in three sectors (anterior, superior, and posterior) and defined (relative to published normative data) as normal (-1 SD, +1 SD), undercoverage (<-1 SD), or overcoverage (>+1 SD). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the CT characteristics of the symptomatic instability and non-instability groups. Results: Of the 70 hips, 62.9% had the diagnosis of symptomatic instability, while 37.1% had no instability symptoms. Hips with instability (compared to non-instability) had significantly lower alpha angle (maximal difference at 1:00 - 47.0° vs. 59.4°), increased femoral version (22.3° vs. 15.3°), and decreased radial acetabular coverage (maximal difference at 1:00 – 59.9% vs. 62.2%) (all p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified femoral version (OR 1.1, p=0.02), alpha angle at 1:00 (OR 0.91, p=0.02), and RAC at 1:00 (OR 0.46, p=0.003) as independent predictors of the presence of instability. The model combining these three factors had excellent predictive probability with a c-statistic 0.92. Conclusion: We found significant differences in the 3D hip morphology of the symptomatic instability and non-instability subgroups within the borderline dysplasia cohort. In the setting of borderline dysplasia, three-dimensional deformity characterization with low-dose CT allowed for differentiation of patients diagnosed with underlying instability vs. non-instability. Femoral version, alpha angle at 1:00, and radial acetabular coverage at 1:00 were identified as independent predictors of diagnosis in borderline acetabular dysplasia. Summary: This study attempts to define 3D CT characteristics to help distinguish between patients with impingement-based vs instability-based symptoms of borderline acetabular dysplasia.

scholarly journals Standard Radiographic Assessment of Femoral Cam Morphology is Influenced by Neck-Shaft Angle and Femoral Version

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0039
Author(s):  
Layla Haidar ◽  
Ryan Warth ◽  
Erinn Pemberton Annie Waite ◽  
Alfred Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Observer Reliability ◽  
Angle Measurements ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Shaft Angle ◽  
Head Neck

Objectives: Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a three-dimensional (3D) deformity that is still difficult to assess using traditional two-dimensional (2D) radiographic views. While measurements of alpha angle and head-neck offset are used to estimate the likelihood of actual impingement, these 2D measurements do not account for z-axis variations in femoral version (FV) and neck-shaft angle (NSA). The purpose of this qualitative proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the potential variation in alpha angle and neck-shaft offset measurements with incremental changes in NSA and FV by simulating traditional radiographic views with software-generated Digitally-Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs). We hypothesize that incremental changes in hip morphology will produce qualitative changes in alpha angle and neck-shaft offset. Methods: 3D-CT reconstruction images were obtained from one subject with symptomatic cam-type FAI. The 3D reconstruction was cleaned to include only the femoral head, neck and subtrochanteric region along with the ipsilateral hemipelvis. Using 3D medical image processing software (Mimics; Materialise, Inc.; Belgium), the pre-processed 3D model was manipulated in a standardized manner to simulate 5-degree incremental variations in FV and NSA (-15 degrees to +15 degrees for FV; -15 degrees to +10 degrees for NSA). Negative FV reflected external rotation of the femoral head-neck unit, whereas negative NSA reflected abduction of the femoral head-neck unit. Each modified 3D model was then used to generate DRRs corresponding to traditional 2D radiographic views used for assessment of cam-FAI (Anteroposterior [AP], False Profile [FP]), Cross Table Lateral [CTL], Frog Leg Lateral [FLL], 45- and 90-degree Dunn [45D and 90D, respectively]. Alpha angle and head-neck offset were measured on each radiographic view corresponding to each incremental change in FV and NSA. All measurements utilized the perfect circle technique and were made by two independent observers for assessment of inter-observer reliability. Two-way random effects ANOVA was used for statistical assessment of inter-observer reliability and reported as intra-class correlation coefficients (κ). Comparisons between groups were performed using two-tailed paired t-tests assuming unequal variance. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Inter-observer reliability (κ) for head-neck offset and alpha angles were 0.46 (fair) and 0.88 (excellent), respectively. Variations in head-neck offset and alpha angle with incremental variations in FV and NSA are summarized in Figure 1. There were statistically significant changes in mean alpha angles when the NSA was adjusted from Neutral to -5 degrees (p=0.01) and from -5 degrees to -10 degrees (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in alpha angles or head-neck offsets between each incremental change in FV (p<0.05). Alpha angle measurements were significantly more variable than head-neck offset measurements for all variations in FV (p<0.001) and NSA (p=0.02) (Figure 2). Conclusion: Two-dimensional evaluation of three-dimensional Cam morphology (alpha angle and head-neck offset) was found to be significantly affected by alterations in femoral version and head-neck offset. Head-neck offset measurements were significantly less variable than alpha angle measurements across all FVs and NSAs within each radiographic view. Future work should be done to develop standardized procedures for routine 3D radiographic assessment of cam-type FAI. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

Relationship Between Hip Dysplasia, Pain, and Osteoarthritis in a Cohort of Patients with Hip Symptoms

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1583-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanne Morvan ◽  
Ronan Bouttier ◽  
Bernard Mazieres ◽  
Evelyne Verrouil ◽  
Jacques Pouchot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Margin ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Hip Pain ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
The Relationship

Objective.The relationship between acetabular dysplasia (HD) and hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear, especially for mild forms of dysplasia. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of HD in a population-based sample with symptoms and to evaluate potential associations linking HD, hip OA, and hip pain.Methods.Individuals 40 to 75 years of age with symptoms in 1 or both hips were recruited during a multiregional prevalence survey. All study participants underwent examination and radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated using Kellgren-Lawrence staging (with stages ≥ 2 indicating hip OA) and HD measures [center-edge (CE) angle, acetabular inclination angle (HTE), acetabular depth (AD), and vertical center-anterior margin angle].Results.We studied both hips of 842 individuals (1684 hips), among whom 203 had hip OA. Compared to left hips, right hips had significantly smaller CE angles and significantly greater AD and HTE values (p ≤ 0.001). Overall, the prevalence of HD ranged from 7.6% to 22.2% of the hips depending on the measure used. The prevalence of HD was higher in individuals with hip OA, with significant differences for abnormal HTE (19.1% vs 11.4%; p < 0.0001) and abnormal CE (11.3% vs 7.5%; p = 0.04). By logistic regression, only abnormal HTE remained associated with OA. Same-side hip pain was not statistically more common in individuals with HD after stratification on OA status (p = 0.12).Conclusion.Our study confirms the relationship between OA and HD, particularly as defined based on the HTE angle.

scholarly journals Defining the Borderline Hip: High Variability in Acetabular Coverage and Femoral Deformity

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0034
Author(s):  
Maria Schwabe ◽  
Cecilia Pascual-Garrido ◽  
John Clohisy ◽  
Elizabeth Graesser Jeffrey Nepple
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Acetabular Coverage ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Text Figure ◽  
Femoral Deformity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Center Edge Angle

Objectives: Borderline acetabular dysplasia is radiographically defined as a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) of 20-25 degrees. It is well accepted that some borderline hips have instability while others have primarily impingement. The optimal management of borderline dysplasia is challenging and particularly complex due to the anatomic variability that exists among patients but has not been well characterized. The purpose of this current study was to investigate the variability in hip deformity present on low-dose CT in a cohort of patients with symptomatic borderline acetabular dysplasia. Methods: Seventy consecutive hips with borderline acetabular dysplasia undergoing surgical treatment were included in the current study. Radiographic evaluation included LCEA, acetabular inclination, anterior center edge angle (ACEA), and alpha angles on AP, Dunn, and frog views. All patients underwent low-dose pelvic CT for preoperative planning. Femoral deformity was assessed with femoral version, alpha angle (measured at 1:00 increments), and maximum alpha angle. Radial acetabular coverage was calculated according to standardized clockface positions [measured from 8:00 (posterior) to 4:00 (anterior)] and defined as normal, undercoverage, or overcoverage relative to 1 SD from the mean of normative values. Results: The mean LCEA was 22.1+1.4, while the mean acetabular inclination was 10.3+3.3. The mean ACEA in the group was 25.3+5.8 (range 10.1-43.9), with 16% having an ACEA < 20 and 50% having an ACEA < 25. The mean femoral version was 17.9° (range -4° to 59°). The mean maximal alpha angle was 57.2° (range 43° to 81°) with 61.4% greater than 55°. Lateral coverage (RAC at 12:00) was deficient in 74.1% of cases. Anterior coverage (RAC at 2:00) was highly variable with 17.1% undercoverage, 72.9% normal, and 10.0% overcoverage. Posterior coverage (RAC at 10:00) was also highly variable with 30.0% undercoverage, 62.9% normal, and 7.1% overcoverage. The three most common patterns of coverage were: isolated lateral undercoverage (31.4%), normal coverage (18.6%), and lateral and posterior undercoverage (17.1%). Conclusion: Patients with borderline acetabular dysplasia demonstrate highly variable three-dimensional deformities including anterior, lateral, and posterior acetabular coverage, femoral version, and alpha angle. Comprehensive deformity characterization in the population is important to guide diagnosis and treatment decisions. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text][Figure: see text]

scholarly journals THREE-DIMENSIONAL PREDICTORS OF FAI DISEASE PROGRESSION IN THE CONTRALATERAL HIP

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0013
Author(s):  
Lucas M. Fowler ◽  
John C. Clohisy ◽  
Wahid Abu-Amer ◽  
Cecilia Pascual Garrido ◽  
Jeffrey J. Nepple
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Symptom Development ◽  
Acetabular Version ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Experienced Pain ◽  
Bony Morphology

Background: Bony morphologies contributing to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are relatively common in the general population, but drivers of symptom development are not well understood. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of three-dimensional bony morphology in symptom development in the contralateral hip in patients undergoing ipsilateral surgical treatment for FAI. Methods: The study included a prospective cohort of 161 consecutive patients (101 females, 60 males) who presented for ipsilateral FAI surgical treatment from 2013-2018. The average age was 29.1 years. Minimum follow-up was 1 year (mean, 2.3 years; range, 1-6 years). Low-dose CT scans were obtained prior to surgical treatment. Three-dimensional hip analysis of the contralateral hip was performed relative to normative data and allowed measurements of 15 key parameters. Prior to surgery and at routine follow-up, patients completed standardized questionnaires that included pain in the contralateral hip. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Results: There were 133 patients (83%) with follow-up. Significant levels of pain in the contralateral hip were reported in 25 (18.8%) patients at presentation and 50 (35.3%) patients at follow-up. Twenty-six (19.5%) patients progressed to surgery at an average of 1.12 years. Significant predictors of symptom development were alpha angle >55° at 1:00 (p=0.037), femoral version <0° or > 20° (p=0.027), and decreased central acetabular version at 3:00 (p=0.048). Significant predictors of surgery were age <30 years (p=0.023) and alpha angle >55° at 1:00 (p=0.005). Conclusion: We found that roughly 1 in 5 patients undergoing surgical treatment for ipsilateral FAI experienced pain in the contralateral hip at presentation, over one third reported pain at follow-up, and 1 in 5 progressed to surgery. Higher alpha angle, abnormal femoral version, and decreased acetabular version were correlated with symptom development, while higher alpha angle and age under 30 were associated with progression to surgery.

scholarly journals Anteroinferior Hip Instability in Flexion During Dynamic Arthroscopic Examination Is Associated With Abnormal Anterior Acetabular Horn

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096556
Author(s):  
Munif A. Hatem ◽  
Asadullah Helal ◽  
Anthony N. Khoury ◽  
Hal David Martin
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Acetabular Version ◽  
Hip Instability ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Arthroscopic Examination ◽  
Sector Angle ◽  
Lateral Center Edge Angle ◽  
Center Edge Angle

Background: The stabilization of the femoral head is provided by the distal acetabulum when the hip is in a flexed position. However, the osseous parameters for the diagnosis of hip instability in flexion are not defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine whether the osseous parameters of the distal acetabulum are different in hips demonstrating anteroinferior subluxation in flexion under dynamic arthroscopic examination, compared with individuals without hip symptoms. The hypothesis was that the morphometric parameters of the anterior acetabular horn are distinct in hips with anteroinferior instability compared with asymptomatic hips. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 30 hips with anteroinferior instability in flexion under dynamic arthroscopic examination were identified. A control group of 60 hips (30 patients), matched by age and sex, was formed from individuals who had undergone pelvis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nonorthopaedic reasons. Unstable and control hips were compared according to the following parameters assessed on axial MRI scans of the pelvis: anterior sector angle (ASA), anterior horn angle (AHA), posterior sector angle (PSA), posterior horn angle (PHA), acetabular version, lateral center-edge angle, acetabular inclination (Tönnis angle), and femoral head diameter. Results: The coverage of the femoral head by the anterior acetabular horn was decreased in unstable hips compared with the control group (mean ASA, 54.8° vs 61°, respectively; P < .001). Unstable hips also had a steeper anterior acetabular horn, with an increased mean AHA compared with controls (52.5° vs 46.8°, respectively; P < .001). An ASA <58° had a sensitivity of 0.8, a specificity of 0.68, a negative predictive value of 0.87, and a positive predictive value of 0.56 for anteroinferior hip instability. An AHA >50° had a sensitivity of 0.77, a specificity of 0.72, a negative predictive value of 0.86, and a positive predictive value of 0.57 for anteroinferior hip instability. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean PSA, PHA, acetabular version, lateral center-edge angle, acetabular inclination, or femoral head diameter between unstable hips and controls. Conclusion: Abnormal morphology of the anterior acetabular horn is associated with anteroinferior instability in hip flexion. The ASA and AHA can aid in the diagnosis of hip instability.

scholarly journals Lower pelvic tilt, lower pelvic incidence, and increased external rotation of the iliac wing in patients with femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion compared to hip dysplasia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 813-824
Author(s):  
Till Dominic Lerch ◽  
Adam Boschung ◽  
Florian Schmaranzer ◽  
Inga A. S. Todorski ◽  
Jan Vanlommel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Sagittal Balance ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Acetabular Retroversion ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Acetabular Version ◽  
Iliac Wing

Aims The effect of pelvic tilt (PT) and sagittal balance in hips with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion (AR) is controversial. It is unclear if patients with AR have a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. Therefore, we asked: are parameters for sagittal balance, and is rotation of the iliac wing, different in patients with AR compared to a control group?; and is there a correlation between iliac rotation and acetabular version? Methods A retrospective, review board-approved, controlled study was performed including 120 hips in 86 consecutive patients with symptomatic FAI or hip dysplasia. Pelvic CT scans were reviewed to calculate parameters for sagittal balance (pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope), anterior pelvic plane angle, pelvic inclination, and external rotation of the iliac wing and were compared to a control group (48 hips). The 120 hips were allocated to the following groups: AR (41 hips), hip dysplasia (47 hips) and cam FAI with normal acetabular morphology (32 hips). Subgroups of total AR (15 hips) and high acetabular anteversion (20 hips) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Results PI and PT were significantly decreased comparing AR (PI 42° (SD 10°), PT 4° (SD 5°)) with dysplastic hips (PI 55° (SD 12°), PT 10° (SD 6°)) and with the control group (PI 51° (SD 9°) and PT 13° (SD 7°)) (p < 0.001). External rotation of the iliac wing was significantly increased comparing AR (29° (SD 4°)) with dysplastic hips (20°(SD 5°)) and with the control group (25° (SD 5°)) (p < 0.001). Correlation between external rotation of the iliac wing and acetabular version was significant and strong (r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Correlation between PT and acetabular version was significant and moderate (r = 0.58; p < 0.001). Conclusion These findings could contribute to a better understanding of hip pain in a sitting position and extra-articular subspine FAI of patients with AR. These patients have increased iliac external rotation, a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. This has implications for surgical therapy with hip arthroscopy and acetabular rim trimming or anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):813–824.

scholarly journals Intact Ligamentum Teres Predicts Superior Prognosis in Borderline Dysplastic Patients: A Matched Pair Controlled Study with Minimum Five-Year Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0042
Author(s):  
Benjamin Domb ◽  
Sarah Chen ◽  
Rafael Walker-Santiago ◽  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Philip Rosinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Ligamentum Teres ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Matched Control Group ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Objectives: (1) To report minimum five-year patient reported outcomes (PROs) in borderline dysplastic patients with ligamentum teres (LT) tears who underwent hip arthroscopy and (2) to compare these PROs to a pair-matched control group of borderline dysplastic hips without LT tears. Methods: Data was prospectively collected for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy during September 2008 and August 2013. Patients were included if had a preoperative diagnosis of borderline dysplasia [lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18°- 25°] and had preoperative and minimum five-year postoperative modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS), and Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS) scores. Exclusion criteria were Tönnis grade osteoarthritis >1, previous hip conditions, any prior ipsilateral hip surgery, or workers’ compensation status. Two borderline dysplastic groups were created. An LT tear group was matched 1:1 to a control group (no LT tear) with similar age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and laterality via propensity score matching. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: 24 LT tear patients (24 hips) were matched 24 patients (24 hips) without an LT tear. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or laterality between groups. Mean age was 36.2 ± 17.2 and 34.9 ± 15.9 years for the control and LT tear group, respectively (P = 0.783). There were 17 (70.8%) and 16 (66.7%) females in the control and LT tear group, respectively and the mean preoperative LCEA was 23.3° and 22.2° in the control and LT tear group, respectively. No differences were observed between groups in baseline PROs, intraoperative findings, or surgical procedures, except for LT treatment. Five-year postoperative PROs were comparable in both groups, with the control group exhibiting superior Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Mental Component (VR-12M) (P = 0.041) and Short Format 12 Mental Health (SF-12M) (P = 0.042). The control group exhibited less pain and higher satisfaction with surgery; however, this trend was not significant. Finally, the LT tear group was significantly less likely to achieve the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for mHHS (P = 0.022). Conclusion: Following hip arthroscopy, patients with borderline dysplasia and LT tears demonstrated favorable PROs at minimum five-year follow-up. Outcomes were similar to a pair-matched control group without LT tears, with the control group showing higher VR-12M and SF-12M scores. Furthermore, borderline dysplastic patients with LT tears were significantly less likely to achieve the PASS for mHHS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document