scholarly journals Corneal higher-order aberrations after cataract surgery: Manual phacoemulsification versus femtosecond-laser assisted technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199061
Author(s):  
Dominika Pohlmann ◽  
Daniel Pilger ◽  
Eckart Bertelmann ◽  
Christoph von Sonnleithner
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Anova Analysis ◽  
Higher Order Aberrations ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽  
Group B

Purpose: To compare and evaluate corneal higher-order aberrations (c-HOA) between conventional manual phacoemulsification (Phaco), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with astigmatic keratotomy (FSAK). Methods: In this retrospective single center study, 53 healthy individuals with cataract (73 eyes) underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of an intraocular lens. Three groups were formed: group A, Phaco ( n = 27 eyes of 21 patients); group B, FLACS ( n = 25 eyes of 15 patients); group C, FSAK ( n = 21 eyes of 17 patients). An iTrace aberrometer (Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA) was used to perform aberrometry with a pupil scan size of 5.0 mm. We used ANOVA analysis and the paired sample t-test for statistical analysis. Results: There was no difference in total c-HOA between the groups prior to surgery ( F(2,66) = 2.2, p = 0.128), but some evidence for a difference between the groups after surgery (F(2,65) = 3.87, p = 0.025). After surgery, total c-HOA increased in all groups, but the greatest increase occurred FSAK. Conclusion: Manual phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery seem to have less impact on corneal higher-order aberrations than the combination of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with astigmatic keratotomy.

Higher Order Aberrations in Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Versus Manual Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul H. Ernest ◽  
Marko Popovic ◽  
Matthew B. Schlenker ◽  
Lindsay Klumpp ◽  
Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Higher Order Aberrations

Bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared to standard bimanual phacoemulsification: A case–control study

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Maria Cavallini ◽  
Elisa Fornasari ◽  
Michele De Maria ◽  
Andrea Lazzerini ◽  
Luca Campi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Endothelial Cell Count ◽  
Group A ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
Group B ◽  
Surgically Induced

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimanual, low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with 1.4-mm microincisions compared to standard bimanual phacoemulsification (bimanual microincision cataract surgery). Design: Prospective, non-randomized comparative case series. Methods: Bimanual femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with microincisions was performed on 80 eyes (Group A) with the low-energy Ziemer LDV Z8; a matched case–control series of 80 eyes performed with standard bimanual microincision cataract surgery technique was selected for comparison (Group B). All interventions were performed by the same experienced surgeon. Intraoperative parameters were recorded as well as intra- and postoperative complications. Best corrected visual acuity, surgically induced astigmatism, central corneal thickness and endothelial cell count were evaluated before surgery and at 1 and 3 months post intervention. Results: The mean effective phaco times were 3.79 ± 2.19 s (Group A) and 4.49 ± 1.84 s (Group B) (p = 0.041). No major intra- or postoperative complications occurred. An overall significant mean best corrected visual acuity improvement was noted at 3 months, but was not statistically different between the groups. No significant changes were observed for surgically induced astigmatism or corneal pachymetry. A significant loss of endothelial cell count in both groups was detected at 3 months, with Group A reporting a significantly lower endothelial cell count loss compared to Group B (p = 0.009). Conclusion: Bimanual, low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with 1.4-mm microincisions by an expert surgeon was proven to be safe and effective in this study. This technique has advantages compared with standard bimanual microincision cataract surgery in terms of endothelial preservation.

Changes of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Cataract Surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 1244-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfei Ye ◽  
Keke Zhang ◽  
Jin Yang ◽  
Yi Lu
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Higher Order Aberrations

scholarly journals Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Microhook ab Interno Trabeculotomy and Goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade: Preliminary Early 3-Month Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4115
Author(s):  
Hiromitsu Onoe ◽  
Kazuyuki Hirooka ◽  
Hideaki Okumichi ◽  
Yumiko Murakami ◽  
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Higher Order Aberrations ◽  
Postoperative Changes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Kahook Dual Blade ◽  
Ab Interno

We examined postoperative corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) present after combined phacoemulsification with either microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (μLOT-Phaco) or goniotomy, using the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB-Phaco). Retrospective study: A total of 45 eyes underwent μLOT-Phaco and KDB-Phaco (LOT-Phaco) procedures, with 21 eyes that underwent cataract surgery alone used as controls. Visual acuity and corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations were analyzed before and at 1, 2, and 3 months after the surgeries. Risk factors that could potentially influence HOAs were evaluated. No significant postoperative changes were noted for corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations after cataract surgery alone. The mean corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations were 0.222 ± 0.115 μm, 0.203 ± 0.113 μm, and 0.084 ± 0.043 μm at baseline and 0.326 ± 0.195 μm (p < 0.001), 0.302 ± 0.289 μm (p = 0.03), and 0.150 ± 0.115 μm (p < 0.001) at 3 months after LOT-Phaco, respectively. Results of the analysis for risk factors suggested that a longer incision in Schlemm’s canal could influence corneal HOAs, coma-like aberrations, and spherical-like aberrations after LOT-Phaco. Although no significant postoperative changes were observed in corneal HOAs and coma-like or spherical-like aberrations after cataract surgery alone, a significant increase in corneal HOAs and coma-like or spherical-like aberrations remained after the LOT-Phaco procedure.

scholarly journals Clinical Impact of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT-based Personalized Predictive Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiotherapy: a Retrospective, Single-center Study for Unresectable HCC Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Bucalau ◽  
Benoît Collette ◽  
Illario Tancredi ◽  
Michael Vouche ◽  
Martina Pezzullo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
A Posteriori ◽  
Selective Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Predictive Dosimetry ◽  
Administered Activity ◽  
Center Study

Abstract BackgroundRecent data indicates that personalized dosimetry-based selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) may be associated with better outcome for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).AimWe aim to evaluate the contribution of personalized predictive dosimetry (performed with Simplicity90® software) in HCC patients by comparing them to our historical cohort whose activity was determined by standard dosimetry. MethodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study conducted between February 2016 and December 2020 that included patients with HCC who received SIRT after simulation based on either standard dosimetry (group A) or, as of December 2017, on personalized dosimetry (group B). Primary objectives were best overall response (BOR) and objective response rate (ORR) evaluated by mRECIST at 3 months. Safety and toxicity profiles were evaluated at day 1, 1- and 3-months post-treatment. For group A we studied the dose-response relationship at 3 months and compared the activity to be administered determined a posteriori using Simplicit90Y® and the activity actually administered determined by the standard approach.ResultsBetween February 2016 and December 2020, 66 patients received 69 simulations leading to 40 treatments. The median follow-up time was equal for both groups, 21 months (range 3-55) in group A and 21 months (range 4-39) in group B. The per patient analysis revealed a significant benefit of personalized predictive dosimetry in terms of better overall response at 3 months (80% vs. 33.3%, p= 0.007) and at 6 months (77.8% vs. 22.2%, p= 0.06). This trend was found in the analysis by nodule with a response rate according to mRECIST of 87.5% for personalized dosimetry versus 68.4% for standard dosimetry at 3 months, p= 0.24. Only one grade 3 biological toxicity (hyperbilirubinemia) was noted in group A. The comparison between the administered activity and the recommended activity recalculated a posteriori using Simplicit90Y® showed that the vast majority of patients who progressed (83.33%) received less activity than that recommended by the personalized approach or an inadequate distribution of the administered activity. ConclusionsOur study confirms that the use of personalized dosimetry allows a better selection of HCC patients who can benefit from SIRT, and consequently, improves the effectiveness of this treatment.

scholarly journals The Impact of Unilateral or Bilateral Cataract Surgery on Visual Acuity and Life Quality of Elderly Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zuo ◽  
Haidong Zou ◽  
Xinfeng Fei ◽  
Weiqi Xu ◽  
Jianhong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Bilateral Cataract ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

In the current study, the CLVQOL was used to assess VRQOL before unilateral or bilateral cataract surgery and at the end of the follow-up period in order to determine the greater beneficial mode of surgery for patients, if one of the two surgical methods is more beneficial over the other. The patients were classified as receiving unilateral (group A) and bilateral cataract surgery (group B). There were no significant differences between groups A and B before the operation in terms of life quality scores, binocular weighted average LogMAR BCVA, age, educational level, gender, systematic and ocular comorbidities, and the complications of the operation. It was shown that visual acuity improved more significantly with bilateral cataract surgery than with unilateral surgery in elderly patients with a high preoperative disease burden in Shanghai city. However, the improvement in life quality was not different in patients receiving either bilateral or unilateral cataract surgery.

scholarly journals Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) with Clear Corneal Incision and SICS with Scleral Incision – A Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Md Shafiqul Alam ◽  
Khaleda Nazneen Bari
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Clear Corneal Incision ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Postoperative Astigmatism ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Age related cataract is the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment throughout the world. With the advent of microsurgical facilities simple cataract extraction surgery has been replaced by small incision cataract surgery (SICS) with posterior chamber intra ocular lens implant, which can be done either with clear corneal incision or scleral incision. Objective: To compare the post operative visual outcome in these two procedures of cataract surgery. Materials and method: This comparative study was carried out in the department of Ophthalmology, Delta Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period of January 2010 to December 2012. Total 60 subjects indicated for age related cataract surgery irrespective of sex with the age range of 40-80 years with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly and equally distributed in 2 groups; Group A for SICS with clear corneal incision and group B for SICS with scleral incision. Post operative visual out come was evaluated by determining visual acuity and astigmatism in different occasions and was compared between groups. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS for windows version12. Results: The highest age incidence (43.3%) was found between 61 to 70 years of age group. Among study subjects 40 were male and 20 were female. Preoperative visual acuity and astigmatism were evenly distributed between groups. Regarding postoperative unaided visual outcome, 6/12 or better visual acuity was found in 19.98% cases in group A and 39.6% cases in group B at 1st week. At 6th week 6/6 vision was found in 36.3% in Group A and 56.1% in Group B and 46.2% in group A and 66% in group B without and with correction respectively. With refractive correction, 6/6 vision was attained in 60% subjects of group A and 86.67% of group B at 8th week. Post operative visual acuity was statistically significant in all occasions. Postoperative astigmatism of >0.50D was in 82.5% subjects of group A and 52.8% subjects of group B at 1st week. At 6th week postoperative astigmatism of less than 1D was in 79.95% subjects of Group A and 83.34% subjects of Group B. About 20% subjects in Group A and only 3.3% in Group B showed astigmatism of more than 1D and these differences on both the occasions were statistically significant. Conclusion: The post operative visual outcome was better in SICS with scleral incision (group B) than in SICS with clear corneal incision (Group-A). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v2i1.17793 Delta Med Col J. Jan 2014; 2(1): 22-27

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document