scholarly journals Industry Perspective: Maximizing the Benefit of Improved Detection with Guided and Monitored Thermal Ablation of Small Tumors

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan W. Nields

The continuous growth of mammography is driven by global acceptance of the demonstrated ability of screening mammography to reduce mortality from breast cancer. An increasing number of benign and malignant tumors are being diagnosed as a result of the growth in mammography, improvements in technology, especially digital mammography, as well as by an increase in patient surveillance. Breast imaging technology for cancer screening continues to improve, with the integration of ultrasound with digital mammography showing promise that an even larger number of small abnormalities will be detected in screening programs. The results of minimally invasive ablative techniques as tested in pilot clinical studies for breast tumor ablation are reviewed. A new x-ray based thermal monitoring method is described. An improved ability to intraoperatively monitor thermal ablative methods may enable more accurate minimally invasive treatment of an ever increasing number of both benign and malignant breast tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yossi Mandel ◽  
Boris Rubinsky

Nonthermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) is an new minimally invasive tissue ablation modality that uses high electric field pulses to produce irreversible permeation of the cell membrane (irreversible electroporation) while avoiding thermal damage and is applied to treat malignant tumors. This paper describes efforts to develop NTIRE as a new minimally invasive treatment modality for uveal melanoma, the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and other ocular malignancies. The paper deals with a 3D mathematical simulation model of the eye that employs the simultaneous solution to the electric field equation and to the Pennes bioheat equation to predict the electric field in the eye as well as the rise in eye temperature in response to the application of a high power electric pulse. Treatment efficacy was defined as the fraction of tumor volume in which the electric field exceeded a predefined target field and treatment safety was calculated by the ratio of the electric field in the tumor to the electric field in the vitreous humor or in the macula. Results show that treatment efficacy and safety are criteria that can be used to optimize the NTIRE treatment protocol.


2021 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-442
Author(s):  
Clark Chen ◽  
Ian Lee ◽  
Claudio Tatsui ◽  
Theresa Elder ◽  
Andrew E. Sloan

Abstract Introduction Laser Interstitial Thermotherapy (LITT; also known as Stereotactic Laser Ablation or SLA), is a minimally invasive treatment modality that has recently gained prominence in the treatment of malignant primary and metastatic brain tumors and radiation necrosis and studies for treatment of spinal metastasis has recently been reported. Methods Here we provide a brief literature review of the various contemporary uses for LITT and their reported outcomes. Results Historically, the primary indication for LITT has been for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, indications have continued to expand and now include gliomas of different grades, brain metastasis (BM), radiation necrosis (RN), other types of brain tumors as well as spine metastasis. LITT is emerging as a safe, reliable, minimally invasive clinical approach, particularly for deep seated, focal malignant brain tumors and radiation necrosis. The role of LITT for treatment of other types of tumors of the brain and for spine tumors appears to be evolving at a small number of centers. While the technology appears to be safe and increasingly utilized, there have been few prospective clinical trials and most published studies combine different pathologies in the same report. Conclusion Well-designed prospective trials will be required to firmly establish the role of LITT in the treatment of lesions of the brain and spine.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Dmitry Enikeev ◽  
Vincent Misrai ◽  
Enrique Rijo ◽  
Roman Sukhanov ◽  
Denis Chinenov ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To critically appraise the methodological rigour of the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) vis-à-vis BPH surgery as used by specialist research associations in the US, Europe and UK, and to compare whether the guidelines cover all or only some of the available treatments. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The current guidelines issued by the EUA, AUA and NICE associations have been analyzed by 4 appraisers using the AGREE-II instrument. We also compared the recommendations given in the guidelines for surgical and minimally invasive treatment to find out which of these CPGs include most of the available treatment options. <b><i>Results:</i></b> According to the AGREE II tool, the median scores of domains were: domain 1 scope and purpose 66.7%, domain 2 stakeholder involvement 50.0%, domain 3 rigor of development 65.1%, domain 4 clarity of presentation 80.6%, domain 5 applicability 33.3%, domain 6 editorial independence 72.9%. The overall assessment according to AGREE II is 83.3%. The NICE guideline scored highest on 5 out of 6 domains and the highest overall assessment score (91.6%). The EAU guideline scored lowest on 4 out of 6 domains and has the lowest overall assessment score (79.1%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The analyzed CPGs comprehensively highlight the minimally invasive and surgical treatment options for BPH. According to the AGREE II tool, the domains for clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest scores. The stakeholder involvement and applicability domains were ranked as the lowest. Improving the CPG in these domains may help to improve the clinical utility and applicability of CPGs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052110244
Author(s):  
Yantao Cai ◽  
Chenfang Zhu ◽  
Qianqian Chen ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Shanyu Guo

Objective The probability of malignancy in women who are diagnosed with a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4A score is low. Application of a second opinion ultrasound (SOUS), which is low in cost and minimally invasive, may lower the biopsy rate for patients who fall into this category. This study aimed to apply SOUS to patients with a BI-RADS score of 4A and predict the pathological results of a biopsy. Methods One hundred seventy-eight patients were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to screen for predictive factors that are associated with malignancy. Categorical alteration of downgraded, unchanged, or upgraded was made after SOUS results. Changes in category were compared with biopsies to determine their predictive value of benignancy or malignancy. Results Independent factors associated with malignancy were age (>50 years), tumor size (≥20 mm), margin (not circumscribed), orientation (not parallel), and peripheral location, and an upgraded categorical alteration from SOUS. Downgraded categorical alterations were associated with benignancy. Conclusions In BI-RADS 4A cases, a biopsy is recommended when independent factors are associated with malignancy. A downgraded result from an SOUS examination is a protective factor, supporting the likelihood of benignancy in these patients.


Author(s):  
Yu Qu ◽  
Hui Zhuang ◽  
Meng Zhang ◽  
Yufeng Wang ◽  
Dong Zhai ◽  
...  

Although calcium phosphate cements (CPC) have been clinically used to repair bone defects caused by bone tumor resection, traditional CPC cannot kill the remaining tumor cells after surgery and prevent...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document