scholarly journals Comparison of Minimal Residual Disease Detection between the Manual and Automated Gating Strategies of Euroflow Next-Generation Flow in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3083-3083
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
Mikio Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Pharmaceutical Company ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Chugai Pharmaceutical ◽  
Company Limited ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: The rate of complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically increased because of the development of novel agents. In addition, the development of methods for measuring minimal residual disease (MRD), such as multiparameter flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing, has made it possible to stratify CR patients according to the MRD extent. EuroFlow next-generation flow (EuroFlow-NGF) is considered one of the gold standard methods for evaluating the negative status of MRD in MM. The automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF has been shown to detect MRD as accurately as the manual gating strategy by experts. Oberle et al. (Haematologica, 2017) have found that daratumumab persisted on the surface of myeloma cells treated with it and that the anti-CD38 multi-epitope antibody used in EuroFlow-NGF has partial cross-reactivity with daratumumab, leading to generally lower mean fluorescence intensities of CD38. Therefore, MRD levels may have been underestimated in patients who were treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) using the automated gating strategy, leading to inappropriate management of the patients. Because no studies have examined the correlation of MRD extent between the manual and automated gating strategies in patients with MM who have received anti-CD38 mAbs, we compared MRD detection between the two gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF in patients with MM. Methods: The study included bone marrow samples from 51 patients with MM (27 male and 24 female patients), including 13 patients treated with anti-CD38 mAb (12 treated with daratumumab and 1 treated with isatuximab). The median patient age was 70 years (range, 32-92 years) at MRD assessment. The disease statuses at MRD assessment were stringent CR in 26 patients (51%), CR in 7 (14%), very good partial response in 13 (26%), partial response in 1 (2%), and progressive disease in 4 (8%). The sample preparation protocol, Ab panel, and automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF have been reported previously (Flores-Montero et al. Leukemia 2017). Briefly, we performed the EuroFlow-NGF method, which involved ammonium chloride-based bulk lysis, followed by surface staining using antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 multiepitope (ME)-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, and CD81-APC C750 in tube 1 and surface/intracellular staining using antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 ME-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, CD81-APC C750, cytoplasmic (cy) Igκ-APC, and cyIgλ-APC C750 after permeabilization in tube 2. For data analysis, events from both eight-color tubes (tubes 1 and 2) were merged, and the values of all parameters per tube were mathematically calculated using the merge and calculation functions of Infinicyt software (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain). Automatic identification and enumeration of total plasma cells (tPCs) and abnormal plasma cells (MRD) were performed using the automatic gating function of Infinicyt software as described previously (Flores-Montero et al. Leukemia 2017). We compared the total nucleated cell number, tPC ratio, and MRD ratio between the manual (by experts) and automated gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF. Results: In patients with MM who did not receive any anti-CD38 mAb therapy, we observed high correlations for both the tPC (r = 0.959, P < 0.0001) (Figure A) and MRD (r = 0.974, P < 0.0001) (Figure B) ratios between the manual and automated gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF. On the other hand, in patients with MM who received anti-CD38 mAb therapy, we did not observe good correlations for both the tPC (r = 0.349, P = 0.2) (Figure A) and MRD (r = 0.292, P = 0.3) (Figure B) ratios between the two strategies owing to a lower fluorescence intensity of CD38 on PCs. In addition, when the MRD threshold was set to 10-5, the discordance of MRD positivity/negativity between the two strategies was significantly higher in patients who received anti-CD38 mAb therapy than in those who did not receive anti-CD38 mAb therapy [4/13 (31%) vs. 1/38 (3%), P = 0.012]. Conclusion: Although the automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF could be a viable alternative to the manual strategy for the assessment of MRD in MM, we may have to utilize the manual strategy to obtain precise MRD results for patients with MM who received anti-CD38 mAbs. Figure Disclosures Takamatsu: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Fujimoto Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Becton, Dickinson and Company: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria. Yoroidaka:Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Yamashita:Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Murata:Celgene: Honoraria; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Nakao:Daiichi-Sankyo Company, Limited: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; SynBio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Alaxion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Matsue:Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Using Euroflow-NGF in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with a Combination of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRD)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3130-3130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
Kyoko Yoshihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pharmaceutical Company ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Chugai Pharmaceutical ◽  
Company Limited ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Extramedullary Plasmacytomas

Background: Owing to the development of novel agents, the rate of complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) has increased. Additionally, the development of methods for measuring minimal residual disease (MRD) (e.g., multiparameter flow cytometry [MFC] and next-generation sequencing) has enabled us to stratify CR patients according to MRD levels. In this study, we hypothesized that deep response predicts better prognosis in MM. To investigate this hypothesis, we assessed the response of patients treated with carfilzomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (KRD) using MFC and compared survival outcomes between different groups defined by the MRD status. Methods: The response of patients with relapsed/refractory MM treated with KRD at four different centers between September 2016 and October 2018 was prospectively investigated using the EuroFlow next-generation flow (EuroFlow-NGF) method. In this method, ammonium chloride-based bulk lysis was used, followed by surface staining with antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 multiepitope (ME)-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, and CD81-APC C750 in tube 1 and surface/intracellular staining with antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 ME-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, CD81-APC C750, cytoplasmic (cy) Igκ-APC, and cyIgλ-APC C750 after permeabilization in tube 2. MRD levels were assessed using bone marrow (BM) cells after several KRD cycles, with the lower limit of detection set at 1 × 10−5. Presence of high-risk cytogenetics [del 17p, t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] in BM cells was analyzed through FISH. Results: A total of 21 patients (12 males, 9 females) were treated with KRD and assessed for MRD levels. The median age of these patients was 66 years at KRD initiation (range 30-83 years), and 11 patients had ISS 1, 6 had ISS 2, and 4 had ISS 3. Four patients displayed high-risk chromosomal abnormalities, including del 17p (n = 3) and t(14;16) (n = 1). The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1-6); these included bortezomib (n=12), lenalidomide (n=19), and autologous stem-cell transplantation (n=12). The median number of KRD cycles was 4 (range 1-22). The proportion of patients achieving ≥CR and overall response (≥ partial response [PR]) was significantly higher after KRD treatment than the proportion that had been achieved by previous therapies (71% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001; 100% vs. 71%, p = 0.008, respectively). Pre-KRD responses included 2 stringent CR (sCR), 7 very good PR (VGPR), 6 PR, 3 stable disease, and 3 progressive disease. Post-KRD responses included 13 sCR, 2 CR, 3 VGPR, and 3 PR. A total of 95% (20/21) of patients achieved sCR, and 5% (1/21) VGPR as best response. After KRD, response was upgraded in 19 (90%) patients and maintained in two PR (10%) patients. During and after KRD treatment, MRD negativity was achieved in 12 of 16 (75%) and in 15 of 21 (71%) patients, respectively. The median number of therapy lines after KRD was 1 (range 0-5). All 4 high-risk cytogenetic cases achieved MRD negativity. Among MRD-positive cases, both 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year overall survival (OS) from KRD initiation were 100%. Among MRD-negative cases, 2-year PFS and OS from KRD initiation were 92% and 100%, respectively. The median follow-up was 1.8 years (range 0.5-2.5 years). One MRD-negative case showed extramedullary relapse 1.4 years after the last KRD cycle. This patient did not have high-risk cytogenetics and achieved "flow MRD negativity" after two KRD cycles, and the treatment was stopped after 7 KRD cycles due to peripheral neuropathy. Paiva et. al. also reported that only 6 of 225 (3%) MRD-negative patients relapsed. Strikingly, all 6 relapsing cases in the report had extramedullary plasmacytomas at diagnosis; all relapsed with extramedullary plasmacytomas and only 2 developed concomitant serological relapse (ASH 2017, abstract #905). Conclusions: KRD induced deep responses in relapsed/refractory MM patients who eventually displayed excellent PFS. All patients with high-risk cytogenetics achieved EuroFlow-NGF negativity. Post-remission imaging studies such as MRI/PET-CT may be necessary for patients who presented with extramedullary plasmacytomas even when they achieved flow MRD negativity. Figure Disclosures Yoroidaka: Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Takamatsu:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Fujimoto Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Becton, Dickinson and Company: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria. Yamashita:Celgene: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria; TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED: Honoraria. Murata:Celgene: Honoraria; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Yoshihara:Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Eisai Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Yoshihara:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K.: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Honoraria. Nakao:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Alaxion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo Company, Limited: Honoraria; SynBio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Matsue:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Comparison of Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Autografts of Patients with Multiple Myeloma between 8-Color Multiparameter Flow Cytometry (EuroFlow) and Next-Generation Sequencing

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Naoki Takezako ◽  
Rachel K Wee ◽  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in conjunction with novel therapeutic drugs can dramatically improve response rates and the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients with MM are considered to be incurable, and relapse owing to minimal residual disease (MRD) is the main cause of death among these patients. Therefore, new technologies to assess deeper responses are required. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) methods have been used to assess MRD. However, the lack of standardization of conventional MFC approaches has had a negative impact on its reproducibility. Recently, a next-generation MFC method (EuroFlow, NGF) has been developed by the EuroFlow Consortium and the International Myeloma Foundation (IMF) for a highly sensitive and standardized detection of MRD in MM. Aims: To compare the prognostic value of MRD detection in autografts in MM between NGS (Adaptive) and 8-color MFC method (EuroFlow, NGF), and also MRD levels between fresh and cryopreserved autografts. Methods: A total of 39 newly-diagnosed MM patients who underwent ASCT were enrolled in this study. Median age 60 at ASCT (range 41-69); males 22, females 17; ISS 1 (n=10), 2 (n=19), 3 (n=10). 10 patients showed high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (t(4;14) (n=9), del17p & t(4;14) (n=1)). The induction regimen was bortezomib-based chemotherapy. All patients received melphalan 200 mg/sqm as conditioning regimen before ASCT. 34 of 39 (87%) patients received maintenance therapy until progressive disease. The best response post-ASCT was as follows: 23sCR, 2CR, 12VGPR, 2PR. 39 autografts, one from each MM patient, were analyzed using NGF and NGS methods. The NGF method was based on a standardized lyse-wash-and-stain sample preparation protocol, the measurement of high numbers of cells and an optimized 8-color, 2-tubes, antibody panel, for accurate identification of plasma cells (PCs) and discrimination between phenotypically aberrant (aPC) and normal PC (nPC) (J Flores-Montero et al., Leukemia 2017). NGS-based MRD assessment was performed using Adaptive's standardized NGS-MRD Assay (Seattle, WA) (Martinez-Lopez et al., Blood 2014). To assess the correlation of MRD levels between fresh and cryopreserved autografts using NGF, 6 additional MM patients' autografts were used. Results: MRD levels in all 39 autografts were assessed using EuroFlow, while those in 32 of 39 (82%) were assessed with NGS due to limited availability of material for calibration. We identified abnormal plasma cells (aPC) in autografts based on multivariate analysis of individual cells from each patient (e.g. CD56+, CD19-, CyIgκ+, CD117+). Since there was a good correlation in MRD levels between fresh and thawed frozen autografts detected by EuroFlow (R=0.943, P=0.02), we assessed the MRD levels in thawed frozen autografts. For the MM MRD in autografts, the events from tube 1 and tube 2 were combined and a median of 7.3×106 (range: 2.2×106-37.6×106) events was acquired. The sensitivity of EuroFlow was 1×10-5-2×10-6 while that of NGS was 10-7 due to the high number of DNA derived from autografts (Takamatsu et al., Ann Oncol 2017). 21 of 39 (54%) cases were MRD positive by 8-color MFC while 22 of 32 (69%) cases were MRD positive by NGS. The correlation of MRD levels between 8-color MFC and NGS was relatively high (Fig. 1A). MRD negative by NGF (MRDMFC (-)) cases tended to show better PFS than MRDMFC (+) cases (P=0.145) (Fig. 1B) while MRD negative by NGS (MRDNGS (-)) cases showed significantly better PFS than MRDNGS (+) cases (P=0.03) (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, MRDMFC (-) MRDNGS (-) cases showed significantly better PFS than MRDMFC (-) MRDNGS (+) cases (P=0.01), but the PFS of MRDMFC (-) MRDNGS (+) cases was not different from that of MRDMFC (+) MRDNGS (+) cases (P=0.70). MRDMFC (-) and MRDNGS (-) cases showed better OS than MRDMFC (+) (P=0.14) and MRDNGS (+) (P=0.08) cases, respectively. Conclusions: Although EuroFlow is a fast and accurate method for detecting MRD of MM in autografts, in this study the NGS platform had a higher sensitivity and prognostic value than EuroFlow. The homogenous nature of the mobilized autograft relative to the focal nature of myeloma in bone marrow might provide a better sample to assess MRD. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Takamatsu: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Nakao:Novartis: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease in Autografts and Bone Marrow of Patients with Multiple Myeloma: 8-Color Multiparameter Flow Cytometry (EuroFlow-NGF) Vs. Next-Generation Sequencing

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Naoki Takezako ◽  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in conjunction with novel therapeutic drugs can dramatically improve response rates and the prognoses of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients with MM ultimately relapse due to minimal residual disease (MRD). Next-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (EuroFlow-NGF) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are currently the standard methods to assess MRD. Aims: To compare the prognostic value of MRD detection in autografts and bone marrow (BM) cells using 8-color MFC (EuroFlow-NGF) and NGS (Adaptive Biotechnologies), and also MRD levels between fresh and cryopreserved autografts using NGF. Methods: The study enrolled 52 newly-diagnosed MM patients who underwent ASCT. The median age ASCT was 61 (range 41-69) years and included 29 males and 23 females at ISS I (n = 17), II (n = 23), and III (n = 12). Of these, 18 patients harbored high-risk chromosomal abnormalities including t(4;14) (n = 15), del17p and t(4;14) (n = 2), and complex (n = 1). Bortezomib-based chemotherapy was used for induction together with melphalan at 140 mg/m2 (n = 1) and 200 mg/m2 (n = 51) for conditioning before ASCT. 39 of 52 (75%) patients received maintenance therapy until progressive disease. The best responses achieved post-ASCT included 30 sCR, 4 CR, 15 VGPR, and 3 PR. Forty autografts, one from each MM patient, were analyzed using NGF and NGS protocols, and BM cells at pre/post-ASCT and autografts derived from 16 patients were analyzed using NGS. The EuroFlow-NGF method uses standard sample preparation; large numbers of cells are evaluated using an optimized 8-color antibody panel that facilitates accurate identification of discrimination between phenotypically aberrant plasma cells (aPCs) and their normal counterparts (Flores-Montero et al., Leukemia 2017). NGS-based MRD assessment was performed using Adaptive's standardized NGS-MRD Assay (Seattle, WA) (Martinez-Lopez et al., Blood 2014). Eight additional autografts were used to assess MRD in both fresh and cryopreserved samples by NGF. Results: MRD was evaluated in 48 of 52 autografts (92%) using NGF and in 44 of 52 autografts (85%) using NGS. We identified aPCs in autografts based on multivariate analysis of individual cell populations (e.g., CD56+, CD19−, CyIgκ+, and CD117+). As the results of NGF revealed a strong correlation with respect to MRD in fresh vs. thawed autografts (r = 0.999, P &lt; 0.0001), MRD was subsequently evaluated in thawed autografts. The sensitivity of NGF was 1 × 10−5-2 × 10−6; the sensitivity of NGS was 1 × 10−6. 28 of 48 (58%) of the autografts were MRD-positive by NGF; 30 of 44 (68%) of the autografts were MRD-positive by NGS. MRD levels in autografts using NGF and NGS correlated with one another (r = 0.69, P &lt; 0.0001; Fig. 1A). MRD negative in autografts by NGF cases (MRDNGF (-)) and MRDNGS (-) tended to show better progression-free survival (PFS) than MRDNGF (+) (P = 0.195) and MRDNGS (+) (P = 0.156), respectively. Furthermore, MRDNGS (-) showed significantly better overall survival (OS) than MRDNGS (+) (P = 0.03) (Fig. 1C) while MRDNGF (-) showed better OS than MRDNGF (+) (P = 0.09) (Fig. 1B). Our data revealed only a minimal correlation between MRD in the autografts (median 1.1 × 10−5,range 0-7.29 × 10−4) and in the BM cells at pre-ASCT (median 5.05 × 10−3,range 6 × 10−6-2.64 × 10−1; r = 0.09, P = 0.7) or at post-ASCT (median 2.11 × 10−4,range 0-9.09 × 10−3; r = 0.14, P = 0.6); MRD detected in the autografts was &gt; 27 times lower than that detected in pre-ASCT BM cells, and MRD detected in the post-ASCT BM cells was &gt; 3 times lower than that detected in pre-ASCT BM cells except for one case in which the ratio was increased by two times. Interestingly, while MRD was detected in all BM cells at pre-ASCT (n = 16), 4 of 16 (25%) of these autografts were MRDNGS-negative. The median of MRD levels of the 4 cases in pre-ASCT and post-ASCT BM cells were 4.14 × 10−4 (range 6-583 × 10−6)and 1.8 × 10−5 (range 0-27 × 10−6), respectively. Conclusion: Although EuroFlow-NGF is a rapid and accurate method for detecting MRD, NGS was more sensitive and provided greater prognostic value than EuroFlow-NGF. Disclosures Takamatsu: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy, Research Funding. Takezako:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Nakao:Symbio: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals The Use of Next Generation Gene Sequencing to Measure Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with AL Amyloidosis and Low Plasma Cell Burden: A Feasibility Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4353-4353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayna Sarosiek ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Mariateresa Fulcinti ◽  
Allison P. Jacob ◽  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: AL amyloidosis is a bone marrow disorder in which clonal plasma cells produce light chains that misfold and deposit in vital organs, such as the kidneys and heart, leading to organ failure and eventual death. Treatment is directed towards the clonal plasma cell population in an effort to halt the production of toxic light chains and recuperate organ function. Pallidini et al. demonstrated that almost 50% of patients with AL amyloidosis who achieved a complete hematologic response to prior therapy had minimal residual disease (MRD) detectable in their bone marrow by multiparametric flow cytometry (MPF).1. Next generation gene sequencing (NGS) has been a successful tool in measuring MRD among patients with multiple myeloma2 though the data regarding its use in AL amyloidosis are limited. AL amyloidosis is a disease with a much smaller plasma cell burden at baseline (typically 5-10%), making the task of isolating an initial clonal sequence even more challenging. We sought to evaluate NGS as a method of isolating a clonal population of plasma cells among patients with systemic AL amyloidosis in a first-ever feasibility study. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had systemic AL amyloidosis and no clinical evidence of concurrent active multiple myeloma. In this study, feasibility was deemed successful if discovery of a clone could be achieved in 3 out of 10 of patients. Approximately five cc's of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were collected from each patient and processed for CD138 selection and DNA isolation/purification. De-identified samples were sent to Adaptive Biotech Inc. (Seattle, WA) for initial clonal identification using the ClonoSEQ immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) assay. Genomic DNA was amplified by implementing consensus primers targeting the IGH complete (IGH-VDJH) locus, IGH incomplete (IGH-DJH) locus, immunoglobulin κ locus (IGK) and immunoglobulin l locus (IGL). The amplified product was sequenced and a clone identified based on frequency. After proof of feasibility in the first 10 patients an additional 27 patients had initial clonal identification via the same process mentioned above. Results: In total, 37 patient samples underwent NGS via the ClonoSEQ IGH assay method. The median patient age was 66 years old (range: 44 to 83), 24% of which were female. All 37 patients had measurable disease based on serum electrophoresis and immunofixation and/or serum free light chain assay (Table 1). Four patients had no monoclonal protein detected on SIFE or UIFE and 13 patients had a normal sFLC ratio. Of the 33 patients with monoclonal disease on immunofixation, 12 patients had only a free lambda monoclonal protein and the remaining 21 patients had a clonal heavy chain with an associated light chain. Bone marrow biopsies demonstrated clonal plasmacytosis of 40% or lower. ClonoSEQ IGH assay identified trackable clones in 31 of 37 patients (84%) (see Table 1). Four patients had at least one trackable sequence (range: 1 to 5 sequences) in the peripheral blood and 29 patients had at least one trackable sequence in the bone marrow aspirate (range: 1 to 7 sequences). No correlation was seen between the detection of a clone and standard measures of plasma cell tumor burden (SIFE, SPEP, UIFE, UPEP, and sFLCs). Conclusion: NGS was successful in identifying an initial clone in 29 of 37 patients with systemic AL amyloidosis, four of which were detectable in the peripheral blood. Due to the low clonal burden in patients with AL amyloidosis, it is often difficult to assess disease status, especially post-treatment. These encouraging results may enhance disease monitoring and improve patient care in this rare disease. We are currently tracking MRD in the patients with identifiable clones as they receive systemic treatment, the results of which will be available for presentation in December 2019. REFERENCES 1. Palladini G, Massa M, Basset M, Russo F, Milani P, Foli A, et al. Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease By Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Can Hinder Recovery of Organ Damage in Patients with AL Amyloidosis Otherwise in Complete Response. Abstr 3261. 2016; 2. Ladetto M, Brüggemann M, Monitillo L, Ferrero S, Pepin F, Drandi D, et al. Next-generation sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR for minimal residual disease detection in B-cell disorders. Leukemia. 2014;28:1299-307. Table 1 Disclosures Sarosiek: Acrotech: Research Funding. Sanchorawala:Proclara: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Caelum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Jacob:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Other: shareholder. Munshi:Amgen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy.

Evolution of Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Testing for Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2274-2274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nischala Ammannagari ◽  
Paul K. Wallace ◽  
Theresa Hahn ◽  
Yali Zhang ◽  
Christine M. Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multiparametric Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Minimal residual disease (MRD) after autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to be an important predictor of clinical outcomes, suggesting that MRD negativity may be a new goal of therapy. Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is a commonly used method for MRD assessment, however this technique is still evolving and efforts are underway to standardize this testing. The key factors which enable detection of residual malignant plasma cells by MFC remain an area of active investigation. We performed a retrospective review of 172 consecutive MM patients who received AHCT between 10/1/2007 and 5/31/2015 at our institution and had undergone MRD assessment by MFC at day +100 post-AHCT. Day +100 post-AHCT response was determined using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (URC) and was correlated with MRD assessment as well as progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Data were collected on the specific MFC panel utilized, including the epitopes analyzed and the total plasma cell number (PCN) counted (normal and malignant PC). These variables were correlated with clinical outcomes including day +100 MM response, PFS and OS. Of 172 patients, 30 were MRD-positive, 133 MRD-negative, and 9 were equivocal at day +100 post-AHCT, the latter of which were excluded from further analyses. Day+100 MRD-negative status by MM response was: 31/37(84%) for VGPR, 35/41 (85%) for CR, and 42/42 (100%) for sCR. Patients who achieved a CR or sCR had improved PFS and OS rates compared with patients who achieved ≤VGPR: 3-year PFS: 61% (95% CI 49-74%) vs 46% (95% CI 32-59%), P=0.03; 3-year OS: 96% (95% CI 91-100%) vs 69% (95% CI 56-81%), P=0.005)). Patients with MRD-negative disease at day +100 post-AHCT had significantly superior PFS and OS compared to those with MRD-positive disease: 3-yr PFS 62% (95% CI 52-72%) vs 33% (95% CI 12-53%), P <0.0001) (Figure 1); 3-year OS 85% (95% CI 78-93%) vs 64% (95% CI 44-85%), P=0.004). There was no association between MRD status and age (<60 vs ≥60 years), sex, race (white vs other), performance status (KPS ≤80 vs ≥90), or subsequent transplant (P>0.1). The details of the four different MRD MFC panels are shown in Table 1. Panels C and D were compared, at a similar PCN level, but different epitopes tested, and found no significant difference in PFS or OS. Further analysis of PCN within the MRD-negative cohort revealed a trend towards improved 3-yr PFS rates with increasing numbers of PCN analyzed: 42% (95% CI 20-63%) for PCN<250,000, 68% (95% CI 52-83%) for PCN=250,000-500,000, 59% (95% CI 42-76%) for PCN >500,000-1,000,000 and 89% (78-100%) for PCN>1,000,000 (P=0.099) (Figure 2). The 3-yr OS rates for MRD-negative patients were higher for increasing PCNs analyzed, but the PCN categories were not statistically significantly different: 74% (95% CI 54-94%) for PCN<250,000, 88% (95% CI 77-99%) for PCN=250,000-500,000, 85% (95% CI 73-98%) for PCN >500,000-1,000,000 and 100% for PCN>1,000,000 (P=0.2). Sensitivity analysis revealed similar trends when a cut-off of above or below 500,000 or 1,000,000 was used. Our results confirm that achievement of MFC MRD negativity at day +100 post-AHCT is associated with improved PFS and OS. Factors such as the long-half lives of immunoglobulins, the quality of the bone marrow aspirate obtained, and the presence of occult extramedullary disease may account for the patients who were MRD negative but did not achieve a CR at day +100 post AHCT by IMWG URC. MRD assessment by MFC at our institution has evolved over time to include higher numbers of acquired and analyzed events. Notably, there was a trend towards improved outcomes with greater numbers of plasma cells analyzed, suggesting that continued development of MRD assessment by MFC should focus on increasing PCN analyzed in order to improve detection of residual MM clones. Disclosures Hahn: Novartis: Equity Ownership; NIH: Research Funding. McCarthy:The Binding Site: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gamida Cell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Holstein:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Simplified in-House Deep Sequencing Method of Inmunoglobulin Genes for Minimal Residual Dissease Quantification and Risk Stratification in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2972-2972
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sanchez-Vega ◽  
Santiago Barrio ◽  
Yanira Ruiz ◽  
Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Deep Sequencing ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Effective Technology ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract BACKGROUND: The first step to the cure of Multiple myeloma (MM) is achieving a clinical complete response (CR). However, a majority of patients relapse in part due to the persistence of low levels of pathological plasma cells after treatment (minimal residual disease (MRD)). In previous work, we have shown that Next generation sequencing (NGS) of immunoglobulin (IG) rearranged genes is an effective technology to identify and quantify pathological clonal cells in MM, and also it is a good predictor of patient prognosis. However, this technology is a proprietary multiplex PCR, uses a reference plasmid, it is performed at the centralized laboratories, and it is not broadly available. AIMS: To present a new in-house simplified method for quantification of IG gene clonal rearrangements by NGS. To test the suitability of the method for MRD detection in MM patients compared with 8-color high sensitivity Flow Cytometry (8c-MFC) data on a prospective way. To determine its capability as a predictor of patient prognosis. METHOD: We use deep sequencing to prospectively analyzed DNA from bone marrow samples of 58 patients (58 diagnostic samples and 80 follow-up samples) of patients included the GEM10 clinical trial. The method employs the primers developed by BIOMED-2 for IGH and IGK, and a set of specific mathematical and bioinformatics tools. First, we identified the clonal rearrangement(s) (clonotype) in the diagnostic sample by fragment analysis and NGS. Second, we searched the NGS sequences from follow-up samples to detect and quantitate (MRD) the presence of the clonotype identified in the diagnostic sample. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression free Survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The survival curves generated were compared with the log-rank test for trend. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the method is 10-5 for 150.000 cells. Reproducibility is >90%. The Spearman correlation coefficient between NGS and 8c-MFC data for diagnosis and follow-up samples was R=0.6903, p<0.0001. When we applied the criteria of 10-5 for NGS, discordant results were as follow: 121 cases were positive by both methods, 2 cases were positive (>10-5) by 8c-MFC but negative (<10-5) by NGS; 7 samples were negative (<10-5) by 8c-MFC but positive (>10-5) by NGS; and 7 cases were negative by both methods. Next we analyzed de correlation of OS and PFS with MRD levels determined by NGS and by 8c-MFC. For NGS data, median PFS (FigA) was 34 months for patients with values of MRD>10-5 vs not reached for patients with values of MRD<10-5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.69, P =0 .0109). Also, for 8c-MFC data, the patients with values of MRD<10-5 had longer PFS than those with values of MRD>10-5 (34 months versus 47; HR = 3.69, P =0 .0109). Median OS (FigB) was also significantly longer in MRD<10-5 (NGS) patients (not yet reached), compared to MRD>10-5 (NGS) patients (41 months, HR = 3.6, P =0.0495). For 8c-MFC we did not get a significant association (41 vs 50 months, HR=1.979, p=0.228). It should be noted that this comparison was made with the standard 8c-MFC and it is probable that the sensitivity will be inferior to that of the Next generation flow. There were no significant differences in terms of PFS between the data obtained by our in-house method, 8c-FCM and previous data obtained with LymphoSight technology. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirms that analysis of MRD levels determined by deep sequencing is capable of predict survival outcomes in myeloma patients. NGS sequencing of Ig genes is an effective technology to identify and quantify pathological clonal cells in MM. This approach is a methodological and economical alternative to MFC and other methods for MRD follow-up. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Paiva: Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BD Bioscience: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Binding Site: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; EngMab AG: Research Funding. Ocio:Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jassen: Honoraria. Mateos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy. San Miguel:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria.

Real-World Experience with Minimal Residual Disease Testing with Next Generation Flow Cytometry and Functional Imaging in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
David Böckle ◽  
Paula Tabares Gaviria ◽  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Janin Messerschmidt ◽  
Lukas Scheller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Functional Imaging ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) diagnostics in multiple myeloma (MM) are gaining increasing importance to determine response depth beyond complete remission (CR) since novel agents have shown to induce high rates of deep clinical responses. Moreover, recent reports indicated combining functional imaging with next generation flow cytometry (NGF) could be beneficial in predicting clinical outcome. This applies in particular to the subset of patients suffering from relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who tend to show a higher incidence of residual focal lesions despite serological response. Here, we report our institutions experience with implementing both functional imaging and NGF-guided MRD diagnostics in clinical practice. Methods: Our study included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and RRMM achieving VGPR, CR or sCR. Bone marrow aspirates were obtained for MRD-testing according to IMWG 2016 criteria. Samples were collected between July 2019 and July 2020 and analyzed with NGF (according to EuroFlowTM guidelines) at a sensitivity level of 10-5. Results were compared to functional imaging obtained with positron emission tomography (PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). High-risk disease was defined as presence of deletion 17p, translocation (14;16) or (4;14). Results: We included 66 patients with NDMM (n=39) and RRMM (n=27) who achieved VGPR or better. In patients with RRMM the median number of treatment lines was 2 (range 2-11). Fifteen patients suffered from high-risk disease. Median age at NGF diagnostics was 64 years (range 31-83). Among patients achieving VGPR (n=27), CR (n=10) and sCR (n=29) seventeen (26%) were MRD-negative by NGF testing. CR or better was significantly associated NGF MRD-negativity (p=0.04). Notably, rates of NGF MRD-negativity were similar among patients with NDMM (28%) and RRMM (26%). Even some heavily pretreated patients who underwent ≥ 4 lines of therapy achieved MRD-negativity on NGF (2 of 9). Functional imaging was performed in 46 (70%) patients with DW-MRI (n=22) and PET (n=26). Median time between NGF and imaging assessment was 2 days (range 0-147). Combining results from imaging and NGF, 12 out of 46 (26%) patients were MRD-negative with both methods (neg/neg). Three patients displayed disease activity as measured with both, imaging and NGF (pos/pos). Twenty-nine of the remaining patients were MRD-positive only according to NGF (pos/neg), while two patients were positive on imaging only (neg/pos). More patients demonstrated combined MRD-negativity on NGF and imaging (neg/neg) in the NDMM setting than in RRMM (32% versus 19%). We also observed that 30% of the patients with high-risk genetics showed MRD-negativity on both imaging and NGF. Of note, none of the patients with very advanced disease (≥4 previous lines) was MRD-negative on both techniques. Conclusion In the clinical routine, MRD diagnostics could be used to tailor maintenance and consolidation approaches for patients achieving deep responses by traditional IMWG criteria. Our real-world experience highlights that MRD-negativity can be achieved in patients suffering from high-risk disease and also in late treatment lines, supporting its value as endpoint for clinical trials. However, our data also support MRD diagnostics to be combined with functional imaging at least in the RRMM setting to rule out residual focal lesions. Future studies using MRD for clinical decision-making are highly warranted. Disclosures Einsele: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rasche:Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Skyline Dx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: an important tool in clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Gozzetti ◽  
Monica Bocchia
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Future Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual

: Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection represents a great advancement in multiple myeloma. New drugs are now available that increase depth of response. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the use of next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) to search for MRD in clinical trials. Best sensitivity thresholds have to be confirmed, as well as timing to detect it. MRD has proven as the best prognosticator in many trials and promises to enter also in clinical practice to guide future therapy.

scholarly journals T Cells Genetically Modified to Express an Anti–B-Cell Maturation Antigen Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cause Remissions of Poor-Prognosis Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
pp. 2267-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer N. Brudno ◽  
Irina Maric ◽  
Steven D. Hartman ◽  
Jeremy J. Rose ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Maturation ◽  
B Cell Maturation ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
B Cell Maturation Antigen

Purpose Therapies with novel mechanisms of action are needed for multiple myeloma (MM). T cells can be genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), which are artificial proteins that target T cells to antigens. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is expressed by normal and malignant plasma cells but not normal essential cells. We conducted the first-in-humans clinical trial, to our knowledge, of T cells expressing a CAR targeting BCMA (CAR-BCMA). Patients and Methods Sixteen patients received 9 × 106 CAR-BCMA T cells/kg at the highest dose level of the trial; we are reporting results of these 16 patients. The patients had a median of 9.5 prior lines of MM therapy. Sixty-three percent of patients had MM refractory to the last treatment regimen before protocol enrollment. T cells were transduced with a γ-retroviral vector encoding CAR-BCMA. Patients received CAR-BCMA T cells after a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Results The overall response rate was 81%, with 63% very good partial response or complete response. Median event-free survival was 31 weeks. Responses included eradication of extensive bone marrow myeloma and resolution of soft-tissue plasmacytomas. All 11 patients who obtained an anti-MM response of partial response or better and had MM evaluable for minimal residual disease obtained bone marrow minimal residual disease–negative status. High peak blood CAR+ cell levels were associated with anti-MM responses. Cytokine-release syndrome toxicities were severe in some cases but were reversible. Blood CAR-BCMA T cells were predominantly highly differentiated CD8+ T cells 6 to 9 days after infusion. BCMA antigen loss from MM was observed. Conclusion CAR-BCMA T cells had substantial activity against heavily treated relapsed/refractory MM. Our results should encourage additional development of CAR T-cell therapies for MM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document