Prognostic factors in progressive high-grade glial tumors treated with systemic approach: A single center experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092068
Author(s):  
Ozkan Alan ◽  
Tugba Akin Telli ◽  
Tugba Basoglu Tuylu ◽  
Rukiye Arikan ◽  
Nazım Can Demircan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Ps

Purpose Malignant high-grade gliomas are the most common and aggressive type of primary brain tumor, and the prognosis is generally extremely poor. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcome of systemic treatment in recurrent high-grade glioma patients and the impact of prognostic factors on survivals. Methods Data from 114 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who received systemic treatment and followed in our clinic between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, age, gender, histology, type of surgical resection, side effects after systemic treatment (deep vein thrombosis, hypertension, proteinuria), IDH1 and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) mutation status were investigated as prognostic factors for progression-free survival and overall survival. Results At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 48 (17–77) and 68% of the patients were male. Most common pathologic subtype was glioblastoma multiforme (68%). Median follow-up duration was 9.1 months (1–68 months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.2 months and 8 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, deep venous thrombosis and the presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (p < 0.05) and, ECOG PS, the presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation for overall survival (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study is real life data and the median progression-free survival and overall survival rates are similar to the literature. We have found ECOG PS, presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation to be independent prognostic factors for both progression-free survival and overall survival.

High-grade glioma of central nervous system: Single center treatment experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14040-e14040
Author(s):  
Nur Olgun ◽  
Deniz Kızmazoğlu ◽  
Batuhan Özdoğar ◽  
Emre Çeçen ◽  
Ceren Kızmazoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
One Year ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

e14040 Background: To evaluate characteristics and treatment responses of patients with high grade gliomas (HGG) in our center Methods: Medical files of patients with malignant CNS tumors between 1987-2020 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 44 patients with HGG. Results: Diagnosis of patients as follows: 21 pons glioma, 2 anaplastic astrocytoma, 11 anaplastic ependimoma, 7 glioblastoma multiforme, 1 glioblastoma, 2 gliomatosis cerebri. The median age at diagnosis was 6,5 yrs (7 – 17 yrs), M/F:25/19. Age distrubution: <5 yrs 12 patients, 5-10 yrs 18 patients, 10-18 yrs 14 patients. The most frequent complaints for pons gliomas: cranial nerve paralysis (52%), visial impairment (48%), headache (38%), power loss (43%) and speech disorder (30%). Surgery was performed to extrinsic component of mass in 3 patients of pons gliomas. For other HGG: 7 subtotal resection and 16 gross total resection had performed. Seven patients died before RT. And other 37 patients received radiotherapy. RT total doses varied between 50-60 Gy. Seven patients were not received chemotherapy, 3 of them died before chemo, and others received only RT. Chemotherapy protocoles were changed over the years: For pons gliomas, MOPP (Mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine) in 3 patients, NOPP (nitrosourea, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine) in 2 patients, only ICE (Ifosfamide, carboplatin, cisplatin) in five patients, oral cyclophosphamide in one patient, temozolamide in one patient and temo + bevacizumab in one patient. Last 3 patients received nimotuzumab-vinorelbine after ICE and temo. For other HGGs, platin based regimens used fort he first line treatment. Temozolamide-bevacizumab, irinotecan-temsirolimus combinations were the other options as second and also third line treatments. Median progression free survival time was 6 mos (2 weeks -25 mos) for pons gliomas, for other gliomas median progression free survival time was 14 mos (0 -74 mos). For pons gliomas: Event free survival rate for 6 mos was 75%, for one year was 17%, One year, 18 mos, and two years overall survival rates were 84%, 52% and 10% respectively. For other HGGs: Event free survival rate for one year and two years were 57% and 17% respectively. One year and two years overall survival rates were 73% and 36% respectively. Conclusions: High grade glioma is a group of tumor in which still the helplessness experienced in treatment. Despite radiotherapy and chemotherapy, prognosis is very poor. The progression free and overall survival rates of patients were similar to literature. With new developments in molecular pathology, as the use of molecular target therapies, the progression free survival rates newly will improve.

scholarly journals Anlotinib Alone or in Combination With Temozolomide in the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qunying Yang ◽  
Chengcheng Guo ◽  
Xiaoping Lin ◽  
Lili Luo ◽  
Zhenqiang He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Karnofsky Score ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Anlotinib is a multi-target anti-angiogenic agent. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma.Materials and Methods: The clinical data of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide in our cancer center were collected and analyzed. Treatment response was evaluated according to the response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria. Progression-free survival, progression-free survival at 6 months, overall survival, and overall survival at 12 months were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test.Results: Between August 2019 and December 2020, 31 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (21 of grade 4 and 10 of grade 3) were enrolled in this study. Seventeen patients received anlotinib alone and 14 received anlotinib plus temozolomide. All patients were heavily treated, the median lines of previous treatments were 2, and the median Karnofsky score was 60. At the data cutoff date, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 months and the progression-free survival at 6 months was 43.5%. The median overall survival was 7.7 months, and the overall survival at 12 months was 26.7%. The progression-free survival at 6 months and the overall survival at 12 months for 21 patients with grade 4 glioma was 40.2 and 27.9%, respectively. The tumor objective response rate was 41.9% in all patients and 33.3% in patients with grade 4 glioma. No grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were recorded during the treatment.Conclusion: Anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide showed encouraging efficacy and favorable tolerability in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who had been heavily treated.

scholarly journals Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors at baseline: an exploratory analysis

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e000752
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Guillem Argiles ◽  
Alberto F Sobrero ◽  
Christophe Borg ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Tumour Burden ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Indolent Disease ◽  
Ecog Ps

BackgroundThe choice of treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is generally influenced by tumour and patient characteristics, treatment efficacy and tolerability, and quality of life. Better patient selection might lead to improved outcomes.MethodsThis post hoc exploratory analysis examined the effect of prognostic factors on outcomes in the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of trifluridine tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) versus Placebo plus BSC in Patients with mCRC Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies (RECOURSE) trial. Patients were redivided by prognosis into two subgroups: those with <3 metastatic sites at randomisation (low tumour burden) and ≥18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomisation (indolent disease) were included in the good prognostic characteristics (GPC) subgroup; the remaining patients were considered to have poor prognostic characteristics (PPC).ResultsGPC patients (n=386) had improved outcome versus PPC patients (n=414) in both the trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms. GPC patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (n=261) had an improved median overall survival (9.3 vs 5.3 months; HR (95% CI) 0.46 (0.37 to 0.57), p<0.0001) and progression-free survival (3.3 vs 1.9 months; HR (95% CI) 0.56 (0.46 to 0.67), p<0.0001) than PPC patients receiving trifluridine/tipiracil (n=273). Improvements in survival were irrespective of age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), KRAS mutational status, and site of metastases at randomisation. In the trifluridine/tipiracil arm, time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 and proportion of patients with PS=0–1 discontinuing treatment were longer for GPC than for PPC patients (7.8 vs 4.2 months and 89.1% vs 78.4%, respectively).ConclusionLow tumour burden and indolent disease were factors of good prognosis in late-line mCRC, with patients experiencing longer progression-free survival and greater overall survival.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of supraclavicular lymphadenopathy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1377-1380
Author(s):  
Paulina Cybulska ◽  
Sara A Hayes ◽  
Alexandra Spirtos ◽  
Michael J Rafizadeh ◽  
Olga T Filippova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

ObjectivesTo assess outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients with high-grade serous ovarian/tubal/primary peritoneal cancers with radiographic supraclavicular lymphadenopathy at diagnosis.MethodsWe evaluated all patients with newly diagnosed high-grade serous ovarian cancers treated at our center between January 1, 2008 and May 1, 2013 who had supraclavicular lymphadenopathy (defined as ≥1 cm in short axis) on radiographic imaging (either computed tomography or positron emission tomography) at the time of diagnosis.ResultsOf 586 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer receiving primary treatment during the study period, we identified 13 (2.2%) with supraclavicular lymphadenopathy diagnosed on pre-treatment imaging. The median age at diagnosis was 52.0 years (range 38.2–72.3). Five (31%) had clinically palpable nodes on physical examination. Four (31%) had a known BRCA mutation. All 13 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by interval debulking surgery. Each patient received a median of four cycles of neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (range 3–7). At interval debulking surgery, complete gross resection was achieved in nine (70%) patients, and optimal resection (0.1–1 cm residual disease) in four (30%). Eleven patients (85%) recurred; however, only one (8%) recurred in the supraclavicular lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 44.3 months (range 22.4–95.0). Median progression-free survival for the cohort was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.2 to 14.1). Median overall survival was 44.3 months (95% CI 41.5 to 47.1). In patients obtaining complete gross resection at interval debulking surgery, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.9 months (95% CI 8.9 to 18.9) and 78.1 months (95% CI 11.1 to 145.1), respectively.ConclusionsIn our study, approximately 2% of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer presented with radiographic evidence of supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy at diagnosis did not portend an unfavorable outcome when complete gross resection was achieved at interval debulking surgery.

Use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A multicenter real-world experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110386
Author(s):  
Angela Chen ◽  
Vincent H Ha ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Carole R Chambers ◽  
Michael B Sawyer
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factors ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Treatment outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Berna Akkus Yildirim ◽  
Sezin Yuce Sari ◽  
Guler Yavas ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis

ObjectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis.MethodsData from four centers were collected retrospectively for 92 patients with endometrial cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy alone postoperatively, delivered by either the sandwich or sequential method. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 35 % and 33 %, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 33 months. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy postoperatively compared with patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy via the sandwich method compared with patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the univariate analysis, in addition to treatment strategy, pathology, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, grade III disease, myometrial invasion greater than or equal to 50%, and adjuvant radiotherapy alone were negative predictors for both overall survival and progression-free survival.ConclusionWe demonstrated that adjuvant combined treatment including radiotherapyand chemotherapy significantly increases overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared with postoperative pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy.

scholarly journals Prognostic factors in High-Grade Localized Osteosarcoma of the Extremities: The Tunisian Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902097450
Author(s):  
Feryel Letaief ◽  
Salim Khrouf ◽  
Yosra Yahiaoui ◽  
Adel Hamdi ◽  
Azza Gabsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Bone Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tunisian Patients

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most frequent bone cancer occurring in children and adolescents aged 10–20 years. Several prognostic factors have been identified by studies done at western centers. The aim of our study was to identify the prognostic factors in Tunisian patients in order to improve their management. Methods: We reviewed the data of localized limb osteosarcoma patients treated in Salah Azaïz Institute from January 1980 to December 2018. Patient’s treatment and survival variables were assessed. Patients received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery in an expert center. They received afterward an adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the tumor necrosis assessed by Huvos. Results: Eighty-five patients were enrolled. Mean duration of follow-up was 30 months (range 1–297 months). Males were 1.6 times more frequent, median age was 17 (from 1 to 62 years). Conventional osteoblastic osteosarcoma was the most frequent histological subtype (77%). Median tumor size was 10 cm. Femoral location was the most frequent (60%). The overall average history of symptoms was 103 days (4 to 423 days). The 5-year overall-survival was 38% and the event free survival 32%. Tumor site, lactate dehydrogenase levels, high methotrexate levels at 24 h, clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter, surgery type and delay of relapse were found to affect overall survival. Tumor site, Lactate dehydrogenase levels and clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter affected the progression free survival. Conclusion: Demographic characteristics of Tunisian patients are mainly the same than worldwide. Femoral site, normal level of lactate dehydrogenase, a clinical response during neoadjuvant treatment, an R0 surgery, a delay of relapse over 2 years and Median H24 Methotrexate level superior to 4.4 µmol/l were associated with a better prognosis in our study.

Measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: an analysis of the correlation between CT imaging and chemotherapy response score

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 929-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meabh McNulty ◽  
Adarsh Das ◽  
Paul A Cohen ◽  
Andrew Dean
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiological Response ◽  
Response Score

IntroductionResponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is measured by CT and the decision to proceed with interval surgery is made on the radiological response after two or three cycles of therapy. The Chemotherapy Response Score grades histological tumor regression in omental metastases resected at interval surgery and is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. It is uncertain whether radiological response is associated with prognosis and whether radiological response predicts Chemotherapy Response Score.To assess if radiological response is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Additionally, to investigate whether radiological response predicts the Chemotherapy Response Score.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiological response was assessed by comparing CT imaging at baseline and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) and classified as stable disease, partial response, complete response, or progressive disease. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazard models and the log-rank test.ResultsA total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 51 had pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy CT scans available for analysis. Radiological response was not associated with progression-free survival or overall survival on univariate analysis (stable disease vs partial response; HR for progression-free survival 1.15; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.32; p = 0.690; HR for overall survival 1.19; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.46; p = 0.645). In a multivariate model, radiological response was not associated with either progression-free survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=1.19; 95% CI 0.498 to 2.85; p = 0.694) or overall survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=0.954; 95% CI 0.38 to 2.40; p = 0.920). There was a significant association between the Chemotherapy Response Score and radiological response (p = 0.005).DiscussionA partial response and stable disease on radiological assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer were not associated with survival, despite having a correlation with the Chemotherapy Response Score.

Prognostic Value of Syndecan-1 in Multiple Myeloma and its Relationship with Other Prognostic Factors.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2402-2402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Emily Blood ◽  
Martin M. Oken ◽  
Philip R. Greipp
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Syndecan-1 (CD138) is a heparan sulfate bearing proteoglycan found on various epithelial cells as well as on B lineage cells depending on its stage of development. Syndecan-1 (CD138) is abundantly expressed by plasma cells, especially myeloma cells. The extra cellular domain along with the heparan sulfate side chains can be cleaved off the cell surface and can be detected in the serum as soluble syndecan. Syndecan possibly plays a multifunctional role in the biology of myeloma. It has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma. It has also been shown to promote myeloma cell growth through different mechanisms. Its expression has also been suggested to correlate with bone disease in MM. Methods: In this study we studied serum levels of soluble syndecan in newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E9486 and its associated correlative laboratory clinical trial E9487. We evaluated the prognostic value of syndecan in MM and its relationship to other known prognostic factors for this disease. In addition, syndecan levels were correlated with clinical and laboratory markers of bone disease. Results: A total of 501 patients were studied and the median serum syndecan-1 was 158 ng/mL. Syndecan levels correlated positively with other prognostic factors and markers of tumor burden such as β2-microglobulin (correlation coefficient 0.3; P &lt;0.00001), labeling index (0.25; &lt;0.0001), creatinine (0.23; &lt;0.0001), soluble IL6 receptor (0.3; &lt;0.0001), BM plasma cell percentage (0.16; &lt;0.0006), and disease stage (P=0.0007). Significant differences in the overall and progression free survival was found between two groups of patient separated using the median value as cut-off. The High syndecan group had a median overall survival of 36.3 months compared to 49.3 months for the low syndecan group (P &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, the high syndecan group had progression free survival of 25.4 months compared to 33.5 months for the low syndecan group (P &lt; 0.0001). In a proportional hazards model including syndecan-1 as well as labeling index, β2M, Platelet count, IL-6R, syndecan-1 retained its prognostic value for overall survival (HR 1.3, P = 0.021). Syndecan levels were correlated with various bone markers including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal type I procollagen (PICP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and tartrate resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) and were found to correlate only with ICTP (0.25, P &lt; 0.0001). No correlation was found between clinical markers of bone disease including presence of lytic lesions, osteoporosis and pathologic fractures on X-rays or bone pain. Conclusion: In this large study, we once again confirm the prognostic value of serum syndecan-1 levels in large group of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Syndecan-1 level correlates with other disease markers. Syndecan levels also correlated with ICTP, a marker of bone turnover, though no strong correlation was found between syndecan levels and clinical markers of myeloma bone disease. The biological basis of these finding needs further evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document