scholarly journals Outcomes of Meniscal Repair versus Meniscectomy in Patients with Concomitant ACL and Bucket Handle Meniscus Tears (200)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0030
Author(s):  
Laura Keeling ◽  
Alexandra Galel ◽  
Cooper Ehlers ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Edward Chang
Keyword(s):  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Surgical Decision Making ◽  
Bucket Handle

Objectives: Bucket handle meniscus tears often present concurrently with tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). However, little is known regarding the influence of demographic factors on surgical decision-making, or on outcomes following treatment of bucket handle meniscus tears in ACL-deficient patients. Furthermore, no study has compared outcomes in this population between patients undergoing meniscectomy versus repair. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine if there is a difference in outcomes between patients presenting with concomitant ACL and bucket handle meniscus tears treated with meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. A secondary aim of this study was to discover if there is an association between the decision to perform a meniscus repair or meniscectomy based on demographic factors. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, we evaluated 62 patients presenting with ACL tear who were found to have a bucket handle meniscus tear preoperatively or at the time of ACL reconstruction. Of those, 30 patients underwent partial meniscectomy, while 32 underwent meniscal repair. Primary outcome measures included ACL and meniscal retear rates, as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Documented PROMs included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores. Demographic and patient-specific factors evaluated included age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and location of meniscus tear. Results: Of 62 patients presenting for ACL reconstruction with concomitant bucket handle meniscus tear, a total of 34 patients with greater than one year (mean 22.4 month) follow-up were included. 14 patients underwent repair, and 20 underwent meniscectomy. No significant differences were noted in IKDC (p = 0.36), delta IKDC (p = 0.18), SANE (p = 0.61), or ACL-RSI (p = 0.67) scores between the repair and meniscectomy groups at final follow-up. No significant differences were found in ACL (p = 1.00) or meniscus (p = 0.49) retear rates between the two groups. Younger age, lower BMI, and tear location (red-red zone) were significantly associated with the decision to perform meniscal repair over meniscectomy (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among patients presenting with concomitant ACL and bucket handle meniscus tears, we found no difference in patient-reported outcomes or retear rates in patients undergoing meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. Demographic and patient-specific factors including age, BMI, and tear location may influence surgical decision-making when determining the optimal treatment of bucket handle meniscus tears in this population.

scholarly journals What are the Risk Factors for Worse Outcomes of Meniscus Surgery in 23-39-Year-Old Patients Ligamentously Stable Knees?

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0046
Author(s):  
◽  
Megan Flynn ◽  
Anthony Egger ◽  
Yuxuan Jin ◽  
Elizabeth Sosic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Young Adult ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Objectives: Meniscus tears are a common and significant source of knee dysfunction in active young adult patients, and no high-quality prospective cohort or RCTs studies exist evaluating patient-reported outcomes in patients in this age group with ligamentously stable knees. Our objective was to identify patient-reported outcomes and patient-specific risk factors from a prospective cohort with a minimum of one-year follow-up following meniscal repair or excision in patients with ligamentously stable knees. We hypothesized that both groups would have significant improvement in outcomes; patients undergoing meniscal repair would have a higher reoperation rate; and articular cartilage injuries, subsequent knee surgery, and certain demographic characteristics would be significant risk factors to inferior outcomes at one year. Methods: Between February 2015 and December 2017, ligamentously stable meniscal procedures were enrolled and prospectively followed using the outcomes management evaluation system (OME) at Cleveland Clinic. Patients aged 23-39 preoperatively completed a series of validated outcome measurements including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for both Pain (KOOS Pain) and Quality of Life (KOOS QoL). At the time of surgery, physicians documented all intra-articular findings, treatment, and surgical techniques utilized. Patients were followed at minimum of 1-year postoperatively through the OME platform and asked to complete the same outcome instruments done at baseline as well as a question designed to evaluate the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). The incidence and details of any subsequent knee surgeries were also obtained. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of outcomes. Results: A total of 371 patients aged 23-39 underwent meniscus excision or repair during the study period. One hundred ninety-four met inclusion criteria, and one-year follow-up was obtained on 72% (n = 139) of the cohort (67% male; median age 32). Both KOOS Pain and KOOS QoL improved significantly at one-year for the entire cohort. Fourteen percent of the cohort (9% on the ipsilateral knee, 5% on the contralateral knee) underwent subsequent surgery at a minimum of one-year postoperatively. The patient-specific risk factors for worse one-year outcomes included preoperative baseline mental capacity score (VR-12 MCS), lower baseline KOOS QoL score, and the intraoperative finding of any grade 3 or 4 chondral changes. Conclusion: Young adult patients with ligamentously stable knees undergoing meniscal surgery have significantly improved patient-reported outcomes regardless of excision or repair; however, 14% of patients underwent additional knee surgery at a minimum of one-year postoperatively. The risk factors for worse outcomes include lower baseline mental health score, lower baseline KOOS QoL score, and any grade 3 or 4 chondromalacia scene.

scholarly journals Surgical Outcomes after Bucket Handle Meniscus Repairs: analysis of a large contained cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0020
Author(s):  
Lue-Yen Tucker ◽  
Amy Vieira ◽  
David Ding
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Operative Notes ◽  
Bucket Handle

Objectives: Comprising approximately 10% of all mensiscus tears, bucket-handle meniscus tears are large longitudinal vertical meniscus tears that have an attached fragment flipped into the intercondylar notch. Meniscectomy would often result in significant meniscal loss and increased joint loading. Alternatively, meniscus repair attempts to restore the function of the meniscus and aims to preserve joint mechanics. The objective of this observational data-only study is to evaluate the long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in patients who underwent a bucket handle meniscus repair and assess risk factors associated with subsequent knee surgical intervention. Methods: We performed an electronic health records search for all patients who underwent arthroscopic knee meniscal repairs from 2011 to 2018. Natural language processing was used to search for terms of interest in the long operative notes to determine if these surgeries were performed for bucket handle meniscus tears. These patients comprised our initial cohort. Study subjects were followed for at least one year and up to five years with censoring at death, membership disenrollment, or 12/31/2019. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes (i.e., subsequent operative procedures, deep surgical site infections, and deep venous thrombosis) were evaluated via a database review. Descriptive statistics were employed. Results: The median follow-up time was 4.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.7-5.0 years). A total of 1353 patients underwent meniscus repair surgery for a bucket-handle meniscus tear. The median age was 24 years (IQR 17-34). During the follow-up period, 492 subsequent ipsilateral procedures were performed in 272 (20.1%) patients. 59 (4.3%) patients underwent a subsequent repeat meniscus repair and 164 (12.1%) patients underwent a subsequent meniscectomy. The median time to first procedure was 41.1 months (IQR 23.3-60 months). Younger age and lower BMI were significant risk factors for having subsequent surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 1.02-1.05, and aOR 1.60, 95%CI 1.09-2.35, respectively). Patients undergoing concomitant ACL reconstruction had a lower risk of undergoing subsequent surgery (aOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.50-0.88). Conclusions: This is the largest reported contained patient cohort study on outcomes after bucket-handle meniscus repair. 20% of patients underwent repeat surgery during the follow-up time period with 4.3% experiencing a subsequent repeat meniscus repair and 12% experiencing a subsequent meniscectomy. Risk factors for subsequent surgery include younger age and lower BMI. Concomitant ACL reconstruction at time of bucket-handle meniscus repair reduced the risk of subsequent reoperation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of functional outcome of bucket handle medial meniscus repair along with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 499
Author(s):  
Akshay Jain ◽  
Adhir Jain ◽  
Manjeet Singh ◽  
Prateek Pathak
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMT) are often displaced and unstable and comprise nearly 10% of all meniscus tears and commonly affect the young male population. Displacement of the free segment can lead to significant pain and disability, necessitating reduction and surgical treatment. The aim of present prospective longitudinal cohort study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of bucket handle medial meniscus repair along with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction at 2 years follow up.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Between January 2017 to December 2018, 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction along with bucket handle medial meniscus repair were included in the study. Meniscus repair was done using the all inside, outside in, inside out or hybrid techniques. All patients were evaluated clinically at pre op and at 2 year follow up using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score and compared. Meniscal healing was assessed clinically using Barrett’s criteria.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The study comprised 30 patients with a mean age of 27.47 years (range from 13 to 49 years) with 66.67% males. According to clinical examination and Barrett criteria’s the clinical failure rate was 6.67% (2 out of 30 patients) who underwent partial menisectomy later. We also compared functional outcomes of sedentary and active peoplesand also between meniscal repair of less than 3 cm and more than 3 cm’s. There was no statistically significant difference in the functional outcomes in both the groups; however range of motion was significantly higher in tear length 3 cm or less compared to more than 3 cm.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Meniscal repair should be aggressively considered in young pa­tients to enhance functional recovery and durability of the knee joint, if the meniscus is reparable.</p>

scholarly journals Development of OA Following ACL Reconstruction: Unexpected Finding in Medial Versus Lateral Meniscus Pathology

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0036
Author(s):  
Karen Briggs ◽  
Stephanie Petterson ◽  
Kevin Plancher
Keyword(s):  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Medial Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscectomy ◽  
Meniscal Pathology

Objectives: Recent studies have described increased risk of OA following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Systematic reviews have suggested that meniscal pathology, which occurs in up to 60% of patients with ACL injury, increases this risk. The literature reports a 50% incidence of OA following medial meniscectomy, two times the risk compared to lateral meniscectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of meniscal pathology on the incidence of OA following ACLR. Methods: All patients who underwent primary autograft or allograft BPTB transtibial ACLR by a single surgeon between 1999-2015 were identified. Revision ACLR, multi-ligamentous reconstructions, and patients with less than 2-year imaging follow-up were excluded. Meniscus pathology and treatment were recorded. OA was defined at follow-up as Kellgren-Lawrence grade III-IV on plain radiographs. Chi-square tests assessed differences in incidence rates (p<0.05). Results: A consecutive series of 103 patients (56 males, 47 females; age 36.1±11.4 years) with BPTB ACLR with an average follow-up of 8.81±4.96 (range 2-20 years) were included. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears at the time of ACL injury was 47.6% (49/103) and prevalence of lateral meniscus tears was 56.3% (58/103) (p=0.166). Medial compartment OA was seen in 9.7% (10/103) of patients. Prevalence of medial compartment OA was greater in patients with medial meniscus tear (14.3%; 7/49) compared to those without a medial meniscus tear (5.6%; 3/54); however, this was not significant (p=0.135). Of the 7 patients with medial meniscal tear and medial compartment OA, 5 underwent partial medial meniscectomy and 2 underwent repair. Lateral compartment OA was seen in 14.6% (15/103). The prevalence of lateral compartment OA was greater in patients with a lateral meniscus tear (22.4%; 13/58) compared to patients without lateral meniscus tears (4.4%; 2/45) (p=0.01). Patients with lateral meniscus tear were 5.04 [95%CI: 1.2 to 21.2] times more likely to develop OA. Thirteen of the 47 (28%) patients that underwent partial lateral meniscectomy developed lateral OA compared to 0% of patients (0/10) that underwent lateral meniscal repair (p=0.068). Conclusion: While studies with multiple surgeons and rehabilitation protocols have shown the development of OA following ACLR is increased with medial meniscal pathology, we found that the prevalence of medial OA was not significantly higher in these patients with medial meniscal tear at an average of 8.81 years follow-up. Whereas, lateral meniscal repair dramatically reduced the development of knee OA compared to partial meniscectomy in this cohort of patients with ACLR. These findings can inform clinical practice as despite prior literature indicating a relationship between medial meniscal tear and osteoarthritis, we did not see a greater prevalence of OA amongst patients undergoing ACLR with a medial meniscal tear. Further, a lateral meniscal repair offers superior protection against OA when compared to partial lateral meniscectomy in treating lateral meniscal tears and is essential in the treatment of these complex patients.

scholarly journals Can We Extrapolate SINS Score to Evaluate Instability in Spinal Tuberculosis?

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110308
Author(s):  
Yogesh Kishorkant Pithwa ◽  
Vikrant Sinha Roy
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Structural Instability ◽  
Stable Group ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Helpful Tool ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

Study Design: Prospective Observational Study. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of utilizing SINS score, originally suggested for neoplastic conditions, to assess structural instability in spinal tuberculosis. Methods: Patients with an established diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis were included in the study. Based on SINS scoring, patients classified as those with “indeterminate stability” were managed with or without surgery based on other parameters including neurological status, severity of pain, medical comorbidities, etc. Results: Eighty [39 males, 41 females] patients prospectively evaluated with mean age 46.74 ± 17.3 years. Classification done into stable [n = 7], indeterminate [n = 45] and unstable [n = 28] groups based on SINS scoring. All the patients in unstable group were treated with surgical stabilization whereas none in the stable group required surgical stabilization. In the indeterminate group, 26 patients underwent surgical stabilization, while 19 treated non-operatively. Major determinants predisposing to surgical intervention in “indeterminate group” were pain [14 of 26 patients] and neurological status [11 of 26 patients]. Mean follow-up 38.5 ± 22.61 months with minimum follow-up being 24 months. Preoperative VAS score for pain improved from median of 9/10 to 1/10 following surgery [ P < .0001]. In the non-operative group, the improvement was from median score of 6/10 to 1/10 [ P < .0001]. Preoperative ODI improved in non-operative and operative group from median of 42% and 70%, respectively to 10% and 12%, respectively in the postoperative period [ P < .0001 for both groups]. Conclusions: SINS scoring can be a helpful tool in surgical decision-making even in spinal tuberculosis. Further refinement of the score can be done with a larger, multicenter study.

scholarly journals Patient and Family Engagement during Treatment Change to Emicizumab at a Hemophilia Treatment Center

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5796-5796
Author(s):  
Susan U Lattimore ◽  
Madolyn T Hofstetter
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Family Engagement ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Maternal Child Health ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Health Maintenance ◽  
Patient Reported

Introduction: Treatment options to prevent bleeding events in people with hemophilia A expanded with the FDA-approval of emicizumab. Safety and efficacy of emicizumab have been reported, but patient-specific health goals and expectations for switching to emicizumab are unpublished. Federally-supported Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs), under the Maternal Child Health Bureau's Regional Hemophilia Network, are working to increase patient and family engagement in care decisions through quality improvement initiatives. Placing patients and families at the center of their care has been found to correlate with the ability to undertake personal health maintenance, adhere to complex treatment regimens and improve health outcomes. Objective: We sought to engage patients and families in their care by capturing patient-reported goals and gaps in education when changing treatment to emicizumab prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A at The Hemophilia Center at Oregon Health & Science University. Methods: A member of the HTC team not directly involved in the patient's care asked baseline questions at emicizumab initiation. Two follow-up questions were asked 5 weeks and 3 months after baseline, in clinic or via phone. Five open-ended baseline questions facilitated conversation and addressed patient/caregiver stated goals of treatment change and unanswered questions regarding emicizumab. Two follow-up questions assessed progress toward goals identified at baseline and information they wish they knew before switching. Participation was voluntary. No age or disease severity exclusions, but patients with active inhibitor were not included in this pilot project. For patients age < 18, both patient and caregiver were able to respond. Results: Thirty patients changing treatment to emicizumab were engaged. Fourteen patients and 5 caregivers responded independently. Eleven pediatric patients had a response by both patient and caregiver to total 41 baseline responses. Eighteen patients were <18 years and mean age was 19 (range: 1 to 70). 20 patients had severe hemophilia; 10 had moderate hemophilia. Most patients and caregivers said they were well informed prior to treatment change regarding the drug, administration, safety, and reported experience. Unanswered questions were categorized and included: side effects/drug interactions (17%), treating bleeds/amount of factor to have on hand (20%), and subcutaneous injections (13%). 47% had no outstanding questions at baseline. Patient-/caregiver-reported goals were categorized. Among all goals, 43% aligned with an increase/change in physical activity, 23% decrease in bleeding events, 17% less bruising, 10% fewer infusions, 3% more convenience, and 3% becoming more independent. Follow up data is available for 26 (87%) patients. At follow up visits, gaps in pre-switch education included unexpected painful injections (27%), ordering emicizumab and/or supplies (14%), maintaining peripheral infusion skills (4.5%), preparing emicizumab (4.5%), and assessing/treating bleeds (4.5%). 50% of patients/caregivers reported no outstanding education needs. All patients/caregivers (100%) stated they met their baseline-identified goals by month 3. Additional information derived from conversations prompted by the questions and offered by patients and families included reports of increased convenience, decreased parental worry, increased activity, fewer bleeding events, fewer work absences, and decreased pain. Discussion: Patients and caregivers are receptive to providing information regarding expectations surrounding treatment change to emicizumab. Respondents were able to identify personal goals in regard to their care and provide input into additional education that may inform other patients switching to emicizumab. Progress on patient-reported goals remains ongoing at this time. Although 50% of respondents indicated that there was information they wished they knew prior to changing treatment, none of the patients approached under this project have discontinued the use of emicizumab. It is feasible to engage patients and families with bleeding disorders in their care, as exampled by progress under this quality improvement initiative. Further analysis is needed to understand longer-term engagement of patients who use emicizumab for treatment of hemophilia A. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Principles, Assessment, and Evaluation for Palliative Surgery

2019 ◽  
pp. 163-174
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Cohen ◽  
Thomas J. Miner
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Palliative Surgery ◽  
Case Managers ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Assessment And Evaluation ◽  
Life Improvement ◽  
Medical Teams ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

Palliative surgery requires the highest level of surgical decision-making. The surgeon must evaluate the severity of the patient’s symptoms, the patient’s priorities, the available options for treatment, and the morbidity the patient can incur by undergoing an operation. Indications for palliative surgery are influenced by symptom severity and are disease and patient specific. It is a necessity that patients are managed by a multidisciplinary team, which can include surgeons, palliative specialists, endoscopists, interventional radiologists, medical teams, case managers, social workers, nurses, and chaplains. Communication is the cornerstone of successful palliation and can be facilitated by utilizing the palliative triangle. Patient selection requires a deliberate and thoughtful assessment of the specific circumstances and needs of each individual patient. In evaluating outcomes, emphasis should be placed on symptom and quality-of-life improvement, which is subsequently weighed against the morbidity of the operation in the context of anticipated recovery and survival time.

Smoking Is Associated with Anterior Ankle Impingement After Isolated Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Cartilage ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194760352095940
Author(s):  
Arnd F. Viehöfer ◽  
Fabio Casari ◽  
Felix W.A. Waibel ◽  
Silvan Beeler ◽  
Florian B. Imhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Ankle Impingement ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Anterior Ankle Impingement

Objective To determine potential predictive associations between patient-/lesion-specific factors, clinical outcome and anterior ankle impingement in patients that underwent isolated autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). Design Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 34.7 ± 15 years who underwent isolated cartilage repair with AMIC for OLTs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.9 years. Patients completed AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores at final follow-up, as well as Tegner scores at final follow-up and retrospectively for preinjury and presurgery time points. Pearson correlation and multivariate regression models were used to distinguish associations between patient-/lesion-specific factors, the need for subsequent surgery due to anterior ankle impingement and patient-reported outcomes. Results At final follow-up, AOFAS and Tegner scores averaged 92.6 ± 8.3 and 5.1 ± 1.8, respectively. Both body mass index (BMI) and duration of symptoms were independent predictors for postoperative AOFAS and Δ preinjury to postsurgery Tegner with positive smoking status showing a trend toward worse AOFAS scores, but this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.054). Nine patients (25.7%) required subsequent surgery due to anterior ankle impingement. Smoking was the only factor that showed significant correlation with postoperative anterior ankle impingement with an odds ratio of 10.61 when adjusted for BMI and duration of symptoms (95% CI, 1.04-108.57; P = 0.047). Conclusion In particular, patients with normal BMI and chronic symptoms benefit from AMIC for the treatment of OLTs. Conversely, smoking cessation should be considered before AMIC due to the increased risk of subsequent surgery and possibly worse clinical outcome seen in active smokers.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Meniscal repair in Bucket handle. Systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0020
Author(s):  
Damián Bustos ◽  
Lucas Marangoni ◽  
Pablo Bertiche ◽  
Javier Núñez ◽  
Iván Bitar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Meniscal Lesions ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Bibliographic Search ◽  
Rate Of Failure ◽  
Bucket Handle

Introduction: Faced with a bucket meniscal lesion we have two treatment options. A frequently practiced option is to remove the bucket handle, another is to repair it. Generally, they are associated with ligament injuries. In this context, it has been shown that meniscal repair has a good result, but the evolution of isolated meniscal repairs is not entirely clear. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the results after the repair of bucket handle injuries. Materials and Methods: A bibliographic search of the computerized database was carried out pubmed. Eight articles were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of interest included, level of evidence, number of patients, follow-up, average age, surgical technique,% cure,% failure, complications, associated injuries and average time from injury to surgical repair. Results: The works studied, on average, 43 patients, with ages between 16 and 33 years making 341 patients. The follow-up period was focused on 58 months. The percentage of cure varies from 52% to 98%. Conclusion: The isolated repair of this type of meniscal lesions has a good overall evolution associated with a low rate of failure and complications Level of evidence: IV Type of study systematic review

scholarly journals MENISCUS REPAIR VERSUS DEBRIDEMENT FOR MENISCAL TEARS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS – PREDICTORS FOR TREATMENT BASED ON DEMOGRAPHICS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0016
Author(s):  
Lauren Agatstein ◽  
Alton W. Skaggs ◽  
Matthew J. Brown ◽  
Nicole Friel ◽  
Brian Haus
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Children's Hospitals ◽  
Children's Hospital ◽  
Children’S Hospitals ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Children’S Hospital

BACKGROUND: Pediatric and adolescent patients with meniscus tears have a relatively high rate of healing after meniscus repair – up to greater than 80% in the literature. Despite this fact, many patients undergo meniscus debridement for treatment of their meniscus tears. In this study, we investigated the demographic factors predictive of whether a pediatric patient would receive a meniscal repair or a meniscal debridement for their meniscal tear. METHODS: The California statewide ambulatory surgery database (OSHPD) was queried for all patients under 18 years old who underwent meniscus debridement or meniscus repair from 2008-2016. The effect of age, hospital setting (adult versus pediatric hospital), injury chronicity, gender, insurance type, race, and year of service was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 13,906 pediatric patients had meniscal surgery during the timeframe. 83% (11,561/13,906) underwent meniscal debridement and 17% (2,345/13,906) underwent meniscal repair. Age, hospital type, nature of injury, gender, private insurance, being Hispanic, and year of service were statistically significant in predicting the odds of having meniscus repair versus meniscus debridement. Surgery at a children’s hospital increases the odds of having meniscus repair (p < 0.001). Of the 82.6% of pediatric patients (11,491/13,906) treated at non-children’s hospitals, 16% (1839) had repair and 84% underwent debridement (9,652). Of the 17.4% (2,415) treated at children’s hospitals, 21% (506) had repair and 79% (1,909) underwent debridement. As patients age, the odds of receiving a meniscus repair decrease (p < 0.001). Acute meniscus injury (p < 0.001) or private insurance (p < 0.05) increase the odds of having meniscus repair. However, females (p < 0.05) and Hispanics (p < 0.01) had decreased odds of having meniscus repair. As time between injury and surgery progressed, the odds of having meniscus repair versus meniscus debridement increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing evidence that pediatric patients have successful outcomes after meniscal repair surgery. The results of this study demonstrate that the majority of pediatric patients with meniscus tears undergo a meniscal debridement rather than a repair. Treatment at a children’s hospital, private insurance, and a short time frame between injury and surgery were positive predictors of meniscus repair over debridement. The results of the study may help inform patients, families, and referring physicians about what type of treatment a patient may receive for a meniscus tear, based on their demographic profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document