scholarly journals Safety Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Studies of Venetoclax in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5472-5472
Author(s):  
Samer Al Hadidi ◽  
Rammurti Kamble ◽  
Courtney Nicole Miller-Chism ◽  
Martha P. Mims

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Venetoclax blocks the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein, leading to cell death of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) cells. Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of venetoclax for treatment of relapsed/refractory or treatment naïve CLL. METHODS We conducted an integrated safety analysis to characterize the frequency, severity, natural history, and outcomes of adverse events (AEs) with venetoclax versus comparators. Data were pooled from 2 completed phase III randomized controlled studies that had included 406 venetoclax -treated and 402 comparator-treated patients with CLL as a first line in treatment naïve patients and for relapsed/refractory disease (Table.1). Safety analyses included reporting of AEs using crude and exposure-adjusted incidence rates. RESULTS The median follow up duration is 25.95months (range: 23.8-28.1 months) for both venetoclax-treated and comparator-treated patients. Discontinuation because of AEs occurred at the same rate in both groups. When adjusted to exposure, hyperglycemia and diarrhea were the only common grade 3 AEs more often reported with venetoclax than with the comparators. The prevalence of common grade 3/4 AEs with venetoclax were <10% apart from neutropenia (55.2%) and infections/infestations (17.5%) though with adjustment to exposure time both of these side effects were more common in comparator arms (Table.2). Grade 3/4 venetoclax associated tumor lysis syndrome happened in 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS These results from an integrated analysis support a favorable benefit/risk profile of venetoclax in patients with CLL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3175-3175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Al Hadidi ◽  
Rammurti Kamble ◽  
Courtney Nicole Miller-Chism ◽  
Martha P. Mims

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that is used more frequently in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab for relapsed/refractory MM and primary treatment for transplant eligible and ineligible patients. METHODS We conducted an integrated safety analysis to characterize the frequency, severity, natural history, and outcomes of adverse events (AEs) with daratumumab versus comparators. Data were pooled from 5 completed phase III randomized controlled studies that had included 1798 daratumumab-treated and 1797 comparator-treated patients with MM as a first line in both transplant eligible and transplant ineligible and for relapsed/refractory disease(Table.1). Safety analyses included reporting of AEs using crude and exposure-adjusted incidence rates. RESULTS The median follow up duration is 16.84 months (range: 7.4-28 months) for both daratumumab-treated and comparator-treated patients. Discontinuation for any reason occurred less often with daratumumab (22% vs. 33.9%) though discontinuation because of AEs occurred at similar rates (25% vs.26%) as well as deaths due to AEs occurred at similar rates (2.25% vs. 1.84%). When adjusted to exposure, neutropenia, lymphopenia, diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, pneumonia and hypertension were the only common grade 3 AEs more often reported with daratumumab than with the comparators(Table.2). The prevalence of common grade 3/4 AEs with daratumumab were <7% apart from neutropenia, lymphopenia and pneumonia (45.9 vs. 32.3, 13 vs. 7.5, and 10.6 vs.7.2)(Table 3). Grade 3/4 daratumumab infusion related reactions happened in 3.8% CONCLUSIONS These results from an integrated analysis support a favorable benefit/risk profile of daratumumab in patients with MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Versha Banerji ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
Anna Christofides ◽  
Sarah Doucette ◽  
Pierre Laneuville

The 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology took place 7–10 December in Orlando, Florida. At the meeting, results from key studies in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia were presented. Of those studies, phase III oral presentations focused on the efficacy and safety of therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. One presentation reported updated results of the ECOG 1912 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib plus rituximab to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab in patients with CLL younger than 70 years of age. A second presentation reported interim results of the ELEVATE-TN trial, which is investigating the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab or acalabrutinib monotherapy versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. A third presentation reported on the single-agent zanubrutinib arm of the SEQUOIA trial in patients with del(17p). The final presentation reported a data update from the CLL14 trial, which is evaluating fixed-duration venetoclax and obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzumab, including the association of minimal residual disease status on progression-free survival. Our meeting report describes the foregoing studies and presents interviews with investigators and commentaries by Canadian hematologists about potential effects on Canadian practice.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (25) ◽  
pp. 2735-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E.W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Jeffrey Mueller ◽  
Robyn Egan ◽  
...  

Purpose Induction chemotherapy (IC) before radiotherapy lowers distant failure (DF) rates in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The goal of this phase III trial was to determine whether IC before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improves survival compared with CRT alone in patients with N2 or N3 disease. Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with nonmetastatic N2 or N3 SCCHN were randomly assigned to CRT alone (CRT arm; docetaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea plus radiotherapy 0.15 Gy twice per day every other week) versus two 21-day cycles of IC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC + CRT arm). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included DF-free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results A total of 285 patients were randomly assigned. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (9%); during CRT (both arms combined), they were mucositis (49%), dermatitis (21%), and leukopenia (18%). Serious adverse events were more common in the IC arm (47% v 28%; P = .002). With a minimum follow-up of 30 months, there were no statistically significant differences in OS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41), RFS, or DF-free survival. Conclusion IC did not translate into improved OS compared with CRT alone. However, the study was underpowered because it did not meet the planned accrual target, and OS was higher than predicted in both arms. IC cannot be recommended routinely in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced SCCHN.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier C. Badoux ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
...  

Purpose Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug active as salvage therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We combined lenalidomide with rituximab to improve response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Patients and Methods Fifty-nine adult patients (age 42 to 82 years) with relapsed or refractory CLL were enrolled onto a phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab. Patients had received prior fludarabine-based therapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously) was administered weekly during cycle one and on day 1 of cycles three to 12. Lenalidomide was started on day 9 of cycle one at 10 mg orally and administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 28 days. Rituximab was administered for 12 cycles; lenalidomide could continue indefinitely if patients benefitted clinically. Results The overall response rate was 66%, including 12% complete responses and 12% nodular partial remissions. Time to treatment failure was 17.4 months. Median overall survival has not been reached; estimated survival at 36 months is 71%. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (73% of patients). Fourteen patients (24%) experienced a grade 3 to 4 infection or febrile episode. There was one episode of grade 3 tumor lysis; one patient experienced renal failure during the first cycle of therapy, and one venous thromboembolic event occurred during the study. Conclusion The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active in patients with recurrent CLL and warrants further investigation.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Januario E. Castro ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Carlos I. Amaya-Chanaga ◽  
Natalie Nguyen ◽  
Colin MacCarthy ◽  
...  

Abstract High-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and rituximab (R) is an effective non-myelosuppressive treatment regimen for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Also, this combination has shown activity even in pts who have adverse leukemia-cytogenetics, such as del17p. Phase III studies have demonstrated that CLL pts treated with chlorambucil and obinutuzumab-Gazyva (G), another anti-CD20 mAb, had a superior outcome than comparable pts treated with R-chlorambucil. We hypothesized that G-HDMP is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of pts with CLL. Accordingly, we initiated an open-label phase Ib/II clinical study. A total of 40 pts were enrolled in two cohorts of 20 pts each (previously untreated (PU) and relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL) and treated with HDMP 1 g/m2on Day 1-3 of cycles 1-4 (28 days/cycle) and G administered based on FDA dosing recommendations for 6 cycles. The pts had a median age of 67 years + 9.1 in the RR cohort and 63 years + 8.3 in the PU cohort. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count was 30.7 + 7.3 x1,000/mm3 for pts in the RR cohort and 47.6 + 19.7 x1,000/mm3for pts in the PU cohort. Pts showed the following cytogenetic abnormalities: del(17p) in 30% RR vs. 0% PU, del(13q) in 60% RR vs. 70% PU, del(11q) in 20% RR vs. 35% PU, and trisomy 12 in 15% RR vs. 20% PU. Most AEs were grade 1-2 (RR=87%; PU=93%) without development of dose-limiting toxicities. Only two pts needed therapy discontinuation. One pt due to pulmonary embolism and the second pt due to asymptomatic gastrointestinal bleeding that required blood transfusion and resolved spontaneously. Grade 1-2 G-infusion-related reactions (IRR) were observed in 40% and 80% of pts in the RR and PU cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 IRR were observed in 10% of pts in the PU cohort only. We observed cytopenias (neutropenia grade 3-4: RR=55%, PU=40%; thrombocytopenia grade 3-4: RR=35%, PU=20%; and anemia grade 3-4: RR=0%, PU=0%). There were no cases of febrile neutropenia. Two pts (10%) in the RR cohort and one pt (5%) in the PU cohort developed infection grade 1-2 that was treated with oral antibiotics but did not require study treatment discontinuation. The most frequent non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were transaminitis, hyperglycemia, and electrolyte alterations (grade 1-2). There were no treatment related deaths in either cohort. The response assessment was performed in all 40 pts by iwCLL criteria. The ORR was 100% in the PU cohort and 95% in the RR cohort. 70% of the pts in the PU cohort and 85% of the pts in the RR cohort achieved a PR. CR was observed in 30% and 10% of the pts in the PU and RR cohorts, respectively. One pt (5%) in the RR cohort and four pts (20%) in the PU cohort achieved MRDneg status (<0.01% CLL in the bone marrow by multiparameter flow cytometry). Only one pt in the RR cohort achieved SD. At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, the RR cohort had a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 13.6 months and median Treatment Free Survival (TFS) of 14.7 months; the median Overall Survival (OS) has not been reached. In the PU cohort, the median PFS, TFS and OS have not been reached. One pt from the RR cohort and one pt from the PU cohort died during the follow-up period due to disease progression. G-HDMP was well tolerated and all 40 pts showed hematological and clinical responses during the study treatment without development of unexpected AEs. In both cohorts, most of IRR were grade 1-2 and severe IRR (grade 3-4) were much less compared with previously published data (G-chlorambucil / CLL-11 study). Compared to pts in the CLL-11 study, cytopenias appeared to be more frequent, however, the rate of infection and need for IV antibiotics or hospitalizations was lower. Of note, the eligibility criteria allowed pts with severe cytopenias and transfusion requirement to participate in our study. Response in PU pts were higher in terms of ORR, CR and CR-MRDnegativecompared with the data from the CLL-11 study and suggests a possible synergistic activity between G and HDMP. Overall, G-HDMP was well tolerated in the PU and RR CLL pts with a lower rate of IRR making this regimen more manageable in the outpatient setting. Responses were higher than previously reported in PU pts. Responses in RR pts appear to be comparable to our previous studies using R-HDMP. Our data supports G-HDMP as an alternative combination regimen for the treatment of CLL pts. Disclosures Kipps: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19005-e19005
Author(s):  
Colin Thomas ◽  
Sameh Gaballa ◽  
Martina DiMeglio ◽  
Seyfettin Onder Alpdogan ◽  
Matthew H. Carabasi ◽  
...  

e19005 Background: No standard salvage regimen exists for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) NHL or CLL. Bendamustine, pentostatin and ofatumumab have activity in pts with CLL and NHL, but have not been combined as a single regimen. We conducted a phase I trial to assess the safety of this regimen. Methods: Pts with RR B-NHL or CLL were eligible. The design was a standard 3+3 using escalating doses of Bendamustine (50, 70, or 90 mg/m2 D1-2), Pentostatin (4 mg/m2 D1), and Ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg D1; cycle 2-6: 1000 mg D2) every 28 days. Responses were assessed after cycle 3. Results: Ten pts were enrolled (6M/4F). Median age was 56 (range 37-65). Pts had follicular (FL) NHL (n = 2), CLL or SLL (n = 6), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) (n = 1), and extra-nodal marginal zone (MZL) NHL (n = 1). Pts had relapsed (n = 7) or refractory disease (n = 3) and received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range 1-4). Two CLL pts had high risk cytogenetics: 11p (n = 1) and 17p (n = 1). Most NHL pts (3/4) had stage 4 disease and all were refractory to rituximab. The ORR was 90% (PR = 5 pts: FL = 2, CLL/SLL = 3; CR = 4; CLL = 3, MZL = 1). One pt with PMBL progressed on treatment and died. One pt with CLL relapsed after 6 months. After a median follow up of 17 mo, the OS was 90% and PFS was 80%. Two pts (FL and CLL/SLL) subsequently underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant. DLT was not reached. Grade 3-4 toxicities included electrolyte imbalance (50%), neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (30%), tumor lysis (20%), neutropenic fever (20%), and infusion reactions (10%). Common grade 1-2 toxicities were hyperglycemia (90%), thrombocytopenia (80%), nausea (80%), edema (80%), fatigue (80%) and neutropenia (70%). Conclusions: The BOP regimen is well tolerated and safe in pts with RR B-NHL or CLL. No DLT toxicity was reached at the highest bendamustine dose of 90mg/m2. Targeted therapies have largely supplanted the role of chemo-immunotherapy in the salvage setting. This trial was initiated in the pre-ibrutinib era and accrual to the planned phase II portion is on hold as pts now receive targeted therapy as salvage therapy. BOP might be an option for pts refractory to other strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT01352312.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (24) ◽  
pp. 6450-6458 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
Jan Dürig ◽  
Laimonas Griskevicius ◽  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
...  

Abstract We conducted an international phase 2 trial to evaluate 2 dose levels of ofatumumab, a human CD20 mAb, combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (O-FC) as frontline therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients with active CLL were randomized to ofatumumab 500 mg (n = 31) or 1000 mg (n = 30) day 1, with fludarabine 25 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 days 2-4, course 1; days 1-3, courses 2-6; every 4 weeks for 6 courses. The first ofatumumab dose was 300 mg for both cohorts. The median age was 56 years; 13% of patients had a 17p deletion; 64% had β2-microglobulin > 3.5 mg/L. Based on the 1996 National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines, the complete response (CR) rate as assessed by an independent review committee was 32% for the 500-mg and 50% for the 1000-mg cohort; the overall response (OR) rate was 77% and 73%, respectively. Based on univariable regression analyses, β2-microglobulin and the number of O-FC courses were significantly correlated (P < .05) with CR and OR rates and progression-free survival (PFS). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 3-4 investigator-reported adverse events were neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (13%), and infection (8%). O-FC is active and safe in treatment-naive patients with CLL, including high-risk patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00410163.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 528-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Ann Janssens ◽  
K Govindbabu ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Chemoimmunotherapy with purine analogues and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is the standard of care as initial therapy in younger and physically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, most CLL patients are elderly and/or have comorbidities, meaning that fludarabine-containing regimens are often inappropriate, carry greater toxicity, and treatment of these patients remains challenging. Most randomized studies in previously untreated CLL have been conducted in younger or fit patients and results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to older, less fit patients. While chlorambucil (CHL) remains a standard of care for this patient population, more effective but tolerable treatment choices are still needed. Ofatumumab (O) demonstrated superior preclinical activity, compared to rituximab, against cells with low CD20 density like CLL and showed clinical activity as monotherapy, with high overall response rates (ORR) in patients with refractory CLL. Therefore, the addition of O to CHL could provide superior clinical outcomes than CHL alone, while being tolerable, for patients who are elderly and/or have comorbidities and currently have limited treatment options. Methods Patients with CLL who required therapy (2008 NCI-WG guidelines) and were considered inappropriate for fludarabine-based therapy due to advanced age and/or co-morbidities were randomized (1:1) to receive either O+CHL or CHL. CHL was given orally (10mg/m2 at days 1-7 of each 28 day cycle) and O was administered as intravenous infusions (Cycle 1: 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1). O premedication included acetaminophen, antihistamine and glucocorticoid. Treatment duration was a minimum of 3 cycles, until best response up to a maximum of 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients 447 patients from 16 countries were randomized. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Median age was 69 years with 82% ≥65 years and/or having ≥2 comorbidities. All modified Rai stages were represented (Low 8%, intermediate 51%, high 40%). 56% of patients had unmutated IgVH, 6% showed 17p deletions and 75% had β-2-microglobulin levels ≥3500μg/L. Results PFS as assessed by an IRC was significantly prolonged in the O+CHL arm (22.4 months) compared to CHL alone (13.1 months, p<0.001). ORR was higher for O+CHL vs CHL (82% vs 69%, p=0.001), with a superior CR rate (12% vs 1%). 37% of O+CHL subjects with an IRC-assessed CR were MRD negative. With a median follow-up of 29 months, median OS was not reached for O+CHL or CHL. Median duration of treatment for both arms was 6 cycles and 82% of patients received 6 or more cycles of O+CHL. Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred from start of treatment until 60 days after the last dose were experienced by 50% of patients receiving O-CHL and 43% of patients on CHL with the most common being neutropenia (O+CHL: 26%, CHL: 14%). Grade ≥3 infusion-related AEs were reported in 10% of patients. No fatal infusion reactions were reported. Grade ≥3 infections were reported in 15% (O+CHL) and 14% (CHL) of patients, with the most common infection being pneumonia (O+CHL: 4%, CHL: 3%). Deaths during treatment occurred in 2% of subjects in both arms. Conclusion Ofatumumab added to chlorambucil (O+CHL) demonstrated clinically important improvements with a manageable side effect profile in patients with CLL who have not received prior therapy and who are considered inappropriate for fludarabine based therapy. Disclosures: Hillmen: Roche Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of ofatumumab in combination with chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL. The reported trial will support the extension of the ofatumumab licence. Robak:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Janssens:GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Mayer:Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Panagiotidis:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kimby:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Emergent: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schuh:GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Montillo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McKeown:GSK: Employment. Carey:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Gupta:GSK: Employment. Chang:GSK: Employment. Lisby:Genmab: Employment, hold stock options Other. Offner:Lilly: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document