Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Idelalisib in a Community Oncology Setting

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA, Zydelig®) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved in the U.S. as an oral monotherapy for relapsed / refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) after at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. IDELA's regulatory approval was based on a phase 2, open-label clinical trial in 125 patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Gopal et al., NEJM, 2014) and outcomes in the FL subgroup were published by Salles et al. (Haematologica, 2017). The current study evaluates the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients treated with IDELA for R/R FL in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with R/R FL (grades 1, 2, and 3a) and treated with IDELA within the US Oncology Network (USON) between 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data were obtained from USON's structured electronic health records' system, iKnowMed (iKM)TM. Manual chart review (ChR) was used to determine physician response and to confirm IDELA treatment patterns. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Descriptive statistics were generated for outcomes of interest, including duration of therapy (DoT), median follow-up, and adverse event (AE) frequency. Results: A total of 124 patients with FL and prescribed IDELA were identified in iKM TM. After Chr confirming the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma diagnosis and initiation of IDELA, 88 patients were retained for analysis. Median age of patients was 68.9 years, with 52.3% female and the majority white and non-Hispanic (90.9% and 93.2%, respectively, Table 1). The most common regimens immediately prior to IDELA initiation were bendamustine + rituximab (22.7%), rituximab (17%), and rituximab maintenance (11.4%). Eighty-six (97.7%) patients had co-morbidities categorized as vascular (50%), endocrine (33%), respiratory (13.6%), or cardiac (12.5%). Thirteen (14.8%), 21 (23.9%), and 54 (61.4%) patients initiated IDELA in second line (2L), 3L, and >4L, respectively. Baseline lab values at IDELA initiation were similar regardless of line of therapy (LOT). mDOT was 5.5 mos. for the entire population and was similar across all LOTs (4.1 mos., 6.1 mos., and 5.5 mos. in 2L, 3L, and >4L, respectively). AEs were noted in 45.5% with the most common being gastrointestinal (31.8%) and dermatologic (10.2%). Respiratory and infectious AEs were noted in 2.3% and 1.1%, respectively, although Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis was rarely prescribed (2.3%). Toxicity as a reason for IDELA discontinuation varied in frequency across LOT and was more common in 2L compared to 3L and >4L (91.7% compared to 43.8% and 46.9%, respectively). With a median follow-up of 18.6 months for the population, the mPFS was 11.4 mos. [95%CI: 8.5,17.0] and mOS was 32.5 mos. [95% CI: 25.3,NR]. Stratified by LOT, median follow-up time, mOS, and mPFS were greater in 2L (30.8 mos., NR [95% CI: 27.37,NR], and 29.0 mos. [95% CI: 8.6,NR], respectively) than in 3L or >4L (3L: 17.9 mos., 29.4 mos. [95%CI: 18.6,NR], and 17.5 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,NR]; >4L: 16.5 mos., 25.3 mos. [95%CI: 13.5.,NR], and 8.6 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,12.6], respectively, Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion: Findings from this analysis suggest that R/R FL patients treated with IDELA in a real-world setting experience a similar mDOT and mPFS as those treated in the clinical trial setting (Salles et al., Haematologica, 2017). Patients treated in 2L demonstrated longer PFS and OS compared to later lines, but also experienced increased IDELA discontinuation due to toxicity, perhaps reflecting a lower incidence of progressive disease in earlier treatment lines, or a more immunocompetent population leading to higher rates of autoimmune AEs. Use of PJP prophylaxis in IDELA-treated patients was uncommon, an observation suggesting an opportunity for provider education. Our findings enhance available data on relapsed FL patient outcomes in real-world clinical practice and support the use of IDELA in patients with R/R FL after at least 2 systemic therapies. Disclosures Andorsky: Gilead: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:McKesson: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Robert:McKesson: Employment. Awan:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Idelalisib is a PI3 kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed follicular B-cell lymphoma who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Some patients in this observational study used Idelalisib after one prior systemic treatment.

Download Full-text

Health Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with the Use of Obinutuzumab-Based Regimens Are Similar to Rituximab-Based Regimens for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123408 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4721-4721

Author(s):

Tu My To ◽

Keith L. Dawson ◽

Anthony S Masaquel ◽

Arpamas Seetasith

Keyword(s):

Drug Treatment ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Real World ◽

Specific Drug ◽

First Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Total Cost ◽

Claims Database ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: Obinutuzumab (GA101; G), a fully humanized, glycoengineered, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved in the US for the first-line (1L) treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL). Despite the superior efficacy of G plus chemotherapy (G-chemo) versus rituximab (R) plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in patients with previously untreated FL demonstrated in the Phase III, randomized GALLIUM study (NCT01332968; Marcus et al. N Engl J Med 2017), information on healthcare resource use (HRU) and real-world costs with G in previously untreated FL patients is limited. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine HRU and costs for G-based and R-based therapies for the 1L treatment of FL using a US claims database. Methods: The data source for this study was the PharMetrics Plus Commercial Claims database. Adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with FL between February 1, 2015 and September 30, 2018 and who began any treatment for FL between February 1, 2016 and September 30, 2018 were included. The first FL treatment date within this selection window was denoted the index date. Patients were required to have ≥12 months of pre-index and ≥3 months of post-index continuous study enrolment, and to have at least one FL diagnosis on or during the 12-month pre-index period. Patients with FL treatment during the 12-month pre-index period were excluded in order to select only previously untreated patients. HRU and cost data during the 1L treatment period were descriptive and categorized by HRU category. Costs are in 2018 US dollars ($) and standardized as per patient per month (PPPM) costs. FL treatment determination was based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Results: A total of 1584 FL patients with ≥3 months follow up were analyzed. Overall, 26 patients received G-chemo (any combination) as their 1L treatment, 208 patients received R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), 391 patients received R-Benda (bendamustine) and 17 patients received R-CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone); the remaining 942 patients received other regimens (predominantly other R combinations). Data are reported for those patients who received G-chemo, R-CHOP, R-Benda or R-CVP as 1L therapy (n=642; 281 females, 361 males). Baseline patient characteristics were similar for most variables across treatment groups. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 56.9 (9.7) years and all patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of ≥2 (mean [SD]: 2.9 [1.9]). Mean (SD) patient follow-up was 14.1 (8.0) months and mean (SD) duration of 1L treatment was 7.0 (5.1) months. A summary of all-cause HRU in patients receiving 1L treatment is provided by treatment category (Figure 1A). The proportion of patients with at least one hospitalization was highest with R-CHOP (23.6%). The proportion of patients with at least one emergency room (ER) visit was highest with R-Benda (29.4%). Mean (SD) total all-cause healthcare costs PPPM during 1L treatment were comparable among G-chemo, R-CHOP and R-Benda (Figure 1B) and lowest with R-CVP ($17,874 [$13,465]). Medical costs (mean [SD]) were highest for R-Benda ($27,716 [$19,610] PPPM) and lowest for R-CVP ($17,373 [$12,908] PPPM). G-chemo was associated with the lowest pharmacy costs ($76 [$107] PPPM) (Figure 1B). Mean (SD) total cost of FL drug treatment PPPM was $16,028 ($9,942) for G-chemo, $11,684 ($6,122) for R-CHOP and $12,108 ($8,794) for R-CVP. Mean (SD) total cost of FL drug treatment PPPM was highest with R-Benda ($21,263 [$15,328]). G-specific drug costs PPPM ($9,643 [$6,071]) were similar to R-specific drug costs ($9,992 [$5,234] R-CHOP; $9,083 [$5,859] R-Benda; and $10,702 [$7,717] R-CVP). Conclusions: Our results depict real-world HRU and costs associated with G and commonly used 1L regimens for FL. In this setting, HRU and costs associated with G-chemo were comparable with R-chemo, supporting the use of G-chemo as a treatment option for patients with previously untreated FL. The study findings are limited by the small sample size of the G-chemo patient cohort (n=26) and short follow-up; to address this, an updated analysis incorporating a larger number of patients is planned. Disclosures To: Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dawson:Roche/Genentech: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Masaquel:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Seetasith:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Mature Follow up from a Phase 2 Study of PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Patients with Double (Rituximab and Alkylating agent)-Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1708.1708 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1708-1708 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Ajay K. Gopal ◽

Brad S. Kahl ◽

Sven de Vos ◽

Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽

Stephen J. Schuster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-alkylator combinations are the standard therapies for patients (pts) with iNHL, however, refractory disease nearly uniformly develops. Once iNHL becomes double-refractory to both rituximab + alkylating agents, there are limited options to induce durable remissions. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity in double-refractory iNHL (Gopal NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (Zydelig®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. Based on these encouraging initial results, we now describe long-term follow up, safety, and remission durations of this double-refractory iNHL population treated with idelalisib. Methods: Eligible iNHL pts included those with measurable disease refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of index therapy, confirmed by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007, and Owen 2013). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 20 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Enrolled pts (N = 125) had a median age of 64 years and included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], including bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and autologous transplant (n=14). 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. 38 pts (30%) had elevated LDH, and 33 pts (26%) had bulky disease >7 cm. The median time to progression from last prior therapy was 3.9 months. With a median exposure of 11.1 months (range 0.7 to 35.4), the overall response rate (ORR) is 56% (95% CI = 46.8-64.9) with 70 responders, comprising 12 CRs (9.6%), 58 PRs (46.4%). The median time to response was 1.9 months (time of first evaluation) and time to CR was 4.5 months. There were 43 pts with stable disease (SD) (34.4%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden. ORR for iNHL subtypes is: FL (54%), SLL (61%), MZL (47%), and LPL/WM (70%). CR rate for iNHL subtypes is: FL (14%), SLL (4%), MZL (7%), and LPL/WM (0%). Among responders, median DOR is 13.9 (0.03-31.3) months. DOR for iNHL subtypes in months (Figure 1) is: FL 11.8, SLL 13.9, MZL 18.4, and LPL/WM (not yet reached). Median PFS for all pts is 11.0 months, in comparison to a median PFS of the last prior regimen of 3.9 months (p<.0001). The median PFS for individual subtypes in months was: FL 11.0, SLL11.1, MZL 6.6, and LPL/WM 22.2. The median overall survival of all patients was 30.8 months. The adverse events include (total%/≥ grade 3%) diarrhea/colitis (50/18), fatigue (30/2), nausea (31/2), cough (32/0), pyrexia (30/2), dyspnea (18/5), rash (14/2), pneumonia (14/11), and pneumonitis (4/3). Based on central laboratory measurements, Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 18 pts (14%). Drug was temporarily held in these pts, and 11/15 pts (73%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. Overall, 30 pts (24%) have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: The prolonged administration of idelalisib was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in inducing and maintaining remissions in double-refractory iNHL population with an ORR of 56%, PFS of 11 months, and DOR of 13.9 months. The response rate and long term duration of responses in the small number of subjects with LPL/WM is very promising, and will be evaluated in larger trials of this disease. The observed disease control compared to prior regimens suggests the potential for prolonged clinical benefit in this challenging patient population with unmet medical need. Figure 1: Duration of Response by Disease Group. Figure 1:. Duration of Response by Disease Group. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Martin:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Viardot:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Blum:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Goy:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Davies:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zinzani:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dreyling:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorensen:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Molecular Stratification in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma - Results of the Pomalidomide Mukseven (NCT02406222) Biomarker Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123640 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4327-4327

Author(s):

James Croft ◽

Andrew Hall ◽

Amy L Sherborne ◽

Katrina Walker ◽

Sidra Ellis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

T Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains challenging as durable remissions are achieved in patient sub-groups only. Identifying patients that are likely to benefit prior to or early after starting relapse treatments remains an unmet need. MUKseven is a trial specifically designed to investigate and validate biomarkers for treatment optimization in a 'real-world' RRMM population. Design In the randomized multi-center phase 2 MUKseven trial, RRMM patients (≥2 prior lines of therapy, exposed to proteasome inhibitor and lenalidomide) were randomized 1:1 to cyclophosphamide (500 mg po d1, 8, 15), pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg; if ≥75 years 20 mg; d1, 8, 15, 21) (CPomD) or PomD and treated until progression. All patients were asked to undergo bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) bio-sampling at baseline, cycle 1 day 14 (C1D14, on-treatment) and relapse. For biomarker discovery and validation, IGH translocations were profiled by qRT-PCR, copy number aberrations by digital MLPA (probemix D006; MRC Holland), GEP by U133plus2.0 array (Affymetrix), PD protein markers by IHC and PB T-cell subsets by flow cytometry for all patients with sufficient material. Primary endpoint was PFS, secondary endpoints included response, OS, safety/toxicity and biomarker validation. Original planned sample size was 250 patients but due to a change in UK standard of care during recruitment with pomalidomide becoming available, a decision was made to stop recruitment early. Results In total, 102 RRMM patients were randomized 1:1 between March 2016 and February 2018. Trial entry criteria were designed to include a real-world RRMM population, permitting transfusions and growth factor support. Median age at randomization was 69 years (range 42-88), 28% of patients had received ≥5 prior lines of therapy (median: 3). Median follow-up for this analysis was 13.4 months (95% CI: 12.0-17.5). 16 patients remained on trial at time of analysis (median number of cycles: 19.5; range 8-28). More patients achieved ≥PR with CPomD compared to PomD: 70.6% (95% CI: 56.2-82.5%) vs. 47.1% (CI: 32.9-61.5%) (P=0.006). Median PFS was 6.9 months (CI: 5.7-10.4) for CPomD vs. 4.6 months (CI: 3.5-7.4) for PomD, which was not significantly different as per pre-defined criteria. Follow-up for OS is ongoing and will be presented at the conference. High-risk genetic aberrations were found at following frequencies: t(4;14): 6%, t(14;16)/t(14;20): 2%, gain(1q): 45%, del(17p): 13%. Non-high risk lesions were present as follows: t(11;14): 22%, hyperdiploidy: 44%. Complete information on all high-risk genetic markers was available for 71/102 patients, of whom 12.7% had double-hit high-risk (≥2 adverse lesions), 46.5% single-hit high-risk (1 adverse lesion) and 40.8% no risk markers, as per our recent meta-analysis in NDMM (Shah V, et al., Leukemia 2018). Median PFS was significantly shorter for double-hit: 3.4 months (CI: 1.0-4.9) vs. single-hit: 5.8 months (CI: 3.7-9.0) or no hit: 14.1 months (CI: 6.9-17.3) (P=0.005) (Figure 1A). GEP was available for 48 patients and the EMC92 high-risk signature, present in 19% of tumors, was associated with significantly shorter PFS: 3.4 months (CI: 2.0-5.7) vs. 7.4 (CI: 3.9-15.1) for EMC92 standard risk (P=0.037). Pharmacodynamic (PD) profiling of cereblon and CRL4CRBN ubiquitination targets (including Aiolos, ZFP91) in BM clots collected at baseline and C1D14 is currently ongoing. Preliminary results for the first 10 patients demonstrate differential change of nuclear Aiolos (Figure 1C), with a major decrease in Aiolos H-scores in 7/10 patients from baseline to C1D14 and reconstitution at relapse. T-cell PB sub-sets were profiled at baseline and C1D14 by flow cytometry. Specific sub-sets increased with therapy from baseline to C1D14, e.g. activated (HLA-DR+) CD4+ T-cells, as reported at last ASH. CD4+ T-cell % at baseline was associated with shorter PFS in these analyses in a multi-variable Cox regression model (P=0.005). PD and T-cell biomarker results will be updated and integrated with molecular tumor characteristics and outcome. Discussion Our results demonstrate that molecular markers validated for NDMM predict treatment outcomes in RRMM, opening the potential for stratified delivery of novel treatment approaches for patients with a particularly high unmet need. Additional immunologic and PD biomarkers are currently being explored. Disclosures Croft: Celgene: Other: Travel expenses. Hall:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Walker:Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research funding to Institution. Pawlyn:Amgen, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Amgen, Celgene, Takeda: Consultancy. Flanagan:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Garg:Janssen, Takeda, Novartis: Other: Travel expenses; Novartis, Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Couto:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Wang:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boyd:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pierceall:Celgene: Employment. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cook:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi, Karyopharm, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squib, GlycoMimetics, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi: Honoraria. Brown:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Other: Research funding to Institution. Kaiser:Takeda, Janssen, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene, Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Abbvie, Karyopharm: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Epidemiology of PNH and Real-World Treatment Patterns Following an Incident PNH Diagnosis in the US

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125867 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3407-3407 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jessica J Jalbert ◽

Umesh Chaudhari ◽

Haixin Zhang ◽

Jonathan Weyne ◽

Jamile M. Shammo

Keyword(s):

Incidence Rate ◽

Real World ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Procedure Codes ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired, life-threatening blood disease. While PNH is known to be a rare disease, the incidence and prevalence of the condition has been described only in a few small studies. In addition, while the International PNH registry is a rich source of data on real-world PNH patients globally, it is not possible to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH directly from the registry. As complement inhibitors are becoming the standard of care for PNH treatment, we also sought to explore how patients are managed following an incident PNH diagnosis. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH and to describe real-world treatment patterns among patients newly diagnosed with PNH in the United States (US). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Truven US MarketScan Commercial/Medicare data (1 Jan 2015 to 30 June 2018), an employer-sponsored insurance claims database including annually approximately 30 million insured patients and their dependents' complete longitudinal records of inpatient services, outpatient services, and prescription drug claims covered under a variety of fee-for-service and capitated health plans. While these data are considered nationally representative of Americans with employer-provided health insurance, data come mainly from large employers. To estimate prevalence, we identified patients with ≥ 1 PNH diagnosis (ICD10: D59.5) among persons continually enrolled in the databases in 2017. To estimate incidence, we required ≥1-year of baseline enrolment and no PNH diagnosis or eculizumab exposure, identified using national drug codes [NDC] or procedure codes for drug administration, during the baseline period. Person-time accrued post-baseline until PNH diagnosis, end of study period, or disenrollment. We stratified incidence and prevalence estimates by age and sex and described patients with incident PNH in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and past-year healthcare resource utilization. Using Kaplan-Meier estimators, we estimated incidence of eculizumab initiation, timing of initiation, treatment duration, and risk of discontinuation/treatment holiday (>42 days between eculizumab exposures [i.e. 14-day exposure period + 28-day grace period between infusions], the equivalent of missing 2 infusions assuming a bi-weekly infusion schedule for eculizumab) following the incident PNH diagnosis. While accounting for censoring, we also investigated patterns of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, identified using procedure codes, in terms of incidence and timing of first transfusion following an incident PNH diagnosis. Results: The prevalence of PNH varied little between 2016 and 2017, from 12 to 13 per 1,000,000. The incidence rate over the study period was 5.7 per 1,000,000 person-years, representing 257 incident PNH cases. The incidence rate of PNH increased with age and was similar across sex. At diagnosis, mean age was 50.0 years (standard deviation [SD]: 18.6), 3.1% (8/257) were less than 18 years, 52.1% were women, 19.5% had a past-year diagnosis of aplastic anemia, 8.2% had a past-year diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, 14.0% had a past-year RBC transfusion, and 31.5% had been hospitalized in the past-year. Over a mean follow-up time of 385.6 days (SD: 253.2), 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3-14.1%) of patients initiated eculizumab on average 60.5 days (SD: 55.9) from PNH diagnosis. At 1 year, about one third of patients discontinued eculizumab or had taken a treatment holiday; average treatment duration was 328.2 days (SD:245.4). Cumulative incidence of RBC transfusions at 6 months and 1 year was 14.6% (10.1-18.9%) and 17.4% (12.2-22.3%), respectively. On average, the first RBC transfusion occurred within 63.6 days (SD: 114.4) of an incident PNH diagnosis. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, only a minority of patients recently diagnosed with PNH are initiated on eculizumab. Among PNH patients treated with eculizumab, less than 70% remain on treatment after 1 year. Findings must be interpreted in the context of limitations including lack of information on clone size, symptom burden, measures of disease activity, or bone marrow failure state which may affect treatment course. Future studies should explore factors affecting eculizumab initiation and persistence on treatment. Disclosures Jalbert: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chaudhari:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weyne:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shammo:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onconova: Research Funding; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astex Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Adverse Events Among Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Using Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112695 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3585-3585

Author(s):

Sudeep Karve ◽

Joanna C Huang ◽

Nikhil Ranade ◽

Sanchita Porwal ◽

Monali Desai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Cardiovascular Events ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

First Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a myeloproliferative neoplasm is primarily treated using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Several next-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib) have been approved since the first approval of imatinib in 2002. With varying safety profiles, data on non-trial long-term TKI use and associated adverse events (AE) can aid in clinical decision making. Using population based data sources the current study assessed treatment patterns and AEs in a non-trial setting among TKI users with CML. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using MarketScan Commercial, and Supplemental Medicare databases (2012-2016). Data includes details on medical (e.g., date of diagnosis, diagnosis codes, procedures) and pharmacy (e.g., drug dose, duration, strength) utilization for over 90 million individuals enrolled in employer-sponsored health-plans in the US. Patients with a prescription claim for TKI along with at least 2 medical claims on separate dates with a diagnosis code for CML (ICD-9-CM: 205.10 - 205.12; ICD-10: C92.10-C92.12) were selected. Patients were aged ≥18 years at TKI initiation and had continuous health plan enrollment ≥6 months before and ≥6 months after TKI initiation. Patients were followed from TKI initiation until health plan disenrollment or end of database, whichever occurred earlier (defines follow-up period). TKI treatment patterns including initial dose, initial and total TKI treatment duration, treatment switching and discontinuation were assessed. Frequency and proportion for incident (i.e. newly observed conditions) AEs including rash, bleeding, gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), tumor lysis syndrome and cardiovascular events (CHF, arrhythmia, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, cerebrovascular events) and post-AE outcomes (switching, discontinuation, dose reduction) were assessed. AE list was developed based on commonly reported events in clinical trials involving TKIs for CML and clinical judgement. All analyses were descriptive in nature. RESULTS: Study included 2,213 CML patients with mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 55 (15) years, of which 55% were male and 55% had ≥2 co-morbid conditions. Post CML diagnosis, first-line of TKI initiated was imatinib (41%), dasatinib (36%), nilotinib (22%), and bosutinib and ponatinib (1% each). The average (SD) follow-up duration post TKI initiation was 607 (442) days. Mean (SD) duration of first-line TKI prescription was 392 (383) days. 61% of patients continued initial TKI during the follow-up period, 7% discontinued and 32% switched/re-initiated TKI (Figure 1). 39.2% patients had at least 1 incident AE while on index TKI therapy. GI disorders (20.4%) were the most commonly observed AE, followed by cardiovascular events (14.6%), rash (8.4%), bleeding (8.0%), and TLS (0.2%). The average (SD) time to GI disorders, bleeding, cardiovascular event, rash, and TLS was 242 (274) days, 238 (272) days, 219 (261) days, 222 (255) days, and 223 (285) days, respectively. The rates of discontinuation, treatment switch or dose reduction were largely similar across all AEs (Figure 2). The mean duration on any TKI (all-lines of therapy) was 561 (438) days. The most commonly observed AEs on while of TKI therapy (irrespective of line of therapy) were GI disorders (24.7%), followed by cardiovascular events (17.3%), rash (11.5%), bleeding (10.1%) and TLS (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The study helps address the current literature gap of long-term treatment patterns and AE among patients with CML using TKIs in a non-clinical trial setting. During follow-up 46% patients experienced at least 1 incident AE while on TKI therapy. Majority of patients (61%) continued same TKI therapy following AE. The type and rate of AE were similar following first-line therapy and anytime on TKI (any-line) during the follow-up period. Study results may not be comparable to clinical trial findings due to certain limitations; e.g., this study did not capture all adverse events but assessed incident AE based on a pre-specified list. Also, due to limitations of administrative claims data, assessment of AE grade was not feasible. However, findings from this study can complement clinical trial data in selection of TKIs for long-term use in real-world setting and can also be of value in selecting TKIs for future clinical studies involving novel combinations in CML. Disclosures Karve: AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huang:ZS Associates: Employment; Novo Nordisk Inc: Equity Ownership; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Ranade:ZS Associates: Employment. Porwal:ZS Associates: Employment. Desai:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rosenberg:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Real-World Differences in Characteristics and Survival of Relapsed AML Patients with and without Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118621 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2297-2297

Author(s):

Abdalla Aly ◽

Saurabh Ray ◽

Anuj Shah ◽

Marc Botteman

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

To Receive

Abstract Background: Some AML patients, particularly those relapsing rapidly, may not get a chance to receive a potentially curative stem cell transplant (SCT) due to early death, among other reasons. This study compares the differences in characteristics and survival of relapsed AML patients with and without SCT, as observed in a real-world setting. Methods: Relapsed AML patients aged 66-75 years were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database by medical claims associated with ICD-9 code 205.02 (2009-2014). Patients were followed from relapse to the earliest of death, SCT, or end of follow-up. Baseline characteristics were compared between relapsed AML patients with and without SCT. The SCT rates were estimated after adjusting for the competing risk of death. The Fine and Gray method was used to identify predictors of receiving SCT and were reported in terms of sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan-Meier estimates (reported in terms of median and 6-, 12-, and 24-months survival rates, tested with a log Rank test statistic) and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, race, Census region, marital status, urban location, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and diagnosis year (reported in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI) was used to assess the difference in survival between patients with and without SCT. Results: Of the 474 relapsed AML patients (median age, 70 years, median follow up, 4.4 months, male, 55%) included in the study, 8% received SCT, 80% died without having SCT and 12% were administratively censored. Patients were less likely to receive SCT if they were 71-75 years old (SHR 0.28, 95% CI (0.19 to 0.41; P <.001) and had higher comorbidity with CCI >3 (SHR 0.16, 95% CI (0.06 to 0.44; P <.001). The median overall survival was 16.1 months for patients with SCT vs. 4.1 months for those without SCT (log rank P <.001; adjusted HR 0.52, 95% CI (047 - 0.57; P <.001)). The 6-, 12-, and 24-month overall survival for all relapsed AML patients was 42%, 26%, and 12%, respectively. For patients with SCT, the 6-, 12-, and 24-month overall survival was 84%, 59%, and 43%, respectively. For patients without SCT, the 6-, 12-, and 24-month overall survival was 39%, 23%, and 12%, respectively. Conclusions: Relapsed AML patients who received SCT experienced significantly longer survival compared to those who did not receive SCT in this elderly study population. However, only 8% of all relapsed AML patients received SCT. Therapies that bridge more patients to SCT are expected to improve overall survival in this high unmet need population. Disclosures Aly: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmerit International: Employment, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Incorporated: Research Funding. Ray:Daiichi Sankyo Incorporated: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmerit International: Employment, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Incorporated: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Botteman:Daiichi Sankyo Incorporated: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmerit International: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Other: Provided consulting to Bioverativ, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Durable Responses Following Treatment with the PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Combination with Rituximab, Bendamustine, or Both, in Recurrent Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase I/II Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3063.3063 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3063-3063 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Sven de Vos ◽

Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian Flinn ◽

Marshall T. Schreeder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

B Cell ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity as monotherapy in recurrent (Flinn, Blood 2014) or refractory iNHL subjects (Gopal, NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (ZYDELIG®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. This study evaluated Idelalisib in combination with rituximab, bendamustine, or both. We now present mature safety and response data with up to 4 years of follow up. Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory indolent NHL. Idelalisib (Z) was administered continuously with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2 given weekly for 8 doses) (R/Z regimen), with bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2, for 6 cycles) (B/Z regimen), or in combination with R (375 mg/m2, on Day 1) and B (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle, for 6 cycles (BR/Z regimen). Initial subjects in the R/Z and B/Z groups (n=8 each), received Idelalisib 100 mg/dose BID. Thereafter, all patients received an Idelalisib dose of 150 mg/dose BID. Tumor response was evaluated according to standard criteria (Cheson 2007). The cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 26 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Between April 2010 and May 2012, 79 subjects with iNHL were enrolled (including 59 with FL, 15 with SLL, and 5 with MZL). Median [range] age was 61 [37-84] years. At baseline patients had elevated beta-2 microglobulin (59%), stage IV disease (58%), bulky adenopathy (> 5cm) (48%), anemia (Hgb <12gm/dL) (41%), and elevated LDH (28%). Patients had a median number of 3 prior therapies (range 1 -11). Most patients had received a rituximab-containing regimen (98%), an alkylating agent (86%), or an anthracycline (53%). Approximately 46% of patients were refractory to their last pre-study therapy and 58% of patients were refractory to rituximab. Frequent adverse events (all grade %/grade 3-4 %) included pyrexia (54/3), nausea (44/0), fatigue (43/4), diarrhea (39/15), rash (38/9), cough (35/0), pneumonia (22/19), pneumonitis (4/3), and febrile neutropenia (3/3). Laboratory abnormalities included lymphopenia (75/62), neutropenia (56/41), anemia (47/10), thrombocytopenia (42/8), and serum transaminase elevations (56/17). Drug was temporarily held for Grade 3/4 ALT/AST elevations, and 8/13 pts (62%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. 27% of pts have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Of the 79 subjects enrolled, 64 had an objective response with an ORR of 81% (95% CI: 70.6-89.0). Complete responses were demonstrated in 26 patients (33%), and partial responses in 38 patients (48%). In addition, 7 patients had stable disease (9%), and 4 patients had progressive disease (5%) as best response on-study. Four patients were non-evaluable, as they did not have follow up CT scans. By treatment subgroup, the ORR were (n=24/32) 75% (95% CI: 57-89) for R/Z, (n=29/33) 88% (95% CI: 72-97) for B/Z, and (n=11/14) 79% (95% CI: 49-95) BR/Z. The CR rates were 25% (n=8/32), 36% (n=12/33), and 43% (n=6/14) respectively; stable disease was noted in 4/32 patients (13%), 3/33 patients (9%), and 0/14 patients in the three groups respectively. ORR/CR by iNHL subtype is: FL (81%/39%), SLL (73%/13%), and MZL (100%/20%). The median progression-free survival is 32.8 months. Median PFS for R/Z group is 29.7 months, B/Z group 32.8 months, and BR/Z group 37.1 months. The PFS at 24 months was 55%, 64%, and 71% for the R/Z, B/Z, and BR/Z groups respectively. The median duration of response has not yet been reached. Median DOR for the R/Z group is 28.6 months, for the B/Z, and BR/Z groups it is not yet reached. The DOR at 24 months was 65%, 67%, and 64% for the R/Z, B/Z, and BR/Z groups respectively. Figure 1: Median overall survival is not yet reached. Conclusions: Idelalisib in combination therapy was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in this recurrent iNHL population with an ORR of 81%, and CR rate of 33%. Responses are durable beyond 2 years, supporting further evaluation of these combination regimens. Phase 3 trials evaluating the efficacy of Idelalisib in combination with R or BR in iNHL are ongoing (NCT01732913, NCT01732929). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures de Vos: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Fowler:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boccia:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Furman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns Among Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients in the United States Veteran Population (2010-2015)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5952.5952 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5952-5952

Author(s):

Kejal Parikh ◽

Shivani Pandya ◽

Safiya Abouzaid ◽

Onur Baser ◽

Lin Xie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Chemotherapy Agent ◽

The Us ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Despite a relatively higher incidence in the veteran population, there are few real-world claims-based analyses to describe Multiple Myeloma (MM) treatment patterns among this patient population (Landgren O, Blood, 2006). This study aimed to assess treatment patterns among newly diagnosed MM (ndMM) patients using the US Veteran Health Administration (VHA) data. Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients with ≥2 claims for MM (ICD-9-CM code: 203.0x) 30 days apart and ≥1 treatment during identification period (1OCT2011-31MAR2015) from the VHA dataset. The initial course of therapy (COT1) date was the index date and included all treatments prescribed within 60 days of this date. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment for 12 months pre- and ≥6 months post-index date unless patients died within 6 months (follow up period), ≥1 full cycle of therapy with a valid COT1 regimen, no evidence of prior MM diagnosis or treatment (including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)), and no evidence of ASCT in the follow up period. A subsequent COT (COT2) was defined as the earliest occurrence of: the addition of a new drug or switch in regimen after the first 60 days, restart of a previous regimen after >180-day gap, or a dose increase from maintenance to relapse therapy. Dexamethasone/prednisone[d] which were assumed to be included regardless of whether or not they were observed during the study period did not impact the ongoing COT. Treatment patterns during the follow-up period were initially examined among patients treated with novel (lenalidomide [R] and/or bortezomib [V] with or without chemotherapy agents) and non-novel therapies (≥1 chemotherapy agent, steroid monotherapy) and then compared among those initiating Rd and Vd. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was defined as the duration from initiation of COT1 plus any gaps before COT2. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate TTNT and assess the impact of various predictors on TTNT among patients initiating Rd and Vd. Results: Of 1,183 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 55.4% (n=655) were treated with novel therapies and 44.6% (n=528) with non-novel therapies. Among patients treated with novel therapy, the majority initiated Rd (47.8%; n=313) as COT1 followed by Vd (31.2%; n=204), Vd with cyclophosphamide (11.5%; n=75), RVd (6.6%; n=43), Vd with a chemotherapy agent (2.4%; n=16) and Rd with a chemotherapy agent (0.6%; n=4).Rd initiators were significantly older (75.1 vs 70.6 years, p=0.0002) and a higher percentage was white (69.7% vs 47.0%; p<0.0001) than Vd treated patients. While the Charlson Comorbidities Index score did not differ between the two groups (3.6 vs 4.0, p=0.0583), a significantly higher percentage of patients treated with Vd had some comorbidities including hepatitis and renal disease. Among patients with laboratory tests, patients treated initially with Vd had lower hemoglobin (10.8 vs 11.4 g/dl, p=0.0012) and higher serum creatinine (2.3 vs 1.4 mg/dl, p<0.0001) during the pre-index period. The overall average treatment duration in COT1 was significantly longer among patients treated with Rd vs Vd (10.9 vs 7.0 months, p<0.0001). Among patients who were still on active COT1, the mean duration in COT1 was longer among patients treated with Rd than Vd (18.7 vs 13.3 months, p=0.0061). A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with Vd progressed to COT2 (52.5%, vs 26.2% p<0.0001) as compared to Rd. Among patients who progressed to COT2, those treated with Vd had a shorter TTNT compared to Rd (Mean: 9.3 vs 12.8 months, p=0.0049). After adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical factors using Cox regression, TTNT remained significantly shorter for Vd vs those treated with Rd (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.9-3.7, p <0.0001). Conclusion: Slightly over half of MM patients in the US Veteran population were treated with a regimen containing novel therapies; Rd and Vd were the most commonly observed among these. Patients treated initially with Vd had a significantly shorter TTNT compared to those treated with Rd. The difference remained significant after controlling for baseline characteristics including markers for higher disease severity among patients on Vd. Disclosures Parikh: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Pandya:Celgene: Research Funding. Abouzaid:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Baser:Celgene: Research Funding. Xie:Celgene: Research Funding. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Safety in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Pomalidomide in a Real-World Setting According to Last Prior Treatment: A European Post-Authorization Safety Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111906 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3286-3286

Author(s):

Niels Abildgaard ◽

Marie-Christiane Vekemans ◽

Barbara Gamberi ◽

Francesco Di Raimondo ◽

Angel Ramirez Payer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Real World ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Interventional Study ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Safety Study ◽

Real World Setting ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract BACKGROUND The combination of pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) for the treatment (Tx) of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in patients (pts) who have received ≥ 2 prior Tx regimens, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), was approved in Europe in August 2013. POM-DEX is now a standard Tx for pts with RRMM. These pts are at an increased risk for adverse events (AEs) due to prior exposure to multiple lines of Tx and a high disease burden. The European Union post-authorization safety study (EU PASS; NCT02164955) is a prospective, observational, non-interventional study (method: registry) designed to characterize the safety profile of POM-based Tx in pts with RRMM in a real-world setting. AIM To report the incidence of key AEs with POM-based Tx, such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism (VTE), peripheral neuropathy (PN), and second primary malignancies (SPMs), in pts with RRMM treated with POM according to the last prior Tx before starting POM Tx in a post-marketing setting. METHODS Pts with symptomatic RRMM initiating POM-based Tx were enrolled at the investigator's discretion. Thromboprophylaxis was administered per local standard practice. AEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.0). The study is ongoing and open for recruitment in centers across Europe. This analysis focused on the safety profile according to the last prior Tx received before starting POM Tx. RESULTS As of July 12, 2018, 596 pts across 100 institutions in 8 European countries were included in the safety population. At the time of data cutoff, Tx was ongoing in 122 pts (20.5%). Median age was 70 yrs (range, 37-92 yrs), with 28.4% of pts aged < 65 yrs, 38.4% between age 65 and 75 yrs, and 33.2% aged ≥ 75 yrs; 54.2% were male. Median time from diagnosis was 4.8 yrs (range, 0.3-26.9 yrs). Median number of prior Txs was 3; 72.1% of pts had ≥ 3 prior lines. Most pts received prior LEN (99.2%) and BORT (99.0%). In 343 pts assessed for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), 277 had a PS of 0 or 1 at baseline. Among 595 pts whose prior Tx was entered into the database at the time of data cutoff, the last prior Tx before starting POM was LEN in 340 pts (57.1%), BORT in 134 pts (22.5%), a combination of LEN and BORT in 16 pts (2.7%), and any other drug in 105 pts (17.6%). Tx duration of POM was slightly longer in pts treated with prior BORT than in those treated with prior LEN, with a median Tx duration of 18.7 wks (range, 0.9-150.0 wks) in the LEN group vs 23.7 wks (range, 0.1-148.0 wks) in the BORT group. Across all subgroups, hematologic AEs and infections represented most of all AEs (Table). CONCLUSIONS This ongoing, prospective, non-interventional study in pts with RRMM continues to demonstrate that POM-based Tx is generally well tolerated in the real-world setting and that the safety profile is not impacted by the Tx administered immediately before starting a POM-based Tx. Of all pts included in this trial, more pts were treated with LEN immediately before starting POM than any other drug. This analysis shows that AEs are almost similar in pts treated with LEN or BORT or both or any other drug immediately before starting POM Tx. In addition, the reported VTEs, PNs, and SPMs were generally low in all subgroups. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Table. Table. Disclosures Abildgaard: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Di Raimondo:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kueenburg:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rosettani:Celgene International: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bacon:Celgene: Employment. Atiba-Davies:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Plesner:Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Independent Response Assessment Comittee.

Download Full-text

Ofatumumab (OFA) in Combination with CHOP for Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: Follow-up Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1632.1632 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1632-1632

Author(s):

Myron S. Czuczman ◽

Georg Hess ◽

Ole Gadeberg ◽

Lars Moeller Pedersen ◽

Per Hansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Abdominal Hernia ◽

Employment Equity ◽

End Points ◽

Vulval Cancer ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphomas

Abstract Abstract 1632 Background: OFA is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to both the large and small extracellular loops of CD20. OFA is currently approved for patients (pts) with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and has demonstrated activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma (FL). We previously reported results of a phase II study of OFA in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, prednisone 100 mg daily for 5 days) chemotherapy (O-CHOP) in pts with previously untreated FL (Czuczman et al. Br J Haematol. 2012;157:438). We now report updated efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) follow-up data for this study. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00494780). Methods: Fifty-nine pts with previously untreated FL were randomized to OFA 500 mg (n = 29) or 1000 mg (n = 30) on day 1, with CHOP on day 3, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR), as assessed by an independent end points review committee. Secondary end points included complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, adverse events (AEs) and PK. Follow-up assessments after therapy were done every 3 months (mo) until mo 12 and then every 6 mo until alternative FL therapy or mo 60. Positron emission tomography (PET) was done at baseline and 3 mo after last therapy. Blood samples for PK analyses were collected to determine OFA serum concentrations, and noncompartmental methods were used to estimate PK parameter values. Results: Fifty-eight pts received therapy; 1 pt in the 1000-mg group withdrew before initiation of therapy. The ORR was 90% for the 500-mg group (n=29) and 100% for the 1000-mg group (n=29); 55% of pts achieved CR or unconfirmed CR (CRu), including 67% of pts with a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score of 3–5. At baseline, 57 pts were PET positive, and 49 pts underwent repeat PET scans after therapy. Forty of 49 pts (82%) became PET negative, including 27 of 29 (93%) pts who achieved CR/CRu and 13 of 20 pts (65%) who achieved partial response (PR). With a median follow-up of 33.8 mo, the median PFS for the 500-mg group was 27.6 mo and the median PFS for the 1000-mg group was not reached (P=0.46). Median PFS for pts with FLIPI scores of 0–1 (n=17), 2 (n=20) and 3–5 (n=21) was not reached, 27.6 mo and 27.6 mo, respectively (P=0.68). Median PFS for pts (n=32) who achieved CR/CRu was also not reached and was 28.3 mo for pts (n=23) achieving PR. Median PFS for PR pts who were PET positive and PET negative after therapy was not reached and 28.3 mo, respectively. No deaths have been reported. No hematologic serious AEs (SAEs) were experienced during the follow-up period. During the follow-up period, non-hematologic SAEs were reported in 1 pt in the 500-mg group (pneumonia) and 5 pts in the 1000-mg group (abdominal hernia, erysipelas, intervertebral disc protrusion, meniscus lesion and vulval cancer); none were ofatumumab-related. After repeated dosing, OFA clearance values were 6.3 and 5.9 mL/h, and half-life values were 27.2 and 26.8 days in the 500-mg and 1000-mg groups, respectively. Conclusions: O-CHOP achieved durable remissions in previously untreated pts with FL. There were no observed PK or PFS differences between the 500-mg and 1000-mg arms, but the study was not powered to detect such differences. O-CHOP was effective in pts with high-risk FLIPI scores, and CR/CRu and PFS rates were not affected by FLIPI score. PET status after therapy did not predict PFS in responding pts, although the study was too small to make such a determination. These results indicate that O-CHOP should be studied as a therapy for FL pts with high-risk FLIPI scores. Disclosures: Czuczman: GlaxoSmithKline: Advisory board Other, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab in follicular lymphoma. Belada:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mayer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gupta:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winter:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Goldstein:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jewell:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lisby:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text