Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: an updated meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-139667
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jin Wo ◽  
Jun Wen ◽  
Liu Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
C5 Palsy ◽  
Cervical Compressive Myelopathy ◽  
Neck Disability

BackgroundMultilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are debilitating degenerative diseases. If conservative treatment is ineffective, surgical options for multilevel CSM and OPLL include laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF). In this updated meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of both approaches.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase datasets from their inception to 31 March 2020, to identify all eligible studies comparing LP versus LF for multilevel CSM and OPLL. Data were extracted according to predefined endpoints. We summarised data by the random-effects or fixed-effect models, as necessary.ResultsOf 533 eligible studies, 16 were identified, which included 638 patients who underwent LP and 671 patients who underwent LF. No significant differences were observed between preoperative and postoperative scores of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (p=1.0 and 0.20, respectively); Visual Analogue Scale (p=0.24 and 0.89, respectively); sagittal vertical axis ((p=0.16 and 0.87, respectively); Nurick Scale (p=0.59 and 0.17, respectively); and range of motion (p=0.67 and 0.63, respectively). However, total complications were higher for LF compared with LP (p=0.006). A significantly higher incidence of C5 palsy was observed in the LF group (p=0.004). The postoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) was also higher in the LF group (p<0.001).ConclusionsAlthough LP and LF shared similar clinical improvement, LP had fewer complications, a lower incidence of C5 palsy, and better NDI scores and recovery outcomes than LF. Randomised studies are warranted to validate these findings.

scholarly journals Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
Han Jo Kim ◽  
Peter Passias ◽  
Themistocles Protopsaltis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Spine Deformity ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
A Minor

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Factors that predict outcomes for adult cervical spine deformity (ACSD) have not been well defined. To compare ACSD patients with best versus worst outcomes. Methods: This study was based on a prospective, multicenter observational ACSD cohort. Best versus worst outcomes were compared based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NP-NRS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores. Results: Of 111 patients, 80 (72%) had minimum 1-year follow-up. For NDI, compared with best outcome patients (n = 28), worst outcome patients (n = 32) were more likely to have had a major complication ( P = .004) and to have undergone a posterior-only procedure ( P = .039), had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = .009), and had worse postoperative C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P = .027). For NP-NRS, compared with best outcome patients (n = 26), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were younger ( P = .045), had worse baseline NP-NRS ( P = .034), and were more likely to have had a minor complication ( P = .030). For the mJOA, compared with best outcome patients (n = 16), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were more likely to have had a major complication ( P = .007) and to have a better baseline mJOA ( P = .030). Multivariate models for NDI included posterior-only surgery ( P = .006), major complication ( P = .002), and postoperative C7-S1 SVA ( P = .012); models for NP-NRS included baseline NP-NRS ( P = .009), age ( P = .017), and posterior-only surgery ( P = .038); and models for mJOA included major complication ( P = .008). Conclusions: Factors distinguishing best and worst ACSD surgery outcomes included patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. These findings suggest areas that may warrant greater awareness to optimize patient counseling and outcomes.

Surgical outcomes in rigid versus flexible cervical deformities

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Themistocles S. Protopsaltis ◽  
Nicholas Stekas ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Alexandra Soroceanu ◽  
Renaud Lafage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
T1 Slope ◽  
Flexion Extension

OBJECTIVECervical deformity (CD) patients have severe disability and poor health status. However, little is known about how patients with rigid CD compare with those with flexible CD. The main objectives of this study were to 1) assess whether patients with rigid CD have worse baseline alignment and therefore require more aggressive surgical corrections and 2) determine whether patients with rigid CD have similar postoperative outcomes as those with flexible CD.METHODSThis is a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter CD database. Rigid CD was defined as cervical lordosis (CL) change < 10° between flexion and extension radiographs, and flexible CD was defined as a CL change ≥ 10°. Patients with rigid CD were compared with those with flexible CD in terms of cervical alignment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and at multiple postoperative time points. The patients were also compared in terms of surgical and intraoperative factors such as operative time, blood loss, and number of levels fused.RESULTSA total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria (32 with rigid and 95 with flexible CD, 63.4% of whom were females; mean age 60.8 years; mean BMI 27.4); 47.2% of cases were revisions. Rigid CD was associated with worse preoperative alignment in terms of T1 slope minus CL, T1 slope, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and C2 slope (C2S; all p < 0.05). Postoperatively, patients with rigid CD had an increased mean C2S (29.1° vs 22.2°) at 3 months and increased cSVA (47.1 mm vs 37.5 mm) at 1 year (p < 0.05) compared with those with flexible CD. Patients with rigid CD had more posterior levels fused (9.5 vs 6.3), fewer anterior levels fused (1 vs 2.0), greater blood loss (1036.7 mL vs 698.5 mL), more 3-column osteotomies (40.6% vs 12.6%), greater total osteotomy grade (6.5 vs 4.5), and mean osteotomy grade per level (3.3 vs 2.1) (p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in baseline HRQOL scores, the rate of distal junctional kyphosis, or major/minor complications between patients with rigid and flexible CD. Both rigid and flexible CD patients reported significant improvements from baseline to 1 year according to the numeric rating scale for the neck (−2.4 and −2.7, respectively), Neck Disability Index (−8.4 and −13.3, respectively), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (0.1 and 0.6), and EQ-5D (0.01 and 0.05) (p < 0.05). However, HRQOL changes from baseline to 1 year did not differ between rigid and flexible CD patients.CONCLUSIONSPatients with rigid CD have worse baseline cervical malalignment compared with those with flexible CD but do not significantly differ in terms of baseline disability. Rigid CD was associated with more invasive surgery and more aggressive corrections, resulting in increased operative time and blood loss. Despite more extensive surgeries, rigid CD patients had equivalent improvements in HRQOL compared with flexible CD patients. This study quantifies the importance of analyzing flexion-extension images, creating a prognostic tool for surgeons planning CD correction, and counseling patients who are considering CD surgery.

scholarly journals Review of laminoplasty versus laminectomy in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Riccardo Paracino ◽  
Maria Rossella Fasinella ◽  
Fabrizio Mancini ◽  
Alessandra Marini ◽  
Mauro Dobran
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Cervical Trauma ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Neck Disability

Background: We reviewed the literature comparing the indications/efficacy of laminectomy (LA) with or without fusion versus laminoplasty (LP) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: We identified 14 studies in PubMed/Medline to include in our analysis. Outcomes were assessed utilizing the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index, and Nurick scale. Variables studied included ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), cervical range of motion (ROM), the C2-C7 sagittal Cobb angle, the Ishihara index, and the Hirabayashi scale. Patients with cervical trauma/fracture, infection, or tumor were excluded from the study. Results: In these 14 studies, there were no significant differences between LA and LP groups in terms of preoperative versus postoperative: JOA scores (e.g., including the improvement rate), VAS scores, and ROM. However, the LA patients demonstrated greater postoperative cervical lordosis versus those in the LP group. Conclusion: At present, there are no guidelines for choosing LA versus LP for treating CSM. Factors that should be considered when choosing one procedure over the other should include the patients’ preoperative clinical status, the type of CSM, the pathological extent of OPLL, and whether there is a sufficient cervical lordotic curvature.

scholarly journals Does Diabetes Affect the Surgical Outcomes in Cases With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament? A Multicenter Study From Asia Pacific Spine Study Group

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199630
Author(s):  
Narihito Nagoshi ◽  
Kota Watanabe ◽  
Masaya Nakamura ◽  
Morio Matsumoto ◽  
Nan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
C5 Palsy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Objectives: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Methods: Approximately 253 cervical OPLL patients who underwent surgical decompression with or without fixation were registered at 4 institutions in 3 Asian countries. They were followed up for at least 2 years. Demographics, imaging, and surgical information were collected, and cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and the visual analog scale (VAS) for the neck were used for evaluation. Results: Forty-seven patients had DM, showing higher hypertension and cardiovascular disease prevalence. Although they presented worse preoperative JOA scores than non-DM patients (10.5 ± 3.1 vs. 11.8 ± 3.2; P = 0.01), the former showed comparable neurologic recovery at the final follow-up (13.9 ± 2.9 vs. 14.2 ± 2.6; P = 0.41). No correlation was noted between the hemoglobin A1c level in the DM group and the pre- and postoperative JOA scores. No significant difference was noted in VAS scores between the groups at pre- and postsurgery. Regarding perioperative complications, DM patients presented a higher C5 palsy frequency (14.9% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.04). A similar trend was observed when surgical procedure was limited to laminoplasty. Conclusions: This is the first multicenter Asian study to evaluate the impact of DM on cervical OPLL patients. Surgical results were favorable even in DM cases, regardless of preoperative hemoglobin A1c levels or operative procedures. However, caution is warranted for the occurrence of C5 palsy after surgery.

Association Between Deep Posterior Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Morphology and Clinical Features in Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822198965
Author(s):  
Toru Doi ◽  
Nozomu Ohtomo ◽  
Fumihiko Oguchi ◽  
Keiichiro Tozawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakarai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Fatty Infiltration ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Paraspinal Muscle ◽  
Paraspinal Muscles ◽  
Muscle Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Neck Disability

Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Objective: To clarify the association of the paraspinal muscle area and composition with clinical features in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Methods: Consecutive patients with cervical OPLL who underwent cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery were reviewed. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty infiltration ratio (FI%) of deep posterior cervical paraspinal muscles (multifidus [MF] and semispinalis cervicis [SCer]) were examined. We assessed the association of paraspinal muscle measurements with the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes, such as Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. Moreover, we divided the patients into 2 groups according to the extent of the ossified lesion (segmental and localized [OPLL-SL] and continuous and mixed [OPLL-CM] groups) and compared these variables between the 2 groups. Results: 49 patients with cervical OPLL were enrolled in this study. The FI% of the paraspinal muscles was significantly associated with the number of vertebrae ( ρ = 0.283, p = 0.049) or maximum occupancy ratio of OPLL ( ρ = 0.397, p = 0.005). The comparative study results indicated that the NDI score was significantly worse (OPLL-SL, 22.9 ± 13.7 vs. OPLL-CM, 34.4 ± 13.7) and FI% of SCer higher (OPLL-SL, 9.1 ± 1.7% vs. OPLL-CM, 11.1 ± 3.7%) in the OPLL-CM group than those in the OPLL-SL group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that OPLL severity may be associated with fatty infiltration of deep posterior cervical paraspinal muscles, which could affect neck disability in patients with cervical OPLL.

scholarly journals Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS): a retrospective study of 45 cases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Luo ◽  
Kaiqiang Sun ◽  
Jingchuan Sun ◽  
Shunmin Wang ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
One Year ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Abstract Background To investigate the clinical effect of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS), and compare ACAF with hybrid decompression fixation (HDF). Methods A retrospective analysis of 85 cases with MCSMSS was carried out. 45 patients were treated with ACAF, while 40 patients were treated with HDF. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Computed Tomography (CT) transverse measurement, cervical curvature and Kang's grade were compared between two groups. Results The patients were followed up for 12 to 17 months. Compared with HDF, ACAF group achieved better decompression according to CT measurement and Kang’s grade (P < 0.05), and recovered to a greater cervical Cobb’s angle (P < 0.05). However, JOA score and NDI index showed no significant difference one year after surgery (P＞0.05). Additionally, ACAF presented longer operation time and greater intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05). As to complications, ACAF developed less incidences of cerebrospinal fluid examination (CSF) leakage, neurologic deterioration, epidural hematoma and C5 palsy by comparing with HDF. Conclusions ACAF is an effective method for the treatment of MCSMSS. Compared with HDF, ACAF has the advantages of significant decompression, increasing cervical curvature, and reducing the incidences of complications.

scholarly journals The Impact of a Stabilization Exercise on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
Binbin Wu ◽  
Hongyan Yuan ◽  
Deyu Geng ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Cheng Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Stabilization Exercise ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The efficacy of a stabilization exercise for the relief of neck pain remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effectiveness of a stabilization exercise on neck pain. Methods We searched Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO Information Services, and the Cochrane Library databases through May 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of a stabilization exercise on neck pain. This meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. Results Six RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group of patients with neck pain, a stabilization exercise can significantly reduce pain scores at 4 to 6 weeks (mean difference [MD]: −2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.46 to −0.35; p = 0.02), Neck Disability Index [NDI] at 10 to 12 weeks (MD:− 6.75; 95% CI, −11.71 to −1.79; p = 0.008), and depression scale at 4 to 6 weeks (MD: −4.65; 95% CI, −7.00 to −2.31; p = 0.02), but it has no obvious impact on pain scores at 10 to 12 weeks (MD: −1.07; 95% CI, −3.42 to 1.28; p = 0.37) or at 6 months (MD: −1.02; 95% CI, −3.43 to 1.39; p = 0.41). Conclusions A stabilization exercise can provide some benefits to control neck pain.

Does Obesity Correlate With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Neurosurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Sielatycki ◽  
Chotai Silky ◽  
Kay Harrison ◽  
David Stonko ◽  
Matthew McGirt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score ◽  
Association Score ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Neck Disability

Abstract BACKGROUND Studies have investigated the impact of obesity in thoracolumbar surgery; however, the effect of obesity on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between obesity and PROs following elective ACDF. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative conditions were evaluated. Patients were divided into groups with a body mass index ≥35. The EuroQol-5D, Short-Form 12 (SF-12), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and Neck Disability Index were used. Correlations between PROs and obesity were calculated at baseline and 1 year. RESULTS A total of 299 patients were included, with 80 obese (27%) and 219 nonobese (73%). patients At baseline, obesity was associated with worse myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score: 10.7 vs 12.2, P = .01), general physical health (SF-12 physical component scale score: 28.7 vs 31.8, P = .02), and general mental health (SF-12 mental component scale score: 38.9 vs 42.3, P = .04). All PROs improved significantly following surgery in both groups. There was no difference in absolute scores and change scores for any PRO at 12 months following surgery. Furthermore, there was no difference in the percentage of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference for the Neck Disability Index (52% vs 56%, P = .51) and no difference in patient satisfaction (85% vs 85%, P = .85) between groups. CONCLUSION Obesity was not associated with less improvement in PROs following ACDF. There was no difference in the proportion of patients satisfied with surgery and those achieving a minimal clinically important difference across all PROs. Obese patients may therefore achieve meaningful improvement following elective ACDF.

scholarly journals Jingtong Granule: A Chinese Patent Medicine for Cervical Radiculopathy

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liguo Zhu ◽  
Jinghua Gao ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Minshan Feng ◽  
Jinyu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Methodological Assessment ◽  
Neck Disability

Objective. This paper systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of Jingtong granule (JG) for cervical radiculopathy (CR).Methods. Randomized controlled trials comparing JG with no intervention, placebo, or conventional therapies were retrieved. The trials testing JG combined with conventional therapies versus conventional therapies were also enrolled. Study selection, methodological assessment, data extraction, and analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane standards. The strength of evidence was evaluated according to GRADE approach.Results. Three trials with 400 participants were included. Methodological quality was evaluated as generally low. One study found that JG showed significant difference on decreasing pain scores compared with placebo. Meta-analysis indicated that JG plus conventional analgesic exhibited a significant immediate effect on the pain scores (WMD = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.98;P<0.00001). Additionally, JG combined with analgesic presented beneficial immediate effect on neck disability index. However, the treatment effects of JG demonstrated in the trials were not large, and the safety of JG was unproven. Finally the evidence level was evaluated to be low.Conclusions. Our results indicated that JG showed some potential benefits for CR. Nevertheless, treatment effects are uncertain due to both the methodological concerns and the very modest reported improvements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document