scholarly journals The search for new antithrombotic mechanisms and therapies that may spare hemostasis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (17) ◽  
pp. 1899-1902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward F. Plow ◽  
Yunmei Wang ◽  
Daniel I. Simon

Abstract Current antithrombotic drugs, including widely used antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, are associated with significant bleeding risk. Emerging experimental evidence suggests that the molecular and cellular mechanisms of hemostasis and thrombosis can be separated, thereby increasing the possibility of new antithrombotic therapeutic targets with reduced bleeding risk. We review new coagulation and platelet targets and highlight the interaction between integrin αMβ2 (Mac-1, CD11b/CD18) on leukocytes and GPIbα on platelets that seems to distinguish thrombosis from hemostasis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna Voigtlaender ◽  
Florian Langer

AbstractPlatelets play critical roles in hemostasis and thrombosis. While low platelet counts increase the risk of bleeding, antithrombotic drugs, including anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, are used to treat thromboembolic events. Thus, the management of thrombosis in patients with low platelet counts is challenging with hardly any evidence available to guide treatment. Recognition of the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia is essential for assessing the bleeding risk and tailoring therapeutic options. A typical clinical scenario is the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients experiencing transient thrombocytopenia during myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In such patients, the severity of thrombocytopenia, thrombus burden, clinical symptoms, and the timing of VTE relative to thrombocytopenia must be considered. In clinical practice, distinct hematological disorders characterized by low platelet counts and a thrombogenic state require specific diagnostics and treatment. These include the antiphospholipid syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and (spontaneous) HIT syndromes, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 274-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Steigerwald ◽  
U. Walter ◽  
J. Kössler

SummaryInhibition of platelet function plays an important role in the treatment and secondary prevention of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular ischemic diseases. Established antiplatelet agents use different pharmacological targets for this role. Acetylic salicylic acid achieves a reduction of thromboxane A2 formation by inhibition of COX-1. Ticlopidin or clopidogrel are ADP-P2Y12 receptor antagonists. Tirofiban, abciximab or eptifibatid are used for the inhibition of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor which is activated at the surface of platelets preceding the final step of their aggregation. The mechanism of dipyridamole is based on the inhibition of adenosine uptake and of phosphodiesterase-5.Efforts are made to improve antiplatetelet therapy with the aim to find agents with favorable clinical outcome and lower bleeding risk. Current clinical studies focus on a new generation of ADP receptor antagonists (prasugrel, cangrelor and ticagrelor) as successors of ticlopidin and clopidogrel after coronary arterial interventions. Developments using platelet targets different from established drugs are thrombin receptor antagonists (like SCH530348) or thromboxane receptor antagonists (like S18886/terutroban) in patients with cerebrovascular events. Results from recent experimental studies could lead to new strategies for antiplatetelet therapy (like inhibition of GP Ib receptor, GP VI receptor, platelet-leukocyte interaction, factor XII and others) in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 1186-1191
Author(s):  
Ioannis Gkirdis ◽  
Dimitrios N. Nikas ◽  
Theodora Bampali ◽  
Theofilos M. Kolettis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoko Ono ◽  
Marin Ishikawa ◽  
Kana Matsuda ◽  
Momoko Tsuda ◽  
Keiko Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heparin bridging therapy (HBT) is indeed related to a high frequency of bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). In this study, our aim was to investigate clinical impact of management of oral anticoagulants without HBT in bleeding after colonic EMR. Methods From data for patients who underwent consecutive colonic EMR, the relationships of patient factors and procedural factors with the risk of bleeding were analysed. Our management of antithrombotic agents was based on the shortest cessation as follows: the administration of warfarin was generally continued within the therapeutic range, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were not administered on the day of the procedure. We calculated bleeding risks after EMR in patients who used antithrombotic agents and evaluated whether perioperative management of anticoagulants without HBT was beneficial for bleeding. Results A total of 1734 polyps in 825 EMRs were analysed. Bleeding occurred in 4.0% of the patients and 1.9% of the polyps. The odds ratios for bleeding using multivariate logistic regression analysis were 3.67 in patients who used anticoagulants and 4.95 in patients who used both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In patients with one-day skip of DOACs, bleeding occurred in 6.5% of the polyps, and there were no significant differences in bleeding risk between HBT and continuous warfarin or one-day skip DOACs. Conclusions The use of oral anticoagulants was related to bleeding after colonic EMR, and perioperative management of oral anticoagulants based on the shortest cessation without HBT would be clinically acceptable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2059
Author(s):  
Bastiaan Zwart ◽  
William A. E. Parker ◽  
Robert F. Storey

In recent years, much progress has been made in the field of antithrombotic drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment, as reflected by the introduction of the more potent P2Y12-inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor, and novel forms of concomitant anticoagulation, such as fondaparinux and bivalirudin. However, despite substantial improvements in contemporary ACS treatment, there remains residual ischemic risk in this group and hence the need for even more effective antithrombotic drugs, while balancing antithrombotic efficacy against bleeding risk. This review discusses recently introduced and currently developed antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in ACS treatment.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 1076-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf H. Klungel ◽  
Patrick C. Souverein ◽  
Anthonius de Boer ◽  
Tom Schalekamp

SummaryTreatment with vitamin K antagonists (coumarins) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. In order to elucidate the bleeding risk of users of antiplatelet drugs among users of coumarins, we assessed the odds ratio of major bleeding associated with use of antiplatelet drugs in users of the coumarins acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon. We used data froma Dutch record linkage system, including pharmacy and linked hospitalization records for approximately two million subjects, to conduct a nested case control study in a cohort of new users of coumarins. Cases were patients who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of major bleeding while taking coumarin and were matched with up to four control subjects. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to determine ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI).We identified 1848 case patients who were matched to 5818 controls. Users of clopidogrel or aspirin showed a significantly increased risk of hospitalization because of major bleeding (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–6.9 and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–1.9, respectively), whereas users of dipyridamole and combinations of antiplatelet drugs showed a strong trend (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0–2.3 and OR 1.8, 95 % CI 1.0–3.3, respectively). In all cases, the risks were greater for upper gastrointestinal bleedings than for other bleedings. In conclusion, the use of any antiplatelet drug increases the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding among users of coumarins. Concurrent use of clopidogrel or dipyridamole and coumarins is probably not safer than concurrent use of aspirin and coumarins.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (153) ◽  
pp. 190096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridhima Wadhwa ◽  
Kamal Dua ◽  
Ian M. Adcock ◽  
Jay C. Horvat ◽  
Richard Y. Kim ◽  
...  

Severe steroid-resistant asthma is clinically important, as patients with this form of the disease do not respond to mainstay corticosteroid therapies. The heterogeneity of this form of asthma and poor understanding of the pathological mechanisms involved hinder the identification of therapeutic targets and the development of more effective therapies. A major limiting factor in the understanding of severe steroid-resistant asthma is the existence of multiple endotypes represented by different immunological and inflammatory phenotypes, particularly in adults. Several clinical and experimental studies have revealed associations between specific respiratory infections and steroid-resistant asthma in adults. Here, we discuss recent findings from other authors as well as our own studies that have developed novel experimental models for interrogating the association between respiratory infections and severe steroid-resistant asthma. These models have enabled the identification of new therapies using macrolides, as well as several novel disease mechanisms, including the microRNA-21/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/histone deacetylase 2 axis and NLRP3 inflammasomes, and highlight the potential of these mechanisms as therapeutic targets.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Roffman

A review of the literature was conducted for clinical trials evaluating the antiplatelet P2Y12 receptor antagonists, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, as well as the guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or myocardial infarction. Clinical guidelines recommend that patients with ACS be treated with dual oral antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. The selection of an appropriate antiplatelet agent depends on the treatment approach and a patient’s bleeding risk and clinical history. With respect to antiplatelet activity, prasugrel and ticagrelor demonstrate greater potency and less interpatient variability than clopidogrel. In phase III clinical trials, prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced the incidence of ischemic events in patients with ACS compared with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were associated with a similar risk of major bleeding, whereas patients receiving prasugrel had an increased risk of major bleeding versus those receiving clopidogrel. Pharmacists can provide guidance on the appropriate use of antiplatelet agents as well as the use of concomitant medications, while being vigilant for any potential drug interactions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (08) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Jennings

SummaryPlatelets are central mediators of haemostasis at sites of vascular injury, but they also mediate pathologic thrombosis. Activated platelets stimulate thrombus formation in response to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque or endothelial cell erosion, promoting atherothrombotic disease. They also interact with endothelial cells and leukocytes to promote inflammation, which contributes to atherosclerosis. Multiple pathways contribute to platelet activation, and current oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist target the thromboxane A2 and ADP pathways, respectively. Both can diminish activation by other factors, but the extent of their effects depends upon the agonist, agonist strength, and platelet reactivity status. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, residual morbidity and mortality remain high. Neither agent is effective in inhibiting thrombin, the most potent platelet activator. This lack of comprehensive inhibition of platelet function allows continued thrombus formation and exposes patients to risk for recurrent thrombotic events. Moreover, bleeding risk is a substantial limitation of antiplatelet therapy, because these agents target platelet activation pathways critical for both protective haemostasis and pathologic thrombosis. Novel antiplatelet therapies that provide more complete inhibition of platelet activation without increasing bleeding risk could considerably decrease residual risk for ischemic events. Inhibition of the protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 platelet activation pathway stimulated by thrombin is a novel, emerging approach to achieve more comprehensive inhibition of platelet activation when used in combination with current oral antiplatelet agents. PAR-1 inhibition is not expected to increase bleeding risk, as this pathway does not interfere with haemostasis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document