scholarly journals Health Services: A Mixed Methods Assessment of Canadian Cancer Patient Education Materials Related to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482198970
Author(s):  
Courtney van Ballegooie ◽  
Peter Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Eastern Health ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Education Material ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Grade Reading Level ◽  
Complex Words

The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted the reorganization in the scheduling and method of care for many patients, including patients diagnosed with cancer. Cancer patients, who have an immunocompromised status, may be at a higher risk of severe symptoms from infection with COVID-19. While information is rapidly evolving regarding COVID-19, Canada, both nationally and provincially, has been conveying new information to patients online. We assessed the content and readability of COVID-19-related online Canadian patient education material (PEM) for cancer patients to determine if the content of the material was written at a grade reading level that the majority of Canadians can understand. PEMs were extracted from provincial cancer agencies and the national Canadian Cancer Society, evaluated using 10 readability scales, qualitatively analyzed to identify their themes and difficult word content. Thirty-eight PEMs from both national and provincial cancers associations were, on average, written above the recommended 7th grade level. Each of the associations’ average grade levels were: BC Cancer (11.00 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.27-13.38), CancerControl Alberta (10.46 95% CI 8.29-12.62), Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (11.08 95% CI 9.37-12.80), Cancer Care Manitoba (9.55 95% CI 6.02-13.01), Cancer Care Ontario (9.35 95% CI 6.80-11.90), Cancer Care Nova Scotia (10.95 95% CI 9.86-12.04), Cancer Care Eastern Health Newfoundland and Labrador (10.14 95% CI 6.87-13.41), and the Canadian Cancer Society (10.06 95% CI 8.07-12.05). Thematic analysis identified 4 themes: public health strategy, information about COVID-19, patient instructions during COVID-19, and resources. Fifty-three percent of the complex words identified were medical jargon. This represents an opportunity to improve PEM readability, to allow for greater comprehension amongst a wider target audience.

Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials on Major Otolaryngology Association Websites

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 848-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Anderson Eloy ◽  
Shawn Li ◽  
Khushabu Kasabwala ◽  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
David R. Hansberry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Flesch Reading Ease ◽  
Education Material ◽  
Individual Assessment ◽  
Honestly Significant Difference ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade Reading Level ◽  
Post Hoc

Objective Various otolaryngology associations provide Internet-based patient education material (IPEM) to the general public. However, this information may be written above the fourth- to sixth-grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of otolaryngology-related IPEMs on various otolaryngology association websites and to determine whether they are above the recommended reading level for patient education materials. Study Design and Setting Analysis of patient education materials from 9 major otolaryngology association websites. Methods The readability of 262 otolaryngology-related IPEMs was assessed with 8 numerical and 2 graphical readability tools. Averages were evaluated against national recommendations and between each source using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) analysis. Mean readability scores for each otolaryngology association website were compared. Results Mean website readability scores using Flesch Reading Ease test, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Coleman-Liau Index, SMOG grading, Gunning Fog Index, New Dale-Chall Readability Formula, FORCAST Formula, New Fog Count Test, Raygor Readability Estimate, and the Fry Readability Graph ranged from 20.0 to 57.8, 9.7 to 17.1, 10.7 to 15.9, 11.6 to 18.2, 10.9 to 15.0, 8.6 to 16.0, 10.4 to 12.1, 8.5 to 11.8, 10.5 to 17.0, and 10.0 to 17.0, respectively. ANOVA results indicate a significant difference ( P < .05) between the websites for each individual assessment. Conclusion The IPEMs found on all otolaryngology association websites exceed the recommended fourth- to sixth-grade reading level.

Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Canadian Pediatric Associations (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Man ◽  
Courtney van Ballegooie
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Health Behaviours ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Pediatric Society ◽  
Word Analysis ◽  
Education Material ◽  
Preventative Health ◽  
Grade Reading Level ◽  
Online Patient Education

BACKGROUND Online patient education materials (PEMs) are frequently written above the recommended reading level in North America. Poor PEM readability limits the accessibility of medical information to individuals with average to lower literacy levels. Pediatric hospital and association websites have not only been shown to be a preferred source of information among caregivers but have also become a necessity in the COVID-19 pandemic. The readability of Canadian pediatric association websites has not yet been assessed quantitatively. OBJECTIVE To assess the readability of online Canadian pediatric association PEMs to determine if the content of the material is written at a reading level that the majority of Canadians can understand. METHODS PEMs were extracted from ten Canadian pediatric associations and evaluated for their reading level using ten validated readability scales. Associations underwent a difficult word analysis and cross association comparisons were assessed. RESULTS Online PEMs were identified from three pediatric association websites, where the grade reading level was found to be 8.8 +/- 1.8 for the Caring for Kids website, 9.5 +/- 2.2 for the Pediatric Endocrine Group website and 13.1 +/- 2.1 for the Atlantic Pediatric Society website. The difficulty word analysis identified that 19.9% of words were unfamiliar overall. CONCLUSIONS The online PEMs were found to be written above the recommended seventh grade reading level for Canadians. Consideration should be made to create PEMs at an appropriate grade reading level for both patients and their caregivers to encourage health literacy and ultimately promote preventative health behaviours and child health outcomes.

scholarly journals Bladder Cancer Health Literacy: Assessing Readability of Online Patient Education Materials

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Lauren E. Powell ◽  
Theodore I. Cisu ◽  
Adam P. Klausner
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Search Engine ◽  
Reading Ability ◽  
Health Care Expenditure ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
T Test ◽  
Grade Levels ◽  
Grade Reading Level

BACKGROUND: Understanding of health-related materials, termed health literacy, affects decision makings and outcomes in the treatment of bladder cancer. The National Institutes of Health recommend writing education materials at a sixth-seventh grade reading level [6]. The goal of this study is to assess readability of bladder cancer materials available online. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to characterize available information about bladder cancer online and evaluate readability. METHODS: Materials on bladder cancer were collected from the American Urological Association’s Urology Care Foundation (AUA-UCF) and compared to top 50 websites by search engine results. Resources were analyzed using four different validated readability assessment scales. The mean and standard deviation of the materials was calculated, and a two-tailed t test for used to assess for significance between the two sets of patient education materials. RESULTS: The average readability of AUA materials was 8.5 (8th–9th grade reading level). For the top 50 websites, average readability was 11.7 (11–12th grade reading level). A two-tailed t test between the AUA and top 50 websites demonstrated statistical significance between the readability of the two sets of resources (P = 0.0001), with the top search engine results being several grade levels higher than the recommended 6–7th grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS: Most health information provided by the AUA on bladder cancer is written at a reading ability that aligns with most US adults, with top websites for search engine results exceeding the average reading level by several grade levels. By focusing on health literacy, urologists may contribute lowering barriers to health literacy, improving health care expenditure and perioperative complications.

Evaluation of an Educational Whiteboard Video to Introduce Fertility Preservation to Female Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e488-e497
Author(s):  
Talia Greenspoon ◽  
Rebecca Charow ◽  
Janet Papadakos ◽  
Mahsa Samadi ◽  
Anne Marie Maloney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Education Material ◽  
Before And After

PURPOSE: Fertility is an important issue for adolescents and young adults with cancer facing potential infertility. Egg cryopreservation options exist, but information is sometimes overwhelming. We evaluated a fertility preservation educational video and assessed patient and family knowledge and impressions at pre- and post-video timepoints. METHODS: We developed a whiteboard video to explain egg cryopreservation to patients and families. The video was evaluated on the basis of patient education best practices (readability, understandability, actionability). Participants were recruited using convenience sampling in oncology clinics. They completed questionnaires before and after watching to assess knowledge and interest. Inclusion criteria were patients age 13-39 years and minimum 1 month from diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and mean comparisons were conducted. RESULTS: The video script read at a grade 8 reading level. Average understandability and actionability scores were below the acceptable standard. We recruited 108 patients (mean age, 27 years) and 39 caregivers/partners. Patients’ knowledge about fertility preservation increased after viewing the video. Interest was high before and after, and satisfaction was high for both patients and caregivers. Participants appreciated information on process, procedure, and delivery but desired more information on logistics, including cost. CONCLUSION: A targeted patient education video about fertility preservation options can build knowledge and encourage discussions about infertility. The video can be used as a model for videos on related topics to provide accurate information in a youth-friendly medium; however, following patient education best practices for readability, understandability, and actionability may increase video effectiveness. Future research should assess how audiovisual patient education material affects patient behavior.

Education program for cancer patients and families.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Marina Messinger ◽  
Udit Yadav ◽  
Romy Jose Thekkekara ◽  
Susan H. McDunn
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Cancer Chemotherapy ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Counseling Services ◽  
Patient Education Program ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Level Of Understanding

57 Background: Studies of patient education and communication have been shown to affect patient health outcomes, including emotional and physical health. Effective patient education is challenged by limitations in patient literacy. As much as 20% of the American population was found to have a low literacy level at or below a 5th grade reading level. Our program was based in a public hospital treating underserved patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds who often have low baseline health literacy and varying educational backgrounds. Methods: A cancer patient education program was organized for recently diagnosed cancer patients and their families. A lecture and interactive learning session was implemented to teach the basics of what cancer is, what chemotherapy is, social services available to patients, and counseling services available. A pre- and post-survey was administered to assess patients’ confidence in their understanding of cancer, chemotherapy, navigation of social and counseling services. Patients self rated their level of understanding as “poor”, “a little”, “average”, “good”, or “very good”. Results: Comparison of pre- and post-survey results showed self-assessed improvement of understanding of cancer, chemotherapy, social services, and counseling services by more than one level of understanding (1.29, 1.37, 1.18, 1.14 level of understanding improvement respectively). Conclusions: A patient education program for cancer patients teaching the basics of cancer and chemotherapy as well as giving patients and families resources for social services and counseling services is a very necessary resource. Better patient understanding of health issues may improve compliance with treatments, help alleviate anxiety, and enable patients and their families to participate actively in their care. This need is especially felt in a hospital treating an underserved population. Survey results show an improvement in patient self-assessed understanding of cancer, chemotherapy, and social services.

scholarly journals Assessing the Understanding of Pediatric-Oriented Medication Education Materials Versus Standard Available Education Materials

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 362-366
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Biggs ◽  
Nicole E. Glasgow ◽  
Francoise Pradel ◽  
Jill A. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Education Material ◽  
School Study ◽  
The Us ◽  
Dosing Frequency ◽  
Grade Reading Level ◽  
Study Participants

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to determine if education material targeting children would improve understanding of medication indication, administration, and common side effects in pediatric subjects. METHODS This cross-sectional pilot study included students 7 to 11 years old from a suburban elementary school. Study participants were read either the US Food and Drug Administration–approved adult medication leaflet or a pediatric medication leaflet created at a first-grade reading level for levetiracetam (Keppra, UCB, Inc, Atlanta, GA). Students were asked a set of standardized survey questions to evaluate comprehension of side effects, medication indication, dosing frequency, administration, and overall impression of the leaflet. RESULTS Fifty-eight children were included. Fifty percent of the children were male, 79% were Caucasian, and the average age was 9 years. There was no statistical difference for demographics in the adult leaflet versus the pediatric leaflet group. Children correctly stated the indication for the medication in 30% of participants (9/30) in the adult leaflet group and 79% of participants (22/28) in the pediatric leaflet group, p = 0.002. The administration frequency question was answered correctly in 93% of the pediatric leaflet group (26/28) as compared to 73% in the adult leaflet group (22/30), p = 0.05. For questions about side effects and how to administer the medication, there was no difference between the groups. The responses regarding readability and understanding of the leaflets were significantly different in the pediatric leaflet group compared to the adult leaflet group, p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Leaflets designed for pediatric patients resulted in an improvement in the understanding of the indication for levetiracetam.

scholarly journals Achilles Tendon Repair: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0022
Author(s):  
Burke Gao ◽  
Alan G. Shamrock ◽  
Trevor Gulbrandsen ◽  
John E. Femino ◽  
Cesar de Cesar Netto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Grade Level ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair ◽  
Grade Reading Level ◽  
Google Search ◽  
Online Patient Education

Category: Sports; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Patients often access online resources to learn about orthopedic procedures prior to undergoing elective surgery. In order to be fully understood by the average English-speaking adult, online health information must be written at an elementary school reading level. To be helpful to patients, educational resources should also be generally understandable and have actionable direction that positively affects healthcare interactions. There are several previously validated indices for accessing the reading level of written materials. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) provides a reliable and validated method to measure the understandability and actionability of education materials. The purpose of this study was to utilize PEMAT and readability algorithms to quantify readability, understandability and actionability of online patient education materials related to Achilles tendon repair. Methods: Online patient education materials were identified using two independently conducted Google engine searches with the term ‘Achilles tendon repair’. Using the top 50 search results, articles were included if they specifically served to educate patients regarding TAA. Exclusion criteria included news articles, non-text materials (video), research manuscripts, industry websites, and articles not related to Achilles tendon repair. The readability of included articles was quantified using the validated Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level index. The PEMAT form for printed materials was used to assess understandability and actionability using a 0-100 scale for both measures of interest. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was utilized to examine the relationship between a website’s average rank on Google (from first to last) and its readability, understandability, and actionability. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Thirty-one websites met inclusion criteria. The mean Flesch Kincaid reading grade level was 10.8+-2.9, with only one website written below the 6th grade reading level. Higher Flesch-Kincaid grade was associated with later Google seach rank (rho: 0.488, p=0.010). Mean understandability and actionability scores were 67.1+-16.4% and 38.3+-28.4%, respectively. Among understandability criteria, only 12.9% (n=4) of articles included summaries and just 38.7% (n=12) included visual aids. Among actionability categories, 74% (n=23) of websites identified at least one action for readers, while only 60.8% (n=14) of these studies broke down actions into explicit, easy to understand steps. Actionability scores were not correlated with Google search rank (rho: -0.02, p=0.888), while higher understandability scores were associated with later Google search rank (rho: 0.45, p=0.017). Conclusion: Only one website describing Achilles tendon repair was written at or below the nationally recommended 6th grade reading level. Overall, Achilles tendon repair online educational materials scored poorly with respect to readability, understandability, and actionability. Articles that appeared earlier in the Google search had lower readability and understandability scores. In the era of shared decision making, it is vital that patients understand procedures, as well as the risks and benefits prior to undergoing elective surgery. These results suggest that current publicly available resources for Achilles tendon repair remain inadequate for patient education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document