scholarly journals Prognostic factors in High-Grade Localized Osteosarcoma of the Extremities: The Tunisian Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902097450
Author(s):  
Feryel Letaief ◽  
Salim Khrouf ◽  
Yosra Yahiaoui ◽  
Adel Hamdi ◽  
Azza Gabsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Bone Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tunisian Patients

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most frequent bone cancer occurring in children and adolescents aged 10–20 years. Several prognostic factors have been identified by studies done at western centers. The aim of our study was to identify the prognostic factors in Tunisian patients in order to improve their management. Methods: We reviewed the data of localized limb osteosarcoma patients treated in Salah Azaïz Institute from January 1980 to December 2018. Patient’s treatment and survival variables were assessed. Patients received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery in an expert center. They received afterward an adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the tumor necrosis assessed by Huvos. Results: Eighty-five patients were enrolled. Mean duration of follow-up was 30 months (range 1–297 months). Males were 1.6 times more frequent, median age was 17 (from 1 to 62 years). Conventional osteoblastic osteosarcoma was the most frequent histological subtype (77%). Median tumor size was 10 cm. Femoral location was the most frequent (60%). The overall average history of symptoms was 103 days (4 to 423 days). The 5-year overall-survival was 38% and the event free survival 32%. Tumor site, lactate dehydrogenase levels, high methotrexate levels at 24 h, clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter, surgery type and delay of relapse were found to affect overall survival. Tumor site, Lactate dehydrogenase levels and clinical evaluation of the tumor perimeter affected the progression free survival. Conclusion: Demographic characteristics of Tunisian patients are mainly the same than worldwide. Femoral site, normal level of lactate dehydrogenase, a clinical response during neoadjuvant treatment, an R0 surgery, a delay of relapse over 2 years and Median H24 Methotrexate level superior to 4.4 µmol/l were associated with a better prognosis in our study.

Treatment outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a multi-institutional analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Berna Akkus Yildirim ◽  
Sezin Yuce Sari ◽  
Guler Yavas ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis

ObjectiveTo analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with paraaortic lymph node metastasis.MethodsData from four centers were collected retrospectively for 92 patients with endometrial cancer treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy alone postoperatively, delivered by either the sandwich or sequential method. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 35 % and 33 %, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 33 months. The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy postoperatively compared with patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy via the sandwich method compared with patients treated with sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the univariate analysis, in addition to treatment strategy, pathology, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for both overall survival and progression-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, grade III disease, myometrial invasion greater than or equal to 50%, and adjuvant radiotherapy alone were negative predictors for both overall survival and progression-free survival.ConclusionWe demonstrated that adjuvant combined treatment including radiotherapyand chemotherapy significantly increases overall survival and progression-free survival rates compared with postoperative pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy.

Prognostic Value of Syndecan-1 in Multiple Myeloma and its Relationship with Other Prognostic Factors.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2402-2402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Emily Blood ◽  
Martin M. Oken ◽  
Philip R. Greipp
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Syndecan-1 (CD138) is a heparan sulfate bearing proteoglycan found on various epithelial cells as well as on B lineage cells depending on its stage of development. Syndecan-1 (CD138) is abundantly expressed by plasma cells, especially myeloma cells. The extra cellular domain along with the heparan sulfate side chains can be cleaved off the cell surface and can be detected in the serum as soluble syndecan. Syndecan possibly plays a multifunctional role in the biology of myeloma. It has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma. It has also been shown to promote myeloma cell growth through different mechanisms. Its expression has also been suggested to correlate with bone disease in MM. Methods: In this study we studied serum levels of soluble syndecan in newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E9486 and its associated correlative laboratory clinical trial E9487. We evaluated the prognostic value of syndecan in MM and its relationship to other known prognostic factors for this disease. In addition, syndecan levels were correlated with clinical and laboratory markers of bone disease. Results: A total of 501 patients were studied and the median serum syndecan-1 was 158 ng/mL. Syndecan levels correlated positively with other prognostic factors and markers of tumor burden such as β2-microglobulin (correlation coefficient 0.3; P &lt;0.00001), labeling index (0.25; &lt;0.0001), creatinine (0.23; &lt;0.0001), soluble IL6 receptor (0.3; &lt;0.0001), BM plasma cell percentage (0.16; &lt;0.0006), and disease stage (P=0.0007). Significant differences in the overall and progression free survival was found between two groups of patient separated using the median value as cut-off. The High syndecan group had a median overall survival of 36.3 months compared to 49.3 months for the low syndecan group (P &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, the high syndecan group had progression free survival of 25.4 months compared to 33.5 months for the low syndecan group (P &lt; 0.0001). In a proportional hazards model including syndecan-1 as well as labeling index, β2M, Platelet count, IL-6R, syndecan-1 retained its prognostic value for overall survival (HR 1.3, P = 0.021). Syndecan levels were correlated with various bone markers including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin (OC), C-terminal type I procollagen (PICP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and tartrate resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) and were found to correlate only with ICTP (0.25, P &lt; 0.0001). No correlation was found between clinical markers of bone disease including presence of lytic lesions, osteoporosis and pathologic fractures on X-rays or bone pain. Conclusion: In this large study, we once again confirm the prognostic value of serum syndecan-1 levels in large group of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Syndecan-1 level correlates with other disease markers. Syndecan levels also correlated with ICTP, a marker of bone turnover, though no strong correlation was found between syndecan levels and clinical markers of myeloma bone disease. The biological basis of these finding needs further evaluation.

Prognostic Factors Influencing Progression-Free Survival Determined From a Series of Sporadic Desmoid Tumors: A Wait-and-See Policy According to Tumor Presentation

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (26) ◽  
pp. 3553-3558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sébastien Salas ◽  
Armelle Dufresne ◽  
Binh Bui ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Philippe Terrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Desmoid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Wait And See

Purpose Desmoid tumors are mesenchymal fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferations with locoregional aggressiveness and high ability to recur after initial treatment. We present the results of the largest series of sporadic desmoid tumors ever published to determine the prognostic factors of these rare tumors. Patients and Methods Four hundred twenty-six patients with a desmoid tumor at diagnosis were included, and the following parameters were studied: age, sex, delay between first symptoms and diagnosis, tumor size, tumor site, previous history of surgery or trauma in the area of the primary tumor, surgical margins, and context of abdominal wall desmoids in women of child-bearing age during or shortly after pregnancy. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS). Results In univariate analysis, age, tumor size, tumor site, and surgical margins (R2 v R0/R1) had a significant impact on PFS. PFS curves were not significantly different for microscopic assessment of surgical resection quality (R0 v R1). In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, and tumor site had independent values. Three prognostic groups for PFS were defined on the basis of the number of independent unfavorable prognostic factors (0 or 1, 2, and 3). Conclusion This study clearly demonstrates that there are different prognostic subgroups of desmoid tumors that could benefit from different therapeutic strategies, including a wait-and-see policy.

scholarly journals Impact of Superselective Intra-Arterial and Systemic Chemoradiotherapy for Gingival Carcinoma; Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

Prognostic factors in progressive high-grade glial tumors treated with systemic approach: A single center experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522092068
Author(s):  
Ozkan Alan ◽  
Tugba Akin Telli ◽  
Tugba Basoglu Tuylu ◽  
Rukiye Arikan ◽  
Nazım Can Demircan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Ps

Purpose Malignant high-grade gliomas are the most common and aggressive type of primary brain tumor, and the prognosis is generally extremely poor. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcome of systemic treatment in recurrent high-grade glioma patients and the impact of prognostic factors on survivals. Methods Data from 114 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who received systemic treatment and followed in our clinic between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, age, gender, histology, type of surgical resection, side effects after systemic treatment (deep vein thrombosis, hypertension, proteinuria), IDH1 and alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) mutation status were investigated as prognostic factors for progression-free survival and overall survival. Results At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 48 (17–77) and 68% of the patients were male. Most common pathologic subtype was glioblastoma multiforme (68%). Median follow-up duration was 9.1 months (1–68 months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.2 months and 8 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, deep venous thrombosis and the presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (p < 0.05) and, ECOG PS, the presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation for overall survival (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study is real life data and the median progression-free survival and overall survival rates are similar to the literature. We have found ECOG PS, presence of ATRX and IDH1 mutation to be independent prognostic factors for both progression-free survival and overall survival.

Conditional survival of patients with nonmetastatic bone osteosarcoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23511-e23511
Author(s):  
Ruoyu Miao ◽  
Haotong Wang ◽  
Edwin Choy ◽  
Gregory Michael Cote ◽  
Kevin Raskin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Conditional Survival ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Free Survival

e23511 Background: Conditional survival provides a dynamic prediction of prognosis for patients surviving a defined period of time after diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the conditional survival and prognostic factors over time among patients with non-metastatic bone osteosarcoma. Methods: We reviewed 714 bone osteosarcoma patients treated from 1985 to 2016. Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis or limited follow up were excluded, resulting in 587 cases for analysis. Clinical and pathological variables were recorded. Predictive variables included age at diagnosis, gender, previous radiation history, tumor site, tumor size, histologic subtype, histologic grade, resection margin, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze prognostic factors of conditional overall survival and progression-free survival at baseline and 5 years after diagnosis. Results: The estimated 5-year conditional overall survival increased from 71.0% (95% CI: 67.5%-75.0%) at baseline to 86.9% (95% CI: 82.6%-90.5%) at 5 years, which means if a patient with non-metastatic bone osteosarcoma survived 5 years, the chance of surviving another 5 years was 86.9%. If the patient was progression-free for 5 years, the 5-year conditional overall survival was even higher, 93.2% (95% CI: 89.5%-96.4%), and the 5-year conditional progression-free survival improved from 57.1% (95% CI: 53.3%-61.0%) at baseline to 91.2% (95% CI: 87.5%-94.6%) at 5 years. Prognostic factors for mortality and disease progression change as survival time increases. At baseline, age (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003), histologic subtype (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), grade (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.002 and p = 0.002), resection margin (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001) were predictive of both overall survival and progression-free survival. However, only age (p < 0.001) and histologic subtype (p = 0.015) remained significant for mortality and resection margin (p = 0.001) for disease progression at 5 years. Conclusions: The survival probability of osteosarcoma improves as survival time increases. Estimates of conditional survival can provide useful information for individualized surveillance strategies, risk evaluation, patient counseling, and making clinical decisions.

Impact of age on survival in radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 184 (5) ◽  
pp. 667-676
Author(s):  
C Saïe ◽  
J Wassermann ◽  
E Mathy ◽  
N Chereau ◽  
L Leenhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Objective The objectives of our study were to analyze the influence of age on the survival of patients with RAIR-DTC and to determine their prognostic factors according to age. Methods This single-center, retrospective study enrolled 155 patients diagnosed with RAIR-DTC. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) according to different cutoff (45, 55, 65, 75 years). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and prognostic factors in patients under and over 65 years. Results Median OS after RAIR diagnosis was 8.2 years (95% IC: 5.3–9.6). There was no difference according to age with a 65 (P = 0.47) and 55 years old cutoff (P = 0.28). Median OS improved significantly before 45 years old (P = 0.0043). After 75 years old, median OS significantly decreased (P = 0.0008). Median PFS was 2.1 years (95% CI: 0.8–3) in patients < 65 years old, and 1 year in patients ≥ 65 years old (95% CI: 0.8–1.55) with no statistical difference (P = 0.22). There was no impact of age on PFS with any cutoff. In both groups, progressive disease despite 131I treatment reduced OS. In patients < 65 years old, an interval of less than 3 years between the initial diagnosis and the diagnosis of RAIR metastatic disease was predictive of poor survival. In patients > 65 years old, the presence of a mediastinum metastasis was a significant factor for mortality (HR: 4.55, 95% CI: 2.27–9.09). Conclusion In RAIR-DTC patients, a cut-off age of 65 years old was not a significant predictive factor of survival. Forty-five and 75-years-old cutoff were predictive for OS but not PFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document