EXPRESS: IMPACT OF THE NEW DEFINITION FOR PULMONARY HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS WITH LUNG DISEASE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE UNOS DATABASE
The implications of the recent change in the definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on epidemiology and outcomes are not known. We sought to determine the percentage of patients with the two most common lung diseases that would be reclassified regarding the presence/absence of PH with the revised definition. A query of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed. The percentage of patients meeting the current and previous definition of PH were described. Outcomes of patients stratified by the current and previous definitions were compared. There were 15,563 patients with right heart catheterization data analyzed. PH was more prevalent in both COPD and IPF under the new definition at 52.4% versus 82.4%, and 47.6% versus 73.6%, respectively. âPre-capillaryâ PH by the new definition was lower at 28.1% for COPD and 36.8% for IPF. Of the patients with PH by the old definition, 23.9% of COPD patients and 18.7% of IPF patients were not classified as PH by the new definition. Conversely, 15.9% of COPD patients and 15.1% of IPF patients who did not meet diagnostic criteria for PH by the old definition, did have PH by the new definition. Patients in both disease categories had shorter transplant-free waitlist survival in the presence of PH by both the new and old definitions. There was a trend toward the new definition of pre-capillary PH better discerning outcomes compared to the old definition of PH in IPF patients. Most patients with advanced lung disease who are listed for lung transplantation have PH, but fewer have pre-capillary PH than PH by the old definition. Both the old and new definition of precapillary PH appear to discern outcomes among the two groups of lung disease analyzed, with some evidence to suggest that the new definition performs slightly better in the IPF population.