scholarly journals Benefits of the Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) Procedure Over Traditional Craniotomy for Subdural Hematoma Evacuation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-265
Author(s):  
Danielle Golub ◽  
Kimberly Ashayeri ◽  
Siddhant Dogra ◽  
Ariane Lewis ◽  
Donato Pacione
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Hematoma Volume ◽  
Postoperative Hematoma ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Port System ◽  
History Presentation ◽  
Substantial Morbidity

Background: There remains no consensus on the optimal primary intervention for subdural hematoma (SDH). Although historically favored, craniotomy carries substantial morbidity and incurs significant costs. Contrastingly, the subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) is a minimally invasive bedside procedure. We assessed the benefits of SEPS over traditional craniotomy for SDH evacuation. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of SDH patients receiving craniotomy or SEPS between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Information regarding demographics, medical history, presentation, surgical outcomes, cost, and complications was collected. Pre- and postoperative hematoma volumes were calculated using 3D image segmentation using Vitrea software. Multivariate regression models were employed to assess the influence of intervention choice. Results: Of 107 patients, 68 underwent craniotomy and 39 underwent SEPS. There were no differences in age, sex, blood thinner use, platelet count, INR, hematoma lateralization, age, volume, or midline shift at presentation between intervention groups. Although there was no difference in percent residual hematoma volume 24-hour postintervention (44.1% vs 45.1%, P = .894), SEPS was associated with lower hospitalization costs ($108 391 vs $166 318, * P = .002), shorter length of stay (4.0 vs 5.8 days, * P = .0002), and fewer postoperative seizures (2.6% vs 17.7%, * P = .048). Reoperation rate was higher after SEPS overall (33.3% vs 13.2%, * P = .048) but comparable to craniotomy in chronic SDH (12.50% vs 7.69%, P = 1.000). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, SEPS was noninferior to craniotomy at reducing SDH hematoma volume. The SEPS procedure was also associated with decreased length of stay hospitalization costs, and postoperative seizures and demonstrated a comparable recurrence rate to craniotomy for chronic SDH in particular.

Trends in Periprosthetic Knee Infection and Associated Costs: A Population-Based Study Using National Data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Brochin ◽  
Jashvant Poeran ◽  
Khushdeep S. Vig ◽  
Aakash Keswani ◽  
Nicole Zubizarreta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Trend Test ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Teaching Status ◽  
Increasing Trend ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Increasing Trends

AbstractGiven increasing demand for primary knee arthroplasties, revision surgery is also expected to increase, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) a main driver of costs. Recent data on national trends is lacking. We aimed to assess trends in PJI in total knee arthroplasty revisions and hospitalization costs. From the National Inpatient Sample (2003–2016), we extracted data on total knee arthroplasty revisions (n = 782,449). We assessed trends in PJI prevalence and (inflation-adjusted) hospitalization costs (total as well as per-day costs) for all revisions and stratified by hospital teaching status (rural/urban by teaching status), hospital bed size (≤299, 300–499, and ≥500 beds), and hospital region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). The Cochran–Armitage trend test (PJI prevalence) and linear regression determined significance of trends. PJI prevalence overall was 25.5% (n = 199,818) with a minor increasing trend: 25.3% (n = 7,828) in 2003 to 28.9% (n = 19,275) in 2016; p < 0.0001. Median total hospitalization costs for PJI decreased slightly ($23,247 in 2003–$20,273 in 2016; p < 0.0001) while median per-day costs slightly increased ($3,452 in 2003–$3,727 in 2016; p < 0.0001), likely as a function of decreasing length of stay. With small differences between hospitals, the lowest and highest PJI prevalences were seen in small (≤299 beds; 22.9%) and urban teaching hospitals (27.3%), respectively. In stratification analyses, an increasing trend in PJI prevalence was particularly seen in larger (≥500 beds) hospitals (24.4% in 2003–30.7% in 2016; p < 0.0001), while a decreasing trend was seen in small-sized hospitals. Overall, PJI in knee arthroplasty revisions appears to be slightly increasing. Moreover, increasing trends in large hospitals and decreasing trends in small-sized hospitals suggest a shift in patients from small to large volume hospitals. Decreasing trends in total costs, alongside increasing trends in per-day costs, suggest a strong impact of length of stay trends and a more efficient approach to PJI over the years (in terms of shorter length of stay).

scholarly journals Organisational Factors Induce Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in Elderly Patients – A Retrospective Cohort Study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0135066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffie H. A. Brouns ◽  
Patricia M. Stassen ◽  
Suze L. E. Lambooij ◽  
Jeanne Dieleman ◽  
Irene T. P. Vanderfeesten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Organisational Factors

Abstract P536: Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Volumes and Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Nogueira ◽  
Katherine Etter ◽  
Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Shelly Ikeme ◽  
Michael R Frankel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
Hospitalization Costs

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc on the presentation, care and outcomes of patients with acute cerebrovascular and cardiovascular conditions. We sought to measure the national impact of COVID-19 on the care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: In this retrospective, observational study, we used the Premier Healthcare Database to evaluate the changes in the volume of care and hospital outcomes for AIS and AMI in relation to the pandemic. The pandemic months were defined from March 1, 2020- April 30, 2020 and compared to the same period in the year prior. Outcome measures were volumes of hospitalization and reperfusion treatment for AIS and AMI (including intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] and/or mechanical thrombectomy [MT] for AIS and percutaneous coronary interventions [PCI] for AMI) as well as in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs were compared across a 2-month period at the height of the pandemic versus the corresponding period in the prior year. Results: There were 95,453 AIS patients across 145 hospitals and 19,744 AMI patients across 126 hospitals. There was a significant nation-wide decline in the absolute number of hospitalizations for AIS (-38.94%;95%CI,-34.75% to -40.71%) and AMI (-38.90%;95%CI,-37.03% to -40.81%) as well as IVT (-30.32%;95%CI,-27.02% to -33.83%), MT (-23.54%;95%CI,-19.84% to -27.70%), and PCI (-35.05%;95%CI,-33.04% to -37.12%) during the first two months of the pandemic. This occurred across low-, mid-, and high-volume centers and in all geographic regions. Higher in-hospital mortality was observed in AIS patients (5.7% vs.4.2%, p=0.0037;OR 1.41,95%CI 1.1-1.8) but not AMI patients. A shift towards an increase in the proportion of admitted AIS and AMI patients receiving reperfusion therapies suggests a greater clinical severity among patients that were hospitalized for these conditions during the pandemic. A shorter length of stay (AIS: -17%, AMI: -20%), and decreased hospitalization costs (AIS: -12%, AMI: -19%) were observed. Conclusions: Our findings shed light on the combined health outcomes and economic impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on acute stroke and cardiac emergency care.

Abstract 14759: Burden of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000-2017

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Harsha Patlolla ◽  
Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
The United States ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
White Race ◽  
Hospitalization Costs

Introduction: There is a paucity of contemporary data on the burden of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database (2000 to 2017) was used to evaluate in-hospital burden of ICH in adult (>18 years) AMI admissions. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, length of stay, and measure of functional ability were the outcomes of interest. The discharge destination along with use of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were used to estimate functional burden. Results: Of a total 11,622,528 AMI admissions, 23,422 (0.2%) had concomitant ICH. Compared to those without, admissions with ICH were on average older, female, of non-White race, with greater comorbidities, and higher rates of arrhythmias (all p<0.001). Female sex, non-White race, ST-segment-elevation AMI presentation, use of fibrinolytics, mechanical circulatory support and invasive mechanical ventilation were identified as individual predictors of ICH. The AMI admissions with ICH received less frequent coronary angiography (46.9% vs. 63.8%), percutaneous coronary intervention (22.7% vs. 41.8%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (5.4% vs. 9.2%) as compared to those without (all p<0.001). ICH was associated with a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (41.4% vs. 6.1%; adjusted OR 5.65 [95% CI 5.47-5.84]; p<0.001), and adjusted temporal trends showed a steady decrease in in-hospital mortality over the 18-year period (Figure 1A). AMI-ICH admissions also had longer hospital length of stay, higher hospitalization costs, and greater use of PEG (all p<0.001). In AMI-ICH survivors (N=13, 689), 81.3% had a poor functional outcome indicating severe morbidity and temporal trends revealed a slight increase over the study period (Figure 1B). Conclusions: ICH causes a substantial burden in AMI due to associated higher in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and poor functional outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document