scholarly journals Management of post-operative discitis following discectomy in a tertiary-level hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902098821
Author(s):  
Md Kamrul Ahsan ◽  
Md Sariful Hasan ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam Khan ◽  
Najmus Sakeb
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Level Hospital

Purpose: To perform retrospective analysis of 75 post-operative disc space infections after open lumbar discectomy (OLD) and to assess the outcome of their medical and surgical management in a tertiary-level hospital. Methods: Records of 50 men and 25 women aged 26–65 (mean, 42.53) years who underwent treatment for post-operative discitis (POD) after single level OLD at L3–4 (n = 8), L4–5 (n = 42), L5–S1 (n = 25) level. The POD was diagnosed according to specific clinical signs, laboratory and radiographic investigations and all of them received initial intravenous antibiotics (IVA) for at least 4–6 weeks followed by oral ones. Successful responders (n = 55) were considered in Group-C and remainder [Group-S (n = 20)] were operated at least after 4 weeks of failure. Demographic data, clinical variables, hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment and post-treatment complications were collected from the hospital record and assessment before and after treatment were done by using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Comprehensive outcome was evaluated by modified criteria of Kirkaldy-Willis. Results: The mean follows up was 36.38 months. Significant improvement of mean VAS and JOA score was achieved in both conservative (76.36% satisfactory) and operative (90% satisfactory) groups although the difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Although insignificant, early surgical intervention provided better results (e.g. functional outcomes, length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment therapy) than conventional conservative treatment in post-operative discitis.

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Chewing Gum ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Bowel Motility ◽  
Gum Chewing ◽  
Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay.  Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Catheter Size ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Procedure Type ◽  
Angiographic Findings

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

Effect of Colostomy on Treatment Outcome in Fournier Gangrene: A Prospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110247
Author(s):  
Barakat Abdelreheem Mahmood ◽  
Emad Hussein ElSayed ◽  
Sherif Abdalla Ali
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Perianal Region ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Difference

Background and Aim: Value of colostomy in management of Fournier gangrene (FG) is a debatable issue. Almost all relevant studies are retrospective and included heterogeneous patients’ groups. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the role of colostomy in management of FG affecting the perianal region in 2 well-matched FG groups. Patients and Methods: The present prospective comparative study included 30 patients with FG associated with extensive involvement of the perianal region. They comprised 15 patients subjected to colostomy and other 15 patients who refused to perform the procedure. Colostomy was performed after the first debridement. Outcome parameters in the present study included time to wound healing, length of hospital stay, and inhospital mortality. Results: Comparison between the studied groups regarding the preoperative characteristics revealed no statistically significant differences. Postoperatively, patients in the colostomy group had significantly fewer number of debridements (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 1.2, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (9.5 ± 3.3 vs 29.9 ± 6.2 days, P < .001), and significantly shorter time to wound healing (16.5 ± 3.9 vs 42.9 ± 6.9 days, P < .001). Also, patients in the colostomy group had significantly lower rate of wound dehiscence, wound infection, and flap ischemia. However, the difference wasn’t statistically significant. Conclusions: Aggressive treatment of FG aided by colostomy after first debridement would result in better clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Factors affecting length of hospital stay for people with spinal cord injuries at Kanombe military hospital, Rwanda

2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
PB Bwanjugu ◽  
A. Rhoda
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Pressure Sores ◽  
Rehabilitation Team ◽  
Factors Affecting

In patients with spinal cord injuries increased length ofhospital stay is often as a result of secondary complications such as pressuresores, urinary tract infection and respiratory infection. An increased lengthof hospital stay was observed at Kanombe Military Hospital in Rwanda.The aim of this study was to determine specific factors affecting length ofhospital stay for individuals with spinal cord injuries at Kanombe MilitaryHospital in Rwanda. The records of 124 individuals with spinal cordinjuries who were discharged from the hospital between 1st January1996and 31st December 2007 were reviewed to collect data. Information collected and captured on a data gathering sheetincluded demographic data, information relating to the injury, occurrence of medical complications and length ofhospital stay. Linear regression analysis was computed in SPSS to determine factors affecting the length of stay.The necessary ethical considerations were adhered to during the implementation of the study. Current employmentstatus and the occurrence of pressure sores were significantly associated with the length of hospital stay (p=0.021 andp=0.000 respectively). A strong relationship was noted between pressure sores and length of stay (R= 0.703). There is aneed for all members of the rehabilitation team to devise and implement effective measures to prevent the developmentof pressure sores, in patients with spinal cord injuries in the study setting.

scholarly journals Efficacy of the Ovesco Clip for Closure of Endoscope Related Perforations

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon ◽  
Piyapan Prueksapanich ◽  
Pradermchai Kongkam ◽  
Thawee Rattanachu-ek ◽  
Jaksin Sottisuporn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Day Length ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Rectosigmoid Junction ◽  
Iatrogenic Perforation

Aim. To study the efficacy and other treatment outcomes of Ovesco clip closure of iatrogenic perforation. Methods. Retrospective study from 3 tertiary-care hospitals in Thailand. Patients with iatrogenic perforation who underwent immediate endoscopic closure by Ovesco clip were included. Patients’ demographic data, perforation size, number of Ovesco clips used, fasting day, length of hospital stay, success rates, and complication rate were recorded. Technical success was defined as closure achievement during endoscopic procedure and clinical success was defined as the patient can be discharged without the need of additional surgical or radiological intervention. Results. There were 6 iatrogenic perforations in 2 male and 4 female patients. The median age was 59 years (range 39–78 years). The locations of perforation were 5 duodenal walls and 1 rectosigmoid junction. The median perforation size was 13 mm (range 10–40 mm). The technical success was 100% and the clinical success was 83.3%. The success rates per locations were 100% in colon and 80% in duodenum, respectively. The median fasting time was 5 days (range 1–10 days) and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days (range 2–22 days). There was no mortality in any. Conclusion. Ovesco clip seems to be an effective and safe tool for a closure of iatrogenic perforation.

scholarly journals Adrenaline and Dexamethasone, vs Adrenaline and Fluticasone, vs Adrenaline alone in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Jayendra R. Gohil ◽  
Atul M. Sheladiya ◽  
N. B. Adithya ◽  
Ratna D. Bhojak
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus over which drug best reduces symptoms in Bronchiolitis syndrome. The primary objective of our study is to establish comparative effect of adrenaline nebulisation alone and combination of adrenaline nebulisation plus injectable dexamethasone and adrenaline nebulisation plus fluticasone nebulisation in the treatment of clinical cases of bronchiolitis. Methods: 100 patients diagnosed clinically as bronchiolitis were enrolled in study from 1 month to 24 months of age. Patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Patients with respiratory distress assessment instrument score [RDAI] of 4 to 15 were chosen, randomized into three groups and treatment given till patient fullfilled discharge criteria. Group A (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline alone, Group B (n=34) were given nebulised adrenaline plus injectable dexamethasone and Group C (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone. Results: The mean reduction in clinical severity-RDAI score was 1.75 ±0.86 in Group A, 2.30 ± 0.68 in Group B and 1.42 ± 0.9 in Group C when measured in terms of difference in clinical scores between day 1 and 2 (p=0.0003). Mean duration of hospital stay in the group A was (4.93±1.95 days), Group C (4.78±1.83) and Group B (3.91 ±1.37 days). The difference of stay between the Groups A and B was 1.02±0.58 days vs 0.87± 0.46 days in groups B and C (p-0.0048). Reduction in the length of hospital stay in group B was 22% compared to Group A & 19% compared to Group C (p-0.0048). Side effects were tachycardia in six patients. Conclusion: Combination of adrenaline nebulization and injectable dexamethasone was found significantly better as compared to nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone and nebulised adrenaline alone in patients of clinical bronchiolitis in reducing severity of clinical symptoms and duration of hospitalization.

scholarly journals Tracheostomy at a tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh: any change in pattern?

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Debesh Chandra Talukdar ◽  
Mashuque Mahamud ◽  
Sharfuddin Mahmud ◽  
Md Shaikhul Islam ◽  
DGM Akaiduzzaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Demographic Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Prolonged Intubation ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Emergency Tracheostomy ◽  
Level Hospital

Objective: This study was conducted on tracheostomy to find out the different indications and complications occured at the tertiary level hospital in Bangladesh. Study design: Cross-sectional observational study.Place and Duration: This study was conducted at the department of Otolaryngology & Head Neck surgery and department of ICU, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka & DMCH over one year from January 2014 to December 2014.Methodology: 55 tracheostomy operation were performed in both genders and all age groups either in emergency situations or within an elective environment. All the patients were registered with a definite protocol by filling a pre designed proforma equipped with demographic data, details of present illness mirroring the indication for the procedure, relevant physical examination & investigations, details of the surgical procedure of tracheostomy and postoperative follow up with note of any attendant complications described as immediate, early and late postoperative.Results: Mean age of this study was 40.09 years and male female ratio iwas 3.2: 1. 30(54.54%) patients underwent emergency tracheostomy and 25(45.46%) underwent tracheostomy electively. The commonest indications were laryngeal & hypopharyngeal malignancies which affected 28(50.9%) patients. The overall rate of complications was 25.45%. These were 4(28.57%) immediate post operative, 8(57.14%) early post operative and 2(3.63%) late post operative. Out of overall 14 complications, 11(36.66%) complications occurred in 40 patients who underwent tracheostomy in emergency and 3(12%) complications occurred in 25 patients who underwent tracheostomy electively.Conclusion: Upper airway obstruction due to laryngeal and hypopharyngal carcinoma still remains the most common indication for tracheostomy in our centre but prolonged intubation as an indication for tracheostomy is evolving based on recent improvement in the facilities available at our ICU.J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 25, No.1, April, 2016, Page 67-71

scholarly journals Day of surgery: the impact on patient length of stay in a tertiary vascular unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Holford ◽  
C Ní Ghuidhir ◽  
L Hands
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Impact

Background Our hypothesis was that patients undergoing surgery earlier in the week would have better access to physiotherapy and other discharge services after surgery and, as a result, would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared with patients undergoing surgery later in the week. This study aimed to assess whether there is a significant difference in postoperative length of hospital stay between the groups with secondary assessment by operation subtype. Methods We identified all patients admitted for vascular surgery in 2015 from a prospectively collected database and divided the week into Monday to Wednesday and Thursday to Friday. Endovascular cases were included but day cases were excluded. Further analysis was performed with a breakdown in both groups by operation type. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. Results We identified 652 patients who met our criteria. Within the elective patient group, there was a significantly longer length of stay of three days for the late-week group compared with two days for the early-week group (P = 0.016). Femoral artery procedures had a median length of stay of two days for those operated on early in the week compared with four days later in the week (P < 0.005). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair showed a trend to longer length of stay in the late-week group (P = 0.06). Conclusion Day of surgery appears to impact on patients’ length of stay following vascular procedures, with the greatest impact on medium-sized procedures. This difference could be explained by the difference in weekend support services, but further evaluation is required following introduction of weekend support services to assess this.

Comparison of Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy in Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Prem R Sigdel ◽  
Diwas Gnyawali ◽  
Bipendra DK Rai ◽  
Pawan Dhital ◽  
Purushottam Parajuli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Warm Ischemia ◽  
Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Warm Ischemia Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Ischemia Time ◽  
Living Donor Nephrectomy

Introduction Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the gold standard for kidney retrieval in live donors. Until recently, donor nephrectomies were performed only by open technique in Nepal. There is no information on the experience and outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in Nepal. The study was done to compare the outcomes among donors undergoing open and laparoscopic nephrectomies, and to compare the graft related outcomes between the two groups receiving these kidneys. MethodsIn this retrospective study, 44 kidney donors from March 2019 to October 2019 were analyzed. Donors were divided into 2 groups: open donor nephrectomy (ODN) and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Parameters for analysis included demographic data, warm ischemia time, surgery time and length of hospital stay. Data on early graft function and complications in recipients till 30th post-operative day were compared. ResultsThere were 22 donors each in the ODN and LDN groups. Baseline characteristics of the donors were comparable between two groups. Mean surgery duration (183.55±43.31 minutes vs 117.73±18.75 minutes) and first warm ischemia time (11.22±4.34 minutes vs 2.3±0.8 minutes) was significantly high in LDN. Hemoglobin drop, post-operative complications in donors, creatinine of donors at discharge, mean hospital stay, graft function at one month and complications in recipients were comparable among ODN and LDN. Pain score in 1st post-operative day was comparable between two groups, however, pain was significantly less in second post-operative day in LDN. ConclusionLaparoscopic donor nephrectomy is feasible in Nepal and associated with acceptable morbidity and graft function when compared to ODN.

Surgical Diabetic Foot Infections: Is Osteomyelitis Associated With a Worse Prognosis?

2021 ◽  
pp. 153473462098669
Author(s):  
Javier Aragón-Sánchez ◽  
Gerardo Víquez-Molina ◽  
María Eugenia López-Valverde ◽  
José María Rojas-Bonilla ◽  
Christian Murillo-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Hospital Stay Duration ◽  
Worse Prognosis

It has been reported that patients with diabetes and foot ulcers complicated with osteomyelitis (OM) have a worse prognosis than those complicated with soft tissue infections (STI). Our study aimed to determine whether OM is associated with a worse prognosis in cases of moderate and severe diabetic foot infections requiring surgery. A retrospective series consisted of 150 patients who underwent surgery for diabetic foot infections. We studied the differences between OM versus STI. Furthermore, diabetic foot infections were reclassified into four groups: moderate STI (M-STI), moderate OM (M-OM), severe STI (S-STI), and severe OM (S-OM). The variables associated with prognosis were limb loss, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing (both the initial ulcer and the postoperative wound). No differences in limb salvage, hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing were found when comparing OM with STI. Patients with M-O had a higher rate of recurrences after initial treatment and a longer time to healing when comparing with M-STI. We didn’t find any differences between severe infections with or without OM. In conclusion, we have found in our surgical series of diabetic foot infections that OM is not associated with worse prognosis when comparing with STI regarding limb loss rate, length of hospital stays, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing. The results of the present series should further be confirmed by other authors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document