Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Versus Sternotomy for Resection of Benign Atrial Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective Primary benign cardiac tumors are rare disease entity that predominantly originate from the atria. Benign masses can induce heart failure, arrhythmia, or thromboembolic events. Therefore, surgical excision is often indicated. Current guidelines on the preferred approaches for resection (i.e., median sternotomy [MST] or right anterolateral thoracotomy [RAT]) are lacking. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate all studies comparing RAT to MST for excision of benign atrial masses in terms of safety, efficacy, and complications. Methods The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through 9 June 2020. Data regarding mortality, complications, recurrence, ICU stay, and length of hospital stay were extracted and submitted to meta-analysis using random effects modelling. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I 2 test. Results Four retrospective observational studies were included, including 196 patients (RAT n = 97, MST n = 99). Mortality was 0% in both groups. Recurrence was <1% in the RAT group and 0% in the MST group. Complication rate tended to be lower in favor of the RAT group. Furthermore, RAT was associated with lower length of ICU stay (−17.7 hr, P = 0.01) and hospital stay (−4.0 days, P < 0.001). No significant differences in cardiopulmonary bypass ( P = 0.09) and cross-clamp times ( P = 0.15) were observed. Conclusions The RAT approach is as safe and effective as MST for the excision of benign atrial masses. Moreover, RAT is associated with a reduced complication rate and a reduced duration of hospitalization and could be considered as the preferred approach in anatomically suitable patients.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of VAP in critically ill ICU patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Journal of Intensive Care ◽

10.1186/s40560-020-00487-8 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Priyam Batra ◽

Kapil Dev Soni ◽

Purva Mathur

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Icu Stay ◽

Length Of Icu Stay

Abstract Introduction Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is reported as the second most common nosocomial infection among critically ill patients with the incidence ranging from 2 to 16 episodes per 1000 ventilator days. The use of probiotics has been shown to have a promising effect in many RCTs. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were thus planned to determine the effect of probiotic use in critically ill ventilated adult patients on the incidence of VAP, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of diarrhea, and the incidence of oropharyngeal colonization and in-hospital mortality. Methodology Systematic search of various databases (such as Embase, Cochrane, and Pubmed), published journals, clinical trials, and abstracts of the various major conferences were made to obtain the RCTs which compare probiotics with placebo for VAP prevention. The results were expressed as risk ratios or mean differences. Data synthesis was done using statistical software - Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Results Nine studies met our inclusion criterion and were included in the meta-analysis. The incidence of VAP (risk ratio: 0.70, CI 0.56, 0.88; P = 0.002; I2 = 37%), duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference −3.75, CI −6.93, −0.58; P 0.02; I2 = 96%), length of ICU stay (mean difference −4.20, CI −6.73, −1.66; P = 0.001; I2 = 84%) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.73, CI 0.54, 0.98; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) in the probiotic group was significantly lower than that in the control group. Probiotic administration was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in length of hospital stay (MD −1.94, CI −7.17, 3.28; P = 0.47; I2 = 88%), incidence of oro-pharyngeal colonization (OR 0.59, CI 0.33, 1.04; P = 0.07; I2 = 69%), and incidence of diarrhea (OR 0.59, CI 0.34, 1.03; P = 0.06; I2 = 38%). Discussion Our meta-analysis shows that probiotic administration has a promising role in lowering the incidence of VAP, the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and in-hospital mortality.

Download Full-text

Pneumonia Is Associated with Increased Mortality in Hospitalized COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Respiration ◽

10.1159/000510615 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 100 (1) ◽

pp. 64-76

Author(s):

Yan Yu ◽

Wei Liu ◽

Hong-Li Jiang ◽

Bing Mao

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Readmission Rate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Mortality And Morbidity ◽

Icu Stay ◽

Copd Patients ◽

The Impact

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at a heightened risk of pneumonia. Whether coexisting community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can predict increased mortality in hospitalized COPD patients is still controversial. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the association between CAP and mortality and morbidity in COPD patients hospitalized for acute worsening of respiratory symptoms. Methods: In this review, cohort studies and case-control studies investigating the impact of CAP in hospitalized COPD patients were retrieved from 4 electronic databases from inception until December 2019. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of ICU stay, and readmission rate. The Mantel-Haenszel method and inverse variance method were used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD), respectively. Results: A total of 18 studies were included. The presence of CAP was associated with higher mortality (RR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.50–2.30; p < 0.00001), longer length of hospital stay (MD = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.19–2.59; p < 0.00001), more need for mechanical ventilation (RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.32–1.67; p < 0.00001), and more ICU admissions (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.24–2.03; p = 0.0002) in hospitalized COPD patients. CAP was not associated with longer ICU stay (MD = 5.2; 95% CI: −2.35 to 12.74; p = 0.18) or higher readmission rate (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.96–1.09; p = 0.47). Conclusion: Coexisting CAP may be associated with increased mortality and morbidity in hospitalized COPD patients, so radiological confirmation of CAP should be required and more attention should be paid to these patients.

Download Full-text

1369 Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Emergency General Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic Versus Control Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.952 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

J Hebding ◽

L Wingfield ◽

Y Negreskul ◽

J Gilmour

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Mortality Rate ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

General Surgery ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Emergency Surgery ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Emergency General Surgery ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, the surgical community has attempted to address whether it is safe to continue surgery. The aim of this research was to review evidence on emergency general patients operated on during the pandemic compared to patients undergoing emergency surgery during non-pandemic times to determine if operating during the Covid-19 pandemic led to an increased risk of death, length of hospital stay and complications. Method A systematic review of the literature was performed. PubMed, Cochrane, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Springer Link, Elsevier, and reference lists were analysed for inclusion on 2 January 2021. Results Nine studies and 5,022 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the control group vs pandemic group in mean age (52.3yrs vs 51.9yrs, p = 0.67) or gender (44.4% females vs 49.3%, p = 0.173). Pooled analysis of control vs pandemic showed a mortality rate of 1.26% vs 3.06% (CI:-6.58–6.58, p = 1.00). Mean length of hospital stay was 7.9 vs 7.7 days in control v. pandemic (CI: -2.93-3.33, p = 0.87) and post-operative complication rate of 20.2% vs 25.7% (CI -6.4-25.0, p = 0.20), (control vs pandemic). The pandemic group had significantly more operative management (47.0% vs 40.0%, p = 0.03) with no significant difference in laparoscopic vs open technique (46.0% vs 43.6%, p = 0.20). Conclusions This meta-analysis shows there is no statistically significant difference in mortality rate, length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the pandemic and control cohorts in emergency general surgery patients. This data suggests that general emergency surgery should continue in spite of the pandemic with appropriate precautions in place.

Download Full-text

Utility of transcervical management of Zenker's diverticulum

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215115003205 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 130 (S1) ◽

pp. S16-S19 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

B Jackson ◽

Z Ahmad ◽

R P Morton

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Complication Rate ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Zenker’S Diverticulum ◽

Cricopharyngeal Myotomy ◽

Pharyngeal Pouch ◽

Recent Systematic Review ◽

Transcervical Approach ◽

Endoscopic Techniques ◽

Zenker's Diverticulum

AbstractObjective:To evaluate our results in treating Zenker's diverticulum via the transcervical approach, and to compare our experiences with a recent systematic review of both open and endoscopic approaches to the pharyngeal pouch.Method:An audit yielded 41 consecutive cases of Zenker's diverticulum treated between 2003 and 2013.Results:All 41 patients underwent transcervical cricopharyngeal myotomy; 29 sacs also required ‘inversion’. The median and mean length of hospital stay was 1 night and 2.5 nights respectively. The recurrence rate was 2.4 per cent and the complication rate was 9.8 per cent.Conclusion:When compared to reported endoscopic techniques, transcervical cricopharyngeal myotomy (with or without inversion) in our unit resulted in: shorter hospital stay, a comparable complication rate and fewer recurrences.

Download Full-text

Haemostatic devices in parotid surgery: a systematic review

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology ◽

10.1017/s0022215121001973 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

L Allen ◽

C MacKay ◽

M H Rigby ◽

J Trites ◽

S M Taylor

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Facial Nerve ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Operating Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Blood Loss ◽

Parotid Surgery

Abstract Objective The Harmonic Scalpel and Ligasure (Covidien) devices are commonly used in head and neck surgery. Parotidectomy is a complex and intricate surgery that requires careful dissection of the facial nerve. This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes in parotidectomy using these haemostatic devices with traditional scalpel and cautery. Method A systematic review of the literature was performed with subsequent meta-analysis of seven studies that compared the use of haemostatic devices to traditional scalpel and cautery in parotidectomy. Outcome measures included: temporary facial paresis, operating time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative drain output and length of hospital stay. Results A total of 7 studies representing 675 patients were identified: 372 patients were treated with haemostatic devices, and 303 patients were treated with scalpel and cautery. Statistically significant outcomes favouring the use of haemostatic devices included operating time, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative drain output. Outcome measures that did not favour either treatment included facial nerve paresis and length of hospital stay. Conclusion Overall, haemostatic devices were found to reduce operating time, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative drain output.

Download Full-text

Effect of Oral Motor Intervention on Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology ◽

10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00322 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Danna Chen ◽

Zhen Yang ◽

Chujie Chen ◽

Pu Wang

Keyword(s):

Weight Gain ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Preterm Infants ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Oral Feeding ◽

Transition Time ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Oral Motor ◽

Feeding Efficiency

Objective This review article aimed to explore the effect of oral motor intervention on oral feeding in preterm infants through a meta-analysis. Method Eligible studies were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to July 2020 and screened based on established selection criteria. Thereafter, relevant data were extracted and heterogeneity tests were conducted to select appropriate effect models according to the chi-square test and I 2 statistics. Assessment of risk of bias was performed among the included studies. Finally, a meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of oral motor intervention in preterm infants according to four clinical indicators: transition time for oral feeding, length of hospital stay, feeding efficiency, and weight gain. Results Eighteen randomized controlled trials with 848 participants were selected to evaluate the effect of oral motor intervention on preterm infants. The meta-analysis results revealed that oral motor intervention could effectively reduce the transition time to full oral feeds and the length of hospital stay as well as increase feeding efficiency and weight gain. Conclusions Oral motor intervention was an effective way to improve oral feeding in preterm infants. It is worthy to be used widely in hospitals to improve the clinical outcomes of preterm infants and reduce the economic burdens of families and society. Future studies should seek to identify detailed intervention processes and intervention durations for clinical application.

Download Full-text

Comparison of topical honey and povidone iodine-based dressings for wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Wound Care ◽

10.12968/jowc.2021.30.sup4.s28 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 30 (Sup4) ◽

pp. S28-S36

Author(s):

Fujie Zhang ◽

Zongnan Chen ◽

Feng Su ◽

Taijuan Zhang

Keyword(s):

Wound Healing ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Analogue Scale ◽

Povidone Iodine ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Beneficial Effects ◽

Vas Score ◽

Wound Recovery ◽

Hospital Stay Duration

Objectives: In this review and meta-analysis, we analyse the evidence to compare the efficacy of honey and povidone iodine-based dressings on the outcome of wound healing. Method: A systematic literature search was performed using PRISMA guidelines in academic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. A meta-analysis was carried out to assess the effect of honey and povidone iodine-based dressings on mean healing duration, mean hospital stay duration and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain. Results: From the search, 12 manuscripts with a total of 1236 participants (mean age: 40.7±11.7 years) were included. The honey-based dressings demonstrated a medium-to-large effect in reduction of mean healing duration (Hedge's g: –0.81), length of hospital stay (–3.1) and VAS score (–1.2) as compared with the povidone iodine-based dressings. We present evidence (level 1b) in favour of using honey for improvement of wound recovery as compared with povidone iodine. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis demonstrate beneficial effects of honey-based dressings over povidone iodine-based dressings for wound recovery.

Download Full-text

Locked intramedullary nailing technique of the femur without brilliance amplifier at the trauma and orthopedics department of the university hospital of peace series on 35 cases during 1 year

MOJ Orthopedics & Rheumatology ◽

10.15406/mojor.2021.13.00556 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (5) ◽

pp. 95-97

Author(s):

Augustin Delange Hendrick ◽

Almenord Pharol ◽

Khawly Clifford PG ◽

Augustin Delange ◽

Pierre Marie Woolley

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Intramedullary Nailing ◽

Femoral Fractures ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

University Hospital ◽

Patient Morbidity ◽

Duration Of Hospitalization ◽

The Cost ◽

The University

Femoral fractures increase the length of hospital stay for our patients for several reasons such as lack of blood, economic resources, and lack of infrastructure. The use of a C-arm has been shown to reduce patient morbidity due to early functional recovery and reduced hospital stay. Objective: To develop an intramedullary nailing technique without c-arm with a closed focus to reduce the duration of hospitalization of its patients as well as the cost related to the equipment used for follow-up. Methodology: prospective study on 35 patients for 1 year August 2020 to August 2021 Results: We followed 35 patients in which the mean age was 37.83 years with extremes of 18 and 78 years. The male sex predominates 21 against 14 women or 60% against 40% respectively. The sex ratio is 1.5. A total of 19 diaphyseal fractures (54.3%) were nailed, 9 supracondylar (25.7%) and 7 subtrochanteric (20%). Twenty-seven were closed fractures (71.1%), and 8 were open fractures (22.9%). The length of hospitalization was less than 3 days for 30 patients (85.7%), and more than 3 days for 5 patients (14.3%). Conclusion: We recommend that we promote this closed-hearth technique because it improves the postoperative follow-up of patients. Additionally, it would reduce exposure to radiation from c-arm in hospitals that have this equipment.

Download Full-text

Outcome Difference in Neurosurgical Patients Based on Timing of Tracheostomy and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Nepal Journal of Neuroscience ◽

10.3126/njn.v15i1.20022 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 19-22

Author(s):

Pratyush Shrestha ◽

Subash Lohani ◽

Sunita Shrestha ◽

Upendra P Devkota

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Tracheostomy Tube ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽

Early Tracheostomy ◽

Icu Stay ◽

Neurosurgical Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Length Of Icu Stay

Background and Objective: Tracheostomy in neurosurgical patients has been shown in various studies to lower the length of ICU stay and the length of hospital stay by decreasing the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia. In this regard, we wanted to evaluate the outcome of neurosurgical ICU patients based on timing of tracheostomy and ventilator associated pneumonia.Methods: This is a retrospective single centre study performed over a period of two and a half years. Early tracheostomy was defi ned as those done three days of intubation or earlier and late as those done then after. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS.Results: There were 56 patients over the study period of which 18 patients underwent early tracheostomy and 38 patients underwent late tracheostomy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regards to the length of ICU stay, the length of hospital stay or the length of tracheostomy tube in situ. But based on tracheal aspirate culture positivity, length of tracheostomy tube in situ was signifi cantly longer in those with positive bacterial cultures.Early tracheostomy does not improve neurosurgical outcome while documented pneumonia prolongs the length of tracheostomy tube in situ.Nepal Journal of Neuroscience 15:19-22, 2018

Download Full-text

Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000506716 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Zhenhua Gu ◽

Yucheng Yang ◽

Rui Ding ◽

Meili Wang ◽

Jianming Pu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽

Kidney Stones ◽

Operative Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽

Alternative Approach ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Advances in micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for kidney stones have made it an alternative approach to the retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) approach. Nevertheless, the superiority of micro-PCNL over RIRS is still under debate. The results are controversial. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical results in patients presenting with kidney stones treated with micro-PCNL or RIRS. Methods: A literature search was done for electronic databases to identify researches that compared micro-PCNL and RIRS till December 2019. The clinical outcome included complications, stone-free rates (SFRs), hemoglobin reduction, length of hospital stay, and operative time. Results: Five articles were included in our study. The pooled results revealed no statistical difference in the rate of complications (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.57–1.74, p = 0.99), length of hospital stay (MD = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.82 to 0.24, p = 0.28), and operative time (MD = −6.63, 95% CI = −27.34 to 14.08, p = 0.53) between the 2 groups. However, significant difference was present in hemoglobin reduction (MD = −0.43, 95% CI = −0.55 to 0.30, p < 0.001) and the SFRs (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.98, p = 0.04) when comparing RIRS with micro-PCNL. Conclusions: Compared with micro-PCNL to treat kidney stones, RIRS is associated with better stone clearance and bearing higher hemoglobin loss. As the advantages of both technologies have been shown in some fields, the continuation of well-designed clinical trials may be necessary.

Download Full-text