scholarly journals Acute Kidney Injury and Associated Factors in Intensive Care Units at a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Tanzania

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205435812110279
Author(s):  
Neema W. Minja ◽  
Huda Akrabi ◽  
Karen Yeates ◽  
Kajiru Gad Kilonzo

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a recognized complication in critically ill patients. The epidemiology of AKI varies worldwide, depending on the diagnostic criteria used and the setting. The International Society of Nephrology has called for a reduction in preventable deaths from AKI to zero by the year 2025. It is suspected that the majority of AKI cases are in limited-resource countries, but the true burden of AKI in these settings remains unknown. Objective: We aimed to determine, using standardized KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria, the prevalence of AKI, associated factors, and clinical characteristics of adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Design: Prospective observational study from November 2017 to May 2018. Methods: In all, 320 patients admitted to medical and surgical ICUs were consecutively enrolled. Baseline, clinical, and laboratory data were collected on admission and during their ICU stay. Serum creatinine and urine output were measured, and KDIGO criteria were used to determine AKI status. Results: More than half (55.3%) of ICU patients were diagnosed with AKI. Of these, 80% were diagnosed within 24 hours of admission. Acute kidney injury stage 3 accounted for 35% of patients with AKI. Patients with AKI were older, more likely to have cardiovascular comorbidities, and with higher baseline serum levels of creatinine, potassium, universal vital assessment admission scores, and total white cell count ≥12. Sepsis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.81; confidence interval [CI] = 1.21-11.99), diabetes (OR = 2.54; CI = 1.24-5.17), and use of vasopressors (OR = 3.78; CI = 1.36-10.54) were independently associated with AKI in multivariable logistic regression. Less than one-third of those who needed dialysis received it. There was 100% mortality in those who needed dialysis but did not receive (n = 19). Limitations: Being based at a referral center, the findings do not represent the true burden of AKI in the community. Conclusion: The prevalence of AKI was very high in ICUs in Northern Tanzania. The majority of patients presented with AKI and were severely ill, suggesting late presentation, underscoring the importance of prioritizing prevention and early intervention. Further studies should explore locally suitable AKI risk scores that could be used to identify high-risk patients in the community health centers from where patients are referred.

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin A Pachucki ◽  
Erina Ghosh ◽  
Larry Eshelman ◽  
Krishnamoorthy Palanisamy ◽  
Timothy Gould ◽  
...  

Background Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients with detrimental effects on mortality, length of stay and post-discharge outcomes. The Acute Kidney Injury Network developed guidelines based on urine output and serum creatinine to classify patients into stages of acute kidney injury. Methods In this analysis we utilize the Acute Kidney Injury Network guidelines to evaluate the acute kidney injury stage in patients admitted to general and cardiac intensive care units over a period of 18 months. Acute kidney injury stage was calculated in real time hourly based on the guidelines and using these temporal stage scores calculated for the population; the prevalence and progression of acute kidney injury stage was compared between the two units. We hypothesized that the prevalence and progression of acute kidney injury stage between the two units may be different. Results More cardiac intensive care unit patients had no acute kidney injury (stage <1) during their intensive care unit stay but more cardiac intensive care unit patients developed acute kidney injury (stage >1), compared to the General Intensive Care Unit. Both at intensive care unit admission and discharge, more General Intensive Care Unit patients had acute kidney injury; however, the number of cardiac intensive care unit patients with acute kidney injury was three times higher at discharge than admission. Acute kidney injury developed in a different pattern in the two intensive care units over five days of intensive care unit stay. In the General Intensive Care Unit, acute kidney injury was most prevalent on second day of intensive care unit stay and in cardiac intensive care unit acute kidney injury was most prevalent on the third day of intensive care unit stay. We observed the biggest increase in new acute kidney injury in the first day of General Intensive Care Unit and second day of the cardiac intensive care unit stay. Conclusions The study demonstrates the different trends of acute kidney injury pattern in general and cardiac intensive care unit patient populations highlighting the earlier development of acute kidney injury on General Intensive Care Unit and more prevalence of acute kidney injury on discharge from cardiac intensive care unit.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Konlawij Trongtrakul ◽  
Sujaree Poopipatpab ◽  
Ploynapas Limphunudom ◽  
Chawika Pisitsak ◽  
Kaweesak chittawatanarat ◽  
...  

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Smischney ◽  
Andrew D. Shaw ◽  
Wolf H. Stapelfeldt ◽  
Isabel J. Boero ◽  
Qinyu Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The postoperative period is critical for a patient’s recovery, and postoperative hypotension, specifically, is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and significant harm to the patient. However, little is known about the association between postoperative hypotension in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) after non-cardiac surgery, and morbidity and mortality, specifically among patients who did not experience intraoperative hypotension. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative hypotension at various absolute hemodynamic thresholds (≤ 75, ≤ 65 and ≤ 55 mmHg), in the absence of intraoperative hypotension (≤ 65 mmHg), on outcomes among patients in the ICU following non-cardiac surgery. Methods This multi-center retrospective cohort study included specific patient procedures from Optum® healthcare database for patients without intraoperative hypotension (MAP ≤ 65 mmHg) discharged to the ICU for ≥ 48 h after non-cardiac surgery with valid mean arterial pressure (MAP) readings. A total of 3185 procedures were included in the final cohort, and the association between postoperative hypotension and the primary outcome, 30-day major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, was assessed. Secondary outcomes examined included all-cause 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day acute myocardial infarction, 30-day acute ischemic stroke, 7-day acute kidney injury stage II/III and 7-day continuous renal replacement therapy/dialysis. Results Postoperative hypotension in the ICU was associated with an increased risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at MAP ≤ 65 mmHg (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52; 98.4% confidence interval [CI] 1.17–1.96) and ≤ 55 mmHg (HR 2.02, 98.4% CI 1.50–2.72). Mean arterial pressures of ≤ 65 mmHg and ≤ 55 mmHg were also associated with higher 30-day mortality (MAP ≤ 65 mmHg, [HR 1.56, 98.4% CI 1.22–2.00]; MAP ≤ 55 mmHg, [HR 1.97, 98.4% CI 1.48–2.60]) and 90-day mortality (MAP ≤ 65 mmHg, [HR 1.49, 98.4% CI 1.20–1.87]; MAP ≤ 55 mmHg, [HR 1.78, 98.4% CI 1.38–2.31]). Furthermore, we found an association between postoperative hypotension with MAP ≤ 55 mmHg and acute kidney injury stage II/III (HR 1.68, 98.4% CI 1.02–2.77). No associations were seen between postoperative hypotension and 30-day readmissions, 30-day acute myocardial infarction, 30-day acute ischemic stroke and 7-day continuous renal replacement therapy/dialysis for any MAP threshold. Conclusions Postoperative hypotension in critical care patients with MAP ≤ 65 mmHg is associated with adverse events even without experiencing intraoperative hypotension.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 2367-2377
Author(s):  
Silvia González Sanchidrián ◽  
Javier L. Deira Lorenzo ◽  
M. Jimena Muciño Bermejo ◽  
Pedro J. Labrador Gómez ◽  
Juan R. Gómez-Martino Arroyo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document