scholarly journals Association between interarm blood pressure differences and diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 147916412094591
Author(s):  
Ji Hyun Lee ◽  
Ye An Kim ◽  
Young Lee ◽  
Woo-Dae Bang ◽  
Je Hyun Seo

Background: The effect of interarm blood pressure difference on the development of diabetic retinopathy, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease remains unknown. We investigated to determine the impact of interarm blood pressure difference on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: The study included 563 patients with diabetes, who were evaluated with a simultaneous bilateral blood pressure measurement. The cutoff values for interarm blood pressure difference were 5, 10 and 15 mmHg. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relation between interarm blood pressure difference and diabetic retinopathy, proteinuria and chronic kidney disease. Results: Diabetic patients with systolic interarm blood pressure difference ⩾5, ⩾10 and ⩾15 mmHg showed an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy [adjusted odds ratio = 1.48 (95% confidence interval = 1.01–2.18), odds ratio = 1.80 (95% confidence interval = 0.99–3.22), odds ratio = 2.29 (95% confidence interval = 1.00–5.23)] after adjustment. There were significant associations between interarm blood pressure difference ⩾5 and ⩾10 mmHg and proteinuria [odds ratio = 1.68 (95% confidence interval = 1.15–2.44), 1.89 (95% confidence interval = 1.05–3.37)]. Conclusion: The association between interarm blood pressure difference and the presence of diabetic retinopathy emerged even for systolic interarm blood pressure difference ⩾5 mmHg without interaction of systolic blood pressure. Systolic interarm blood pressure difference should be considered a surrogate marker for vascular complication in patients with type 2 diabetes.

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e40-e41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Fedecostante ◽  
Francesco Spannella ◽  
Federico Giulietti ◽  
Maddalena Ricci ◽  
Marianna Pavani ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Wojciech Matuszewski ◽  
Magdalena M. Stefanowicz-Rutkowska ◽  
Magdalena Szychlińska ◽  
Elżbieta Bandurska-Stankiewicz

Background and Objective: Nowadays, diabetes is one of the main causes of blindness in the world. Identification and differentiation of risk factors for diabetic retinopathy depending on the type of diabetes gives us the opportunity to fight and prevent this complication. Aim of the research: To assess differences in the risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Warmia and Mazury Region, Poland. Materials and Methods: Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) were assessed on the basis of an original questionnaire, which included: personal data, clinical history of diabetes and eye disease. Elements of clinical examination: blood pressure, BMI, waist circumference. Indicators of diabetes metabolic control: mean glycemia, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol and triglycerides, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), albumin–creatinine ratio in urine. Results: The study group included 315 (26%) patients with DM1 and 894 (74%) patients with DM2. Risk factors were estimated on the basis of logistic regression and verified with Student’s t-test. Statistically significant dependencies were found in both groups between the occurrence of diabetic retinopathy and diabetes duration, HbA1c, triglyceride concentrations, indicators of kidney function and cigarette smoking status. In the DM2 group, the development of DR was significantly influenced by the implemented models of diabetic treatment. Conclusions: In the whole study group, the risk of DR was associated with the duration of diabetes, HbA1c, triglyceride concentrations and smoking. In DM1 patients, the risk of DR was associated with diabetic kidney disease in the G1A1/A2 stage of chronic kidney disease, and in DM2 patients with the G2 stage of chronic kidney disease. An important risk factor for DR in DM2 patients was associated with late introduction of insulin therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1570-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Ceriello ◽  
Salvatore De Cosmo ◽  
Maria Chiara Rossi ◽  
Giuseppe Lucisano ◽  
Stefano Genovese ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rianneke de Ritter ◽  
Simone J S Sep ◽  
Carla J H van der Kallen ◽  
Miranda T Schram ◽  
Annemarie Koster ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate whether adverse differences in levels of cardiovascular risk factors in women than men, already established when comparing individuals with and without diabetes, are also present before type 2 diabetes onset.Research design and methodsIn a population-based cohort study of individuals aged 40-75 years (n=3410; 49% women, 29% type 2 diabetes (oversampled by design)), we estimated associations with cardiometabolic and lifestyle risk factors of (1) pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes (reference category: normal glucose metabolism) and (2) among non-diabetic individuals, of continuous levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Age-adjusted sex differences were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models with sex interaction terms.ResultsIn pre-diabetes, adverse differences in cardiometabolic risk factors were greater in women than men for systolic blood pressure (difference, 3.02 mm Hg; 95% CI:−0.26 to 6.30), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (difference, −0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.18 to −0.02), total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (difference, 0.22; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.44), triglycerides (ratio: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.22), and inflammation markers Z-score (ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.41). In type 2 diabetes, these sex differences were similar in direction, and of greater magnitude. Additionally, HbA1c among non-diabetic individuals was more strongly associated with several cardiometabolic risk factors in women than men: per one per cent point increase, systolic blood pressure (difference, 3.58 mm Hg; 95% CI: −0.03 to 7.19), diastolic blood pressure (difference, 2.10 mm Hg; 95% CI: −0.02 to 4.23), HDL cholesterol (difference, −0.09 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.19 to 0.00), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (difference, 0.26 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.47). With regard to lifestyle risk factors, no consistent pattern was observed.ConclusionOur results are consistent with the concept that the more adverse changes in cardiometabolic risk factors in women (than men) arise as a continuous process before the onset of type 2 diabetes.


Nephrology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Szu-Chia Chen ◽  
Yi-Chun Tsai ◽  
Jiun-Chi Huang ◽  
Su-Chu Lee ◽  
Jer-Ming Chang ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e0220506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayne Cho Park ◽  
Young-Ki Lee ◽  
AJin Cho ◽  
Chae hoon Han ◽  
Jung-Woo Noh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document