Comparison of intramuscular butorphanol and buprenorphine combined with dexmedetomidine for sedation in cats

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J Bhalla ◽  
Toby A Trimble ◽  
Elizabeth A Leece ◽  
Enzo Vettorato

Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the sedative effect of butorphanol–dexmedetomidine with buprenorphine–dexmedetomidine following intramuscular (IM) administration in cats. Methods Using a prospective, randomised, blinded design, 40 client-owned adult cats were assigned to receive IM dexmedetomidine (10 µg/kg) combined with either butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg) (‘BUT’ group) or buprenorphine (20 µg/kg) (‘BUP’ group). Sedation was scored using a previously published multidimensional composite scale before administration (T0) and 5, 10, 15 and 20 mins afterwards (T5, T10, T15 and T20, respectively). Alfaxalone (1.5 mg/kg) was administered IM at T20 if the cat was not deemed adequately sedated to place an intravenous catheter. Adverse events were recorded. Friedman two-way ANOVA analysed sedation scores within groups. Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test compared sedation scores between groups; Fisher’s exact test analysed the frequency of alfaxalone administration and adverse events. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Sedation scores between groups were similar at baseline, but at T5, T10, T15 and T20 scores were higher in the BUT group ( P <0.01). Within both groups, sedation scores changed over time and the highest sedation scores were reached at T10. Requirement for additional sedation was similar between groups: two cats in the BUT group and five cats in the BUP group. One cat and 11 cats vomited ( P = 0.002) in the BUT and BUP groups, respectively. No other adverse events were recorded. Conclusions and relevance At these doses, IM buprenorphine–dexmedetomidine provides inferior sedation and a higher incidence of vomiting than butorphanol–dexmedetomidine in cats. Butorphanol–dexmedetomidine may be preferred for feline sedation, especially where vomiting is contraindicated.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1098612X2199615
Author(s):  
Emily P Wheeler ◽  
Amanda L Abelson ◽  
Jane C Lindsey ◽  
Lois A Wetmore

Objectives The aim of this pilot study was to compare the quality of sedation and ease of intravenous (IV) catheter placement following sedation using two intramuscular (IM) sedation protocols in cats: hydromorphone, alfaxalone and midazolam vs hydromorphone and alfaxalone. Methods This was a prospective, randomized and blinded study. Cats were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg), alfaxalone (1.5 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg; HAM group), or hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) and alfaxalone (1.5 mg/kg; HA group). Sedation scoring (0–9, where 9 indicated maximum sedation) was performed at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mins from the time of injection. At 20 mins, an IV catheter placement score (0–10, where 10 indicated least resistance) was performed. Results Twenty-one client-owned adult cats were included in this study. Sedation and IV catheter placement scores were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Peak sedation was significantly higher ( P = 0.002) in the HAM group (median 9; range 7–9) than in the HA group (median 7; range 3–9), and IV catheter placement scores were significantly higher ( P = 0.001) in the HAM group (median 9.5; range 7–10) compared with the HA group (median 7; range 4–9). Spearman correlations were calculated between IV catheter placement score and sedation scores. There was a significant positive correlation of average sedation over time (correlation 0.83; P <0.001) and sedation at 20 mins (correlation 0.76; P <0.001) with a higher, more favorable IV catheter placement score. Conclusions and relevance These preliminary results suggest that the addition of midazolam to IM alfaxalone and hydromorphone produced more profound sedation and greater ease of IV catheter placement than IM alfaxalone and hydromorphone alone.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoi Odani ◽  
Satoru Fukimbara ◽  
Tosiya Sato

Background/Aim: Meta-analyses are frequently performed on adverse event data and are primarily used for improving statistical power to detect safety signals. However, in the evaluation of drug safety for New Drug Applications, simple pooling of adverse event data from multiple clinical trials is still commonly used. We sought to propose a new Bayesian hierarchical meta-analytic approach based on consideration of a hierarchical structure of reported individual adverse event data from multiple randomized clinical trials. Methods: To develop our meta-analysis model, we extended an existing three-stage Bayesian hierarchical model by including an additional stage of the clinical trial level in the hierarchical model; this generated a four-stage Bayesian hierarchical model. We applied the proposed Bayesian meta-analysis models to published adverse event data from three premarketing randomized clinical trials of tadalafil and to a simulation study motivated by the case example to evaluate the characteristics of three alternative models. Results: Comparison of the results from the Bayesian meta-analysis model with those from Fisher’s exact test after simple pooling showed that 6 out of 10 adverse events were the same within a top 10 ranking of individual adverse events with regard to association with treatment. However, more individual adverse events were detected in the Bayesian meta-analysis model than in Fisher’s exact test under the body system “Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.” Moreover, comparison of the overall trend of estimates between the Bayesian model and the standard approach (odds ratios after simple pooling methods) revealed that the posterior median odds ratios for the Bayesian model for most adverse events shrank toward values for no association. Based on the simulation results, the Bayesian meta-analysis model could balance the false detection rate and power to a better extent than Fisher’s exact test. For example, when the threshold value of the posterior probability for signal detection was set to 0.8, the false detection rate was 41% and power was 88% in the Bayesian meta-analysis model, whereas the false detection rate was 56% and power was 86% in Fisher’s exact test. Limitations: Adverse events under the same body system were not necessarily positively related when we used “system organ class” and “preferred term” in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities as a hierarchical structure of adverse events. For the Bayesian meta-analysis models to be effective, the validity of the hierarchical structure of adverse events and the grouping of adverse events are critical. Conclusion: Our proposed meta-analysis models considered trial effects to avoid confounding by trial and borrowed strength from both within and across body systems to obtain reasonable and stable estimates of an effect measure by considering a hierarchical structure of adverse events.


2019 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. e73-e76
Author(s):  
Eric de Haas ◽  
Jill P. Stone ◽  
William de Haas ◽  
Christiaan H. Schrag

Abstract Background Microsurgical anastomosis of vessels is a challenging skill that surgical residents should practice on models before attempting in the clinical setting. These skills are often taught using synthetic materials, animal tissue, or live animal models. With increasing constraints on surgical resident's time, it is important to maximize efficiency of microsurgical training. The purpose of this study is to determine if teaching surgical residents about common vessel anastomosis errors decreases the total number of suture errors during a 4-day training course. Methods Plastic surgery residents (R1–R3) were randomly assigned to receive additional teaching focused on either common microsurgical errors or traditional microsurgical manuals. The residents then performed anastomosis on rat femoral arteries in which the total number of sutures and errors were recorded by staff microsurgeons who were blinded to the intervention. Results Residents who received teaching on common microsurgical errors performed a total of 73 sutures of which 12 were errors. The control group who studied using traditional microsurgical manuals performed a total of 125 sutures of which 38 were errors. There was a statistically significant decrease in the total number of suture errors (Fisher's exact test; p-value = 0.04) and in the number of partial depth bite errors (Fisher's exact test p-value = 0.03). Conclusion Teaching surgical residents about common vessel anastomosis errors decreased the total number of errors when compared with traditional education methods using microsurgery manuals. Partial depth bite errors were also decreased through error-based teaching.


Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2057
Author(s):  
Daniela Gioeni ◽  
Federica Alessandra Brioschi ◽  
Federica Di Cesare ◽  
Vanessa Rabbogliatti ◽  
Martina Amari ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare the sedative and physiological effects following either oral transmucosal (OTM) or intramuscular administration of dexmedetomidine–methadone combination in healthy dogs. Thirty dogs were randomly assigned to receive a dexmedetomidine–methadone combination either by the OTM (n = 15) or intramuscular (n = 15) route. Sedation was scored 10, 20, and 30 min after drugs administration. Heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), respiratory rate (fR), and body rectal temperature were recorded before drugs administration and then every 10 min for 30 min. Propofol dose required for orotracheal intubation was recorded. Sedation scores increased over time within both groups with higher values in intramuscular group (p < 0.05). Within each group, HR decreased significantly compared with baseline (p < 0.001) and was significantly lower in intramuscular group compared with the OTM group (p < 0.001). In both groups, NIBP increased significantly compared with baseline (p < 0.05). In the intramuscular group, fR was lower compared with the OTM group at all the observational time points (p < 0.001). Propofol dose was lower in the intramuscular group (p < 0.05). Compared to intramuscular dexmedetomidine–methadone, OTM combination produced lower but effective sedation in healthy dogs.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 539-539
Author(s):  
Fernanda Gutierrez-Rodrigues ◽  
Flávia S Donaires ◽  
André Pinto ◽  
Alana Vicente ◽  
Laura Dillon ◽  
...  

Abstract Telomerase reactivation by acquisition of mutations in the TERT promoter (TERTp) region is a mechanism of tumorigenesis. The most common TERTp mutations are located in positions -146, -124, and -57 upstream the initiation codon. In non-malignant diseases, TERTp mutations only have been reported in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) caused by germline mutations in telomere biology genes, that are also etiologic in a broader spectrum of diseases collectively named telomeropathies (such as IPF, aplastic anemia [AA], dyskeratosis congenita [DC], and cirrhosis). We screened blood from 136 patients with telomeropathies (median age=29 years; range, 1-76), 52 relatives (median age=40 years; range, 8-72), and 195 controls using a customized low-cost amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for identification and quantification TERTp mutations. Patients had DC (n=21), AA (n=86), IPF with or without another telomeropathy-related phenotype (n=18), or other phenotypes (n=11). Inclusion criteria were telomere length (TL) below the 10th percentile of age-matched controls or a germline mutation in a telomere-related gene classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic or of uncertain significance by the ACMG criteria. Patients' relatives were only studied if they carried the same germline mutation as the proband or had short telomeres, regardless of symptoms or evidence of disease. Patients with acquired AA (n=70), IPF (n=12), other inherited bone marrow failure (n=7), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n=106) were controls. All TERTp mutations identified by NGS were confirmed and tracked over time by droplet digital PCR. We identified the -124 or -146 mutations in leukocytes from 12 unrelated patients diagnosed with IPF (n=6), DC (n=2), or moderate AA (n=4). Five relatives also had the -146 (n=1), and -124 (n=4) mutations, all carriers of a germline mutation in telomere biology gene. The frequency of TERTp mutations was much higher in IPF patients compared to AA cases (33% vs. 4.6%; Fisher's exact test, P=0.0016). However, no difference in frequency of TERTp mutations among patients with IPF vs. marrow failure was observed (41% vs. 58%; Fisher's exact test, P>0.05), suggesting TERTp mutations occurred in both clinical presentations. MutTERTp clones positively correlated with age, as they were only present in individuals older than 18 years old and more frequent in those 60 to 80 years old. Also, TERTp mutations more frequently co-ocurred with germline TERT mutations (n=13) compared to mutations in TERC (n=2), RTEL1 (n=1), or DKC1 (n=2) (76% vs. 23%; Fisher's exact test, P=0.002). All germline variants were pathogenic or had some evidence of pathogenicity. MutTERTp clones size varied from 1.2% to 50% in total leukocytes and was at higher allele frequencies (VAF) in the granulocytic fraction from four patients. In serial samples (available for five patients), the mutTERTp clone size expanded over time, suggesting a selective growth advantage in comparison to unmutated hematopoietic cells. Despite that, mutTERTp clones did not associate with blood counts or telomere elongation; most subjects carrying a TERTp mutation, which is known to upregulate TERT expression, nevertheless had short or very short telomeres (15 out of 17 individuals). Six patients with mutTERTp clones (VAF ranging from 3-33% in myeloid cells) were treated with danazol for two years; four were responders and two were off-study after 3-6 months. In serial samples (available for two patients), the mutTERTp clone sizes decreased during danazol treatment while blood counts improved. After treatment, mutTERTp clones VAF increased. TERTp mutations were found in telomeropathy patients who had a germline variant in telomere biology genes but not in controls or patients with very short telomeres without germline variant in telomere biology genes. We have expanded the spectrum of non-malignant diseases associated with somatic TERTp mutations to DC, AA, and cirrhosis. Our data indicate that mutTERTp clones are specifically and randomly selected with aging in a marrow environment deficient in telomerase function, and mutTERTp selection did not associate with patients' peripheral blood counts, TL, and response to danazol treatment. TERTp emergence may be a useful clonal indicator for telomere dysfunction and may help to assess the pathogenicity of unclear constitutional variants in telomeropathies. Disclosures Young: CRADA with Novartis: Research Funding; National Institute of Health: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1910-1910
Author(s):  
Alyssa Cortese ◽  
Rakeb Lemma ◽  
Ali Wazir ◽  
Mijung Lee

Abstract Introduction: MGMT is a key enzyme in DNA repair. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene plays a critical role in carcinogenesis and confers increased sensitivity of tumor cells to alkylators. MGMT methylation status is known to be prognostic and predictive of treatment response to Temozolomide in patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Despite advancing knowledge about the clinical implication of MGMT in GBM, there is limited information about the association between tumor MGMT status and hematologic tolerance to Temozolomide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of MGMT status and hematologic toxicities after treatment with Temozolomide. Methods: A single institutional retrospective case control study was performed for patients with biopsy proven diagnosis of GBM within the years 2015 to 2020. We collected tumor specific information such as patients MGMT status and treatment specific information including the timing of hematologic adverse events, dose exposure, incidence, and severity of hematologic toxicities. To evaluate the association between tumor MGMT status and hematologic toxicities to Temozolomide we used the Fisher's exact test as well as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 74 patients with biopsy proven glioblastoma were evaluated. 44 were MGMT negative while 30 were MGMT positive. All hematologic adverse events occurred within six weeks of exposure to Temozolomide. At the time of the study completion, the number of high grade (grade 3-4) hematologic toxicity events including leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia were evaluated. There were 2 out of a possible 176 events for nonmethylated MGMT vs 10 out of a possible 120 events for methylated MGMT. This association was determined to be statistically significant with a P value of 0.0051 by Fisher's exact test. Odds ratio (OR) was also calculated with a OR of 7.9, P value of 0.0041 and 95% confidence interval of [1.701- 36.776]. Statistical difference was also noted in the incidence of grade 2-4 thrombocytopenia with 5 events occurring in the methylated group and 0 events occurring in the nonmethylated group with a P value of 0.0088 by Fisher's exact test. Conclusion: Studies have shown the importance of MGMT status in predicting response to treatment with alkylators in patients with GBM. Our study shows that the patients with MGMT methylated GBM tend to develop more hematologic toxicities compared to patients with MGMT non-methylated GBM early in their treatment course, leading to early discontinuation of Temozolomide. This implies these patients need to have close monitoring for hematological toxicity from the initiation of treatment. Further research is warranted to investigate the effect of tumor MGMT status on the DNA repair network in host hematopoietic system after exposure to alkylators. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S536-S537
Author(s):  
Keith Dunn ◽  
Yangxin Huang ◽  
Bryan Baugh ◽  
Nika Bejou ◽  
Donghan Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ritonavir boosted protease inhibitors have been associated with GI intolerance. A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the GI profile of D/C/F/TAF in treatment naïve patients. Methods The phase 3 AMBER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02431247) enrolled treatment naïve patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily D/C/F/TAF 800/150/200/10 mg or D/C + F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence, prevalence and duration of GI adverse events of interest (AEOIs) through Wk 96. Related GI AEOIs were defined as diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain and flatulence (by preferred term using MedDRAv21) deemed very likely, probable, or possibly related to study drug by the investigator. Incidence and prevalence were examined at weekly intervals during the first month of treatment and monthly thereafter. Duration of an AE was calculated for patients whose AEs had start and stop dates. Results In AMBER (N = 725), 362 patients were randomized to D/C/F/TAF and 363 to D/C + F/TDF (Table). Through Wk 48, 14% of D/C/F/TAF patients had a study drug–related GI AEOI vs 19% of D/C + F/TDF patients; of these, all were grade 1/2 and none were serious. Incidence and prevalence of D/C/F/TAF-related GI AEOIs remained low through 96 wks (Figure 1 & 2). Incidence of D/C/F/TAF-related diarrhea and nausea were each 5% in Wk 1 and ≤1% after Wk 2; prevalence of each decreased to &lt; 5% at Wk 2. There was 1 case of D/C/F/TAF-related abdominal discomfort at Wk 1 and none thereafter. Incidence of D/C/F/TAF-related flatulence was &lt; 1% from Wk 1 through Wk 96. Only 2 (1%) patients discontinued before Wk 96 due to a D/C/F/TAF-related GI AEOI (both diarrhea). Through Wk 96, &lt; 3% of patients required treatment with concomitant medication for a D/C/F/TAF-related GI AEOI. Among patients with a D/C/F/TAF-related GI AEOI, the median duration was 16.5 days. Conclusion In AMBER, incidences and prevalences of D/C/F/TAF-related GI AEOIs were low and tended to present early in the study. Combined with rapid decreases in prevalence, these finding suggest that GI AEOIs were transient. Overall, the GI profile of D/C/F/TAF was favorable, and to a greater extent than D/C + F/TDF, suggesting improved tolerance vs an older formulation. Table. Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Figure 1. Incidence of study drug–related GI AEOIs over time among patients randomized to D/C/F/TAF (n = 362). Figure 2. Prevalence of study drug–related GI AEOIs over time among patients randomized to D/C/F/TAF (n = 362). Disclosures Keith Dunn, PharmD, J&J (Employee, Shareholder) Yangxin Huang, PhD, MS, J&J (Employee) Bryan Baugh, MD, J&J (Employee, Shareholder) Nika Bejou, PharmD, BCIDP, AAHIVP, J&J (Employee, Shareholder) Donghan Luo, PhD, J&J (Employee, Shareholder) Jennifer Campbell, PhD, J&J (Employee, Shareholder) David Anderson, MD, J&J (Employee, Shareholder)


Author(s):  
Aditi Dey ◽  
Han Wang ◽  
Helen Quinn ◽  
Rona Hiam ◽  
Nicholas Wood ◽  
...  

This report summarises Australian passive surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for 2017 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration and describes reporting trends over the 18-year period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2017. There were 3,878 AEFI records for vaccines administered in 2017; an annual AEFI reporting rate of 15.8 per 100,000 population. There was a 12% increase in the overall AEFI reporting rate in 2017 compared with 2016. This increase in reported adverse events in 2017 compared to the previous year was likely due to the introduction of the zoster vaccine (Zostavax®) provided free for people aged 70–79 years under the National Immunisation Program (NIP) and also the state- and territory-based meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccination programs. AEFI reporting rates for most other individual vaccines in 2017 were similar to 2016. The most commonly reported reactions were injection site reaction (34%), pyrexia (17%), rash (15%), vomiting (8%) and pain (7%). The majority of AEFI reports (88%) described non-serious events. Two deaths were reported that were determined to have a causal relationship with vaccination; they occurred in immunocompromised people contraindicated to receive the vaccines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Scarpis ◽  
S Degan ◽  
D De Corti ◽  
F Mellace ◽  
R Cocconi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Identification and measurement of adverse events (AEs) is crucial for patient safety in order to monitor them over time and to implement quality improvement programs, testing if they are effective. Global Trigger Tool (GTT) has been proposed as a low-cost method, being also the most effective to detect AEs. This study aims to describe the number of triggers, the rate and level of AEs identified by GTT and the most frequent type of AE. Methods The Italian version of the GTT was used. Ten paper-based clinical records (CRs) randomly selected every 2 weeks were reviewed from January to April 2019 by three independent reviewers (two nurses, one doctor) at the Academic Hospital of Udine. The AEs rates calculated are: AEs per 1,000 patient-days, AEs per 100 admissions, percentage of admissions with an AE. AEs were classified by harm levels according to National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). Results CRs reviewed were 80. Mean age of the patients was 69.3±16.4, women were 37.5%. Mean hospitalisation was 16.8±15.3. Nine were the cases of re-hospitalisation within 30 days (11.3%). The total number of trigger was 156. AEs were 31, with at least one AE on 27.5% of admissions, 38.8 AEs per 100 admissions and 23 AEs per 1,000 patient-days. AEs with harm level E, F and H were respectively 5 (16.1%), 24 (77.4%) and 2 (6.5%). The most frequent type of AE were hospital acquired infections with 15 cases (48.4%). Conclusions The most frequent type of AE was the hospital acquired infections. Rates and levels of AEs were higher than other international studies, probably because of the limited number of CRs reviewed. Key messages Global Trigger Tool is an effective method to detect adverse patient safety events in order to monitor them over time. The most frequent type of adverse events was the hospital acquired infections.


Author(s):  
Jesus M. Villa ◽  
Tejbir S. Pannu ◽  
Carlos A. Higuera ◽  
Juan C. Suarez ◽  
Preetesh D. Patel ◽  
...  

AbstractHospital adverse events remain a significant issue; even “minor events” may lead to increased costs. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous investigation has compared perioperative events between the first and second hip in staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study, we perform such a comparison. A retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of 172 patients (344 hips) who underwent staged bilateral THAs performed by two surgeons at a single institution (2010–2016). Based on chronological order of the staged arthroplasties, two groups were set apart: first-staged THA and second-staged THA. Baseline-demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, hospital adverse events, and hospital transfusions were compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests, Fisher's exact test, and/or Pearson's chi-squared test. The mean time between staged surgeries was 465 days. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between first-staged THA and second-staged THA groups (patients were their own controls). The mean LOS was significantly longer in the first-staged THA group than in the second (2.2 vs. 1.8 days; p < 0.001). Discharge (proportion) to a facility other than home was noticeably higher in the first-staged THA group, although not statistically significant (11.0 vs. 7.6%; p = 0.354). The rate of hospital adverse events in the first-staged THA group was almost twice that of the second (37.2 vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in transfusion rates. However, these were consistently better in the second-staged THA group. When compared with the first THA, our findings suggest overall shorter LOS and fewer hospital adverse events following the second. Level of Evidence Level III.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document