scholarly journals Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients

2019 ◽  
pp. 219256821989629
Author(s):  
Sean Pirkle ◽  
David J. Cook ◽  
Samuel Kaskovich ◽  
Sarah Bhattacharjee ◽  
Alisha Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis ◽  
Thrombotic Complications

Study Design: Retrospective, database review. Objectives: Examine the utilization rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and compare the incidence and severity of bleeding and thrombotic complications in elective spine surgery patients. Methods: We utilized PearlDiver, a national orthopedics claims database. All patients who underwent elective spine surgery from 2007 to 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by the presence of DVT prophylaxis drug codes, then by comorbidities for postoperative bleeding/thrombosis. The severity of all bleeding and thrombotic complications in each cohort was studied, including the incidence of complications requiring operative washout, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. Results: A total of 119 888 patients were included. The majority of patients (118 720, >99%) were not administered postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis while a minority of patients (1168) were. The overall rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications within the population not receiving DVT prophylaxis were 1.96% and 2.45%, respectively ( P < .001). The incidence of surgical intervention for a wound washout was 0.62% compared with 1.05% for pulmonary embolism ( P < .001). Intensive care unit admission rates related to a wound washout procedure or pulmonary embolism also significantly differed (0.07% vs 0.34%, P < .001). There were no observed differences in mortality. When controlling for patient comorbidity, patients with atrial fibrillation, cancer, or a prior history of thrombotic complications experienced the greatest increased risks of postoperative thrombosis. Conclusions: DVT prophylaxis is not routinely utilized following elective spine procedures. We report that there exist specific populations which may receive benefit from these practices, although further study is necessary to determine optimal prevention strategies for both thrombotic and bleeding complications in spine surgery.

Venous Thrombosis and SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Zdanyte ◽  
Dominik Rath ◽  
Meinrad Gawaz ◽  
Tobias Geisler
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vascular Endothelium ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Thrombotic Complications

AbstractSARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection is associated with high risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Thrombotic complications, especially pulmonary embolism, lead to increased all-cause mortality in both intensive care unit and noncritically ill patients. Damage and activation of vascular endothelium, platelet activation, followed by thrombotic and fibrinolytic imbalance as well as hypercoagulability are the key pathomechanisms in immunothrombosis leading to a significant increase in thromboembolism in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared with other acute illnesses. In this review article, we discuss the incidence and prognosis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 disease, based on clinical experience and research available to date.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Triggering the Emergency Response Team at a High-Volume Arthroplasty Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Saku ◽  
R. Linko ◽  
R. Madanat
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Emergency Response ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Low Oxygen ◽  
Response Team ◽  
The Mean

Background and Aims: Emergency Response Teams have been employed by hospitals to evaluate and manage patients whose condition is rapidly deteriorating. In this study, we aimed to assess the outcomes of triggering the Emergency Response Teams at a high-volume arthroplasty center, determine which factors trigger the Emergency Response Teams, and investigate the main reasons for an unplanned intensive care unit admission following Emergency Response Team intervention. Material and Methods: We gathered data by evaluating all Emergency Response Team forms filled out during a 4-year period (2014–2017), and by assessing the medical records. The collected data included age, gender, time of and reason for the Emergency Response Teams call, and interventions performed during the Emergency Response Teams intervention. The results are reported as percentages, mean ± standard deviation, or median (interquartile range), where appropriate. All patients were monitored for 30 days to identify possible intensive care unit admissions, surgeries, and death. Results: The mean patient age was 72 (46–92) years and 40 patients (62%) were female. The Emergency Response Teams was triggered a total of 65 times (61 patients). The most common Emergency Response Team call criteria were low oxygen saturation, loss or reduction of consciousness, and hypotension. Following the Emergency Response Team call, 36 patients (55%) could be treated in the ward, and 29 patients (45%) were transferred to the intensive care unit. The emergency that triggered the Emergency Response Teams was most commonly caused by drug-related side effects (12%), pneumonia (8%), pulmonary embolism (8%), and sepsis (6%). Seven patients (11%) died during the first 30 days after the Emergency Response Teams call. Conclusion: Although all 65 patients met the Emergency Response Teams call criteria, potentially having severe emergencies, half of the patients could be treated in the arthroplasty ward. Emergency Response Team intervention appears useful in addressing concerns that can potentially lead to unplanned intensive care unit admission, and the Emergency Response Teams trigger threshold seems appropriate as only 3% of the Emergency Response Teams calls required no intervention.

Use of hospital resources in the care of patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism

2020 ◽  
pp. 204887262092160
Author(s):  
Alexander E Sullivan ◽  
Tara Holder ◽  
Tracy Truong ◽  
Cynthia L Green ◽  
Olamiji Sofela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Patients

Background Risk stratification and management of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism remains challenging. Professional societies have published stratification schemes, but little is known about the management of patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism. We describe the care of these patients at an academic health system. Methods Patient encounters from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017 were retrospectively identified utilizing a multihospital, electronic health record-based data warehouse. Using the 2019 European Society of Cardiology criteria, differences in hospital resource utilization, defined as intensive care unit admission, use of invasive therapies, and length of stay, were examined in patients with intermediate risk characteristics. Results A cohort of 322 intermediate risk patients, including 165 intermediate–low and 157 intermediate–high risk patients, was identified. Intermediate–high risk patients more often underwent catheter-directed therapy (14.0% vs. 1.8%; P<0.001) compared to intermediate–low risk patients and had a 50% higher rate of intensive care unit admission (relative risk 1.50; 95% confidence interval 1.06, 2.12; P=0.023). There was no difference in median intensive care unit length of stay (2.7 vs. 2.0 days; P=0.761) or hospital length of stay (5.0 vs. 5.0 days; P=0.775) between intermediate–high risk and intermediate–low risk patients. Patients that underwent invasive therapies had a 3.8-day shorter hospital length of stay (beta –3.75; 95% confidence interval –6.17, –1.32; P=0.002). Conclusion This study presents insights into the hospital resource utilization of patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism. The 2019 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification criteria are a clinically relevant scheme that identifies patients more often treated with intensive care unit admission and advanced therapies.

scholarly journals Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after carbon monoxide poisoning: A nationwide population-based study

2021 ◽  
pp. 102490792199442
Author(s):  
Yongil Cho ◽  
Tae Ho Lim ◽  
Byuk Sung Ko ◽  
Hyunggoo Kang ◽  
Jaehoon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Introduction: The risk of venous thromboembolism increases after acute carbon monoxide poisoning. However, studies on the characteristics of patients who develop venous thromboembolism after carbon monoxide poisoning are rare. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for venous thromboembolism within 3 months after carbon monoxide poisoning. Methods: This is a population-based study that employed nationwide claims data from South Korea. Among the carbon monoxide poisoning patients (⩾18 years), the characteristics of the groups with and without venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) were identified. All the significant variables in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression to determine the risk factors for venous thromboembolism occurrence. Results: Among the 24,232 carbon monoxide poisoning patients, 130 subjects developed venous thromboembolism within 90 days of their carbon monoxide poisoning diagnosis. The significant risk factors for venous thromboembolism in the multivariable analysis were age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.003–1.03), intensive care unit admission (aOR = 3.80; 95% CI = 2.34–6.12), length of stay (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.0001–1.04), congestive heart failure (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.36–3.42), and cancer (aOR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.10–3.22). The adjusted odds ratios for intensive care unit admission for patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis were 3.05 (95% CI = 1.61–5.61) and 5.60 (95% CI = 2.89–10.90), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with older age, intensive care unit admission, a longer length of stay, congestive heart failure, or cancer are at greater risk of developing venous thromboembolism after carbon monoxide poisoning. In particular, intensive care unit admission was the strongest risk factor for venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. Monitoring and administering prophylactic treatments to prevent venous thromboembolism would be helpful in high-risk in carbon monoxide poisoning patients.

scholarly journals Mild thrombocytopenia indicating maternal organ damage in pre‐eclampsia: a cross‐sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michinori Mayama ◽  
Mamoru Morikawa ◽  
Takashi Yamada ◽  
Takeshi Umazume ◽  
Kiwamu Noshiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Preterm Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Relative Risks

Abstract Background Currently, there is a disagreement between guidelines regarding platelet count cut-off values as a sign of maternal organ damage in pre-eclampsia; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines state a cut-off value of < 100 × 109/L; however, the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy guidelines specify a cut-off of < 150 × 109/L. We evaluated the effect of mild thrombocytopenia: platelet count < 150 × 109/L and ≥ 100 × 109/L on clinical features of pre-eclampsia to examine whether mild thrombocytopenia reflects maternal organ damage in pre-eclampsia. Methods A total of 264 women were enrolled in this study. Participants were divided into three groups based on platelet count levels at delivery: normal, ≥ 150 × 109/L; mild thrombocytopenia, < 150 × 109/L and ≥ 100 × 109/L; and severe thrombocytopenia, < 100 × 109/L. Risk of severe hypertension, utero-placental dysfunction, maternal organ damage, preterm delivery, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were analyzed based on platelet count levels. Estimated relative risk was calculated with a Poisson regression analysis with a robust error. Results Platelet counts indicated normal levels in 189 patients, mild thrombocytopenia in 51 patients, and severe thrombocytopenia in 24 patients. The estimated relative risks of severe thrombocytopenia were 4.46 [95 % confidence interval, 2.59–7.68] for maternal organ damage except for thrombocytopenia, 1.61 [1.06–2.45] for preterm delivery < 34 gestational weeks, and 1.35 [1.06–1.73] for neonatal intensive care unit admission. On the other hand, the estimated relative risks of mild thrombocytopenia were 0.97 [0.41–2.26] for maternal organ damage except for thrombocytopenia, 0.91 [0.62–1.35] for preterm delivery < 34 gestational weeks, and 0.97 [0.76–1.24] for neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusions Mild thrombocytopenia was not associated with severe features of pre-eclampsia and would not be suitable as a sign of maternal organ damage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document