The Effect of Asparaginase on Serum Triglycerides during Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract Introduction: Treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with asparaginase (ASP) and glucocorticoids, such as dexamethasone (DEX), can cause changes in serum triglycerides (TGs). Glucocorticoids increase the activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), the enzyme responsible for removing TGs from the plasma, and increase production of TG-rich particles, resulting in the mobilization and redistribution of body fat. In contrast, ASP decreases the activity of LPL. Therefore, when glucocorticoids and ASP are given together, it is likely that TG-rich particles are rapidly formed, but insufficiently cleared, resulting in elevated serum TGs. The ASP formulation, e.g., native E. coli ASP (Elspar, L-ASP) vs. PEGylated ASP (Oncaspar; PEG-ASP), may influence the magnitude of TG changes. Our aim was to compare changes in TGs, the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (hyperTG), and associated toxicities in two front-line pediatric St. Jude ALL trials that used different formulations of ASP: Total XV (L-ASP) and Total XVI (PEG-ASP). Methods: Patients on TXV (n=392) and TXVI (n=583) were assigned to the low-risk (LR) or standard/high risk (SHR) therapeutic arms. Serum TGs were measured as research biomarkers at four time-points: consolidation day 15 ("baseline" was > 35 days after the last dose of ASP during remission induction and > 21 days after the last dose of glucocorticoid); day 1 of week 7, 8, and either week 12 (TXV) or week 17 (TXVI) of continuation. Patients received DEX for 5 days/week during weeks 1, 4, and 14, for 8 days at week 7, and for 7 days at week 9 of continuation. In TXV, SHR patients received L-ASP weekly during the observed course of continuation (25,000 U/m2/dose); LR patients received L-ASP thrice weekly during continuation weeks 7-9 (10,000 U/m2/dose). In TXVI, patients were randomized to receive PEG-ASP 2,500 or 3,500 U/m2/dose during continuation: SHR weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15; LR weeks 7 and 9. HyperTG was defined as TG > 1000 mg/dL (dotted horizontal line in Figure 1). Clinically relevant toxicities in TXV, including thrombosis (≥ grade 3), osteonecrosis (≥ grade 2) and pancreatitis (≥ grade 3) were graded according to CTCAE v2.0; in TXVI CTCAE v3.0 was used, with identical grades except for pancreatitis (≥ grade 2). Results: Similar trends in TGs were observed in both protocols for LR patients: there was a decrease in TGs from baseline to week 7, when DEX but not ASP had been given (TXV: p= 2 x 10-8, TXVI: p< 2 x 10-16); TGs increased from week 7 to 8 after both DEX and ASP (TXV: p=3 x 10-14, TXVI: p< 2 x 10-16); and the week 12/17 TG did not differ from baseline (> 16 days after last dose of DEX and ASP, TXV: p= 0.7, TXVI: p= 0.1). Among LR patients, the only difference between protocols was that the week 12/17 TG was higher on TXVI (with PEG-ASP) than TXV (with L-ASP) (p= 0.04). In contrast, among SHR patients, TGs were elevated at all time points relative to baseline (e.g. week 7 compared to baseline, TXV: p= 1 x 10-5, TXVI: p < 2 x 10-16); TGs increased from week 7 to 8 after both DEX and ASP (TXV: p= 6 x 10-16, TXVI: p < 2 x 10-16); and the week 12/17 TG remained higher than baseline (TXV: p= 9 x 10-9, TXVI: p < 2 x 10-16) at 7-16 days after last dose of DEX or ASP. Among SHR patients, TGs were higher in TXVI vs. TXV after baseline: at week 7 (p= 8 x 10-7), week 8 (p= 6 x 10-4), and at the week 12/17 TG (p= 8 x 10-4), suggesting a greater effect of PEG-ASP vs. L-ASP in increasing TGs. More patients developed hyperTG on TXVI vs TXV: 10% (59/583) vs. 5% (20/392), respectively (p= 0.007). In both protocols, only patients on SHR therapy developed hyperTG, suggesting an association with ASP. Patients with hyperTG were more likely to be diagnosed with thrombosis and osteonecrosis. However, this association was only significant after adjustment for age and risk group in TXVI: 17% of patients with vs. 4% without hyperTG developed post-induction thrombosis (p= 0.009); 39% of patients with vs. 11% without hyperTG developed osteonecrosis (p= 0.006). In TXV, associations of hyperTG with thrombosis (p= 0.2) and osteonecrosis (p= 0.08) were not significant after adjustment for age and risk group. There was no association between hyperTG and pancreatitis in either protocol. Conclusions: These data support a greater association of PEG-ASP than L-ASP with elevation of serum TGs, and a greater effect of ASP than DEX. Whether serum hyperTG contributes to toxicities such as thrombosis or osteonecrosis, or is a biomarker of greater drug exposure or sensitivity, is unclear. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Inaba: Shire: Research Funding. Relling:Shire Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Ixazomib Added to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139661 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 41-42

Author(s):

Philip C. Amrein ◽

Karen K. Ballen ◽

Kristen E. Stevenson ◽

Traci M. Blonquist ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Survival Estimate ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experienced Grade

Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients >60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates (CR) of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals (OS) of less than 15%. Intensified treatment in a later CALGB trial showed little improvement with a CR=61% and 5-year OS=6% (Stock, Cancer 2013). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as early efficacy of adding ixazomib to a current MGH-DFCI/HCC multi-agent regimen for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's) were excluded. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible, and dasatinib was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The chemotherapy treatment schedule from induction through maintenance is outlined in Table 1. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients, the primary objective of the trial. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to HSCT continued therapy as noted in the table. Results: There were 19 patients with B-ALL enrolled, none with T-ALL. Among these patients, 7 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements. The median age was 65 years, 74% were male, and 90% had a performance status 0 or 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's: a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury (Table 2). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered at any time consisted mainly of grade 4 neutropenia in 13 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 12 patients. One patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 5 patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two patients with grade 2 neuropathy did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 19 patients, 15 (79%, [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-94%]) achieved CR (14) or CRi (1), and 5 patients went on to HSCT. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range, 1-5) for 8 patients remaining alive. The 1-year overall survival estimate was 53% [95% CI, 29-72%], while the 2-year overall survival estimate was 47% [95% CI, 24-67%]. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL was well-tolerated and associated with a promising rate of complete remission. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Brunner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: MLN 9708, ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. In this trial it is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Download Full-text

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 107 (3) ◽

pp. 1116-1123 ◽

Cited By ~ 364

Author(s):

Monika Brüggemann ◽

Thorsten Raff ◽

Thomas Flohr ◽

Nicola Gökbuget ◽

Makoto Nakao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Risk Group ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Time Points ◽

Standard Risk ◽

Minimal Residual

AbstractAdult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are stratified into the standard-risk (SR) group due to the absence of adverse prognostic factors relapse in 40% to 55% of the cases. To identify complementary markers suitable for further treatment stratification in SR ALL, we evaluated the predictive value of minimal residual disease (MRD) and prospectively monitored MRD in 196 strictly defined SR ALL patients at up to 9 time points in the first year of treatment by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Frequency of MRD positivity decreased from 88% during early induction to 13% at week 52. MRD was predictive for relapse at various follow-up time points. Combined MRD information from different time points allowed definition of 3 risk groups (P < .001): 10% of patients with a rapid MRD decline to lower than 10-4 or below detection limit at day 11 and day 24 were classified as low risk and had a 3-year relapse rate (RR) of 0%. A subset of 23% with an MRD of 10-4 or higher until week 16 formed the high-risk group, with a 3-year RR of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-100%). The remaining patients whose RR was 47% (31%-63%) represented the intermediate-risk group. Thus, MRD quantification during treatment identified prognostic subgroups within the otherwise homogeneous SR ALL population who may benefit from individualized treatment.

Download Full-text

Pediatric-Inspired Chemotherapy Incorporating Pegaspargase Is Safe and Results in High Rates of MRD Negativity in Adults Ages 18-60 with Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115486 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4013-4013 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mark Blaine Geyer ◽

Ellen K. Ritchie ◽

Arati V. Rao ◽

M. Isabella Cazacu ◽

Shreya Vemuri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Lymphoblastic Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Among adolescents and young adults with (w/) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL), treatment using a pediatric (vs. adult) regimen appears to achieve superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS); this observation has driven increased interest in adapting pediatric regimens for middle-aged adults w/ ALL/LBL. However, greater risk of toxicities associated w/ asparaginase complicates administration of pediatric-inspired regimens in adults. We therefore designed a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen w/ doses of pegaspargase (PEG) rationally synchronized to limit overlapping toxicities w/ other chemotherapeutic agents. Methods: We conducted a phase II multi-center trial in adults ages 18-60 w/ newly-diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL/LBL (NCT01920737). Pts w/ Ph+ ALL or Burkitt-type ALL were ineligible. The treatment regimen consisted of 2-phase induction (I-1, I-2), followed by consolidation w/ 2 courses of alternating high-dose methotrexate-based intensification and reinduction, followed by 3 years of maintenance (Figure 1). PEG 2000 IU/m2 was administered in each of the 6 intensive courses of induction/consolidation at intervals of ≥4 weeks. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow (BM) by multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) on day (d) 15 of I1 and following I-1 and I-2. Any detectable MRD (even <0.01% of BM WBCs) was considered positive. Toxicities were assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts were enrolled (30M, 9F), w/ B-ALL (n=28), T-ALL (n=7), B-LBL (n=3), and T-LBL (n=5). Median age at start of treatment was 38.3 years (range 20.2-60.4), w/ 18 pts age 40-60. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated w/ PEG are summarized in Table 1. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was observed post-PEG in I-1 in 9 pts, but only recurred thereafter in 1/8 pts resuming PEG. Pts completing consolidation on protocol (n=16) received median of 6 doses of PEG (range, 2-6). Four pts developed hypersensitivity to PEG and subsequently received Erwinia asparaginase. PEG was discontinued in 4 additional pts due to hepatotoxicity (n=2), pancreatitis (n=1), and physician preference (n=1). Of pts w/ available response assessments, 35/36 (97%) achieved morphologic complete response (CR) or CR w/ incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) following I-1 (n=34) or I-2 (n=1). Both pts not achieving CR/CRi after I-I had early T-precursor ALL; one of these pts was withdrawn from study, and the other (w/ M2 marrow after I-1) achieved CR after I-2. Of the pts w/ ALL (excluding LBL) w/ available BM MRD assessments, 11/28 (39%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1; 18/22 (82%) achieved undetectable MRD by FACS following I-2. Of the pts w/ LBL w/ available BM MRD assessments, 7/7 (100%) achieved or maintained undetectable MRD by FACS following I-1 and I-2. Ten pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1. Seven pts experienced relapse at median 15.2 months from start of treatment (range, 5.4-30.4), of whom 6 subsequently underwent 1st (n=5) or 2nd (n=1) alloHCT. Of the 11 pts w/ ALL w/ undetectable MRD following I-1, only one has relapsed. Five patients have died, including 2 pts in CR1 (from sepsis and multi-organ system failure), and 3 pts in relapse. At median follow-up of 22.3 months among surviving pts (range, 1.0-48.1), median EFS and OS (Figure 2A&B) have not been reached (EFS not censored at alloHCT). 3-year EFS was 62.1% (95% CI: 38.4-78.9%) and 3-year OS was 80.0% (95% CI: 57.5-91.4%). Conclusions: PEG can be incorporated into pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens w/ manageable toxicity for appropriately selected adults up to age 60 w/ Ph- ALL/LBL. While PEG-related AEs are common, few pts require permanent discontinuation of asparaginase. Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia was common, particularly post-I-1, but recurred infrequently when PEG was continued. Two induction courses resulted in a high rate of MRD negativity post-I-2 and translated to a low rate of relapse. Though further follow-up is required, 3-year EFS is encouraging. Data regarding asparaginase enzyme activity and silent inactivation w/ neutralizing anti-PEG antibody will be presented. Ongoing and future studies will additionally investigate whether incorporating novel therapies (e.g. blinatumomab, nelarabine) into frontline consolidation therapy may reduce risk of relapse among adults receiving PEG-containing regimens. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ritchie:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rao:Kite, a Gilead Company: Employment. Tallman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Douer:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Spectrum: Consultancy. Park:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Outcomes after Reinfusion of CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-Modified T Cells in Children and Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147299 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 474-474

Author(s):

Regina M. Myers ◽

Kaitlin Devine ◽

Yimei Li ◽

Sophie Lawrence ◽

Allison Barz Leahy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Alternative Therapy ◽

Car T ◽

Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Relapsed Disease

Abstract Background: CAR-modified T cells targeting CD19 have produced remarkable responses in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL); however, relapse continues to be a substantial challenge. CD19+ relapses, which account for 33-78% of relapses, are associated with loss of CAR T-cell surveillance due to short persistence. Thus, strategies to improve functional persistence to prevent and treat CD19+ relapsed disease are crucial. Here, we report our experience administering reinfusions of murine or humanized 4-1BB CD19 CAR T cells in an effort to prolong persistence in patients with demonstrated short persistence to mitigate relapse risk, treat CD19+ relapsed disease, and produce responses after nonresponse to initial CAR infusion. Methods: This analysis included patients aged <30 years treated with a murine CD19 CAR construct, either investigational CTL019 (NCT01626495, NCT02906371) or commercial tisagenlecleucel, or a humanized CD19 CAR construct, huCART19 (NCT02374333), who received ≥1 reinfusion of the same CAR product due to: 1) clinical signs of poor persistence within 6 months (mos) of initial infusion, including peripheral B-cell recovery (BCR) or CD19+ hematogones in the bone marrow, 2) new CD19+ minimal residual disease (MRD) or relapse, or 3) nonresponse to initial infusion. The huCART19 trial included patients who had previously received a CAR T cell product (CAR-exposed), whereas all patients reinfused with CTL019/tisagenlecleucel were CAR-naïve at initial infusion. The primary outcome was complete response (CR) at day 28 after reinfusion, defined as complete remission with establishment or maintenance of B-cell aplasia. Secondary outcomes included CRS incidence, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 229 CAR-naïve and 33 CAR-exposed patients treated with CD19 CAR between 2012-2020, 81 received ≥1 reinfusion (investigational CTL019, n=44; commercial tisagenlecleucel, n=11; huCART19, n=13 CAR-naïve and n=13 CAR-exposed). In addition, 18 patients received PD-1 blockade after their first (n=11) or subsequent (n=7) reinfusions. Indications for first reinfusion were peripheral BCR (CAR-naïve, n=32; CAR-exposed, n=6), hematogones (CAR-naïve, n=21; CAR-exposed, n=4), CD19+ MRD/relapse (CAR-naïve, n=10, CAR-exposed, n=0), and nonresponse to initial infusion (CAR-naïve, n=5, CAR-exposed, n=3). CRS grade ≥2 (Penn scale) occurred in 19 patients (grade 2, n=13; grade 3, n=4; grade 4, n=2). Grade 3-4 events only occurred in patients with active disease at time of reinfusion. Twenty-two patients had an inpatient admission within 30 days of first reinfusion, of which 7 required intensive care unit admission Among the 63 patients reinfused for relapse prevention, 33 (52%) had a CR at day 28. With a median duration of follow-up of 38 mos, 13 experienced a subsequent relapse (7 CD19+, 4 CD19-, 2 CD19-subset negative), 4 received alternative therapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in remission, and 16 remain in remission without further therapy at a median of 39 mos after first reinfusion. The median duration of B-cell aplasia was 8 mos (IQR 2-35) after reinfusion. Of the 30 with no response (NR), 10 had a subsequent CD19+ relapse, 15 received alternative therapy or HSCT, and 5 remain in remission without further therapy at a median of 43 mos after reinfusion. CIR and OS were not statistically significantly different between patients with CR or NR (CIR, p=0.26; OS, p=0.25) (Figure A-B). However, at 24 mos after reinfusion, CIR was 29% (95% CI, 11-44%) for CR compared to 61% (95% CI, 24-80%) for NR; OS was 90% (95% CI, 80-100%) for both groups. Of the 10 patients reinfused for relapse, 5 (50%) had a CR; 2 subsequently experienced a CD19+ relapse, 2 received an HSCT in remission, and 1 remains in remission without further therapy at 18 mos after reinfusion. Of the 8 patients reinfused for nonresponse to initial infusion, 7 were evaluable; none had a CR, and all died at a median of 2.5 mos after reinfusion. Conclusions: Reinfusion of CTL019/tisagenlecleucel or huCART19 is safe, may prolong B-cell aplasia in patients with short CAR persistence and reduce relapse risk, and can induce remissions in patients with CD19+ relapsed disease. Thus, reinfusion may provide an alternative to HSCT for short persistence. However, reinfusion is not effective for patients with nonresponse to initial CAR infusion. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Callahan: Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Rheingold: Optinose: Other: Spouse's current employment; Pfizer: Research Funding. June: Tmunity, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; AC Immune, DeCART, BluesphereBio, Carisma, Cellares, Celldex, Cabaletta, Poseida, Verismo, Ziopharm: Consultancy. Grupp: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding. Maude: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wugen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Blinatumomab in Combination with Pembrolizumab Is Safe for Adults with Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Study 1504

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131061 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3880-3880 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Marc Schwartz ◽

Lloyd E. Damon ◽

Deepa Jeyakumar ◽

Caitlin L. Costello ◽

Dimitrios Tzachanis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Complete Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Bone ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort

Clinical and preclinical findings suggest that PD-L1 overexpression on lymphoblasts and in the bone marrow microenvironment may mediate resistance to blinatumomab by inhibiting T-cell activation. We report preliminary findings from an ongoing phase I/II multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and a high bone marrow lymphoblast percentage (NCT 03160079). The primary objective of this Phase I/II trial is to determine overall response rate (ORR = complete response (CR) + complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate) after 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab, with key secondary endpoints of adverse events (AEs), minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR/CRh rate, 2-year disease-free and overall survival, and allogeneic HCT rate. Eligible patients are 18 years of age or older with R/R B-ALL after ≥ 1 prior line of therapy (including Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) B-ALL failing one second or third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and >50% lymphoblasts on screening bone marrow sample. Patients receive blinatumomab by continuous IV at 9 mcg/day on days 1-7 and 28 mcg/day on days 8-28 of cycle 1, then 28 mcg/day on days 1-28 in subsequent cycles. Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV is given on days 15 and 36 of each 42-day cycle. Patients in CR/CRh after 1-2 cycles complete a maximum of 5 cycles. A safety cohort of up to 6 patients assessed safety by 3+3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic AEs related to the addition of pembrolizumab to blinatumomab with a DLT monitoring period of 28 days from the first pembrolizumab dose. At the time of this analysis, 5 patients have been enrolled and treated with all 5 completing the DLT monitoring period. Patients had a median age of 60 years (range 22-74) and one had Ph+ disease. Median bone marrow lymphoblast percentage at time of enrollment was 84% (range 53-90). Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1-3) of blinatumomab with pembrolizumab. Common AEs included fever, headache, increased bilirubin, nausea, neurotoxicity, and tachycardia. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs included disseminated intravascular coagulation, hyperferritinemia, hypokalemia, subdural hematoma, encephalopathy, hyponatremia, and macrophage activation syndrome in 1 patient (all related to blinatumomab), hyperbilirubinemia and elevated AST in 1 patient, and hypertriglyceridemia in 1 patient. No grade 3 or greater immune-related AEs have occurred. No pembrolizumab-related DLTs occurred in the first 5 patients in the safety cohort and enrollment is now proceeding in the dose-expansion cohort. The ORR was 50% with 2/4 evaluable patients achieving a CR. One patient achieved an MRD-negative CR in cycle 1 and completed 3 cycles before proceeding to allogeneic HCT. One patient discontinued treatment due to subdural hemorrhage and macrophage activation syndrome during cycle 1 and achieved a CR. Both patients remain in CR for over 6 months. Two patients discontinued treatment due to refractory or progressive disease. The one patient not evaluable for response withdrew from study therapy after 1 cycle without ALL progression. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics as well as outcomes are summarized in the Table. Blinatumomab with pembrolizumab is safe for adults with R/R B-ALL and a high bone marrow lymphoblast percentage. Enrollment continues in the dose-expansion cohort to assess efficacy. Disclosures Damon: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Costello:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schiller:Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wieduwilt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Leadiant, Merck, Servier: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab (given off label)to enhance the efficacy of blinatumomab (given on label) for relaped/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Download Full-text

A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase 2 Pilot Study of Vyxeos (CPX-351) in Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151936 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4399-4399

Author(s):

Bijal D. Shah ◽

Nicole Rozario ◽

Elyce P. Turba ◽

Celeste Bello ◽

Julio C. Chavez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tp53 Mutation ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Pilot Trial ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Allogeneic Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Vyxeos® is a liposomal formulation employing a 1:5 molar ratio of daunorubicin:cytarabine. Clinical trials in high risk acute myeloid leukemias demonstrated a significant benefit in CR rates and median OS, culminating in FDA approval August 2017. Emerging pediatric data suggest this benefit may extend to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The following pilot trial was performed to better understand the activity and toxicity profile in adults with relapsed and refractory ALL. Methods: Adults with ALL or mixed phenotype leukemia were eligible if >5% lymphoblasts and/or extramedullary disease >1x1cm. Induction consisted of Vyxeos 100 units/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5. Those with clinical benefit could receive up to 3 cycles of consolidation delivered at 65 units/m2 on days 1 & 3 after recovery of neutrophils (>500 cells/uL) and platelets (>50,000 cells/uL). Response: 11 patients (pts) have been treated to date, with median age of 39y (22-74y), 9 male, and 3 Caucasian. Six pts had B-ALL, including 1 B-myeloid. Four of 5 T-ALL pts had early T-cell precursor (ETP) phenotype. NGS was available in 9 pts, and included TP53 mutation (n=4), and PH-like changes (n=2). Median prior lines of therapy was 3, with 7 pts showing primary refractory disease. Prior blinatumomab, inotuzumab, CAR-T cell therapy, and allogeneic transplant were noted in 5, 2, 1, and 3 pts. Pancytopenia was uniform during induction, with febrile neutropenia noted in 9 pts. One pt passed from pneumonia after moving to comfort measures in lieu of intubation 20 days after Vyxeos, and is non-evaluable for response. A second pt developed grade 3 sepsis. The remainder of infections were grade 1-2. One pt had grade 3 gastrointestinal bleed, and 3 pts had grade 1 spontaneous subdural bleeding. One pt developed recurrent pericarditis in setting of anterior mediastinal mass. One case of veno-occlusive disease was observed in a pt with prior allogeneic transplant and inotuzumab. Median time to ANC recovery was 33.5 days among 10 evaluable pts. Two pts with refractory disease failed to recover platelets; among the remaining pts, median time to platelet recovery was 30.5 days. Adverse events were uncommon during consolidation, and include foot cellulitis and myopericarditis, each in 1 pt. Among 10 evaluable pts, 3 achieved CR/CRi, including 2 ETP T-ALL and one B-ALL. Two pts with TP53 mutation demonstrated >50% blast reduction with hematologic recovery, allowing for prolonged time to subsequent therapy. Four pts received 1-3 cycles consolidation. One pt was bridged to donor leukocyte infusion. Responses were noted in only 2 pts after progression following Vyxeos, highlighting refractory status of those enrolled. Median PFS was 57 days (95%CI: 10, 105), time to next therapy 76 days (95%CI: 47, 105), and OS 223 days (95%CI: 144, 302). Conclusions Vyxeos in high-risk refractory adult ALL was overall well tolerated and active, with median OS of approximately 7.5 months in this pilot trial. Confirmation of benefit in a larger study is warranted, incorporating a second induction course and/or the addition of novel agents to further improve on remission rate and duration of response. Disclosures Shah: Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Chavez: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Morphosys: Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotech: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; karyopharm: Consultancy; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Sokol: Dren Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Vyxeos is being evaluated in the described trial for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.

Download Full-text

Blinatumomab in Children with Relapsed or Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R-ALL): Final Results of 110 Patients Treated in an Expanded Access Study (RIALTO)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141336 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-25

Author(s):

Franco Locatelli ◽

Gerhard Zugmaier ◽

Noemi Mergen ◽

Peter Bader ◽

Sima Jeha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Final Analysis ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Introduction: The open-label, expanded access study (RIALTO) demonstrated that blinatumomab is efficacious with a manageable safety profile in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R BCP-ALL). Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy that activates cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. Here, findings from the final analysis of RIALTO are presented (NCT02187354). Methods: Enrolled in the study were children >28 days and <18 years of age with R/R CD19+ BCP-ALL (defined as ≥2 relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [alloHSCT], or refractory to prior treatments) and ≥5% blasts or <5% blasts but with minimal residual disease (MRD) level ≥10−3. Blinatumomab was given as continuous infusion in a 6-week cycle (4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles and safety follow-up visit 30 days post-treatment. Patients with <25% blasts were dosed at 15 µg/m2/day, whereas those with ≥25% blasts were dosed at 5 µg/m2/day (days 1-7 of cycle 1) followed by dose increase to 15 µg/m2/day. Primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent (TE) and treatment-related (TR) adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR; <5% blasts) and MRD response (<10−4 blasts by PCR or flow-cytometry) in the first 2 cycles, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and alloHSCT rate after blinatumomab treatment. Results: As of the data cutoff date (January 10, 2020) for the final analysis, demographics and baseline characteristics of 110 patients enrolled (median age, 8.5 years [95% CI 0.4-17.0]), 61% had <50% blasts at baseline, and 11% had <5% blasts (n=12; with MRD ≥10−3) remain unchanged compared with the primary analysis (Table 1). For best treatment response within the first 2 cycles, results are comparable to that of the primary analysis. Among 110 patients, overall CR rate was 62.7% (n= 69). Of 98 patients with ≥5% blasts at baseline, 59% (n=58) achieved CR; of them, 79% (n=46) achieved an MRD response and 62% (n=39) proceeded to HSCT. The 2 patients with t(17;19) achieved CR with an MRD response. Of the 4 patients with germline trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), 3 achieved CR with an MRD response Among the 12 patients with <5% blasts but with MRD ≥10−3 at baseline, 92% (n=11) achieved CR and MRD response; 75% (n=9) proceeded to HSCT (Table 2). Of the 5 patients who had received prior blinatumomab , 4 achieved CR. Of 110 patients treated with blinatumomab, median OS (95% CI) was 14.6 (11-24.5) months with median follow-up time of 18.2 months, which increased by 1.5 months compared with that reported in the primary analysis, with 29.9% of patients still surviving at month 24. Median RFS (95% CI) remains unchanged at 8.5 months (4.7-14.0), with a median follow-up time of 11.5 months in patients who achieved CR; 38% of patients relapsed and 9% died. RFS was more favorable for patients who received HSCT post blinatumomab (70%) than for those who did not (30%) at month 12, respectively, which is consistent with the results from primary analysis. Among patients who had HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 45), median OS (95%) was 16.6 (7.1-NE) months vs 14.6 (10.9-24.5) months in patients without HSCT prior to blinatumomab (n= 65). Compared with the primary analysis, 5 additional patients received HSCT after achieving CR in the final analysis. Median OS among patients in CR after HSCT by MRD responders vs MRD non-responders was NE at 15-month analysis (Figure). Safety results in the final analysis were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis. Of 110 patients, 99% experienced TEAEs, with 65% being grade ≥3 (see Table 3 for details). TRAEs were reported in 74% of patients; 26% were grade ≥3 and 19% were deemed serious. Details on grade ≥3 TRAEs are shown in Table 3. The 9 fatal AEs, unrelated to blinatumomab, occurred due to relapse and progressive nature of the disease (Table 3). Conclusions: Overall, the safety and efficacy results from the final analysis are consistent with those reported in the primary analysis as no new safety signals were observed. These findings strengthen the observation that blinatumomab demonstrates durable efficacy and is a suitable treatment option in children with R/R BCP-ALL. Table 1. Disclosures Locatelli: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceeutical: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zugmaier:Amgen: Current Employment, Other: Personal Fees ; 20190300609: Patents & Royalties: Licensed patient . Mergen:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Research Funding. Schlegel:bluebird bio: Honoraria. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel Support. Handgretinger:Amgen: Honoraria. Brethon:Amgen: Other: invitation to meetings, remunerations for oral presentations, advices for the record of Blinatumomab in pediatrics in France. Rössig:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kormany:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viswagnachar:IQVIA: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Ixazomib in Addition to Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117506 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2704-2704

Author(s):

Philip C. Amrein ◽

Karen K. Ballen ◽

Traci M. Blonquist ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

Gabriela S. Hobbs ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: While progress has been made in the treatment of childhood leukemia, the outlook for patients >60 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor with complete remission rates of approximately 60% and 3-year survivals of less than 15% (Larson R., Hematology 2005). Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor, which has shown single agent activity and promising combination activity in pediatric ALL patients (Messinger, Blood 2012). We sought to assess the safety and tolerability, as well as an early appreciation of the therapeutic promise, of adding ixazomib to standard multi-agent standard treatment for older adults with ALL. Methods: Patients aged 51 to 75 years of age with newly diagnosed B-ALL and T-ALL were screened for eligibility. Excluded were patients with mature ALL (including Burkitt's). Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (BCR-ABL1+) were eligible and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was added to the chemotherapy on Day 10 for these patients. The induction treatment consisted of the following: Prednisone 40 mg/m2/day, Days 2-22 for patients <60 years of age; Prednisone 40mg/m2/day Days 2-8 for patients ≥ 60 years of age; Vincristine (V) 2 mg IV on Days 2, 9, 16, 23; Doxorubicin (D) 30mg/m2/day on Days 2 and 3; intrathecal cytarabine 50 mg on Day 2; Intrathecal methotrexate 12 mg Day 29; G-CSF 300 mcg/kg sc or IV was started on Day 5 and continued until ANC was >2000 for 2 consecutive days. On Days 1, 8, 15, ixazomib was given orally at the dose prescribed according to 3 dose-escalation cohorts: 2.3 mg/day, 3.0mg/day, or 4.0 mg/day. A standard 3 +3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine the dose of ixazomib for each patient. The primary objective of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib during induction for these patients. After induction patients received consolidation I consisting of the following: cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2/day, Days 2-3; prednisone 40 mg/m2/day, Days 2-6; PEG-asparaginase 500 units/m2 IV on Day 2 (for Ph- patients only); intrathecal methotrexate 12 mg on Days 2 and 15. On Days 1, 8, 15 of consolidation I, ixazomib was given orally at the dose previously prescribed for them during induction. After consolidation I, patients in complete remission (CR) with a suitable donor were offered stem cell transplantation as per institutional guidelines. Those not going to transplantation proceeded to continuation therapy as follows: CNS Phase: Intrathecal methotrexate 12 mg, cytarabine 40 mg, hydrocortisone 50 mg on days 1, 8, 15, vincristine Day 1, doxorubicin on Day 1, 6-MP Days 1-14, dexamethasone (DEX) Days 1-5, PEG-ASP Day 1+15 Consolidation II: 8 cycles of V + D + 6-MP + DEX + PEG-ASP; Maintenance Phase: V + DEX + 6+MP + oral methotrexate (ends after 18 months of remission). Results: The dose escalation phase completed with 9 patients. Among these patients, 4 harbored BCR-ABL1 rearrangements, all had B-ALL, the median age was 65 years, 78% were male, and 78% were performance status 1. The MTD was 2.3 mg of ixazomib, as 2 patients at 3.0 mg developed DLT's, a grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and a grade 5 acute kidney injury. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 8 patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 7 patients. Two patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There was 1 patient with a grade 2 neuropathy that did not meet the definition of DLT. Among the 9 patients, 7 (78%) achieved CR, and 2 patients went on to stem cell transplantation. Conclusions: A dose of 2.3 mg of ixazomib was well-tolerated in combination with induction chemotherapy among older patients with ALL, and is being tested in the expansion phase of this trial. The remission rate in this older adult population appears favorable in both Ph-negative and Ph-positive patients. Table. Table. Disclosures Amrein: Takeda: Research Funding. Fathi:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Study Of Hyper-CVAD Plus Everolimus In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3916.3916 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3916-3916 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Naval Daver ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Deborah A. Thomas ◽

Michael E. Rytting ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Mtor Inhibition ◽

Gene Set ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The outcomes of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain poor. Dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal transduction pathway is central to leukemic cell growth and survival. Everolimus is an orally active inhibitor of mTOR approved for the treatment of pts with several tumor types. Aim The purpose of this phase I/II study was to establish the safety and efficacy of everolimus in combination with hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) in pts with relapsed/refractory ALL and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL). Methods Pts ≥ 10 years of age with relapsed/refractory ALL or LL, ECOG performance status 2 2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Pts were treated with oral everolimus at 5 or 10 mg (phase 1 dosing) continuously concurrently with 8 cycles of the standard hyper-CVAD regimen, starting day 0 of course 1. Everolimus 5 mg daily was established as maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after 2 cycles. Comprehensive proteomic profiling of 10 proteins along with their phosphorylated forms was performed using reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPA). Total RNA was isolated from patient samples using TRIzol reagent and gene expression analysed using a HumanHT-12 v4 gene expression chip from Illumina (N = 5). Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed on day 0 and day 15 of course 1 (N = 8). Background Twenty pts were enrolled between April 2010 and June 2013, with accrual ongoing. Clinical characteristics included 9 pts in first salvage, 2 in second salvage and 9 beyond second salvage (Table 1). Median (Med) number of cycles given was 2 (1-5). Med follow-up was 19 months (1-35). Seven of 20 pts responded for an overall response rate of 35% with complete remission (CR) in 6 pts (30%), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in 1 (5%), and partial remission (PR) in 2 (10%). Six of 9 pts (66%) in first salvage achieved CR, and one of 2 pts in second salvage achieved CRi. Four pts proceeded to stem cell transplant in CR. Med event-free survival (EFS) and med overall survival (OS) were 6 and 7 months, respectively, for pts in 1st salvage, and 2 and 4 months, respectively for pts in second salvage and beyond (P=0.01 and P=0.002). The 1-year OS is 47% for 1st salvage pts and 9% for pts in second salvage and beyond. Grade 3 mucositis was dose-limiting toxicity. Other grade 3/4 toxicities including infections, transaminitis, diarrhea, headache, and increased bilirubin occurred in 18 (90%), 6 (30%), 2 (10%), 2 (10%), and 2 (10%) pts. Among the 10 pts profiled by RPPA, inhibition of mTOR signaling (p-pS6K) was observed in 7/10 (70%). Everolimus significantly inhibited phosphorylation of S6K on both, pS235-S236 and pS240-S244 sites (P=0.007 and P=0.01, respectively). Inhibition of pS6 was observed at both 5 mg and 10 mg doses. No statistically significant difference in phosphorylation of 4EBP1, AKT or other proteins was noted. Gene set enrichment analysis performed in paired PB samples from 5 pts showed enrichment of the ABC transporter gene set in pts who failed to respond. Analysis of PB samples 24 hrs post everolimus exposure was associated with reduction of the signature for miR-21, miR-30 and miR-507 gene sets, irrespective of a biological response to mTOR inhibition as assessed by S6K phosphorylation. PK analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) for everolimus was dose-dependent with higher AUC at 10 mg versus 5 mg. Those achieving CR had significantly higher AUC and lower clearance at steady state compared to pts with PR/no response (Fig. 1, P=0.025), but it was not associated with toxicity. Conclusion The combination ofhyper-CVAD plus everolimus was well tolerated, and findings indicate that further testing of mTOR inhibitors with standard chemotherapy in the frontline therapy of ALL and LL is warranted. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. Ravandi:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and Security of a Modified CALGB10403 in Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries: A Multicentric Experience in Central America

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153545 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2284-2284

Author(s):

Juan Rangel-Patiño ◽

Lee-Tsai Yu Ling ◽

Victor Itaí Urbalejo Ceniceros ◽

Maria Elena Monserrat Luna Perez ◽

Karla Adriana Espinosa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Central America ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Middle Income ◽

Middle Income Countries ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Related Mortality

Abstract Background: Mexico and Central America have a high incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Chemotherapy with Hyper-CVAD has been widely used with poor outcomes, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 25.7% in this group of age. In low-and middle-income countries (LMIC), limitations in supportive care such as low access to neutrophil stimulant agents, antifungal prophylaxis and limited intensive care access, may increase treatment-related mortality. On the other hand, reports suggest that specific high-risk subgroups may be more frequent in Hispanic patients from Mexico and Central America. We hypothesize that the use of a less-myeloablative regimen, based on L-asparaginase could overcome the bad outcomes previously reported. Methods We modified the original CALGB 10403 based on local drug-access. We include patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative B- or T-cell ALL between 14-49 years from 4 centers in Mexico and one in Guatemala. We modified the regimen as following: replaced pegaspargase by E. Coli asparaginase, thioguanine by 6-mercapatopurine and incorporate rituximab 375mg/m2 for 6 doses in CD20 positive patients. After the first interim analysis (October 2019), we replaced the prednisone by dexamethasone during induction. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry after induction and after first consolidation. We considered high-risk karyotype if MLL-rearrangements, complex or hypodiploid and high-white blood cell count (WBC) if >30 x10 3/mcL for B-ALL or >100 x10 3/mcL for T-ALL. The main objective was to evaluate OS and as secondary objectives to evaluate complete response (CR) rate, relapse-free survival (RFS) and to assess the safety of this regimen. Results From January 2017 to December 2020, 95 patients have been enrolled with a median age of 23 years (range 14-49). One third (34.6%) had overweight and 11.7% were obese. The majority (92.6%) had a B-cell ALL and a normal karyotype (81.2%). The median WBC was 18.4 x10 3/mcL (0.2-427.7) and 40.9% had a high-WBC. During induction, adverse events (AE) included grade 3/4 elevated bilirubin (21.1%), transaminases (14.7%), hyperglycemia (14.7%), hypofibrinogenemia (44.2%), thrombosis (10.5%), hypersensitivity (2.2%) and pancreatitis (2.1%). During consolidation, AE included grade 3/4 hepatic toxicity (18.9%), hypertriglyceridemia (14.8%), thrombosis (5.3%) and pancreatitis (2.1%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 55.8% during induction (grade 4: 31.5%), and in 32.9% during consolidation (grade 4/5: 5.3%). A dose adjustment due to AE was required in 22.1% during induction and in 23.2% during consolidation. The induction related-mortality (IRM) rate was 7.4% The CR rate was 87.8%. After-induction, MRD was <0.01% in 39.1%, 0.01-0.1% in 39.1% and > 0.1% in 24.6%. Post-consolidation MRD was only measured in 43 patients and was <0.01% in 37.2%. During follow-up, 26.7% relapsed: 62.5% bone marrow (BM) relapses, 25.0% central nervous system (CNS) relapses and 12.5% CNS + BM relapses. Eight patients (8.4%) received an allogeneic-stem cell transplant (HSCT) as consolidation. The 2-year OS was 72.1%. The post-induction MRD <0.1% was associated with a better OS (figure 1A) (HR: 0.17 (95%CI: 0.06-0.55), p=0.003) and a high-WBC with an inferior OS (figure 1B) (HR: 4.13 (95%CI: 1.68-10.14), p=0.002). The 2-year RFS was 65.2%. The post-induction MRD <0.1% was associate with a better RFS (figure 1C) (HR: 0.19 (95%CI: 0.07-0.50), p=0.001) and a high-WBC and overweight / obesity with an inferior RFS (HR: 4.08 (95%CI: 1.71-9.73), p=0.001 and 2.50 (95%CI: 1.06-5.86), p=0.036 respectively) (figure 1D). Conclusions: The adoption of modified CALGB10403 regimen in Central America based on local resources is feasible. It is associated with a significant improvement in the OS and decrease in IRM when compared with previous reports. Despite a very high-rate of hepatic and metabolic toxicities, these were manageable. As reported by other groups, MRD, high-WBC and overweight/obesity are associated with poor outcomes. Despite being encouraging results, a significant number of patients persist with positive MRD and the main cause of dead is disease progression. Access to cellular therapies, and BiTes is cost restricted in LMIC. Hence, we should generate strategies to intensify treatment in MRD positive patients and expand transplant access to overcome outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rangel-Patiño: Bristol: Consultancy; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Ceniceros: Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Espinosa: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Amador: Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy. Cabrero Garcia: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; BD: Speakers Bureau. Inclan-Alarcon: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Boehringer: Speakers Bureau. Neme Yunes: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Meillon-García: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy. Apodaca: Sanofi: Consultancy; Asofarma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Demichelis: Bristol/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; ASH: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy.

Download Full-text