scholarly journals Population Pharmacokinetics of Ruxolitinib in Patients with aGVHD Who Had an Inadequate Response to Corticosteroids

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4534-4534
Author(s):  
Xuejun Chen ◽  
Xiang Liu ◽  
Phillip Wang ◽  
Swamy Yeleswaram
Keyword(s):  
Population Level ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Oral Clearance ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Prediction Bias ◽  
Final Population ◽  
Population Pk ◽  
Research Institute

Background: Jakafi® (ruxolitinib) is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate- and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) and for the treatment of adult patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant to hydroxyurea. A prospective, open-label, single-cohort, Phase 2 study (REACH1) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Jakafi® (ruxolitinib) in patients with acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) who have had an inadequate response to corticosteroids. A population PK analysis was employed to characterize the PK of ruxolitinib in this patient population. Patients and Methods: REACH1, Study INCB 18424-251, and COMFORT-I are the 3 studies supporting the population PK of ruxolitinib; the first study is in participants with aGVHD who have had an inadequate response to corticosteroids, and the other 2 studies are in participants with MF. First, the final PK model for ruxolitinib in patients with MF was applied to the data in patients with MF and aGVHD. When significant biases were observed in this validation process, new population PK models were developed based on the pooled data. The accuracy and robustness of the final population PK model were assessed using a predictive check method. Results: An under-prediction bias was observed at the population level when existing PK model in MF was applied to pooled data in patients with MF and aGVHD. A new model was developed to account for the under prediction bias at the population level. The final population PK model for ruxolitinib was a 2 compartment disposition model with first order absorption, absorption lag time, and linear elimination. Body weight and gender were significant predictors of the volume of distribution of the central compartment and oral clearance, respectively. Patients with aGVHD showed lower oral clearance (66.7%) and slower rate of absorption (~28%) than that in patients with MF. The stage of liver involvement in GVHD and use of moderate or potent CYP3A4 inhibitors were identified as covariates for ruxolitinib CL. Conclusion: The population PK analysis supports the proposed dose regimen in patients with aGVHD who had an inadequate response to corticosteroids as well as dose recommendations for DDI and subjects with organ dysfunction. Disclosures Chen: Incyte Research Institute: Employment. Liu:Incyte Research Institute: Employment. Wang:Incyte Research Institute: Employment. Yeleswaram:Incyte Research Institute: Employment.

Population pharmacokinetics of bedaquiline in patients with drug-resistant TB

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1006-1012
Author(s):  
H. Zhu ◽  
L. Xie ◽  
Z-Q. Liu ◽  
B. Wang ◽  
M-Q. Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Variability ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Peripheral Compartment ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Oral Clearance ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Final Population ◽  
Population Pk ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for bedaquiline (BDQ) to describe the concentration-time data from patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) in China.METHOD: A total of 306 PK observations from 69 patients were used in a non-linear, mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) approach. BDQ PK can be adequately described by a three-compartment model with a transit absorption model. The impact of baseline covariates, including age, sex, height, weight, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), apolipoprotein (ALP), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), creatinine (CR), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) on the oral clearance (CL/F) of BDQ were investigated.RESULTS: In final population PK model, no significant covariates were found in the population PK model for BDQ. The population PK parameter estimate values for oral clearance (CL/F); CL/F between central compartment and peripheral compartment (Q1/F, Q2/F); peripheral volume of distribution (Vp1/F, VP2/F) were respectively 1.50 L/h (95% CI 1.07–1.93), 2.54 L/h (95% CI 1.67–3.41), 1,250 L (95% CI 616.9–1883.1), 2.00 L/h (95% CI 1.10–2.90) and 4,960 L (95% CI 1647.6–8272.4). Inter-individual variability on CL/F was 65.0%.CONCLUSION: This is the first study to establish a population PK model for BDQ in Chinese patients with MDR-TB. The final model adequately described the data and had good simulation characteristics. Despite some limitations, the final population PK model was stable with good accuracy of parameter estimation.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine with documented inadequate response to 2 to 4 classes of migraine preventive medications over 6 months of treatment in the phase 3b FOCUS study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
Joshua M. Cohen ◽  
Maja Galic ◽  
Verena Ramirez Campos ◽  
Steve Barash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Episodic Migraine ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Moderate Severity ◽  
Preventive Medication ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Acute Headache

Abstract Background Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) selectively targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide and has proven efficacy for the preventive treatment of migraine. In this study, we evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of monthly and quarterly fremanezumab. Methods Episodic migraine and chronic migraine patients completing the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS trial entered the 12-week open-label extension and received 3 monthly doses of fremanezumab (225 mg). Changes from baseline in monthly migraine days, monthly headache days of at least moderate severity, days of acute headache medication use, days with photophobia/phonophobia, days with nausea or vomiting, disability scores, and proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% or  ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days were evaluated. Results Of the 807 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period and entered the open-label extension, 772 patients completed the study. In the placebo, quarterly fremanezumab, and monthly fremanezumab dosing regimens, respectively, patients had fewer average monthly migraine days (mean [standard deviation] change from baseline: − 4.7 [5.4]; − 5.1 [4.7]; − 5.5 [5.0]), monthly headache days of at least moderate severity (− 4.5 [5.0]; − 4.8 [4.5]; − 5.2 [4.9]), days per month of acute headache medication use (− 4.3 [5.2]; − 4.9 [4.6]; − 4.8 [4.9]), days with photophobia/phonophobia (− 3.1 [5.3]; − 3.4 [5.3]; − 4.0 [5.2]), and days with nausea or vomiting (− 2.3 [4.6]; − 3.1 [4.5]; − 3.0 [4.4]). During the 12-week open-label extension, 38%, 45%, and 46% of patients, respectively, achieved a ≥50% reduction and 16%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, achieved a ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days. Disability scores were substantially improved in all 3 treatment groups. There were low rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation (<1%). Conclusion Fremanezumab demonstrated sustained efficacy up to 6 months and was well tolerated in patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine and documented inadequate response to multiple migraine preventive medication classes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03308968 (FOCUS).

scholarly journals Results of an open-label, randomized, comparative clinical trial of nifuratel in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-127
Author(s):  
Natalya N. Dekhnich ◽  
A.A. Tryapyshko ◽  
Ivan V. Trushin ◽  
Alexey Yu. Kuzmenkov ◽  
Roman S. Kozlov
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Comparative Clinical Trial ◽  
Stool Antigen Test ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Intent To Treat

Objective. To assess efficacy and safety of 14-day triple nifuratel-based therapy compared to 14-day standard triple therapy in adult patients with symptomatic H. pylori infection. Materials and Methods. A total of 70 patients with dyspepsia and microbiologically confirmed H. pylori infection were enrolled into the open-label, randomized, comparative clinical trial. The study group (n = 35) received a 14-day triple nifuratel-based therapy: esomeprazole (20 mg BID), nifuratel (400 mg BID) and amoxicillin (1000 mg BID). The comparator group (n = 35) received 14-day conventional clarithromycinbased triple therapy: esomeprazole (20 mg BID), clarithromycin (500 mg BID) and amoxicillin (1000 mg BID). Eradication of H. pylori was assessed using stool antigen test. Results. Eradication rates for 14-day nifuratel-based triple therapy and 14-day clarithromycin-based triple therapy in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population were 82.9% and 74.3% (p = 0.561), respectively. In the per-protocol (PP) population, eradication rates were 90.6% and 89.7% (p = 1.00), respectively. Adverse events were reported in 17.1% of patients in the study group and 34.3% of patients in the comparator group (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The 14-day triple nifuratel-based therapy has demonstrated a high H. pylori eradication rate (above 90%). Nifuratel triple therapy may be considered as an alternative to clarithromycin-based triple therapy for patients with a history of the prior macrolide exposure or macrolide intolerance.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Abatacept for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Longterm Data from the ACQUIRE Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Genovese ◽  
César Pacheco Tena ◽  
Arturo Covarrubias ◽  
Gustavo Leon ◽  
Eduardo Mysler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Link Type

Objective.Assess longterm tolerability, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) in methotrexate-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.The phase III, multinational Abatacept Comparison of Sub[QU]cutaneous Versus Intravenous in Inadequate Responders to MethotrexatE (ACQUIRE) trial comprised a 6-month, randomized, double-blind (DB) period, in which patients received intravenous (IV) or SC ABA, plus MTX, followed by an open-label, longterm extension (LTE), in which patients received SC ABA, 125 mg/week. Safety and efficacy from the LTE (∼3.5 yrs of exposure) are reported.Results.Patients who completed the DB period (1372/1385, 99.1%) entered the LTE; 1134 patients (82.7%) kept taking the treatment at time of reporting. Mean (SD) was 31.9 months (6.8); median (range) exposure was 33.0 (8–44) months. Patients entering the LTE had longstanding, moderate-to-severe disease [mean 7.6 (7.9) yrs and DAS28 (C-reactive protein) 6.2 (0.9)]. Incidence rates (events/100 patient-yrs) were reported for serious adverse events (8.76, 95% CI 7.71, 9.95), infections (44.80, 95% CI 41.76, 48.01), serious infections (1.72, 95% CI 1.30, 2.27), malignancies (1.19, 95% CI 0.86, 1.66), and autoimmune events (1.31, 95% CI 0.95, 1.79). Twenty-seven patients (2%) experienced injection-site reactions; all except 1 were mild. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70 responses achieved during the DB period were maintained through the LTE, and on Day 981 were 80.2% (95% CI 77.2, 83.2), 63.5% (95% CI 58.2, 68.9), and 39.5% (95% CI 34.0, 44.9) for patients who kept taking SC ABA, and 80.0% (95% CI 77.0, 83.0), 63.2% (95% CI 57.8, 68.7), and 39.2% (95% CI 33.7, 44.7) for those who switched from IV to SC ABA.Conclusion.These findings support SC ABA as a well-tolerated and efficacious longterm treatment for patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00559585).

A randomised, placebo-controlled 24-week study evaluating adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with major depressive disorder

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bauer ◽  
Nanco Hefting ◽  
Annika Lindsten ◽  
Mette Krog Josiassen ◽  
Mary Hobart
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Madrs Total Score ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Full Remission

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate brexpiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant therapies (ADTs) as maintenance treatment in patients with major depressive disorder with inadequate response to ADT, utilising a novel study design.MethodsThe study comprised an 8-week prospective treatment period with open-label ADT with double-blind placebo treatment and a 24-week randomised treatment period. Investigators and patients were blinded to treatment periods, randomisation criteria, and timing of randomisation. Patients with early response to open-label ADT were withdrawn at Week 6. Patients fulfilling criteria for inadequate response were randomised to ADT+brexpiprazole 1–3 mg/day, or ADT+placebo. The primary endpoint was full remission: Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤10 and ≥50% decrease from randomisation (i.e. baseline) in MADRS total score for at least 8 consecutive weeks.ResultsThe primary efficacy analysis failed to show a statistically significant difference between the proportions of patients on ADT+brexpiprazole (21.4%) and ADT+placebo (24.9%) achieving full remission; odds ratio: 0.83; p=0.2641. The secondary endpoint of change from baseline to Week 6 in MADRS total score showed no difference between ADT+brexpiprazole and ADT+placebo (−0.4; p=0.3259). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) in patients receiving ADT+brexpiprazole was weight increased (9.5% vs. 5.0% in ADT+placebo). The incidence of TEAEs leading to withdrawal in the randomised treatment period was 6.3% in the ADT+brexpiprazole group and 3.4% in the ADT+placebo group.ConclusionAdjunctive brexpiprazole did not differentiate from ADT+placebo on the primary endpoint of full remission. A number of design elements in this previously untried study design may have contributed to the study result. Brexpiprazole was well tolerated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document