Comparison of Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis — a Cost–Utility Analysis

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Sennfält ◽  
Martin Magnusson ◽  
Per Carlsson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Failure ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Age Group ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Objective Our aim was to compare both health-related quality of life and costs for hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a defined population. Design Decision-tree modeling to estimate total costs and effects for two treatment strategies, HD and PD, among patients with chronic kidney failure, for 5 years following the start of treatment. Courses of events and health-care consumption were mapped in a retrospective matched-record study. Data on health status were obtained from a matched population by a quality-of-life questionnaire (EuroQol). The study has a societal perspective. Setting All dialysis departments in the southeastern health-care region of Sweden. Patients 136 patients with kidney failure, comprising 68 matched pairs, were included in a retrospective record study; 81 patients with kidney failure, comprising 27 matched triplets, were included in a prospective questionnaire study. Main Outcome Measures Cost per life year and cost per quality-adjusted life year. Results The cost per quality-adjusted life year for PD was lower in all analyzed age groups. There was a 12% difference in the age group 21 – 40 years, a 31% difference in the age group 41 – 60 years, and an 11% difference in the age group 61+ years. Peritoneal dialysis and HD resulted in similar frequencies of transplantation (50% and 41%, respectively) and expected survival (3.58 years and 3.56 years, respectively) during the first 5 years after the initiation of treatment. Conclusion The cost–utility ratio is most favorable for PD as the primary method of treatment for patients eligible for both PD and HD.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea in British Columbia

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
MCY Tan ◽  
NT Ayas ◽  
A Mulgrew ◽  
L Cortes ◽  
JM FitzGerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Cpap Therapy ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) is a common disorder characterized by recurrent collapse of the upper airway during sleep. Patients experience a reduced quality of life and an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which is the first-line therapy for OSAH, improves sleepiness, vigilance and quality of life.OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CPAP therapy versus no treatment for OSAH patients who are drivers.METHODS: A Markov decision analytical model with a five-year time horizon was used. The study population consisted of male and female patients, between 30 and 59 years of age, who were newly diagnosed with moderate to severe OSAH. The model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CPAP therapy in reducing rates of MVCs and improving quality of life. Utility values were obtained from previously published studies. Rates of MVCs under the CPAP and no CPAP scenarios were calculated from Insurance Corporation of British Columbia data and a systematic review of published studies. MVCs, equipment and physician costs were obtained from the British Columbia Medical Association, published cost-of-illness studies and the price lists of established vendors of CPAP equipment in British Columbia. Findings were examined from the perspectives of a third-party payer and society.RESULTS: From the third-party payer perspective, CPAP therapy was more effective but more costly than no CPAP (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] of $3,626 per quality-adjusted life year). From the societal perspective, the ICER was similar ($2,979 per quality-adjusted life year). The ICER was most dependent on preference elicitation method used to obtain utility values, varying almost sixfold under alternative assumptions from the base-case analysis.CONCLUSION: After considering costs and impact on quality of life, as well as the risk of MVCs in individuals with OSAH, CPAP therapy for OSAH patients is a highly efficient use of health care resources. Provincial governments who do not provide funding for CPAP therapy should reconsider.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision: A Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy van den Brink ◽  
Wilbert B. van den Hout ◽  
Anne M. Stiggelbout ◽  
Elma Klein Kranenbarg ◽  
Corrie A.M. Marijnen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Preoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Purpose To compare the societal costs and the (quality-adjusted) life expectancy of patients with rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without short-term preoperative radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy). Patients and Methods We used a Markov model to project the clinical and economic outcomes of preoperative radiotherapy. Data on local recurrence rates, quality of life, and costs were obtained from the patients of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. In this trial, 1,861 patients with resectable rectal cancer from 108 hospitals were randomly assigned for TME surgery with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Outcome measures of the model were life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, lifetime costs per patient, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results The base case model estimates that the loss of quality of life due to preoperative radiotherapy is outweighed by the gain in life expectancy. Life expectancy increases by 0.67 years; quality-adjusted life expectancy, by 0.39 years; and costs, by $9,800 per patient. The corresponding cost-effectiveness ratio is $25,100 per quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the cost-effectiveness ratio remains acceptable under a wide range of assumptions. Conclusion Assuming that the reduced local recurrence rate does lead to a survival advantage, the cost-utility analysis estimates that the improved survival outweighs the impaired quality of life and the increased costs. We conclude that short-term preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing TME is both effective and cost-effective.

Quality of Life and Resource Allocation

1988 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 33-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lockwood
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Medical Resources ◽  
Medical Vocabulary ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

A new word has recently entered the British medical vocabulary. What it stands for is neither a disease nor a cure. At least, it is not a cure for a disease in the medical sense. But it could, perhaps, be thought of as an intended cure for a medicosociological disease: namely that of haphazard or otherwise ethically inappropriate allocation of scarce medical resources. What I have in mind is the term ‘QALY’, which is an acronym standing for quality adjusted life year. Just what this means and what it is intended to do I shall explain in due course. Let me first, however, set the scene.

Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life Years

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Torrance ◽  
David Feeny
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Health Improvement ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Quality Adjustment ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life ◽  
Broad Overview

Utilities and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are reviewed, with particular focus on their use in technology assessment. This article provides a broad overview and perspective on these two techniques and their interrelationship, with reference to other sources for details of implementation. The historical development, assumptions, strengths/weaknesses, and applications of each are summarized.Utilities are specifically designed for individual decision-making under uncertainty, but, with additional assumptions, utilities can be aggregated across individuals to provide a group utility function. QALYs are designed to aggregate in a single summary measure the total health improvement for a group of individuals, capturing improvements from impacts on both quantity of life and quality of life– with quality of life broadly defined. Utilities can be used as the quality-adjustment weights for QALYs; they are particularly appropriate for that purpose, and this combination provides a powerful and highly useful variation on cost-effectiveness analysis known as cost-utility analysis.

PP048 Quality Of Health Care Through Integration: Experience Of Cochlear Implantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 93-94
Author(s):  
Lyazzat Kosherbayeva ◽  
Aigul Medeulova ◽  
Abdulla Alzhanov
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Economic Research ◽  
Rehabilitation Programs ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Cost

INTRODUCTION:The State Program for Health Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan (RK) “Densaulyk” for 2016–2019 initiated the modernization of primary health care with the introduction of family practice in order to ensure the availability, completeness and quality of health services on the basis of an integrated healthcare system focused on the needs of the population. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the cochlear implantation (CI) programs.METHODS:A literature search was conducted for all clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and reviews in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Center for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Two reviewers independently evaluated all publications for selection. The analysis included the cost-effectiveness and benefit from the CI program.RESULTS:We analyzed the effectiveness of the services for CI in the RK and other countries (1). In our analysis, we identified that there is no research on Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) in RK. We found that, in general, the cost of CI and pre-surgical procedures are comparable with other countries. The length of stay in Kazakhstan was much higher (an average of 8 days) compared with other countries (3 days). Also in RK, there were significantly lower prices per hospital day and cost of various consultations. Postoperative costs of other countries consisted of one-third to two-thirds of the total costs for preoperative and implantation stages (2, 3). There was a little information on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in RK.CONCLUSIONS:Economic research like QALYs and CUA are new directions in the healthcare system in the RK. Lack of integration between primary care, rehabilitation and other services leads to difficulties in assessing the effectiveness of CI programs (for example, in our case, there was the restriction of assessment in only postoperative costs).

Health-Related Quality of Life and Cost–Utility Analysis of Employees With Musculoskeletal Disorders Receiving Vocational Physiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 476-479
Author(s):  
Laran Chetty
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Cost

Background: The purpose of this project was to evaluate both health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost-utility associated with care for employees with musculoskeletal disorders who received vocational physiotherapy at a North London National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom. Methods: A pre- and post-physiotherapy EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire was administered to employees presenting to the vocational physiotherapy service (VPS) with musculoskeletal disorders. The cost-utility analysis of the physiotherapy service was calculated using cost data provided by VPS billing information and benefits measured using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Findings: Overall, there was a significant improvement in the EQ-5D index from baseline to discharge in all HRQoL domains. The visual analog scale (VAS) improved from a mean of 31.5 (SD = 18.3) at baseline to 73.2 (SD = 18.5) at discharge. A cost-utility analysis indicated that the VPS would continue to be cost-effective until the cost per employee increased by 82.5%. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The project supports integration of vocational physiotherapy services into an occupational health department.

scholarly journals Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 196 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. H. Gerhards ◽  
L. E. de Graaf ◽  
L. E. Jacobs ◽  
J. L. Severens ◽  
M. J. H. Huibers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
The Cost

BackgroundEvidence about the cost-effectiveness and cost utility of computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (CCBT) is still limited. Recently, we compared the clinical effectiveness of unsupported, online CCBT with treatment as usual (TAU) and a combination of CCBT and TAU (CCBT plus TAU) for depression. The study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (ISRCTN47481236).AimsTo assess the cost-effectiveness of CCBT compared with TAU and CCBT plus TAU.MethodCosts, depression severity and quality of life were measured for 12 months. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were performed from a societal perspective. Uncertainty was dealt with by bootstrap replications and sensitivity analyses.ResultsCosts were lowest for the CCBT group. There are no significant group differences in effectiveness or quality of life. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses tend to be in favour of CCBT.ConclusionsOn balance, CCBT constitutes the most efficient treatment strategy, although all treatments showed low adherence rates and modest improvements in depression and quality of life.

Cost-effectiveness analysis: role and implications

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Marsden ◽  
D Wonderling
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Health Gain ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
The Cost

Background: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is often misperceived to be a cost-cutting exercise. The intention of CEA is not to identify and implement cheap technologies, but rather those which offer maximum health gain, subject to available funds. Such analysis is crucial for decision making in health care, as tight budget constraints mean spending in one area of healthcare displaces spending elsewhere. Therefore in order to achieve the greatest health gain for the overall population, treatments must be selected which provide the greatest health gain within the available funds. Summary: The relevance of CEA in health care systems is explained, using varicose vein treatment in the UK NHS as an example. Treatment for varicose veins is often not commissioned to at a local level, most likely because it is misperceived to be a cosmetic problem. However, this view does not take into account the impact of quality of life. CEA balances costs against a quantitative measure of health related quality of life, and could therefore be used to determine whether it is cost-effective to provide varicose vein treatment. The current literature on the cost-effectiveness of varicose vein treatment is reviewed, and an overview of cost-effectiveness principles is provided. Concepts such as economic modelling, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), net monetary benefit (NMB) and sensitivity analysis are explained, using examples relevant to varicose veins where appropriate. Conclusion: This article explains how, far from cutting costs and sacrificing patient health, CEA provides a useful tool to maximise the health of the population in the face of ever tightening budget constraints. CEA could be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of the various treatment options for varicose veins, and efficiencies realised.

Issues in pharmacoeconomic studies with psychotropics: Some practical considerations

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (S3) ◽  
pp. 275s-278s ◽  
Author(s):  
G Simeon
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Psychotropic Medications ◽  
Alternative Strategies ◽  
Optimal Decisions ◽  
Additional Work

Summary The assessment of quality of life (QoL) and economic outcomes of psychotropic medications are closely related. Both costs and QoL are important in establishing the value of new and existing drugs in order to assist patients, physicians, payors of health care, and society to make optimal decisions. These parameters may be combined, as in cost-utility analyses, or analysed separately. Although not a true reflection of normal practice, clinical trials are most often the setting for measurement of these parameters. The viability of such analyses, which often necessitate the inclusion of active comparators and additional work measuring costs and QoL, within the context of controlled studies must be established early on in the development process. If ‘registration oriented’ trials are inappropriate, alternative strategies must be pursued.

scholarly journals Cost-Utility Analysis of Percutaneous and Surgery Methods in Extraction of Cardiac Leads Infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
zinab shaker ◽  
Mohsen Barooni ◽  
Asma Saber Mahani ◽  
Zohreh Shaker
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Life Score ◽  
Pacemaker Leads ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Surgical Cost

Abstract Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are currently major concern in the world and It is expected that Until 2030, 7 out of 10 deaths in world will be related to cardiovascular diseases. Despite the increase in Pasemaker and ICD implants in recent years, the complications of this devices are increasing. One of the most important complications is the pulsating lead infection. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous and surgical method in extracting pacemaker leads with Qaly index.Methods: In this cross-sectional article (descriptive-analytical) using the Markov model, for compare the two methods of percutaneous and surgery for infectious lead. Sampling was census and ( sample size for percutaneous included 57 people) and information about utility was extracted by the SAQ questionnaire. A systematic review was performed to calculate utility of the surgical Cost from the perspective of the service provider. data analysis by SPSS software, and TreeAge software was used for Markov modeland and sensitivity analysis .Results: Changes in quality of life score in both intervention were incremental and significant and intervention is the only effective factor in changes in quality of life score (P <0.05). The ICER was 5470.44$.Conclusion: The results of the study show that utility and cost of surgery are higher than the percutaneous method.Sensitivity analysis shows If the cost of surgery increases more than 806.52$ (discount rate of 0.06), the percutaneous method dominates the surgery method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document