The fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product level on arrival in trauma patients is a better predictor of a fatal outcome than physiological or anatomical severity: A retrospective chart review

Trauma ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 146040862097570
Author(s):  
Hiroki Nagasawa ◽  
Kazuhiko Omori ◽  
Shuko Nojiri ◽  
Ken-Ichi Muramatsu ◽  
Yoshihiro Kushida ◽  
...  

Aim We performed a retrospective investigation to determine the factors, including vital signs, severity of traumatic anatomical abnormality and biochemical data, which are most useful for predicting the outcomes of trauma patients after admission. Methods A retrospective medical chart review was performed for all trauma patients who were admitted to our department from September 2017 to August 2019. These subjects were then divided into two groups according to whether they survived to hospital discharge or not. Results During the investigation period, 790 patients were enrolled as subjects (Death group, n = 34; survival group, n = 756). The injury severity score, serum glucose level, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product level in the Death group were significantly greater than those in the Survival group. A multivariate analysis showed that the fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product level was a significant predictor of a fatal outcome (odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 1.0008-1.0040, p value = 0.0008). Conclusions The fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product levels on arrival may be a better predictor of a fatal outcome in trauma patients than physiological or anatomical severity.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Zhongjun Zheng ◽  
Mao Zhang

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the age trend of trauma patients and to compare different scoring tools to predict in-hospital mortality in elderly trauma patients.Methods: National Trauma Database (NTDB) in the United States from 2005 to 2015 and the Trauma Register DGU® in German from 1994 to 2012 was searched to describe age change of trauma patients. Then we secondly analyzed the data published in http://datadryad.org/. According to the in-hospital survival status, patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluated the value of ISS (injury severity score); NISS (new injury severity score), APACHE Ⅱ (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ), SPAS Ⅱ (simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ) and TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score) in predicting in-hospital mortality among geriatric trauma patients.Results:The analysis of NTDB showed the percentage of geriatric trauma has increased from 0.18 to 0.30, 2005-2015. The analysis of DGU showed the mean age rose from 39.11 in 1993 to 51.10 in 2013, and the percentage of patients aged ≥60 rose from 16.5% to 37.5%. A total of 311 patients aged more than 65 years were secondly analyzed. One hundred and sixty-four (52.73%) patients died in the hospital. ISS, NISS, APACHE, and SAPS in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, but TRISS in the death group was significantly lower than those in the survival group. The AUC of APACHE Ⅱ was 0.715, ISS was 0.807, NISS was 0.850, SPAS Ⅱ was 0.725, and TRISS was 0.828.Conclusion:The increasing number of trauma in the elderly is a challenge for current and future trauma management. Compared with APACHE and SAPS, ISS, NISS and TRISS are more suitable for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly trauma patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Zhongjun Zheng ◽  
Mao Zhang

Abstract Purpose: The study aimed to test the incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and evaluate different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.Methods: Part 1: Annual reports released by the National Trauma Database (NTDB) in the United States from 2005 to 2015 and the Trauma Register DGU® in Germany from 1994 to 2012 were analyzed to test the incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing. Part 2: Secondary analysis of a single-center cohort study conducted among 311 severely injured geriatric trauma patients in a level Ⅰ trauma center in Switzerland was completed. According to the in-hospital survival status, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival group. The differences of the ISS (injury severity score), NISS (new injury severity score), TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score), APACHE Ⅱ (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ) and SPAS Ⅱ (simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ) between two groups were evaluated. Then, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were calculated.Results: Part 1: The analysis of the NTDB showed that the increase in the number of geriatric trauma ranged from 18% to 30% between 2005 and 2015. The analysis of the DGU® showed that the mean age of trauma patients rose from 39.11 in 1993 to 51.10 in 2013, and the proportion of patients aged ≥60 years rose from 16.5% to 37.5%. Part 2: The findings from the secondary analysis showed that 164 (52.73%) patients died in the hospital. The ISS, NISS, APACHE Ⅱ, and SAPS Ⅱ in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, and the TRISS in the death group was significantly lower than those in the survival group. The AUCs of the ISS, NISS, TRISS, APACHE Ⅱ, and SAPS Ⅱ for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were 0.807, 0.850, 0.828, 0.715 and 0.725, respectively.Conclusion: The total number of geriatric trauma is increasing as the population ages. The accuracy of ISS, NISS and TRISS was higher than the APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Zhongjun Zheng ◽  
Mao Zhang

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the age change tendency of trauma patients and to test the accuracy of different scoring tools in prediction of in-hospital mortality in case of geriatric trauma.Methods: Annual reports released by the National Trauma Database (NTDB) in the United States from 2005 to 2015 and the Trauma Register DGU® in German from 1994 to 2012 were used to describe the age change tendency of trauma patients. Secondary analysis of a single-center cohort study conducted among 311 severely injured geriatric trauma patients in a level Ⅰ trauma center in Switzerland was completed. According to the in-hospital survival status, patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluated the predictive performance of the ISS (injury severity score); NISS (new injury severity score), APACHE Ⅱ (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ), SPAS Ⅱ (simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ) and TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score) in prediction of in-hospital mortality among geriatric trauma patients. Results: The analysis of the NTDB showed the proportion of geriatric trauma increased from 18% to 30% from 2005 to 2015. The analysis of the DGU® showed the mean age of trauma patients rose from 39.11 in 1993 to 51.10 in 2013, and the proportion of patients aged ≥60 rose from 16.5% to 37.5%. The secondary analysis indicated one hundred and sixty-four (52.73%) patients died in the hospital. The ISS, NISS, APACHE Ⅱ, and SAPS Ⅱ in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, and the TRISS in the death group was significantly lower than those in the survival group. The AUC of the ISS, NISS, TRISS, APACHE Ⅱ, and SAPS Ⅱ was 0.807, 0.850, 0.828, 0.715 and 0.725, respectively.Conclusion: The total number of geriatric trauma is increasing as the population ages. The accuracy of ISS, NISS and TRISS was higher than the accuracy of the APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ to predict in-hospital mortality in case of geriatric trauma.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2891-2891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavya S. Doshi ◽  
Shannon L. Meeks ◽  
Jeanne E Hendrickson ◽  
Andrew Reisner ◽  
Traci Leong ◽  
...  

Abstract Trauma is the leading cause of death in children ages 1 to 21 years of age. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a high risk of both morbidity and mortality within the subset of pediatric trauma patients. Numerous adult studies have shown that coagulopathy is commonly observed in patients who have sustained trauma and that the incidence is higher when there is TBI. Previously, it was thought that coagulopathy related to trauma was dilutional (i.e. due to replacement of red cells and platelets without plasma) but more recent studies show that the coagulopathy in trauma is early and likely independent of transfusion therapy. Additionally, abnormal coagulation studies (PT, PTT, INR, platelet count, fibrinogen, and D-dimer) following TBI are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in adults. Although coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury in adults is well documented, the pediatric literature is fairly sparse. A recent study by Hendrickson et al in 2008 demonstrated that coagulopathy is both underestimated and under-treated in pediatric trauma patients who required blood product replacements. Here we present the results of a retrospective pilot study designed to assess coagulopathy in the pediatric TBI population. We analyzed all children admitted to our facility with TBI from January 2012 to December 2013. Patients were excluded if they had underlying diseases of the hemostatic system. All patients had baseline characteristics measured including: age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), injury severity score (ISS), initial complete blood count, DIC profile, hematological treatments including transfusions, ICU and hospital length of stay, ventilator days and survival status. Coagulation studies were defined as "abnormal" when they fell outside the accepted reference range of the pediatric hospital laboratory (PT 12.6-15.9, PTT 23.6-42.1 seconds, fibrinogen < 180 mg/dL units, platelets < 185 103/mL and hemoglobin < 11.5 g/dL). Survival was measured as survival at 30 days from admission or last known status at hospital discharge. One hundred and twenty patients met the inclusion criteria of the study and all were included in outcome analysis. Twenty-three of the 120 patients died (19.2%). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare survivors and non-survivors and baseline demographic data showed no difference in age or weight between the two groups with p-values of 0.1635 and 0.1624, respectively. Non-survivors had a higher ISS (30.26 vs 20.92, p-value 0.0004) and lower GCS (3 vs 5.8, p-value 0.0002) compared to survivors. Univariate analysis of coagulation studies to mortality showed statistically significant odds-ratios for ISS (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), PT (OR 5.91, 95% CI 1.86-18.73), PTT (OR 6.48, 95% CI 2.04-20.52) and platelets (OR 5.63, 95% CI 1.74 – 18.21). Abnormal fibrinogen levels were not predictive of mortality (OR 2.56, 95% CI 0.96-6.79). These results are summarized in Table 1. Our results demonstrate that, consistent with adult studies, abnormal coagulation studies are also associated with increased mortality in pediatric patients. Higher injury severity scores and lower GCS scores are also predictive of mortality. Taken together, these results suggest that possible early correction of coagulopathy in severe pediatric TBI patients could improve outcomes for these patients. Table 1. OR 95% CI p-value ISS 1.09 1.04—1.15 .0009 PT > 15.9 sec 5.91 1.86—18.73 0.0026 PTT > 42.1 sec 6.48 2.04—20.52 0.0015 Fibrinogen < 180 mg/dL 2.56 0.96—6.79 0.0597 Platelets < 185 x 103/mL 5.63 1.74—18.21 0.0040 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4071-4071
Author(s):  
Leonard A. Minuk ◽  
Kathleen Eckert ◽  
Tanya Charyk Stewart ◽  
Neil Parry ◽  
Daryl Gray ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Trauma patients often require massive transfusion and their resuscitation is commonly complicated by coagulopathy. Debate persists regarding optimal massive transfusion strategies, which have traditionally adopted 2 approaches: coagulation laboratory based therapy (LBT) versus fixed ratio trauma transfusion pathways (TTP). The proponents of a LBT strategy cite “rational use” and avoidance of over-transfusion. This system may not adequately address the dynamic trauma situation where a delay in coagulation results may be detrimental. A TTP more rapidly meets the needs of trauma patients but may increase blood product utilization. Objective: Retrospectively compare our preliminary early experience with a TTP compared to our previous LBT strategy. Method: Retrospective cohort study using our transfusion database comparing 14 patients who activated the TTP with 28 patients treated before the pathways introduction. Inclusion criteria included severe traumatic injury (Injury Severity Score (ISS) &gt;12), massive transfusion (defined as &gt;8 units of red blood cells (RBCs) in the first 24 hours). The TTP is activated by the trauma team and results in the immediate release of 4 units of uncrossmatched RBCs. Blood product is then issued in trauma packs (TPs). Each trauma pack contains 4 units of RBCs and 4 units of frozen plasma (FP) and every second pack contains one pool of platelets (PLTs). A dose of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is made available after TP #3. Cryoprecipitate (CRYO) is issued only at the request of the trauma team. A CBC, INR, PTT, and fibrinogen is measured at TTP activation and after every other TP. Outcomes: Outcome variables included total blood product utilization (RBC, FP, CRYO, PLTs), time to first and second set of FP (time 0 is release of 1st RBC unit), number of RBC units issued until first and second set of FP, coagulopathy at presentation and highest INR during first 24 hours of resuscitation. Results: The results are summarized in the attached table. There was no difference in ISS between groups. The introduction of the TTP resulted in no difference in the amount of blood product utilization when compared to the pre-pathway control group. Significant differences included a much shorter time to first and second FP delivery and fewer RBC units before the first and second FP delivery. The majority of the patients were coagulopathic on presentation (defined as INR &gt; 1.4) and the TTP group achieved a significantly lower peak INR during the first 24 hours of resuscitation compared to the pre-pathway group. Conclusion: This pilot study shows that the introduction of a trauma transfusion pathway significantly improves coagulopathy and reduces time to FP administration without increasing blood product utilization. Pre-Pathway (n=28) Trauma Transfusion Pathway (n=14) P-value Mean ISS 42.0 ± 12.5 34 ± 15.1 NS Mean RBC units used 23.4 ± 14.5 23.1 ± 10.7 NS Mean FP units used 13.4 ± 9.6 16.1 ± 8.3 NS Mean PLT pools used 1.8 ± 1.5 2.7 ± 1.8 NS Mean CRYO pools used 0.46 ± 0.64 0.71 ± 0.83 NS Mean time to 1stFP (min) 89.9 ± 55.5 55.4 ± 49.2 0.02 Mean time to 2ndFP (min) 237.0 ± 206.8 103.0 ± 59.4 0.0004 Mean #RBC units to 1st set FP 10.4 ± 9.0 7.8 ± 1.6 0.02 Mean #RBC units to 2nd set FP 17.6 ± 8.8 12.9 ± 3.4 0.016 # Patients coagulopathic on initial testing (INR&gt;1.4) 12 (43%) 8 (62%) NS Mean initial INR 1.5 ± 0.55 1.7 ± 0.58 NS Mean of highest INR in first 24h 2.3 ± 1.70 1.4 ± 0.25 0.006 # Patients given rFVIIa 6 (21%) 5 (36%) NS


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal Ives ◽  
Donald Moe ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Bernardino Castelo Branco ◽  
Lydia Lam ◽  
...  

The study purpose was to determine the incidence of mechanical complications (MC) associated with central venous catheterization (CVC) and to evaluate their impact on outcomes. This was a retrospective review of trauma morbidity and mortality records at a Level I trauma center (1999 to 2009). Demographics and outcomes were extracted for all trauma patients with CVC. Patients developing MC were compared with those who did not. Four thousand eight hundred eighteen lines were placed in 2935 patients. Of these, 1.5 per cent (n = 73) had MC. A total of 64.4 per cent (n = 47) were pneumothoraces followed by arterial cannulation at 8.2 per cent (n = 6) and thrombosis at 6.8 per cent (n = 5). The rate of MC by access site was: subclavian 1.8 per cent (n = 52), internal jugular 1.2 per cent (n = 10), and femoral 0.3 per cent (n = 3) (P value for trend = 0.001). Change in management was required in 31.5 per cent (n = 23). Number of lines ( P < 0.001), Injury Severity Score ( P < 0.001), body mass index less than 20 kg/m2 ( P = 0.036), and chest Abbreviated Injury Score greater than3 ( P = 0.034) were significant predictors of MC. Patients with MC had a longer intensive care unit length of stay (18.8 ± 25.7 vs 11.4 ± 13.3; adjusted odds ratio, 5.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.24–9.25; P = 0.001). Incidence of MC was 1.5 per cent. Complications were clinically significant in 31.5 per cent and resulted in longer intensive care unit stays.


2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 764-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Berbiglia ◽  
Peter P. Lopez ◽  
Leah Bair ◽  
Adelaide Ammon ◽  
Gwyneth Navas ◽  
...  

Even with specialized trauma systems, a significant number of deaths occur within the early postinjury period. Our goal was to examine deaths within this period for cause and determine if care could improve outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who were dead on arrival or died within 4 hours of arrival between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011. Survival probabilities and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were calculated. Chart review and trauma review processes were used to determine cases with opportunities for care improvement. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were dead on arrival (DOA), and 176 patients died within 4 hours of arrival. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds (68.4%). The most common causes of death were uncontrolled hemorrhage (68.2%) and neurologic trauma (23.4%). Average ISS was 32. Twenty-nine patients had survival probability percentages over 50. Ten of 176 (5.7%) deaths were found to have opportunities for care improvement. In three cases (1.7%), errors contributed to death. The majority of trauma patients DOA or dying within 4 hours of hospital arrival have nonsurvivable injuries. Regular trauma review processes are invaluable in determining opportunities for care improvement. Autopsy information increases the reliability of the review process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Yanagawa ◽  
Kouhei Ishikawa ◽  
Kei Jitsuiki ◽  
Toshihiko Yoshizawa ◽  
Yasumasa Oode ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Zhongjun Zheng ◽  
Mao Zhang

Abstract Purpose The study aimed to examine the changing incidence of geriatric trauma and evaluate the predictive ability of different scoring tools for in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Methods Annual reports released by the National Trauma Database (NTDB) in the USA from 2005 to 2015 and the Trauma Register DGU® in Germany from 1994 to 2012 were analyzed to examine the changing incidence of geriatric trauma. Secondary analysis of a single-center cohort study conducted among 311 severely injured geriatric trauma patients in a level I trauma center in Switzerland was completed. According to the in-hospital survival status, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival group. The differences of the ISS (injury severity score), NISS (new injury severity score), TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score), APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), and SPAS II (simplified acute physiology score II) between two groups were evaluated. Then, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were calculated. Results The analysis of the NTDB showed that the increase in the number of geriatric trauma ranged from 18 to 30% between 2005 and 2015. The analysis of the DGU® showed that the mean age of trauma patients rose from 39.11 in 1993 to 51.10 in 2013, and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years rose from 16.5 to 37.5%. The findings from the secondary analysis showed that 164 (52.73%) patients died in the hospital. The ISS, NISS, APACHE II, and SAPS II in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, and the TRISS in the death group was significantly lower than those in the survival group. The AUCs of the ISS, NISS, TRISS, APACHE II, and SAPS II for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were 0.807, 0.850, 0.828, 0.715, and 0.725, respectively. Conclusion The total number of geriatric trauma is increasing as the population ages. The accuracy of ISS, NISS and TRISS was higher than the APACHE II and SAPS II for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 1224-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany Bankhead-Kendall ◽  
Sepeadeh Radpour ◽  
Kevin Luftman ◽  
Erin Guerra ◽  
Sadia Ali ◽  
...  

Rib fractures have long been considered as a major contributor to mortality in the blunt trauma patient. We hypothesized that rib fractures can be an excellent predictor of mortality, but rarely contribute to cause death. We performed a retrospective study (2008–2015) of blunt trauma patients admitted to our urban, Level I trauma center with one or more rib fractures. Medical records were reviewed in detail. Rib fracture deaths were those from any respiratory sequelae or hemorrhage from rib fractures. There were 4413 blunt trauma patients who sustained one or more rib fractures and 295 (6.8%) died. Rib fracture patients who died had a mean Injury Severity Score = 38 and chest Abbreviated Injury Score = 3.4. Rib fractures were the cause of death in only 21 patients (0.5%). After excluding patients who were dead on arrival, patients dying as a result of their rib fractures were found to be older ( P < 0.0001) and had a higher admission respiratory rate ( P = 0.02). Multivariable logistic regression found that age ≥65 was the only variable independently associated with mortality directly related to rib fractures (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.3–13.3, P value < .0001). Mortality in patients with rib fractures is uncommon (7%), and mortality directly related to rib fractures is rare (0.5%). Older patients are four times more likely to die as a direct result of rib fractures and may require additional resources to avoid mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document