scholarly journals High Incidence of Herpes Zoster after Cord Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Despite Longer Duration of Antiviral Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4556-4556
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Xue ◽  
Hu Xie ◽  
Wendy Leisenring ◽  
Louise E Kimball ◽  
Sonia Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Zoster ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Antiviral Prophylaxis ◽  
Post Herpetic Neuralgia ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Introduction Herpes zoster (HZ) after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a well-known complication with a peak incidence during the first year post-HCT. Cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients are at increased risk for viral infections and historically have a cumulative incidence of HZ approaching 80% by 2.5 years in the context of short-term peri-HCT antiviral prophylaxis. In 2009, international guidelines for prevention of infections after HCT recommended maintaining HZ prophylaxis for at least 1 year after HCT. We retrospectively studied the impact of longer-term antiviral prophylaxis on the incidence of HZ after CBT. Methods Between 2006 and 2016, we performed 360 CBT at our Institution. Patients who were seronegative for varicella zoster virus (VZV) or received the live varicella vaccine (i.e. Varivax®) pre-CBT without a history of chickenpox or HZ were excluded. From 2006-2008, CBT recipients received acyclovir (ACV) 800 mg BID or valacyclovir (VACV) 500 mg BID for HSV and VZV prophylaxis. From 2008-2016, patients who were CMV seropositive received higher-dose prophylaxis with VACV 2g TID through day +100. Before 2009, institutional guidelines recommended to continue prophylaxis until the end of immunosuppression; after 2009, prophylaxis was recommended for at least 1 year and until 8 months after immunosuppression ends. For patients discharged from our center, data were collected through standardized questionnaires and medical records. We abstracted HZ events and other variables for up to 5 years post-CBT. We calculated the cumulative incidence of HZ after CBT, treating death and second HCT as competing risk events. Variables were evaluated for an association with development of HZ using Cox proportional hazards regression; those of biological interest and with a P value ≤ 0.3 in univariable analyses were considerate for multivariable model. Results The study cohort consisted of 227 CBT recipients with a median follow up of 25.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6.8 - 49). Follow up time was truncated at the time of death (n=113), second HCT (n=13) or last available records (n=32). Cohort characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among 1-year survivors, 91% were still receiving prophylaxis for a median duration of 20.6 months post-CBT (IQR, 14.1 - 29.4). HZ occurred in 44 patients (19%) at a median of 23.6 months (IQR, 16.1 - 30.3). Most patients (n=31/44, 70%) were not taking antiviral prophylaxis when HZ developed. The cumulative incidence of HZ by 1-year post-CBT was low (1.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-4%) but increased starting from the second year and reached 26% (95% CI, 19%-33%) by 5 years (Figure 1). Disseminated HZ occurred in 5 cases (11%), and post-herpetic neuralgia occurred in 14 cases (31.8%). Of the 13 HZ episodes that occurred in patients reportedly taking antiviral prophylaxis, 6/13 had clear documentation of ongoing antiviral prophylaxis and 5/13 were still receiving immunosuppressive treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). All patients responded to antiviral treatment, which consisted of ACV (n=18), VACV (n=16), and famciclovir (n=1). In a multivariable analysis, patients who received myeloablative conditioning or had acute GvHD grades 2-4 had a higher risk of HZ, whereas the use of antiviral prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of HZ (Table 2). Among 35 patients who discontinued prophylaxis before completing immunosuppressive therapy, 28.5% developed HZ. We found no association between CD4+ T cell counts at 1-year after-CBT and HZ risk. Conclusions In this cohort of 227 CBT recipients with up to 5 years of follow up, the cumulative incidence of HZ was 26% at 5 years, despite antiviral prophylaxis for >1 year in the majority of patients. Furthermore, these patients had high rates of post-herpetic neuralgia and disseminated VZV. Antiviral prophylaxis protected against HZ but there were breakthrough cases. Given that a high number of patients interrupted prophylaxis while still receiving immunosuppressants, adherence to antiviral prophylaxis should be emphasized by health care providers. Based on our findings, the lack of alternative prophylactic strategies at this time, and the safety of ACV/VACV, longer duration of prophylaxis should be considered, especially in patients with ongoing immunosuppression. Recent data demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the HZ subunit vaccine after autologous HCT support future study of HZ vaccination after allogeneic HCT. Disclosures Delaney: Nohla Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Biolife Solutions: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boeckh:Chimerix: Research Funding; GSK: Other: Personal fees; GSK: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Merck: Other: Personal fees; Clinigen: Other: Personal fees. Milano:ExCellThera: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hill:Takeda: Other: research support; Karius: Other: research support; Amplyx: Consultancy; Nohla Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: research support.

scholarly journals High Incidence of Herpes Zoster After Cord Blood Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Despite Longer Duration of Antiviral Prophylaxis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Xue ◽  
Hu Xie ◽  
Wendy M Leisenring ◽  
Louise E Kimball ◽  
Sonia Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Zoster ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Antiviral Prophylaxis ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients have a high incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) in the context of short-term peritransplant antiviral prophylaxis. In 2009, international guidelines recommended HZ prophylaxis for at least 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplant. The impact of longer-term antiviral prophylaxis on HZ incidence after CBT is unknown. Methods We retrospectively analyzed varicella zoster virus (VZV)–seropositive CBT recipients who were transplanted between 2006 and 2016. We abstracted HZ events and other variables for up to 5 years post-CBT. We calculated the cumulative incidence of HZ and used Cox proportional hazards regression to identify variables associated with HZ. Results The study cohort consisted of 227 patients. Among 1-year survivors, 91% were still receiving prophylaxis, for a median duration of 20.6 months. HZ occurred in 44 patients (19%) at a median of 23.6 months. The cumulative incidence of HZ by 1 year after CBT was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], .1%–4%), but increased to 26% (95% CI, 19%–33%) by 5 years. In a multivariable analysis, acute graft-vs-host disease was associated with increased risk, whereas antiviral prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk for HZ (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19 [95% CI, .09–.4]). There was no association between CD4+ T-cell counts at 1 year post-CBT and subsequent risk for HZ. Conclusions We found a high incidence of HZ after CBT despite antiviral prophylaxis for > 1 year. Based on these findings, we suggest longer duration of prophylaxis for HZ after CBT. Compliance with antiviral prophylaxis, VZV-specific immune monitoring, and vaccination to mitigate HZ after CBT also require further study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) Treated At Diagnosis with Risk-Adapted Stem Cell Transplant and Consolidation with Novel Agents.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3150-3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
Daniel E Fein ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Christina Bello ◽  
Joanne F Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematologic Response

Abstract Abstract 3150 Background: AL is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by the pathologic production of monoclonal light chains which misfold, deposit in various organs, including the heart, and can cause early death. High dose melphalan with stem cell transplant (SCT) results in high hematologic response rates and is a standard treatment for eligible patients. Achieving a complete hematologic response (CR) to SCT results in extended event-free and overall survival (OS), up to 8 and 13 years respectively in one large series. (Blood 2011; 118:4346) We have studied the addition of novel agents as consolidation following risk-adapted SCT (RA-SCT) in order to improve hematologic response (HR) rates and therefore outcomes. (Br J Haem 2007;139:224; Amyloid 2010;17:80a) In this report we examine the long-term outcomes of patients who received initial therapy with RA-SCT followed by consolidation for hematologic response less than CR (HR < CR). Methods: We performed a retrospective study to assess the HR rates, incidence of hematologic progression and overall survival (OS) of AL patients enrolled at diagnosis on two consecutive phase II trials using RA-SCT with consolidation for HR < CR (NCT01527032 and NCT00458822). OS was calculated from date of transplant to date of death or last follow up. Median event free survival (EFS) and OS were estimated by the method of Kaplan Meier. Cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the incidence of progression and death. Results: Between 2002 and 2011, 83 patients were enrolled and underwent RA-SCT on these trials and, following RA-SCT, those with HR < CR received consolidation with thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) in the first and bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) in the second trial. Thirty-six patients had cardiac involvement (43%) and all patients had free light chain measurements employed to score hematologic response and progression using consensus criteria (Am J Hematol 2005;79:319; Blood 2010;116:1364a). The frequency of CR following SCT was 24% and increased to 48% with post-SCT consolidation. The CR rates increased at 1 year compared to 3 months post-SCT from 21% to 36% with TD and from 28% to 62% with BD. With a median follow up of 5.1 years, the EFS is 4.5 years (95% CI: 2.6 to not reached) and the OS of all patients has not been reached (Figure 1). Sixteen patients died prior to hematologic progression and 26 patients have progressed with a cumulative incidence of hematologic progression of 8%, 18%, and 29% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively (Figure 2). Thirty-one percent (8/26) of relapsed patients have not required second-line therapy while among those who have, 78% (14/18) have responded including 44% (8/18) with CR. The median OS following hematologic progression was 5 years (95% CI: 2.6–5.8). Conclusions: Half of the AL patients on initial therapy trials employing RA-SCT and consolidation for HR < CR achieved CR with 36% of pts on the TD and 62% on the BD consolidation trial in CR at 1 year post-SCT respectively. At 3 years post-SCT the cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% and a third of relapsed patients did not require therapy, likely due to the very sensitive serum free light chain assay that detects low level hematologic progression in the absence of organ progression. Almost 80% of patients requiring second-line therapy responded, over half with CR, and median OS after relapse was 5 years. These results indicate that initial therapy with RA-SCT and consolidation is an effective initial treatment strategy for patients with AL in the era of novel agents. With over 5 years of follow up the median OS has not been reached. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory light-chain amyloidosis. Hassoun:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Giralt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Landau:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Prognostic Factors for Survival after Allogeneic Transplantation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4597-4597
Author(s):  
Christine Greil ◽  
Monika Engelhardt ◽  
Gabriele Ihorst ◽  
Hartmut Bertz ◽  
Reinhard Marks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Significant Difference

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous disease and treatment guidelines are still evolving. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) offers a potentially curative option and is recommended in first relapse and for high-risk patients in first complete remission (CR). Survival after allo-SCT could be substantially improved due to better risk stratification, patient selection and adapted treatment protocols leading to reduced non-relapse mortality (NRM). Prognostic factors for survival after allo-SCT still need to be defined: pheno- and genotype, patients´ age, conditioning regimens and remission status prior to allo-SCT are under discussion. We analyzed the outcome of 180 consecutive ALL patients who received allo-SCT at the Freiburg University Medical Center between 1995 and 2018 with regard to treatment response, survival, adverse reactions, and performed subgroup analyses to identify prognostic factors. The median age in our cohort was 37 years (ys), 19% were older than 55 ys. 27% were diagnosed with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive ALL, 24% with T-ALL. 36% were treated with relapsed/refractory disease. 48% of allo-SCTs were conducted with a HLA-matched, 19% with a HLA-mismatched unrelated and 33% with a related donor. In 61% the conditioning regimen included total body irradiation (TBI). In 48% no minimal residual disease (MRD) was detected prior to allo-SCT, 20% were transplanted in MRD-positive CR. The overall response rate was 86%, with MRD-negativity in 78%. With a median follow up of 10 ys, we observed a median overall survival (OS) of 23 months and a median progression free survival (PFS) of 11 months. The 10ys-OS was 33%, the 10ys-PFS 31%. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 68% at 10 ys, the cumulative incidence of NRM 12%. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) III-IV° occurred in 17%, severe chronic GvHD in 9%. Survival was significantly better in patients reaching MRD-negative CR before allo-SCT (10ys-OS 48% vs. 19%, p<0.0001; 10ys-PFS 46% vs. 17%, p<0.001) and in thoses receiving TBI (10ys-OS 40% vs. 19%, p<0.01; 10ys-PFS 37% vs. 19%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between patients younger or older than 55 ys (10ys-OS 37% vs. 21%, p=0.183; 10ys-PFS 34% vs. 21%, p=0.208) and between those diagnosed with T-, Ph-positive or -negative B-ALL (10ys-OS 41% vs. 35% vs. 29%, p=0.298; 10ys-PFS 38% vs. 33%. vs. 27%, p=0.238). Due to lower NRM, survival improved depending on the year of allo-SCT (10ys-OS 1995-2000 22% vs. 2001-2010 32% vs. 2011-2018 n.r., p<0.01; 10ys-PFS 20% vs. 30% vs. n.r., p<0.01). With a very long follow-up and high rate of MRD-assessment, we observed a high response rate and a low rate of severe GvHD. Our data confirm that allo-SCT enables long-term survival in high-risk ALL, suggest that, in certain subgroups, survival may be best in patients transplanted in CR and receiving TBI for conditioning, including the relevant observation that allo-SCT can be performed in carefully selected elderly patients. Disclosures Finke: Medac: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau. Wäsch:Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Other: Travel, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: travel, Research Funding; Jazz: Other: travel, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: travel, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: travel, Research Funding.

The patient's BCR-ABL1 Kinase Domain Mutation History Is Important for Decisions Regarding Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1692-1692
Author(s):  
Wendy T Parker ◽  
Alexandra L Yeoman ◽  
Bronte A Jamison ◽  
David T Yeung ◽  
Hamish S Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1692 Introduction. BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations are the most common known cause of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in CML. Some imatinib resistant mutations also confer resistance to second generation TKIs nilotinib and/or dasatinib. Therefore, it is recommended that mutation analysis be performed before changing therapy. However, BCR-ABL1 mutant clones are often de-selected upon TKI cessation or change of therapy, and may become undetectable (Hanfstein et al, Haematologica 2011). It is not known whether treatment discontinuation or long term alternative TKI therapy leads to eradication of these mutant clones. If mutant clones persist at sub-clonal levels they have the potential to be re-selected and expand clonally given favorable conditions, such as change to a TKI for which they confer resistance. We examined longitudinal data of patients with imatinib resistant mutations that became undetectable by direct sequencing to determine whether these “long dormant” mutations could reappear, and the circumstances related to reappearance. Method. All chronic phase patients who had been monitored at our institution since starting imatinib, and had mutations detectable by sequencing during imatinib therapy were analyzed; 49 patients, median follow up since starting imatinib was 4.3 years (range 0.6–11.6 years). Sensitive mutation analysis using mass spectrometry (detection limit 0.2% mutant) was performed at selected times when the mutations became undetectable by direct sequencing (detection limit 10–20%). Results. Of the 49 patients with mutations detected by sequencing during imatinib therapy, mutations became undetectable by sequencing in 21 patients (29 mutations), at a median of 2 months after changing therapy (range 1–20 months). This was associated with increased imatinib dose (3 mutations), stopping imatinib (2), hematopoietic cell transplant (6), chemotherapy (1), switching to nilotinib (3), or switching to dasatinib (14). All mutations that became undetectable by sequencing when the patient switched to nilotinib or dasatinib were those known to be sensitive to the inhibitor received (e.g. F359V in a patient treated with dasatinib). In 16 of the 21 patients whose mutations became undetectable by direct sequencing, the mutations have not been detected again with 0.1 to 6.9 years of follow up since the mutations were last detected (median 1.1 years). Of these 16 patients, 15 maintained a stable complete cytogenetic response and 1 lost a major cytogenetic response. In the other 5 patients, the same mutations as those originally detected (identical nucleotide exchange) became detectable by sequencing between 1.7 and 5.4 years after last detection (median 4.4 years), Figure. The original mutations in 4 of these patients confer resistance to nilotinib as well as imatinib (Y253H and F359V), and their reappearance was associated with initiation of nilotinib therapy, Figure. Three of these 4 patients died of their disease, and 1 lost a major cytogenetic response. Sensitive mutation analysis could detect the mutation in 1 of these patients during the time of “dormancy” and before nilotinib therapy. The 5th patient received an autologous hematopoietic cell transplant upon detection of F359V, and the mutation became undetectable by sequencing. The patient subsequently received dasatinib for 3 years and the mutation remained undetectable. Dasatinib therapy was stopped due to intolerance and F359V rapidly reappeared while the patient was off TKI therapy, having been undetectable for 4.8 years. Using sensitive mutation analysis, F359V could be detected at low levels after the transplant, suggesting that the mutant clone had not been eradicated. Conclusion. The data suggest that some BCR-ABL1 mutations may persist at sub-clonal levels for many years after changing therapy. This could lead to clonal expansion under the selective pressure of a TKI for which the mutation confers insensitivity. Alternatively, the reappearance of the mutation could be a new occurrence of the same mutation. The study highlights the importance of knowing the mutation history of individual patients to enable informed therapy choices. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cepheid: Consultancy.

Risk-Adapted Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplant for Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Single Institution Experience.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3109-3109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Landau ◽  
Daniel E Fein ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Christina Bello ◽  
Joanne F Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Abstract 3109 Background: High dose melphalan (MEL) is a standard treatment for eligible patients with AL, a disease in which hematologic response is a key determinant of survival. With the advent of novel agents the role of stem cell transplant (SCT) for patients with AL is being questioned, especially given safety concerns. Yet with appropriate patient selection and the use of risk-adapted SCT (RA-SCT), treatment-related mortality (TRM) improved.(Br J Haem 2007;139:224; Bone Marrow Transplantation 2011; 46:970) Moreover, beginning in 2002, we showed in 2 consecutive phase II trials that following RA-SCT patients can safely receive consolidation with thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) or bortezomib and D (BD), with the goal of improving hematologic response thereby extending overall survival (OS).(Br J Haem 2007;139:224; Amyloid 2010;17:80a) Consolidation was administered for patients achieving less than a complete response (CR). We now describe the outcomes of all patients with AL who underwent RA-SCT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) since the year 2000. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to assess the OS of all patients who underwent SCT for a diagnosis of AL confirmed at MSKCC. Patients who had >2 major organs involved, NYHA class III or greater CHF, critical arrhythmias or cardiac syncope were ineligible for SCT. OS was calculated from transplant to date of death or last follow up. Median survival was estimated by Kaplan Meier methods. Log-rank test was used to determine whether survival functions differed by covariates of interest. Cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the incidence of cause-specific mortality. Results: A total of 151 patients underwent RA-SCT between February 2000 and June 2011; three lost to follow-up are excluded from this analysis. Of the remaining 148 patients 21%, 52% and 34% received RA-SCT at 100, 140 and 200mg/m2 of melphalan respectively based on age, renal function and cardiac involvement.(Blood 2002; 99: 4276) Five patients died within 100 days of SCT (TRM 3.4%). At a median follow up of 6.7 years, the median OS for all patients is 11.1 years (95% CI, 7.32 - not reached-NR) (Figure 1), and for patients who received MEL 100, 140 or 200 is 4.4 (95% CI, 2.7 – 6.3), NR and 11 years (95% CI, 8.2 – NR) respectively (P = <0.01). Cumulative incidence of disease related mortality at 2 years is 5.5%, and subsequently the rate of death from other causes exceeds that due to AL (Figure 2). Conclusions: RA-SCT for appropriately selected patients is safe and is associated with excellent long-term survival. Consolidation with novel agents may improve survival following RA-SCT and likely accounts for the similar OS seen in patients who received MEL 140 and 200. In the era of novel agents available for post-SCT consolidation, RA-SCT is an effective and important initial treatment for patients with AL. Disclosures: Landau: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Hassoun:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Giralt:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Comenzo:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Excellent Outcomes Achieved with Medical Management of Chronic Phase CML Patients with Non-Hematologic TKI Intolerance

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Kelly L. Schoenbeck ◽  
Sirisha Tummala ◽  
Rebecca L. Olin ◽  
Neha G. Goyal ◽  
Anand Dhruva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Support Research

Introduction:Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) intolerance is commonly encountered in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Clinical trials define non-hematologic TKI intolerance as grade 3-4 toxicities, but lower grade toxicities may also impair patients' quality of life and lead to changes in medical management. We sought to compare TKI-intolerant and -tolerant CML-CP patients and their clinical outcomes, including molecular responses, rates of progression, survival, and utilization of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Methods:We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of active CML-CP patients in our Hematology clinic between January 2017 and December 2019. We defined TKI intolerance as any grade non-hematologic toxicity that led to a change in TKI management, such as dose reduction or change of TKI. We also reviewed CML-CP patients who underwent alloSCT in the TKI era (2002-2019). AlloSCT patients were identified for chart review by ICD-10 codes and query of the institution's transplant database. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square tests, and two-tailed t-tests were used to summarize the data. Results:We identified 216 CML-CP patients (Table 1), and 161 (74.5%) met criteria for non-hematologic TKI intolerance. The median age was 59 years-old in TKI-intolerant patients and 49 in tolerant patients (P=0.011). Most patients experienced TKI-intolerance from symptoms (93.2%, n=150); symptoms included fatigue (n=77, 59.2%), arthralgias (n=36, 27.7%), nausea (n=29, 22.3%), headache (n=16, 12.3%), and edema (n=15, 11.5%). The remaining patients were TKI-intolerant based on abnormal laboratory findings such as transaminitis or hyperglycemia (6.8%, n=11/161). Of the 161 TKI-intolerant patients at last follow-up, 130 (80.7%) remained on TKI, 19 (11.8%) were on prescribed discontinuation, 6 (3.72%) were non-adherent, 5 (3.1%) were off TKI for non-CML medical problems, and 1 (0.6%) was on omacetaxine. Dose reductions occurred in the majority who remained on TKIs (n=103/130, 79.2%) and prior to TKI discontinuation (n=13/19, 68.4%). Most TKI-intolerant patients (n=122/161, 75.8%) switched TKIs, with a median of 2 agents used (range 1-5). Of 55 TKI-tolerant patients, 46 (83.6%) were on TKI, 8 (14.5%) were on discontinuation, and 1 (1.8%) was non-adherent. Only 19.6% (n=9/46) patients were dose-reduced, and they rarely changed TKIs (median of 1 agent used). MR4.5 was achieved in 49% (n=79/161) of TKI-intolerant and 41.8% (n=23/55) of TKI-tolerant patients. Only 1 patient in each group progressed to accelerated phase. TKI-intolerant and -tolerant patients had similar times since diagnosis (with a median follow up of 81.7 months and 79.7 months, respectively). Five of 161 (3.1%) TKI-intolerant patients died, all from causes unrelated to CML and TKI therapy. None of the TKI-tolerant patients died during the abstraction period. Twenty CML-CP patients underwent alloSCT from year 2002-2019; 10 (50%) were transplanted for TKI intolerance without other transplant indications (Tables 2 and 3). Three of those 10 patients also had hematologic intolerance. Four (40%) TKI-intolerant patients resumed TKI post-transplant: 3 for disease relapse, 1 for sclerotic GVHD. Seven (70%) developed GVHD, with most cases being chronic (n=6), extensive (n=6), and severe/moderate (n=6). While 80% of patients achieved MR4.5 post-transplant (n=8/10), 30% (n=3/10) experienced transplant-related mortality (TRM) with a mean post-transplant survival of 38.5 months; the remaining 7 patients were alive at a median follow-up of 37.1 months. Conclusion: CML-CP patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance achieved similar clinical outcomes as TKI-tolerant patients despite dose reductions and/or switching TKIs. The use of alloSCT was rare in our practice, and CML-CP patients transplanted for TKI intolerance commonly resumed TKI post-alloSCT and frequently developed extensive GVHD. In light of the high survival rate achieved with medical management in CML-CP patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance, including no disease- or treatment-related deaths, this analysis does not support the use of alloSCT for patients with non-hematologic TKI-intolerance. Disclosures Schoenbeck: American Society of Hematology:Research Funding.Olin:Astellas:Other: Site PI;Genentech:Consultancy;Daiichi Sankyo:Other: Site PI;Amgen:Consultancy;Genentech:Other: Site PI;Pfizer:Other: Site PI.Logan:Amphivena:Research Funding;Autolus:Research Funding;Jazz:Research Funding;Kadmon:Research Funding;Kite:Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Research Funding;Abbvie:Consultancy;Amgen:Consultancy;Novartis:Consultancy.Smith:Revolution Medicines:Other: Research Support, Research Funding;Abbvie:Other: Research Support, Research Funding;FujiFilm:Other: Research support, Research Funding;Daiichi Sanyko:Consultancy, Honoraria;Astellas Pharma:Honoraria, Other: Research Support, Research Funding;Sanofi:Honoraria.Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb:Research Funding.

5-Day Decitabine with Mini Fludarabine and Busulfan Yields Comparable Outcomes to Mini Flu/Bu but with Increased Incidence of Severe Acute GvHD

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3422-3422
Author(s):  
Melissa Baker ◽  
Tracy Andrews ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
Alan P Skarbnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Response

Abstract Background: Studies have shown that hypomethylating agents (HMAs), including 5-AZA and decitabine (Dac) are well-tolerated antileukemic agents (Kantarjian et al, JCO, 2012). Despite its myelosuppressive effect, Dac has low extramedullary toxicities, making it an attractive drug for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Reports suggest that HMAs selectively upregulate tumor associated antigens (TAAs) on malignant cells without expression in healthy tissue (Cruijsen, 2016). We previously reported on a series of 20 patients (pts) in a phase I study of 5-day Dac plus mini fludarabine and busulfan (DacMiniFluBu) in elderly or medically infirm pts (Baker et al, Blood, 2012). In the current analysis, we compared updated results from our DacFluBu study with a historical MiniFluBu control group in pts with MDS or AML. Methods: Pts were evaluated to assess engraftment, toxicity, disease response, PFS and OS. Pts received Dac 20 mg/m2/day on days (d) -15 to -11, Flu 30 mg/m2/day, on d -7 to -3 and Bu 130 mg/m2 on d -4 and -3. The control group received Flu 30 mg/m2 on d -6 to -2 and Bu 130 mg/m2 on d -3 and -2. Both groups received thymoglobulin 2 mg/kg IV on d -3, -2 and -1, followed by infusion of donor stem cells on d 0. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus starting on d -2 and MTX 5 mg/m2 IV on d +1, 3, 6, and 11. Results: 107 pts were analyzed between 5/2009 and 8/2015; 36 pts received DacMiniFluBu; 17 with MDS, and 19 with AML. 23 (64%) had unrelated donors (URD); 13 (36%) had sibling donors. 71 pts were included in the MiniFluBu control group for comparison; 33 with MDS, and 38 with AML. 53 (75%) had URD; 18 (25%) had sibling donors. Median age was 68.5 yrs compared to 66 yrs, respectively. Cohorts were comparable for gender, disease and graft source. The incidence of severe (gr III/IV) acute GVHD (aGvHD) was 22% compared to the control group of 6% (p=0.0195). Moderate or severe cGVHD was seen in 7 pts vs 22 in the control group (p=0.2535). The median follow-up in the DacMiniFluBu group was 262 d, OS was 35%, relapse incidence was 28%, and NRM at 6 mos was 22%. In the control group, the median follow-up was 424 d (p=0.2213), OS was 34%, relapse was 41%, and NRM was 15%. Median time to relapse in the study vs control group was 142 and 149 d (p=0.8722). There were 22 deaths after DacMiniFluBu and 43 after MiniFluBu (p=0.7382). 6 pts in the study group received DLI at a median of 170 d post HCT for either relapse (n=3) or falling chimerism (n=3) compared to 16 pts in the control group at a median of 183 d. Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative incidence of severe aGvHD by regimen. Results showed that conditioning regimen (HR=3.98, 95% CI, p=0.0197), degree of match (HR=1.365, p=0.039) and non-hematologic (heme) gr IV events (HR= 4.266, p=0.029) were all significant independent factors predicting a higher incidence of severe aGvHD. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidences of relapse or survival between pts receiving DacMiniFluBu and MiniFluBu. However, the risk of severe aGvHD was 4 times greater in DacMiniFluBu recipients when controlling for infections, degree of match, and non-heme gr IV events. Findings were confirmed in univariate and multivariate analyses. This may be explained by the increased expression of TAAs in healthy tissues in response to Dac, which evoke T cell responses. This is the first report showing that adding Dac to the MiniFluBu regimen was an independent risk factor for severe aGvHD. Other findings in our analysis linking age, risk stratification, and degree of match to GvHD are consistent with prior reports. The differences between our results and those of other studies warrant larger validation analyses. Dac as part of a conditioning regimen should only be used in context of a clinical trial. Table Table. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Skarbnik: Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Vesole:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Comparison of Fixed Dose, Reduced-Intensity Conditioning with Busulfan and Fludarabine to Reduced PK-Guided Busulfan AUC Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for AML/MDS

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5715-5715
Author(s):  
Brendan Rasor ◽  
Tyler Dickerson ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
Karilyn Larkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Consolidation therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is recommended to prevent relapse and improve survival in patients with intermediate and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Due to toxicity, older patients with comorbidities were historically not candidates for HSCT. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has allowed more patients to proceed to HSCT by reducing toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC).The cornerstone of reducing conditioning regimen intensity is modification of busulfan exposure, expressed as an area under the curve (AUC). This can be achieved by the use of patient-specific pharmacokinetic targets. Previous studies (including BMT CTN 0901) have demonstrated RIC regimens were associated with less toxicity at the cost of potentially decreased survival relative to weight-based MAC regimens. At OSU, we have utilized an AUC target of 4,000 μmol-min/L per day x 4 days in a subset of patients to balance reduced toxicity with risk of relapse. Here we compare outcomes of AUC 4,000 to weight-based RIC Flu/Bu2. Methods: To compare the two regimens, a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort study was conducted. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18-89 years, HSCT for a diagnosis of AML or MDS, and fludarabine + busulfan conditioning regimen ± antithymocyte globulin. In the AUC 4,000 group, the target busulfan exposure was 16,000 μmol-min/L divided over 4 daily doses. In the RIC group, patents received busulfan 0.8 mg/kg/dose for 8 doses (Flu/Bu2). The primary outcome was relapse free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS); time to neutrophil recovery; time to platelet recovery; incidence of acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD); sinusoidal obstructive syndrome; febrile neutropenia; graft failure; and grade 3-5 mucositis, acute kidney injury, or hepatic dysfunction. The log-rank test was used to compare RFS and OS, and Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. Gray's test was used for competing risks analysis of relapse, acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD. Fine and Gray regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio. Results: Seventy-four patients who received conditioning from 2015-2018 with either AUC 4,000 or RIC were identified. Disease type was similar between groups with 61.8% AML in the AUC 4,000 group and 52.5% in the RIC group. There were no significant differences in disease risk status. In the AUC 4,000 group, 17.6% had either AML with myelodysplastic changes or therapy-related AML/MDS, compared to 17.5% in the RIC group. The percent of patients with HCT-Comorbidity Index score of ≥ 3 was 52.9% for AUC 4,000 and 77.5% for RIC. At 18 months, RFS was not significantly different, at 66.9% with AUC 4,000 compared to 57.5% with RIC (p=0.37) (A). Eighteen-month overall survival was also not significantly different with 66.9% alive in the AUC 4,000 group and 60% in the RIC group (p=0.63) (B). Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD were not significantly different (p=0.82, p=0.18, respectively) (C,D). There was, however, a statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse over 18 months in favor of the AUC 4,000 regimen (hazard ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 1.15-14.5) (E). Grade 2-4 mucositis was more common in the AUC 4,000 group (85.3% vs 30%, p<0.01), but there were no significant differences in transaminitis, kidney injury, neutropenic fever, sinusoidal obstructive syndrome, or graft failure. Discussion: Though no significant difference existed in disease risk between the groups, choice of regimen was driven by physician judgement, perceived fitness, and ability to tolerate potential adverse effects. Thus, the results of this study indicate that with patient selection, there is no significant RFS or OS difference, or risk of acute or chronic GVHD between targeted AUC 4,000 and RIC. However, AUC 4,000 was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse. Adverse effects other than mucositis were not significantly different between groups. In order to definitively compare these two conditioning regimens, a prospective study is needed. Figure Disclosures Brammer: Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vasu:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Clinical trial support. William:Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy. Saad:Actinium Pharma Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Kadmon: Other: Research Support; OrcaBio: Other: Research Support.

scholarly journals Cardiac Morbidity in Adolescents and Young Adult Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Kristin C. Marr ◽  
Jonathan Simkin ◽  
Andrea C. Lo ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Matched Case ◽  
Cv Disease ◽  
Relapsed Disease

INTRODUCTION Adolescents and young adult (AYA) survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are potentially at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease due to anthracycline exposure, in addition to use of mediastinal radiotherapy (RT). Although the risk has been well described in the pediatric age-group, the impact in the AYA population has been less well characterized. Capturing the incidence of these late effects is challenging given that events can occur more than a decade after therapy completion. Using population-based administrative data, we evaluated the incidence of CV disease (combined heart failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease (IHD)) in a cohort of AYA survivors treated for classical HL (cHL) using ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) or equivalent chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with cHL aged 16-39 years (y), diagnosed between 1992-2013 and treated with an ABVD or equivalent therapy, were identified in the BC Cancer Lymphoid Cancer Database. Patients must have survived to an Index Date defined as 2 y from most recent HL event (primary diagnosis or if applicable, most recent relapse) and have had a minimum follow-up of 1 y beyond their Index Date. Patients were excluded if they had history of prior malignancy or HIV positivity. Limited stage disease was defined as stage IA, IB or IIA and absence of bulky disease (≥10cm); all others had advanced stage disease. Cases were linked with population-based databases of BC Cancer Registry; BC Radiation Oncology Database; and BC Ministry of Health (MOH) Chronic Disease Registry (CDR) that captures all BC residents registered with medical service plan coverage during the study period. The outcome variables, including HF and IHD, were defined by the BC MOH CDR using Standardized Case Definitions. To focus on late onset CV complications, only events that occurred after the Index Date were included in the analysis. A 10:1 individually-matched control population was identified from the CDR based on age, sex, and health authority region on the Index Date of the matched case. Controls were excluded if they had a pre-existing malignancy, HF, or IHD prior to the study window. Individual outcomes were collected from the Index Date of the matched case until December 31, 2015 or until an individual was censored due to loss to follow-up or death. Kaplan Meier (K-M) methodology and log-rank test was used to estimate cumulative incidence. A competing risk regression analysis was used to evaluate relative risk (RR) and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 11 y (range 3-24 y) from most recent HL event, 764 AYA 2-y survivors were identified, aged 20 to 61 y (median 38 y) at the end of study period. The proportion of limited and advanced stage disease was 34.2% and 65.6%, respectively; and 49.9% were male. Eighty-eight patients (11.5%) had relapsed disease; eighty-six (11.3%) underwent high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as part of their salvage therapy. In total, 268 patients (36.4%) were treated with mediastinal RT for primary therapy or for relapsed disease. Fifty-three percent received cumulative anthracycline dose ≥300 mg/m2. Survivors had a 3-fold increased risk of CV disease relative to controls (p&lt;0.0001). The onset of CV disease in survivors occurred at median of 11.7 y after most recent treatment (range 2.2-19.2 y), and at a median age of 44.3 y (range 21 - 58 y). At 15 y, the estimated cumulative incidence of CV disease was 6.3% in survivors compared to 2.3% in controls (Figure A). In the 496 survivors that received chemotherapy only, the incidence of CV disease at 15 y was 4.6% vs 2.3% in controls, and those that received anthracyclines and mediastinal RT had significantly higher incidence at 8.6% (Figure B). The increase in risk was greatest for a diagnosis of HF (RR 6.92, p&lt;0.0001): at 15 y, the cumulative incidence of HF was 2.2% vs 0.6% in controls. The RR of IHD was 2.63 (p&lt;0.0001) with incidence of 5.1% in cases compared to 1.8% in controls. CONCLUSION Similar to the pediatric population, AYA cHL survivors are at increased risk of both HF and IHD after completion of treatment. The majority of patients had received ABVD alone and had a lower incidence of CV disease at 15 y when compared to those that received treatment that included mediastinal RT. These results will inform counseling regarding risk factor modification and aid in the development of surveillance guidelines for AYA survivors. Disclosures Gerrie: Sandoz: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding. Villa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nano String: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunovaccine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Purdue Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scott:NIH: Consultancy, Other: Co-inventor on a patent related to the MCL35 assay filed at the National Institutes of Health, United States of America.; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoString, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sehn:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria. Savage:BeiGene: Other: Steering Committee; Roche (institutional): Research Funding; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Servier: Consultancy; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document