New Challenges for Public Health Care: Biological and Chemical Weapons Awareness, Surveillance, and Response

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Dudley

Recent events in the United States have demonstrated a critical need for recognizing nurses and emergency health care providers as important elements of the nation’s first line of defense and response against terrorist attacks involving biological, chemical, or radiological weapons. The anthrax letter attacks of September/October 2001 demonstrate the importance of vigilance and attention to detail while interviewing and attending patients and when entering, reviewing, and cataloging patient records. Nursing professionals, emergency care responders, and physicians can perform a crucial role in our first-line defense against terrorism by detecting and reporting unusual or anomalous illness(es) consistent with possible exposure to biological or chemical agents. Nursing professionals should become more familiar with the etiology and clinical symptoms of biological agents of greatest current concern (smallpox, anthrax, tularemia, plague) and be alert for potentially anomalous or unfamiliar combinations of symptoms that could point to unwitting exposure to biological toxins, toxic chemicals, or cryptic radiological agents. Public health surveillance systems must be developed that encourage and facilitate the rapid reporting and follow-up investigation of suspect illnesses and potential disease outbreaks that will ensure early identification and response for covert attacks involving biological, chemical, or radiological weapons.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Kalyango ◽  
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura ◽  
Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho

Abstract Introduction Uganda is in discussions to introduce a national health insurance scheme. However, there is a paucity of information on household preferences and willingness to pay for health insurance attributes that may guide the design of an acceptable health insurance scheme. Our study sought to assess household preferences and willingness to pay for health insurance in Kampala city using a discrete choice experiment. Methods This study was conducted from 16th February 2020 to 10th April 2020 on 240 households in the Kawempe division of Kampala city stratified into slum and non-slum communities in order to get a representative sample of the area. We purposively selected the communities that represented slum and non-slum communities and thereafter applied systematic sampling in the selection of the households that participated in the study from each of the communities. Four household and policy-relevant attributes were used in the experimental design of the study. Each respondent attended to 9 binary choice sets of health insurance plans that included one fixed choice set. Data were analyzed using mixed logit models. Results Households in both the non-slum and slum communities had a high preference for health insurance plans that included both private and public health care providers as compared to plans that included public health care providers only (non-slum coefficient β = 0.81, P < 0.05; slum β = 0.87, p < 0.05) and; health insurance plans that covered extended family members as compared to plans that had limitations on the number of family members allowed (non-slum β = 0.44, P < 0.05; slum β = 0.36, p < 0.05). Households in non-slum communities, in particular, had a high preference for health insurance plans that covered chronic illnesses and major surgeries to other plans (0.97 β, P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that location of the household influences willingness to pay with households from non-slum communities willing to pay more for the preferred attributes. Conclusion Potential health insurance schemes should consider including both private and public health care providers and allow more household members to be enrolled in both slum and non-slum communities. However, the inclusion of more HH members should be weighed against the possible depletion of resources and other attributes. Potential health insurance schemes should also prioritize coverage for chronic illnesses and major surgeries in non-slum communities, in particular, to make the scheme attractive and acceptable for these communities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  

Electronic cigarettes are the tobacco products most commonly used by youths in the United States. The use of e-cigarettes, also known as vaping or JUULing, is a public health epidemic. This collection offers reviews and research to assist pediatric health care providers in identifying and treating adolescent use and exposure to e-cigarettes. https://shop.aap.org/pediatric-collections-vaping-effects-and-solutions-paperback/


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin J. Putzer ◽  
Mirka Koro-Ljungberg ◽  
R. Paul Duncan

ABSTRACTObjective: Disaster preparedness has become a health policy priority for the United States in the aftermath of the anthrax attacks, 9/11, and other calamities. It is important for rural health care professionals to be prepared for a bioterrorist attack or other public health emergency. We sought to determine the barriers impeding rural physicians from being prepared for a human-induced disaster such as a bioterrorist attack.Methods: This study employed a qualitative methodology using key informant interviews followed by grounded theory methods for data analysis. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 6 physicians in the state of Florida from federally designated rural areas.Results: The interview participants articulated primary barriers and the associated factors contributing to these barriers that may affect rural physician preparedness for human-induced emergencies. Rural physicians identified 3 primary barriers: accessibility to health care, communication between physicians and patients, and rural infrastructure and resources. Each of these barriers included associated factors and influences. For instance, according to our participants, access to care was affected by a lack of health insurance, a lack of finances for health services, and transportation difficulties.Conclusions: Existing rural organizational infrastructure and resources are insufficient to meet current health needs owing to a number of factors including the paucity of health care providers, particularly medical specialists, and the associated patient-level barriers. These barriers presumably would be exacerbated in the advent of a human-induced public health emergency. Thus, strategically implemented health policies are needed to mitigate the barriers identified in this study.(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;6:342–348)


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1078
Author(s):  
Monica Simoes Duarte ◽  
Zenith Rosa Silvino

ABSTRACTObjective: to characterize an accredited institution of public health in Rio de Janeiro State, identify the paths taken by the health institution to be accredited and discuss the institutional benefits obtained from accreditation. Methodology: it’s an exploratory and descriptive research, qualitative method of case study one that will be developed in HEMORIO. It will use as a source of evidence documentation related to the management of the institution and semi-structured interviews with health and administrative professionals who work at the institution and followed the accreditation process. Data will be triangulated and treated with the thematic content analysis. Expected results: to contribute to a reflection on quality health services topic in public institutions, wake up and aware managers and health professionals from other institutions of public health in Rio de Janeiro State not accredited to join the implementation of this tool quality. Descriptors: accreditation; quality of health care; access and evaluation; nursing; health management.RESUMOObjetivo: caracterizar uma instituição de saúde acreditada, da rede pública do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, identificar os caminhos percorridos por esta instituição de saúde para ser acreditada e discutir os benefícios institucionais obtidos ao ser acreditada. Metodologia: estudo exploratório e descritivo, com abordagem qualitativa, método de estudo de caso único que será desenvolvido no HEMORIO. Utilizar-se-á como fonte de evidência, a documentação referente ao processo de gestão da instituição e entrevistas semi-estruturadas com os profissionais administrativos e de saúde que trabalham na instituição e acompanharam o processo de acreditação. Os dados obtidos serão triangulados e tratados através da análise de conteúdo temática. Resultados esperados: contribuir para uma reflexão acerca da temática ‘qualidade dos serviços de saúde em instituições públicas’, despertar e sensibilizar gestores e profissionais de saúde, das demais instituições de saúde da rede pública do Estado do Rio de Janeiro não acreditadas, a aderirem à implementação desta ferramenta da qualidade. Descritores: acreditação; qualidade da assistência à saúde; acesso e avaliação; enfermagem; gestão em saúde.RESUMENObjetivo: caracterizar una institución acreditada de salud pública en el Estado del Río de Janeiro, identificar los caminos tomados por la institución de salud para ser acreditada y discutir sobre los beneficios que son obtenidos de las instituciones acreditadas. Metodología: estudio exploratorio y descriptivo, con abordaje cualitativo de un estudio de caso que se desarrollará en HEMORIO. Se utilizará como fuente de documentación, pruebas relacionadas con la gestión de la institución y entrevistas semi-estructuradas con profesionales de la salud y administrativos que trabajan en la institución y seguían el proceso de acreditación. Los datos serán triangulados y tratados con el análisis de contenido temático. Resultados esperados: contribuir a una reflexión sobre el tema de los servicios de salud de calidad en las instituciones públicas, despertar y sensibilizar a los gerentes y profesionales de la salud de otras instituciones de salud pública en el Estado del Río de Janeiro no acreditas que se adhieren a la aplicación de esta herramienta de calidad. Descriptores: acreditación; calidad de la atención de salud; acceso y evaluación; enfermería; gestión en salud.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Kumar Sur

In India, households' use of primary health-care services presents a puzzle. Even though most private health-care providers have no formal medical qualifications, a significant fraction of households use fee-charging private health-care services, which are not covered by insurance. Although the absence of public health-care providers could partially explain the high use of the private sector, this cannot be the only explanation. The private share of health-care use is even higher in markets where qualified doctors offer free care through public clinics; despite this free service, the majority of health-care visits are made to providers with no formal medical qualifications. This paper examines the reasons for the existence of this puzzle in India. Combining contemporary household-level data with archival records, I examine the aggressive family planning program implemented during the emergency rule in the 1970s and explore whether the coercion, disinformation, and carelessness involved in implementing the program could partly explain the puzzle. Exploiting the timing of the emergency rule, state-level variation in the number of sterilizations, and an instrumental variable approach, I show that the states heavily affected by the sterilization policy have a lower level of public health-care usage today. I demonstrate the mechanism for this practice by showing that the states heavily affected by forced sterilizations have a lower level of confidence in government hospitals and doctors and a higher level of confidence in private hospitals and doctors in providing good treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Dackehag ◽  
Lina Maria Ellegård

Abstract The case for competition in health-care markets rests on economic models in which providers seek to maximize profits. However, little is known regarding how public health-care providers, who might not have a profit motive, react to increased competition from private providers. This study considers the heterogeneous effects of a primary health-care reform in a Swedish region that considerably loosened entry restrictions and increased patients’ freedom of choice, thus enabling increased competition. Our difference-in-differences analysis contrasts local markets that were affected by both entry and choice with local monopoly markets, which were unaffected by the reforms. Using detailed administrative data on all visits to public health centers in 2008–2011, we find that providers in markets with increasing competition registered more diagnoses in an administrative database, thus increasing their reimbursement per patient. Although the economic significance of the effect is small, the result suggests that public providers are indeed sensitive to competition.


10.2196/19054 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e19054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Sean Sullivan ◽  
Charles Sailey ◽  
Jodie Lynn Guest ◽  
Jeannette Guarner ◽  
Colleen Kelley ◽  
...  

Background The response in the United States to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been hampered by a lack of aggressive testing for the infection. Testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cornerstone of an effective public health response. However, efforts to test have been hampered by limited reagents, limitations in the availability of swabs used for the collection of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens, limitations in personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care providers collecting the NPS specimens, and limitations in viral transport media for transporting the specimens. Therefore, more flexible options for screening for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and serologic responses are critical to inform clinical and public health responses. Objective We aim to document the ability of patients to self-collect sufficient specimens for SARS-CoV-2 viral detection and serology. Methods Patient self-collection of samples will be done with observation by a health care provider during a telemedicine session. Participants will be mailed a specimen collection kit, engage in a telehealth session with a provider through a HIPPA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)-compliant video meeting, and collect specimens while being observed by the provider. Providers will record whether they are confident in the suitability of the specimen for laboratory testing that would inform clinical decision making. We will objectively assess the sufficiency of biological material in the mailed-in specimens. Results The protocol was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (IRB) on March 30, 2020 (Protocol number 371). To date, we have enrolled 159 participants. Conclusions Defining a conceptual framework for assessing the sufficiency of patient-collected samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and serologic responses to infection is critical for facilitating public health responses and providing PPE-sparing options to increase testing. Validation of alternative methods of specimen collection should include objective measures of the sufficiency of specimens for testing. A strong evidence base for diversifying testing modalities will improve tools to guide public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document