scholarly journals Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-283
Author(s):  
Alison Pottle
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

scholarly journals Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-293
Author(s):  
Emma Zhao ◽  
Nicole Lowres ◽  
Anna Woolaston ◽  
Sharon L Naismith ◽  
Robyn Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Assess Quality

Background Minimising risk factors through secondary prevention behaviour is challenging for patients following an acute coronary syndrome. Cognitive impairment can potentially make these changes more difficult. However, cognitive impairment prevalence in acute coronary syndrome patients is poorly understood. Design This study was based on a systematic review. Methods A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases up to March 2019, to identify studies reporting the prevalence of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients. Predefined inclusion criteria were specified, including use of a validated cognitive impairment screening tool. Studies were excluded if patients had diagnosed dementia or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Strengthening The Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Cochrane Risk of Bias tools were used to assess quality. Results From 747 potential studies, nine were included. The total sample size was 6457 (range 53–2174), mean age range was 51.3–77.4 years, and range of proportions of males was 57–100%. Reported cognitive impairment prevalence rates varied substantially (9–85%) with no clear pattern over time. From the two studies which examined domains, verbal fluency, memory and language were affected the most. Meta-analysis could not be undertaken due to diverse screening tools ( n = 9), cut-off scores and screening timepoints. Conclusions Cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients is currently poorly described, and likely affects a substantial number of acute coronary syndrome patients who remain undetected and have the potential to develop to dementia in the future. As domains are most affected, this could impact understanding and retention of health education. Research is needed to accurately determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment in acute coronary syndrome patients and create suitable standardised measures and thresholds.

scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Narut Prasitlumkum ◽  
Kimberly Ding ◽  
Kieran Doyle ◽  
Balaji Natarajan ◽  
Ramdas Pai
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Long-Term Prognostic Value of Cognitive Impairment on Top of Frailty in Older Adults after Acute Coronary Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 444
Author(s):  
Juan Sanchis ◽  
Clara Bonanad ◽  
Sergio García-Blas ◽  
Vicent Ruiz ◽  
Agustín Fernández-Cisnal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Adult Survivors ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Frailty is a marker of poor prognosis in older adults after acute coronary syndrome. We investigated whether cognitive impairment provides additional prognostic information. The study population consisted of a prospective cohort of 342 older (>65 years) adult survivors after acute coronary syndrome. Frailty (Fried score) and cognitive function (Pfeiffer’s Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire—SPMSQ) were assessed at discharge. The endpoints were mortality or acute myocardial infarction at 8.7-year median follow-up. Patient distribution according to SPMSQ results was: no cognitive impairment (SPMSQ = 0 errors; n = 248, 73%), mild impairment (SPMSQ = 1–2 errors; n = 52, 15%), and moderate to severe impairment (SPMSQ ≥3 errors; n = 42, 12%). A total of 245 (72%) patients died or had an acute myocardial infarction, and 216 (63%) patients died. After adjustment for clinical data, comorbidities, and Fried score, the SPMSQ added prognostic value for death or myocardial infarction (per number of errors; HR = 1.11, 95%, CI 1.04–1.19, p = 0.002) and death (HR = 1.11, 95% 1.03–1.20, p = 0.007). An SPMSQ with ≥3 errors identified the highest risk subgroup. Geriatric conditions (SPSMQ and Fried score) explained 19% and 43% of the overall chi-square of the models for predicting death or myocardial infarction and death, respectively. Geriatric assessment after acute coronary syndrome should include both frailty and cognitive function. This is particularly important given that cognitive impairment without dementia can be subclinical and thus remain undetected.

scholarly journals The "smoker's paradox" in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review

BMC Medicine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlend Aune ◽  
Jo Røislien ◽  
Mariann Mathisen ◽  
Dag S Thelle ◽  
Jan Erik Otterstad
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

PP23 Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for chest pain patients. A systematic review abstract

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. A10.2-A10
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alotaibi ◽  
Abdulrhman Alghamdi ◽  
Charles Reynard ◽  
Richard Body
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Telephone Triage ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Pain Patients

IntroductionChest pain is one of the most common reasons for ambulance callouts and presentation to Emergency Departments (EDs). Differentiating patients with serious conditions (e.g. acute coronary syndrome [ACS]) from the majority, who have self-limiting, non-cardiac conditions is extremely challenging. This causes over-triage and over-use of healthcare resources. We aimed to systematically review existing evidence on the accuracy of emergency telephone triage to detect ACS or life-threatening conditions associated with chest pain.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two independent investigators searched the Embase, Medline, and Cinahl databases for relevant papers. We included retrospective and prospective cohort studies written in English and investigating EMS telephone triage for chest pain patients linked with final diagnosis of ACS. Studies were summarised in a narrative format as the data were not suitable for meta-analysis.ResultIn total, 553 studies were identified from the literature search and cross-referencing. After excluding 550 studies, three were eligible for inclusion. Among those 3 studies, there are different prediction models developed by authors with variation in variables to detect ACS. The result showed that dispatch triage tools have good sensitivity to detect ACS and life-threatening conditions although they are used to triage sign and symptoms rather than diagnosing the patients. On the other hand, prediction models were built to detect ACS and life-threatening conditions and therefore it showed better sensitivity and NPV.ConclusionEMS dispatch systems accuracy for ACS and life-threatening conditions associated with chest pain is good. Since the dispatch tools were built to triage ambulance response priority based on sign and symptoms, this led to over triage among non-life-threatening chest pain patients. Over triage were slightly reduced by deriving prediction models and showed better sensitivity.

Abstract 309: Is Right Bundle Branch Block Associated with Poor Outcomes in the Setting of an Acute Coronary Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Hazem ◽  
Sunita Sharma ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Cameron Leitch ◽  
Roopalakshmi Sharadanant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Importance: Up to 10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have right bundle branch block (RBBB), and RBBB has been associated with a higher risk of mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB for patients with AMI. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Data Sources: We have systematically searched Ovid, Scopus and Web of Science through January 2014. Study Selection: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts, selecting studies that described all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with RBBB and suspected ACS. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcomes. Knowledge synthesis: We pooled risk ratio with hazard ratio in studies reporting those outcomes. When reported, odds ratio was converted into risk ratio using reported event rate in each study’s unexposed -read: non RBBB- group. Main Outcomes: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (death). Results: Eighteen studies were found that reported eligible data. All were observational studies, involving over 89,000 patients. In short-term follow up (up to 30 days), RBBB on presentation was associated with higher all-cause mortality rate, compared to patients without RBBB (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.76-2.82). There was a trend for higher mortality at long-term follow up (range: 6 months-16 years) that did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.93-2.25). Figure-1 demonstrates the forest plot. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and majority of included studied were deemed moderate to high quality. Conclusion and Relevance: RBBB is associated with a more than 2-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AMI at 30 days follow up. Patients with AMI and RBBB represent a high risk group for adverse outcomes. A sentence on the differential findings for new vs. old RBBB and association with outcomes could follow here.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document