Sector-Specific Unemployment and Corporate Income Tax Incidence: A Geometric Exposition

1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard F. S. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Equilibrium Model ◽  
Duality Theory ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Capital Mobility ◽  
National Income ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Tax Incidence ◽  
Corporate Sector ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Simple Geometry

This paper examines the incidence of the corporate income tax using duality theory for a two-sector general equilibrium model in which the economy experiences sector-specific unemployment and perfect capital mobility with a sector-specific rigid-wage in the corporate sector. Utilizing the simple geometry without the complicated mathematical manipulations required in the previous works, we demonstrate that capital always bears more of the corporate tax burden than does labor, while unemployment and national income unambiguously decline.

scholarly journals Sharing the Burden? Empirical Evidence on Corporate Tax Incidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. e107-e140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Dwenger ◽  
Viktor Steiner ◽  
Pia Rattenhuber
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Wage Bargaining ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Tax Incidence ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Wage Bill ◽  
Employment Effects ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
First Time

Abstract This study investigates the direct incidence of the corporate income tax (CIT) through wage bargaining, using an industry-region level panel dataset on all corporations in Germany over the period 1998-2006. For the first time we account for employment effects which result from tax-induced wage changes. Workers share in reductions of the CIT burden; yet, the net effect of wage bargaining on the corporate wage bill, after an exogenous €1 decrease in the CIT burden, is as little as 19-28 cents. This is about half of the effect obtained in prior literature focussing on wages alone.

scholarly journals Measuring the Effects of Corporate Tax Cuts

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan J. Auerbach
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
The Law ◽  
Jobs Act ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Tax Cuts

On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the most sweeping revision of US tax law since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The law introduced many significant changes. However, perhaps none was as important as the changes in the treatment of traditional “C” corporations—those corporations subject to a separate corporate income tax. Beginning in 2018, the federal corporate tax rate fell from 35 percent to 21 percent, some investment qualified for immediate deduction as an expense, and multinational corporations faced a substantially modified treatment of their activities. This paper seeks to evaluate the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to understand its effects on resource allocation and distribution. It compares US corporate tax rates to other countries before the 2017 tax law, and describes ways in which the US corporate sector has evolved that are especially relevant to tax policy. The discussion then turns the main changes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for the corporate income tax. A range of estimates suggests that the law is likely to contribute to increased US capital investment and, through that, an increase in US wages. The magnitude of these increases is extremely difficult to predict. Indeed, the public debate about the benefits of the new corporate tax provisions enacted (and the alternatives not adopted) has highlighted the limitations of standard approaches in distributional analysis to assigning corporate tax burdens.

scholarly journals EMPIRICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE INCOME TAX, GOVERNMENT REVENUE, AND EMPLOYMENT IN OECD COUNTRIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3(43)) ◽  
pp. 18-33
Author(s):  
Vassilios Zoumpoulidis
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Government Revenue ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
The Impact

This paper applies the technique of correlation analysis to find out the impact of corporate tax on government revenue and employment in OECD countries. The findings of the study suggest that there is no relationship between corporate income tax, government revenue, and employment during 2000 and 2019.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PPH BADAN FINAL BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 46 TAHUN 2013 PADA CV. YELLOW DUCK BANJARBARU

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Come

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the final corporate income tax based on Government Regulation no. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru. This research uses descriptive data analysis method. Research conducted by the authors to give the conclusion, that: the implementation of Final Income Tax by Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru, concludes that: New tariff calculation based on PP. 46 of 2013 there is no need for fiscal correction, because the calculation is not from net income, but from gross income. So hopefully in the future, from the results of research provide input on the CV. Yellow Duck, to apply and make payments in the years to come. Implementation of the final corporate income tax based on Government Regulation no. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru with annual gross turnover of less than Rp. 4.800.000.000, - that is Rp. 2.283.408.000, - in the period of 2016 with the rate of Corporate Tax 1% then obtained the total value of corporate income amounting to Rp. 22.834.080, -. While the tax amnesty is the government policy given to taxpayers about forgiveness / forgiveness of taxes, and in exchange for the pardon the taxpayer is required to pay the ransom, obtained the value of corporate tax on the basis of tax amnesty rate of 0.5% with less gross revenue Rp. 4.800.000.000, - on the CV. Yellow Duck period 2016 is Rp. 11.417.040, -.Keywords: PP 46 Year 2013, Corporate Income, CV. Yellow DuckAbstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis penerapan PPh badan final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data metode deskriftif. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis memberikan kesimpulan, bahwa: penerapan PPh Badan Final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru, memberikan kesimpulan bahwa: Perhitungan tarif baru berdasarkan PP No. 46 tahun 2013 tidak perlu dilakukan koreksi fiskal, karena perhitungannya bukan dari laba bersih, melainkan dari peredaran bruto. Sehingga diharapkan kedepannya, dari hasil penelitian memberikan masukan pada pihak CV. Yellow Duck, untuk diterapkan dan dilakukan pembayaran pada tahun-tahun kedepannya. Penerapan PPh badan final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru dengan nilai peredaran bruto per tahun perusahaan kurang dari Rp. 4.800.000.000,- yaitu sebesar Rp. 2.283.408.000,- pada periode tahun 2016 dengan tarif PPh Badan 1% maka diperoleh nilai total PPh Badan sebesar Rp. 22.834.080,-. Sementara dengan adanya tax amnesty yaitu kebijakan pemerintah yang diberikan kepada pembayar pajak tentang forgiveness/ pengampunan pajak, dan sebagai ganti atas pengampunan tersebut pembayar pajak diharuskan untuk membayar uang tebusan, diperoleh nilai PPh Badan berdasarkan tarif tax amnesty 0,5% dengan peredaran bruto kurang dari Rp. 4.800.000.000,- pada CV. Yellow Duck periode 2016 adalah sebesar Rp. 11.417.040,-.Kata kunci : Peraturan Pemerintah 46 Tahun 2013, Penerpan PPh Badan, CV. Yellow Duck

scholarly journals Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Pajak Penghasilan Badan Yang Terutang Terhadap Kinerja Bagian PPh Badan Dengan Koreksi Fiskal Sebagai Penentu Kebijakan

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayu Adi ◽  
Moh Afrizal Miradji
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Preparation Process ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Corporate Entity ◽  
Future Policy ◽  
The Many

According to Hidayat (2013) in terms of financial statements, there are many contradictions within the company and the many interests that exist within the company in preparing financial statements to prepare their taxes to be compiled as Corporate Tax Income Tax reports (Article 25 Income Tax) many conflicts in preparing corporate tax reports, starting from income tax article 21 to income tax article 25 of the profit / loss statement, so that the tax return can be reported as a corporate taxpayer, then in this case before reporting and avoiding tax errors, a fiscal correction is needed to carry out tax preparation. According to Agustina (2007) states that in the preparation of taxes it is necessary to have coordination from various parties who use interests in the use of company finances due to future policy determinants.From this research it is found that in the process of preparing corporate tax many companies do not correct fiscal financial reports, many accounts are not included in the tax calculation, so that if used can reduce the tax burden.In addition, companies can be used to gain investor trust and fairness entities.From expenditures and reports can show the fiscal can show the performance of Corporate Income Tax goes well.The second proof that in the tax preparation process using fiscal correction shows the fairness of a tax obligation.In this case the fiscal financial statements and if corrected fiscal will cause good corporate income tax performance.This shows that there are no tax arrears in a corporate entity because the company complies with company regulations.

Incentive to Finance under the Shoup Corporate Income Tax Concept—Focus on Shoup Semi-Imputation Credit Method

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-362
Author(s):  
Konosuke Kimura
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Tax Reform ◽  
Second World War ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Columbia University ◽  
World War ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Tax System ◽  
Second World

Reform of the Japanese tax system was undertaken after the second World War and was greatly influenced by Carl Shoup, then Professor at Columbia University. Shoup’s recommendations were made during a unique historical period which allowed for an experimental designing of tax reform in Japan to occur under occupation. In this article we review and criticize Shoup’s recommendations and explain the problems inherent in their implementation. Cultural transference problems such as attempted imputation of corporate tax to individual income tax based on the theory of net asset increases tax are discussed. Comparisons are also made with French and German imputation credit methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document