Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Factors that predict outcomes for adult cervical spine deformity (ACSD) have not been well defined. To compare ACSD patients with best versus worst outcomes. Methods: This study was based on a prospective, multicenter observational ACSD cohort. Best versus worst outcomes were compared based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NP-NRS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores. Results: Of 111 patients, 80 (72%) had minimum 1-year follow-up. For NDI, compared with best outcome patients (n = 28), worst outcome patients (n = 32) were more likely to have had a major complication ( P = .004) and to have undergone a posterior-only procedure ( P = .039), had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = .009), and had worse postoperative C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P = .027). For NP-NRS, compared with best outcome patients (n = 26), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were younger ( P = .045), had worse baseline NP-NRS ( P = .034), and were more likely to have had a minor complication ( P = .030). For the mJOA, compared with best outcome patients (n = 16), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were more likely to have had a major complication ( P = .007) and to have a better baseline mJOA ( P = .030). Multivariate models for NDI included posterior-only surgery ( P = .006), major complication ( P = .002), and postoperative C7-S1 SVA ( P = .012); models for NP-NRS included baseline NP-NRS ( P = .009), age ( P = .017), and posterior-only surgery ( P = .038); and models for mJOA included major complication ( P = .008). Conclusions: Factors distinguishing best and worst ACSD surgery outcomes included patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. These findings suggest areas that may warrant greater awareness to optimize patient counseling and outcomes.

Download Full-text

Surgical outcomes in rigid versus flexible cervical deformities

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.8.spine191185 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Themistocles S. Protopsaltis ◽

Nicholas Stekas ◽

Justin S. Smith ◽

Alexandra Soroceanu ◽

Renaud Lafage ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Operative Time ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

T1 Slope ◽

Flexion Extension

OBJECTIVECervical deformity (CD) patients have severe disability and poor health status. However, little is known about how patients with rigid CD compare with those with flexible CD. The main objectives of this study were to 1) assess whether patients with rigid CD have worse baseline alignment and therefore require more aggressive surgical corrections and 2) determine whether patients with rigid CD have similar postoperative outcomes as those with flexible CD.METHODSThis is a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter CD database. Rigid CD was defined as cervical lordosis (CL) change < 10° between flexion and extension radiographs, and flexible CD was defined as a CL change ≥ 10°. Patients with rigid CD were compared with those with flexible CD in terms of cervical alignment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and at multiple postoperative time points. The patients were also compared in terms of surgical and intraoperative factors such as operative time, blood loss, and number of levels fused.RESULTSA total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria (32 with rigid and 95 with flexible CD, 63.4% of whom were females; mean age 60.8 years; mean BMI 27.4); 47.2% of cases were revisions. Rigid CD was associated with worse preoperative alignment in terms of T1 slope minus CL, T1 slope, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and C2 slope (C2S; all p < 0.05). Postoperatively, patients with rigid CD had an increased mean C2S (29.1° vs 22.2°) at 3 months and increased cSVA (47.1 mm vs 37.5 mm) at 1 year (p < 0.05) compared with those with flexible CD. Patients with rigid CD had more posterior levels fused (9.5 vs 6.3), fewer anterior levels fused (1 vs 2.0), greater blood loss (1036.7 mL vs 698.5 mL), more 3-column osteotomies (40.6% vs 12.6%), greater total osteotomy grade (6.5 vs 4.5), and mean osteotomy grade per level (3.3 vs 2.1) (p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in baseline HRQOL scores, the rate of distal junctional kyphosis, or major/minor complications between patients with rigid and flexible CD. Both rigid and flexible CD patients reported significant improvements from baseline to 1 year according to the numeric rating scale for the neck (−2.4 and −2.7, respectively), Neck Disability Index (−8.4 and −13.3, respectively), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (0.1 and 0.6), and EQ-5D (0.01 and 0.05) (p < 0.05). However, HRQOL changes from baseline to 1 year did not differ between rigid and flexible CD patients.CONCLUSIONSPatients with rigid CD have worse baseline cervical malalignment compared with those with flexible CD but do not significantly differ in terms of baseline disability. Rigid CD was associated with more invasive surgery and more aggressive corrections, resulting in increased operative time and blood loss. Despite more extensive surgeries, rigid CD patients had equivalent improvements in HRQOL compared with flexible CD patients. This study quantifies the importance of analyzing flexion-extension images, creating a prognostic tool for surgeons planning CD correction, and counseling patients who are considering CD surgery.

Download Full-text

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: an updated meta-analysis

Postgraduate Medical Journal ◽

10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139667 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. postgradmedj-2020-139667

Author(s):

Jing Wang ◽

Jin Wo ◽

Jun Wen ◽

Liu Zhang ◽

Weiwei Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

C5 Palsy ◽

Cervical Compressive Myelopathy ◽

Neck Disability

BackgroundMultilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossiﬁcation of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are debilitating degenerative diseases. If conservative treatment is ineffective, surgical options for multilevel CSM and OPLL include laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF). In this updated meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of both approaches.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase datasets from their inception to 31 March 2020, to identify all eligible studies comparing LP versus LF for multilevel CSM and OPLL. Data were extracted according to predefined endpoints. We summarised data by the random-effects or fixed-effect models, as necessary.ResultsOf 533 eligible studies, 16 were identified, which included 638 patients who underwent LP and 671 patients who underwent LF. No significant differences were observed between preoperative and postoperative scores of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (p=1.0 and 0.20, respectively); Visual Analogue Scale (p=0.24 and 0.89, respectively); sagittal vertical axis ((p=0.16 and 0.87, respectively); Nurick Scale (p=0.59 and 0.17, respectively); and range of motion (p=0.67 and 0.63, respectively). However, total complications were higher for LF compared with LP (p=0.006). A significantly higher incidence of C5 palsy was observed in the LF group (p=0.004). The postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) was also higher in the LF group (p<0.001).ConclusionsAlthough LP and LF shared similar clinical improvement, LP had fewer complications, a lower incidence of C5 palsy, and better NDI scores and recovery outcomes than LF. Randomised studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Download Full-text

Neck Pain and Disability: Are They Related to Dysfunctional Breathing and Stress?

Physiotherapy Canada ◽

10.3138/ptc-2020-0085 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sarah Stephen ◽

Corlia Brandt ◽

Benita Olivier

Keyword(s):

Neck Pain ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Hold Time ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Numeric Rating Scale ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Breath Hold ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Dysfunctional Breathing ◽

Neck Disability

Purpose: People with neck pain are likely to have negative respiratory findings. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between neck pain and dysfunctional breathing and to examine their relationship to stress. Method: This cross-sectional study included 49 participants with neck pain and 49 age- and sex-matched controls. We measured neck pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS); neck disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI); dysfunctional breathing using the Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), Self-Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ), breath hold time, and respiratory rate (RR); and stress using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Results:Participants with neck pain scored higher on the NQ ( p < 0.001) and the SEBQ ( p < 0.001) than controls. NQ and SEBQ scores correlated moderately with NDI scores ( r > 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.68 and 0.33, 0.73, respectively) and PSS scores ( r > 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.78 and 0.31, 0.73, respectively). SEBQ scores showed a fair correlation with NRS scores and RR a fair correlation with NDI scores. Conclusions: Participants with neck pain had more dysfunctional breathing symptoms than participants without neck pain, and dysfunctional breathing was correlated with increased neck disability and increased stress. The NQ and SEBQ can be useful in assessing dysfunctional breathing in patients with neck pain.

Download Full-text

Association of findings on preoperative extension lateral cervical radiography with osteotomy type, approach, and postoperative cervical alignment after cervical deformity surgery

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2021.3.spine202156 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Hai V. Le ◽

Joseph B. Wick ◽

Renaud Lafage ◽

Gregory M. Mundis ◽

Robert K. Eastlack ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Spine ◽

Surgical Approach ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Spine Deformity ◽

Lower Grade ◽

Cervical Lordosis ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

T1 Slope ◽

Radiographic Parameters ◽

Cervical Spine Radiography

OBJECTIVE The authors’ objective was to determine whether preoperative lateral extension cervical spine radiography can be used to predict osteotomy type and postoperative alignment parameters after cervical spine deformity surgery. METHODS A total of 106 patients with cervical spine deformity were reviewed. Radiographic parameters on preoperative cervical neutral and extension lateral radiography were compared with 3-month postoperative radiographic alignment parameters. The parameters included T1 slope, C2 slope, C2–7 cervical lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Associations of radiographic parameters with osteotomy type and surgical approach were also assessed. RESULTS On extension lateral radiography, patients who underwent lower grade osteotomy had significantly lower T1 slope, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and C2 slope. Patients who achieved more normal parameters on extension lateral radiography were more likely to undergo surgery via an anterior approach. Although baseline parameters were significantly different between neutral lateral and extension lateral radiographs, 3-month postoperative lateral and preoperative extension lateral radiographs were statistically similar for T1 slope minus cervical lordosis and C2 slope. CONCLUSIONS Radiographic parameters on preoperative extension lateral radiography were significantly associated with surgical approach and osteotomy grade and were similar to those on 3-month postoperative lateral radiography. These results demonstrated that extension lateral radiography is useful for preoperative planning and predicting postoperative alignment.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for One Hundred Thirty-Eight Patients With Severe Sagittal Deformity at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Case Series

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opab153 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Justin K Scheer ◽

Lawrence G Lenke ◽

Justin S Smith ◽

Darryl Lau ◽

Peter G Passias ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Case Series ◽

Major Complication ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Surgical Correction ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Sagittal Deformity

Abstract BACKGROUND Operative treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be very challenging with high complication rates. It is well established that patients benefit from such treatment; however, the surgical outcomes for patients with severe sagittal deformity have not been reported. OBJECTIVE To report the outcomes of patients undergoing surgical correction for severe sagittal deformity. METHODS Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter ASD database. Inclusion criteria: operative patients age ≥18, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥15 cm, mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) ≥30°, and/or lumbar kyphosis ≥5° with minimum 2 yr follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores including minimal clinically important difference (MCID)/substantial clinical benefit (SCB), sagittal and coronal radiographic values, demographic, frailty, surgical, and complication data were collected. Comparisons between 2 yr postoperative and baseline HRQOL/radiographic data were made. P < .05 was significant. RESULTS A total of 138 patients were included from 502 operative patients (54.3% Female, Average (Avg) age 63.3 ± 11.5 yr). Avg operating room (OR) time 386.2 ± 136.5 min, estimated blood loss (EBL) 1829.8 ± 1474.6 cc. A total of 71(51.4%) had prior fusion. A total of 89.9% were posterior fusion only. Mean posterior levels fused 11.5 ± 4.1. A total of 44.9% had a 3-column osteotomy. All 2 yr postoperative radiographic parameters were significantly improved compared to baseline (P < .001 for all). All 2yr HRQOL measures were significantly improved compared to baseline (P < .004 for all). A total of 46.6% to 73.8% of patients met either MCID/SCB for all HRQOL. A total of 74.6% of patients had at least 1 complication, 11.6% had 4 or more complications, 33.3% had minimum 1 major complication, and 42(30.4%) had a postop revision. CONCLUSION Patients with severe sagittal malalignment benefit from surgical correction at 2 yr postoperative both radiographically and clinically despite having a high complication rate.

Download Full-text

Improvement in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after vertebral body sliding osteotomy in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and kyphosis

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.3.spine2089 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 33 (3) ◽

pp. 307-315 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dong-Ho Lee ◽

Choon Sung Lee ◽

Chang Ju Hwang ◽

Jae Hwan Cho ◽

Jae-Woo Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Vertebral Body ◽

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Cervical Lordosis ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Segmental Lordosis

OBJECTIVEVertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) is a safe, novel technique for anterior decompression in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Another advantage of VBSO may be the restoration of cervical lordosis through multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) above and below the osteotomy level. This study aimed to evaluate the improvement and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO.METHODSA total of 65 patients were included; 34 patients had undergone VBSO, and 31 had undergone anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs were used to evaluate the improvements in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO. C0–2 lordosis, C2–7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were measured. Subgroup analysis was performed between 15 patients with 1-level VBSO and 19 patients with 2-level VBSO. Patients with 1-level VBSO were compared to patients who had undergone 1-level ACCF.RESULTSC0–2 lordosis (41.3° ± 7.1°), C2–7 lordosis (7.1° ± 12.8°), segmental lordosis (3.1° ± 9.2°), and C2–7 SVA (21.5 ± 11.7 mm) showed significant improvements at the final follow-up (39.3° ± 7.2°, 13° ± 9.9°, 15.2° ± 8.5°, and 18.4 ± 7.9 mm, respectively) after VBSO (p = 0.049, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.038, respectively). The postoperative segmental lordosis was significantly larger in 2-level VBSO (18.8° ± 11.6°) than 1-level VBSO (10.3° ± 5.5°, p = 0.014). The final segmental lordosis was larger in the 1-level VBSO (12.5° ± 6.2°) than the 1-level ACCF (7.2° ± 7.6°, p = 0.023). Segmental lordosis increased postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was maintained until the final follow-up (p = 0.062) after VBSO. However, the postoperatively improved segmental lordosis (p < 0.001) decreased at the final follow-up (p = 0.045) after ACCF.CONCLUSIONSNot only C2–7 lordosis and segmental lordosis, but also C0–2 lordosis and C2–7 SVA improved at the final follow-up after VBSO. VBSO improves segmental cervical lordosis markedly through multiple ACDFs above and below the VBSO level, and a preserved vertebral body may provide more structural support.

Download Full-text

Does the performance of lower limb peripheral nerve blocks differ among orthopedic sub-specialties? A single institution experience in 246 patients

Scandinavian Journal of Pain ◽

10.1515/sjpain-2021-0029 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Arash Ghaffari ◽

Marlene Kanstrup Jørgensen ◽

Helle Rømer ◽

Maibrit Pape B. Sørensen ◽

Søren Kold ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pain Management ◽

Peripheral Nerve ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Major Complication ◽

Numeric Rating Scale ◽

Lower Limbs ◽

Physiological Status ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Abstract Objectives Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNBs) have shown promising results in pain management after orthopaedic surgeries. However, they can be associated with some risks and limitations. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the cPNBs regarding efficacy and adverse events in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries on the lower extremity in different subspecialties. Methods This is a prospective cohort study on collected data from perineural catheters for pain management after orthopedic surgeries in lower limbs. Catheters were placed by experienced anesthesiologists using sterile technique. After an initial bolus dose of 10–20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% (weight adjusted), the catheters were secured and connected to disposable mechanical infusion pumps with ropivacaine 0.2% (basal infusion rate = 6 mL/h; weight adjusted (0.2 mL/kg/h)). After catheterization, the patients were examined daily, by specially educated acute pain service nurses. Pro re nata (PRN) or fixed boluses (10 mL bupivacaine 0.25%; weight adjusted) with an upper limit of 4 times/day, were administered if indicated. Patients’ demographic data, physiological status, and pre-op intake of opioids and other analgesics were registered. The severity of post-operative pain was assessed with ‘Numeric Rating Scale’ (NRS) and ‘Face, legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability’ (FLACC) scale for adults and children, respectively. The need for additional opioids and possible complications were registered. Results We included 547 catheters of 246 patients (Range 1–10 catheters per patient). Overall, 115 (21%) femoral, 162 (30%) saphenous, 66 (12%) sciatic, and 204 (37%) popliteal sciatic nerve catheter were used. 452 (83%) catheters were inserted by a primary procedure, 61(11%) catheters employed as a replacement, and 34 catheters (6.2%) used as a supplement. For guiding the catheterization, ultrasound was applied in 451 catheters (82%), nerve stimulator in 90 catheters (16%), and both methods in 6 catheters (1.1%). The median duration a catheter remained in place was 3 days (IQR = 2–5). The proportion of catheters with a duration of two days was 81, 79, 73, and 71% for femoral, sciatic, saphenous, and popliteal nerve, respectively. In different subspecialties, 91% of catheters in wound and amputations, 89% in pediatric surgery, 76% in trauma, 64% in foot and ankle surgery, and 59% in limb reconstructive surgery remained more than two days. During first 10 days after catheterization, the proportion of pain-free patients were 77–95% at rest and 63–88% during mobilization, 79–92% of the patients did not require increased opioid doses, and 50–67% did not require opioid PRN doses. In addition to 416 catheters (76%), which were removed as planned, the reason for catheter removal was leaving the hospital in 27 (4.9%), loss of efficacy in 69 (13%), dislodgement in 23 (4.2%), leakage in 8 (1.5%), and erythema in 4 catheters (0.73%). No major complication occurred. Conclusions After orthopaedic procedures, cPNBs can be considered as an efficient method for improving pain control and minimizing the use of additional opioids. However, the catheters sometimes might need to be replaced to achieve the desired efficacy.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and Characteristics of Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury Referred to a Rehabilitation Center

Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine ◽

10.5535/arm.20081 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 44 (6) ◽

pp. 438-449

Author(s):

Hae Young Kim ◽

Hye Jin Lee ◽

Tae-lim Kim ◽

EunYoung Kim ◽

Daehoon Ham ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Spinal Cord Injury ◽

Neuropathic Pain ◽

Marital Status ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Traumatic Injury ◽

Major Complication ◽

Depressive Mood ◽

Numeric Rating Scale ◽

Cord Injury

Objective To identify the prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain (NP) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to investigate associations between NP and demographic or disease-related variables.Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with SCI whose pain was classified according to the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain classifications at a single hospital. Multiple statistical analyses were employed. Patients aged <19 years, and patients with other neurological disorders and congenital conditions were excluded.Results Of 366 patients, 253 patients (69.1%) with SCI had NP. Patients who were married or had traumatic injury or depressive mood had a higher prevalence rate. When other variables were controlled, marital status and depressive mood were found to be predictors of NP. There was no association between the prevalence of NP and other demographic or clinical variables. The mean Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of NP was 4.52, and patients mainly described pain as tingling, squeezing, and painful cold. Females and those with below-level NP reported more intense pain. An NRS cut-off value of 4.5 was determined as the most appropriate value to discriminate between patients taking pain medication and those who did not.Conclusion In total, 69.1% of patients with SCI complained of NP, indicating that NP was a major complication. Treatment planning for patients with SCI and NP should consider that marital status, mood, sex, and pain subtype may affect NP, which should be actively managed in patients with an NRS ≥4.5.

Download Full-text

Predictors associated with neurological recovery after anterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy

10.21203/rs.3.rs-41622/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Hiroyuki Inose ◽

Takashi Hirai ◽

Toshitaka Yoshii ◽

Atsushi Kimura ◽

Katsushi Takeshita ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Myelopathy ◽

Recovery Rate ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Multiple Linear Regression Model ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Neurological Recovery ◽

Anterior Decompression ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Japanese Orthopedic Association ◽

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Abstract Background Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) has often been performed for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) in patients with poor cervical spine alignment and/or anterior cord compression. However, it is difficult to preoperatively predict the extent to which patients will experience postoperative neurological improvement. We aimed to identify predictors associated with neurological recovery after ADF in a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Methods We prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for ADF for DCM. The associations of baseline variables with recovery rate were investigated using a multiple linear regression model. Results In total, 36 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. Regarding clinical outcomes, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy, European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 (PCS) scores improved postoperatively. The recovery rate was significantly correlated with the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 pelvic angle. Univariate regression analyses showed that the SVA and PCS score were significantly associated with recovery rate. Lastly, multiple regression analysis identified the independent predictors of recovery rate after ADF as thoracic kyphosis (TK), PCS, and SVA. According to this prediction model, the following equation was obtained: recovery rate = − 8.26 + 1.17 × (TK) – 0.45 × (SVA) + 0.85 × (PCS). Conclusion Patients with lower TK, lower PCS score, and higher SVA were more likely to have poor neurological recovery after ADF. Therefore, DCM patients with these predictors who undergo ADF might be cautioned about poor recovery and be required to provide adequate informed consent.

Download Full-text