scholarly journals Standards for opioid use disorder care: An assessment of Nordic approaches

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Gedeon ◽  
Mikael Sandell ◽  
Inge Birkemose ◽  
Johan Kakko ◽  
Valgerður Rúnarsdóttir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Nordic Countries ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Treatment Access

Aims: Outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) in Nordic countries have improved with integrated treatment and harm-reduction programmes. Approaches and the standard of care are different across the region. Evidence of treatment needs and current approaches are defined from evidence to inform development of a common standard. Method: Evidence of population sizes and treatment approach collected. Common standards for care (harm reduction, pharmacotherapy, psychology/social therapy) defined for each country. Results: Evidence defines number in treatment; potential population needing treatment not defined for all countries. Populations sizes, treatment access (ratio in treatment programme compared to total country population) defined: Sweden 4,000 in OUD care (access ratio 40); Finland 3,000 (55); Norway 8,000 (154); Denmark 7,500 (132). Approach to treatment similar: integrated treatment programmes standard. Care provided by specialists in outpatient clinics/primary care; secondary care/inpatient services are available. Harm reduction is limited in Sweden but available and more accessible elsewhere. Treatment entry criteria: access relatively unlimited in Norway and Denmark, more limited in Finland and Sweden. Standards of care defined: easy access to high-quality services, individual planning, care not limited by time, management of relapse, education for patients, continuous engagement, holistic approach including management of comorbidities, needle equipment programmes without limit, treatment in prisons as community. Conclusion: There are opportunities to improve OUD care in the Nordics. Policy makers and clinicians can advance OUD care and share common success factors. Collaborative work across the Nordic countries is valuable. Further research in clinical practice development can yield important results for the benefit of patients with OUD.

scholarly journals Opportunities to Offer Harm Reduction to People who Inject Drugs During Infectious Disease Encounters: Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa M Peckham ◽  
Erika H Young
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
People Who Inject Drugs ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Postexposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Clinical Encounters ◽  
Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Major Target

Abstract Increased rates of overdose (OD) and blood-borne infections have been associated with injection drug use (IDU). This increasing overlap between IDU-related infectious diseases (ID) is a byproduct of the opioid OD crisis, especially with the transition to synthetic opioids with faster onset and shorter duration leading to potentially more frequent injections. ID specialists are uniquely positioned to positively impact the opioid OD crisis by capitalizing on opportunistic moments of engagement during clinical encounters with people who inject drugs (PWID). Harm reduction services should therefore be expanded and offered to PWID in ID settings to reduce rates of OD, infection, and hospitalization. Major target areas include (1) teaching and distribution of materials related to safer injection practice such as sterile injection supplies, fentanyl test strips, and naloxone; (2) increased screening and access to pre-exposure prophylaxis and postexposure prophylaxis; and (3) initiation of medications for opioid use disorder. Incorporating these strategies in various treatment settings can expand treatment access, improve patient outcomes, and reduce stigma associated with IDU.

scholarly journals “It’s way more than just writing a prescription”: A qualitative study of preferences for integrated versus non-integrated treatment models among individuals with opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Saunders ◽  
Sarah K. Moore ◽  
Olivia Walsh ◽  
Stephen A. Metcalf ◽  
Alan J. Budney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Medical Setting ◽  
Integrated Models ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Medical Settings ◽  
Psychosocial Services ◽  
Treatment Models

Abstract Background Increasingly, treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is offered in integrated treatment models addressing both substance use and other health conditions within the same system. This often includes offering medications for OUD in general medical settings. It remains uncertain whether integrated OUD treatment models are preferred to non-integrated models, where treatment is provided within a distinct treatment system. This study aimed to explore preferences for integrated versus non-integrated treatment models among people with OUD and examine what factors may influence preferences. Methods This qualitative study recruited participants (n = 40) through Craigslist advertisements and flyers posted in treatment programs across the United States. Participants were 18 years of age or older and scored a two or higher on the heroin or opioid pain reliever sections of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medications, and Other Substances (TAPS) Tool. Each participant completed a demographic survey and a telephone interview. The interviews were coded and content analyzed. Results While some participants preferred receiving OUD treatment from an integrated model in a general medical setting, the majority preferred non-integrated models. Some participants preferred integrated models in theory but expressed concerns about stigma and a lack of psychosocial services. Tradeoffs between integrated and non-integrated models were centered around patient values (desire for anonymity and personalization, fear of consequences), the characteristics of the provider and setting (convenience, perceived treatment effectiveness, access to services), and the patient-provider relationship (disclosure, trust, comfort, stigma). Conclusions Among this sample of primarily White adults, preferences for non-integrated versus integrated OUD treatment were mixed. Perceived benefits of integrated models included convenience, potential for treatment personalization, and opportunity to extend established relationships with medical providers. Recommendations to make integrated treatment more patient-centered include facilitating access to psychosocial services, educating patients on privacy, individualizing treatment, and prioritizing the patient-provider relationship. This sample included very few minorities and thus findings may not be fully generalizable to the larger population of persons with OUD. Nonetheless, results suggest a need for expansion of both OUD treatment in specialty and general medical settings to ensure access to preferred treatment for all.

Perceived Benefits and Harms of Involuntary Civil Commitment for Opioid Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 718-734
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Evans ◽  
Calla Harrington ◽  
Robert Roose ◽  
Susan Lemere ◽  
David Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Commitment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Ethics Framework ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
Underserved Patients ◽  
Legal Consequences

Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) prevents imminent overdose, but also restricts autonomy and raises other ethical concerns. Using the Kass Public Health Ethics Framework, we identified ICC benefits and harms. Benefits include: protection of vulnerable, underserved patients; reduced legal consequences; resources for families; and “on-demand” treatment access. Harms include: stigmatizing and punitive experiences; heightened family conflict and social isolation; eroded patient self-determination; limited or no provision of OUD medications; and long-term overdose risk. To use ICC ethically, it should be recognized as comprising vulnerable patients worthy of added protections; be a last resort option; utilize consensual, humanizing processes; provide medications and other evidence-based-treatment; integrate with existing healthcare systems; and demonstrate effective outcomes before diffusion. ICC to OUD treatment carries significant potential harms that, if unaddressed, may outweigh its benefits. Findings can inform innovations for ensuring that ICC is used in an ethically responsible way.

scholarly journals Early innovations in opioid use disorder treatment and harm reduction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Krawczyk ◽  
Adetayo Fawole ◽  
Jenny Yang ◽  
Babak Tofighi
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Home Delivery ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has exerted a significant toll on the lives of people who use opioids (PWUOs). At the same time, more flexible regulations around provision of opioid use disorder (OUD) services have led to new opportunities for facilitating access to services for PWUOs. In the current scoping review, we describe new services and service modifications implemented by treatment and harm reduction programs serving PWUO, and discuss implications for policy and practice. Methods Literature searches were conducted within PubMed, LitCovid, Embase, and PsycInfo for English-language studies published in 2020 that describe a particular program, service, or intervention aimed at facilitating access to OUD treatment and/or harm reduction services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers. Relevant studies were reviewed in full and those that met inclusion criteria underwent final data extraction and synthesis (n = 25). We used a narrative synthesis approach to identify major themes around key service modifications and innovations implemented across programs serving PWUO. Results Reviewed OUD treatment and harm reduction services spanned five continents and a range of settings from substance use treatment to street outreach programs. Innovative service modifications to adapt to COVID-19 circumstances primarily involved expanded use of telehealth services (e.g., telemedicine visits for buprenorphine, virtual individual or group therapy sessions, provision of donated or publicly available phones), increased take-home medication allowances for methadone and buprenorphine, expanded uptake of long-acting opioid medications (e.g. extended-release buprenorphine and naltrexone), home delivery of services (e.g. MOUD, naloxone and urine drug screening), outreach and makeshift services for delivering MOUD and naloxone, and provision of a safe supply of opioids. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has posed multiple challenges for PWUOs, while simultaneously accelerating innovations in policies, care models, and technologies to lower thresholds for life-saving treatment and harm reduction services. Such innovations highlight novel patient-centered and feasible approaches to mitigating OUD related harms. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of these approaches and inform policies that improve access to care for PWUOs.

scholarly journals Implementing a Low-threshold Audio-only Telehealth Model for Medication-assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder at a Community-based Non-profit Organization in Washington, D.C.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellis Jaewon Yeo ◽  
Hannah Kralles ◽  
David Sternberg ◽  
Dana McCullough ◽  
Ajetha Nadanasabesan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Medication Assisted Treatment ◽  
Low Threshold

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had especially devastating effects on people who use drugs. Due to pandemic protocols in the United States, medication-assisted treatment (MAT) regulations became more flexible, permitting our community-based nonprofit organization to transition its low-threshold MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model of care in 2020. Case PresentationThis case study describes our transition from a low-threshold community-based in-person MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model. We extracted data from electronic health records to describe patient characteristics and to calculate treatment retention rates. We measure the success of our intervention relative to published retention rates, both overall as well as for in-person and telehealth care. ConclusionsLow-threshold medication-assisted treatment in the care of people with opioid use disorder is essential to increasing treatment access and continuity. We found that an audio-only telehealth model was viable. Although we had decreased retention rates following the transition to an audio-only telehealth model, our rates remained excellent compared to published values for in-person MAT care. We call for advocacy and regulations to support continued use of telehealth services throughout and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Harm Reduction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Batra ◽  
Noah Villegas ◽  
Erin Zerbo
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Maladaptive Behaviors ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Humanistic Approach ◽  
Female Sex Work

Harm reduction is defined as a set of policies, programs, and practices aimed at reducing the negative health, social, and economic consequences associated with various behaviors. Although classically applied to the treatment of substance use disorders, its scope has broadened over time to include high-risk sexual activity, nonadherence to treatment, and other behaviors that may lead to negative consequences. In addition to providing relevant historical context for scenarios encountered, this chapter uses a case to demonstrate how a provider might take a nonjudgmental and humanistic approach to identifying maladaptive behaviors and apply evidence-based, realistic interventions to reduce associated harms. Specific topics discussed include opioid use disorder, tobacco use disorder, female sex work, and nonadherence to psychotropic medications.

scholarly journals MP11: Emergency physician attitudes on opioid use disorder and barriers to providing buprenorphine/naloxone

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S46-S46
Author(s):  
D. Webster ◽  
T. Meyer ◽  
C. Crain ◽  
J. Fraser ◽  
P. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Harm Reduction ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Physician Attitudes ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Bridge Program ◽  
Narrow Scope ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Systemic Health

Introduction: Buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine) has proven to be a life-saving intervention amidst the ongoing opioid epidemic in Canada. Research has shown benefits to initiating buprenorphine from the emergency department (ED) including improved treatment retention, systemic health care savings and fewer drug-related visits to the ED. Despite this, there has been little to no uptake of this evidence-based practice in our department. This qualitative study aimed to determine the local barriers and potential solutions to initiating buprenorphine in the ED and gain an understanding of physician attitudes and behaviours regarding harm reduction care and opioid use disorder management. Methods: ED physicians at a midsize Atlantic hospital were recruited by convenience sampling to participate in semi-structured privately conducted interviews. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and de-identified transcripts were uploaded to NVivo 12 plus for concept driven and inductive coding and a hierarchy of open, axial and selective coding was employed. Transcripts were independently reviewed by a local qualitative research expert and themes were compared for similarity to limit bias. Interview saturation was reached after 7 interviews. Results: Emergent themes included a narrow scope of harm reduction care that primarily focused on abstinence-based therapies and a multitude of biases including feelings of deception, fear of diversion, feeling buprenorphine induction was too time consuming for the ED and differentiating patients with opioid use disorder from ‘medically ill’ patients. Several barriers and proposed solutions to initiating buprenorphine from the ED were elicited including lack of training and need for formal education, poor familiarity with buprenorphine, the need for an algorithm and community bridge program and formal supports such as an addictions consult team for the ED. Conclusion: This study elicited several opportunities for improved care for patients with addictions presenting to our ED. Future education will focus on harm reduction care, specifically strategies for managing patients desiring to continue to use substances. Education will focus on addressing the multitude of biases elicited and dispelling common myths. A locally informed buprenorphine pathway will be developed. In future, this study may be used to advocate for improved formal supports for our department including an addictions consult team.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document