scholarly journals Can the UK 24-item family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaire be used to evaluate quality improvement strategies aimed at improving family satisfaction with the ICU? A qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-319
Author(s):  
Susannah Lyes ◽  
Alvin Richards-Belle ◽  
Bronwen Connolly ◽  
Kathryn M Rowan ◽  
Lisa Hinton ◽  
...  

Background The experiences and satisfaction of family members of patients are important indicators of healthcare quality in the intensive care unit. The family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire, developed in Canada and now validated in the UK, is becoming the gold standard measure to evaluate family members’ satisfaction with the intensive care unit. To inform future use of the UK FS-ICU-24 to evaluate quality improvement strategies aimed at improving family satisfaction with the intensive care unit, we set out to explore the extent to which the 24-scored items and domains of the UK FS-ICU-24 reflect common suggestions and priorities for quality improvement self-reported as important to family members in the UK. Methods Two data sources were thematically analysed – (1) open-text responses from family members who completed the UK FS-ICU-24 in a large observational cohort study; (2) a set of quality improvement activities generated by patients, family members and staff through experience-based co-design in a mixed-methods’ intensive care unit quality improvement study. Summarised themes were then mapped to the 24-scored items and domains of the UK FS-ICU-24 to assess coverage by the UK FS-ICU-24. Results We found a good degree of coverage between the topics and themes identified as important to family members with the 24-scored items and domains of the UK FS-ICU-24. Conclusion Our study confirms the face validity of the UK FS-ICU-24 and indicates that its inclusion as an outcome measure for evaluating quality improvement strategies aimed at improving family satisfaction with the intensive care unit is appropriate.

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 42-51
Author(s):  
Natalie S. McAndrew ◽  
Laura Mark ◽  
Mary Butler

Background Organizations motivated to provide high-quality care in the intensive care unit are exploring strategies to engage families in patient care. Such initiatives are based on emerging evidence that family engagement improves quality and safety of care. Objective To gather family feedback to guide future nurse-led quality improvement efforts to engage families in the intensive care unit setting. Methods The Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey, which consists of 20 items rated from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), was paired with open-ended questions and administered to families during the intensive care unit stay from March through December 2017. Content analysis was used to identify themes regarding the family experience. Results Responses were collected from 178 family members. The mean (SD) score on the survey was 4.65 (0.33). Five themes emerged regarding the delivery of family care in the intensive care unit: family interactions with the interdisciplinary team, information sharing and effective communication, family navigation of the intensive care unit environment, family engagement in the intensive care unit, and quality of patient care. Conclusions This quality improvement project provided foundational information to guide family engagement efforts in the intensive care unit. Real-time solicitation of feedback is essential to improving the family experience and guiding family-centered care delivery in this practice environment.


Author(s):  
Wan Nor Aliza Wan Abdul Rahman ◽  
Abdul Karim Othman ◽  
Yuzana Mohd Yusop ◽  
Asyraf Afthanorhan ◽  
Hasnah Zani ◽  
...  

In admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), there is a high possibility of a life-threatening condition and possible emotional distress for family members. When the family is distressed and hospitalized, a significant level of stress and anxiety will be generated among family members, thereby decreasing their ability to make responsible decisions. As a result, the family members need full and up-to-date details, helping them to retain hope, and this contributes to lower stress levels. While there is growing evidence of the effectiveness of shared decision-making for family members who are directly involved in decisions, particularly regarding shared decision-making in the Malaysian context, there is less evidence that supported decisions help overall outcome. This study aims to developing the family satisfaction with decision making in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU)-33 Malay language version of family member’s satisfaction with care and decision making during their stay at the intensive care units. A quantitative, cross-sectional validation study and purposive sampling was conducted from 1st November 2017 and 10 October 2018 to January 2020 among 208 of family members.  The family members of the ICU patients involved in this study had an excellent satisfaction level with service care. Higher satisfaction in ICU care resulting in higher decision-making satisfaction and vice versa.


SCIENTIARVM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Ángel Mamani Ruelas ◽  
◽  
Katherine Quispe Medina ◽  
Claudia Butrón Vargas ◽  
Felipe Apaza Huamán ◽  
...  

The appreciation of care by families is of great importance in the evaluation of the quality of care in an intensive care unit (ICU). This study used the adaptation of the Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire: FS-ICU (24). Our objective was to know the degree of satisfaction of family members for the care received from the patient admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (UCIE) as well as with the decision-making process for patient care. This is a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive and prospective study for 5 months. A sample of 69 main relatives of patients admitted to the unit with more than 24 hours of stay was studied, applying the FS-ICU (24) questionnaire. The following results were obtained: In relation to the care of the patient in the ICUE, 68.12% of relatives perceived an excellent or very good concern for the patient, a very good pain management in 49.28%, very good management of dyspnea in 40%, regarding family care, 43.48% considered it very good, with good emotional support in 46.38%. 47.83% considered the coordination of care as good, as well as the concern of the staff. When assessing professional care, the nurse's skills and competencies were considered very good at 43.48%, and communication as good at 43.48%; The doctor's skills and competencies were also very good at 43.48%. Regarding the environment of the UCIE, it was considered good in 44,935, the waiting room as sufficient in 47.83%, and the amount of care as very good in 43.48%. We conclude that most family members have a high degree of satisfaction, result that is similar to international studies; it also gives us aspects to improve such as the waiting room and the privacy of the patients. keywords: Satisfaction; Care; Quality; Intensive Care Unit; Emergency; FS-ICU.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. e8-e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Clark ◽  
Kerry A. Milner ◽  
Marlene Beck ◽  
Virginia Mason

BackgroundIn our competitive health care environment, measuring the experience of family members of patients in the intensive care unit to ensure that health care providers are meeting families’ needs is critical. Surveys from Press Ganey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unable to capture families’ satisfaction with care in this setting.ObjectiveTo implement a sustainable measure for family satisfaction in a 12-bed medical and surgical intensive care unit. To assess the feasibility of the selected tool for measuring family satisfaction and to make recommendations that are based on the results.MethodA descriptive survey design using the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24-item questionnaire to measure satisfaction with care and decision-making.ResultsForty family members completed the survey. Overall, the mean score for families’ satisfaction with care was 72.24% (SD, 14.87%) and the mean score for families’ satisfaction with decision-making was 72.03% (SD, 16.61%). Families reported that nurses put them at ease and provided understandable explanations. Collaboration, inclusion of families in clinical discussions, and timely information regarding changes in the patient’s condition were the most common points brought up in free-text responses from family members. Written communication, including directions and expectations, would have improved the families’ experience.ConclusionAlthough patients’ family members reported being satisfied with their experience in the intensive care unit, there is room for improvement. Effective communication among the health care team, patients’ families, and patients will be targeted for quality improvement initiatives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Ariffudin Abdul Hamid ◽  
Mohd Basri Mat Nor

Introduction: Family satisfaction has been identified as a quality indicator in critical care area. The impact of family satisfaction level was also found to be associated with symptoms of psychological distress such as anxiety, depression and stress among family members. We evaluated the satisfaction level and prevalence, risk factor and correlation of psychological distress symptoms with the satisfaction level among family members in Malaysian Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Materials and Method: This is a cross-sectional, multicentre study conducted in ICU at Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru and International Islamic University Medical Centre. Family members were enrolled 3 days after ICU admission, and they completed a modified version of Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Results:  A total of 176 family members were enrolled in this study. We found 116 (66%) of the family members scores ≥ 3 denoting satisfaction with the mean CCFNI score was 3.11 (SD=0.3). Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress were of 30.1%, 41.4% and 28.9% respectively. Risk factor for psychological distress symptoms were female sex, spousal relationship, lower education, median income less than RM 4000, staying with patient and younger patient age. Negative correlation between depression, anxiety and stress with CCFNI score were found (p< 0.05) but with low correlation coefficient (r=-0.178 to -0.209). Family members without symptoms of psychological distress were more satisfied (higher CCFNI score) with ICU care compared to those with symptoms of psychological distress (p< 0.05). Conclusion:  Family members of ICU patient were satisfied with the care provided in the ICU. High rates of psychological distress symptoms in this study and its correlation with the satisfaction level highlight the need to identify and implement preventive and management strategies for family members to improve the overall ICU care.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Ferrando ◽  
Doug W Gould ◽  
Emma Walmsley ◽  
Alvin Richards-Belle ◽  
Ruth Canter ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess family satisfaction with intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK using the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24-item (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire, and to investigate how characteristics of patients and their family members impact on family satisfaction.DesignProspective cohort study nested within a national clinical audit database.SettingStratified, random sample of 20 adult general ICUs participating in the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme.ParticipantsFamily members of patients staying at least 24 hours in ICU were recruited between May 2013 and June 2014.InterventionsConsenting family members were sent a postal questionnaire 3 weeks after the patient died or was discharged from ICU. Up to four family members were recruited per patient.Main outcome measuresFamily satisfaction was measured using the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire.Main resultsA total of 12 346 family members of 6380 patients were recruited and 7173 (58%) family members of 4615 patients returned a completed questionnaire. Overall and domain-specific family satisfaction scores were high (mean overall family satisfaction 80, satisfaction with care 83, satisfaction with information 76 and satisfaction with decision-making 73 out of 100) but varied significantly across adult general ICUs studied and by whether the patient survived ICU. For family members of ICU survivors, characteristics of both the family member (age, ethnicity, relationship to patient (next-of-kin and/or lived with patient) and visit frequency) and the patient (acute severity of illness and receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation) were significant determinants of family satisfaction, whereas, for family members of ICU non-survivors, only patient characteristics (age, acute severity of illness and duration of stay) were significant.ConclusionsOverall family satisfaction in UK adult general ICUs was high but varied significantly. Adjustment for differences in family member/patient characteristics is important to avoid falsely identifying ICUs as statistical outliers.Trial registration numberISRCTN47363549


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000302
Author(s):  
Tom Maxim ◽  
Agustin Alvarez ◽  
Yvonne Hojberg ◽  
Derek Antoku ◽  
Chioma Moneme ◽  
...  

BackgroundA growing body of research has explored patient satisfaction as one of the healthcare quality measures. To date, scarce data are available regarding family experience in the trauma and surgical intensive care unit (TSICU). The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the results of a family satisfaction survey in the TSICU.MethodsFamily members of patients at a level 1 trauma center were invited to participate in this study after 72 hours of intensive care unit stay. Participants completed a modified version of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire, a validated survey measuring family satisfaction with care and decision-making. Data collection spanned from April 2016 to July 2017. Patient characteristics were compiled from the medical record. Quantitative analysis was performed using a 5-point Likert score, converted to a scale of 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent).ResultsThe overall response rate was 78.6%. Of the 103 family members for 88 patients, most were young (median age: 41 years) and female (75%). Language fluency was 44.6% English-only, 31.7% Spanish-only, and 23.8% bilingual. Mean summary family satisfaction scores (±SD) were 80.6±26.4 for satisfaction with care, 79.3±27.1 for satisfaction with decision-making, and 80.1±26.7 for total satisfaction. Respondents were less satisfied with the frequency of communication with physicians (70.7±27.4) and language translation (73.2±31.2).DiscussionOverall family satisfaction with the care provided to patients in the TSICU is high, although opportunities for improvement were noted in the frequency of communication between physicians and family and language translation services. Further quality improvement projects are warranted.Level of evidenceCare management study: level V.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-236
Author(s):  
John Manna

Background Few responses to the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and no use of family satisfaction scores indicated the need to implement a program to collect and use family satisfaction data at a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) at a southeastern academic medical center. Objectives To improve response rates for family satisfaction surveys, to identify future quality improvement initiatives, to receive qualitative feedback from key stakeholders, and to better understand nursing staff’s satisfaction with the project implementation process. Methods A quality improvement program using the Pediatric Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (pFS-ICU) survey was implemented to evaluate family satisfaction data from a pediatric cardiac ICU. Data were collected for 6 months to identify quality improvement initiatives for continuing excellence. An interprofessional focus group of key stakeholders assessed feedback and perceptions. Results A 61% response rate (n = 81 responses) was achieved on the pFS-ICU survey. Respondents ranked the pediatric cardiac ICU higher than 90% excellence in all categories in every month but 1 (in 1 category). The focus group revealed the survey’s ease of use and indicated that the data allow more focus on patient-centered care. A staff survey showed that 100% of staff understood the new process and 87% agreed that the survey is an effective tool. Conclusion Researchers should study the pFS-ICU survey in other inpatient pediatric step-down units and ICUs because it fosters a high response rate that provides real-time data, leading to quality improvement initiatives that can increase quality of care and improve outcomes.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
EA Henneman ◽  
JB McKenzie ◽  
CS Dewa

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of two methods of meeting the information needs of families of critically ill patients: an open visiting hour policy and a family information booklet. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit of a university medical center. SUBJECTS: Family members (N = 147) of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of an open visiting hour policy and information booklet. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to family members 24 to 48 hours after the patient's admission. The questionnaire addressed family satisfaction with having specific information needs met and posed questions that tested their knowledge of unit policies and personnel. The questionnaire was distributed to three groups: families who had restricted visiting hours and no booklet (group 1, n = 48), families who had open visiting hours but no booklet (group 2, n = 50), and families who had open visiting hours and an information booklet (Group 3, n = 49). Implementation of an open visiting hour policy increased family satisfaction. Families exposed to both the open visiting hours and the information booklet were more knowledgeable about specific details than were those exposed to only the open visiting hour policy. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible visiting hours and information booklets were two practical methods of meeting the information needs of families. Open visiting hours, as a singular intervention, significantly improved family satisfaction. The effectiveness of the booklet in assisting families to recall discrete pieces of information supports the further development and use of preprinted materials to assist in meeting family information needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document