Higher Stability of Mutant mRNA As Compared to Wild-Type mRNA in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Cellular RNA levels are tightly regulated by very complex nuclear and cytoplasmic processes. The regulation of mutant mRNA in cancer cells is rarely studied. We explored the effects of mutations on mRNA levels in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Using next generation sequencing (NGS) and variant allele frequency (VAF) of mutant RNA, we compared relative mutant mRNA or variant allele frequency (RNA-VAF) with variant allele frequency of mutant DNA (DNA-VAF) in the same samples from patients with DLBCL. Methods: RNA and DNA were extracted from 427 FFPE samples from patients with DLBCL. We sequenced the DNA using 177 gene panel and the RNA using 1408 gene panel. The DNA sequencing is based on Single Primer Extension (SPE) library preparation with unique molecular identifier (UMI) (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). The RNA sequencing is based on hybrid capture. Sequencing data of DNA is analyzed using the DRAGEN Platform. Sequence duplicates were removed before calculating VAF. The RNA sequencing data is analyzed using Illumina basespace. RNA VAF is calculated also after removing duplicates using Isaac variant caller. Only mutations detected by both DNA and RNA variant callers are compared. Results: A total of 1770 mutations were detected using the DNA panel and 2207 mutations were detected using the larger RNA sequencing panel. We focused on the most commonly mutated genes that included in both DNA and RNA panels and compared the VAF of the same mutations between DNA and RNA. The selected genes are: KMT2D, NOTCH2, CARD11, MYC, MYD88, EZH2, TP53, CD79B, BCL2, and TET2. The overall VAF in the RNA was significantly higher (P<0.00001) (median:43.9%, minimum: 6%, maximum: 100%) as compared with that of the DNA (median: 28.8%, minimum: 3.5%, maximum: 95%). When each gene is considered individual, all genes showed significantly higher VAF in RNA as compared with DNA. As expected some mutations were detected in DNA, but not in in RNA and vice versa. However, the number of mutations detected in these 10 genes using DNA sequencing was significantly (P= 0.0001) higher (#658) as compared with mutations detected in RNA (#471). Most of the missed mutations by RNA were termination mutations. The most striking RNA-missed mutations were in NOTCH2. The DNA testing showed 81 mutations, while the RNA testing listed only 19 mutations. Almost all NOTCH2 mutations missed by RNA sequencing wer Pro6ArgfsTer27, which leads to early termination of mRNA (loss of function). When we looked at overall NOTCH2 mRNA levels, NOTCH2 mRNA was significantly higher (P=0.002, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) in samples with NOTCH2 mutation detected in both DNA and RNA as compared with mutations detected in DNA only. The NOTCH2 mRNA levels were also lower in samples with mutations detected in DNA only (P=0.046) as compared with wild-type NOTCH2. Conclusion: This data suggests that stability of mutant mRNA is significantly higher for most mutations and most genes. However, there are exceptions, especially when the mutations are termination at early amino acid. NOTCH2 pro6ArgfsTer27 mutation is an example of early termination of transcription, which leads to significant instability and reduction in NOTCH2 mRNA levels acting as a tumor suppressor, while other mutations in the gene lead to over expression and more oncogenenic function. This data suggests that molecular profiling of cancer should include evaluating RNA mutations and expression levels and not all mutations detected in a gene are the same. Furthermore, increased stability of most mutant mRNA may have some implication on methods used for detected minimal residual disease. Figure Disclosures Albitar: Genomic Testing Ccoperative: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tam:Takeda: Consultancy; Paragon Genomics: Consultancy. Hsi:Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cleveland Clinic&Abbvie Biotherapeutics Inc: Patents & Royalties: US8,603,477 B2. Piris:Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture Fees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture Fees. Kantarjian:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Higher Stability of Mutant IDH1/2 mRNA As Compared to Wild-Type mRNA in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127383 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2730-2730

Author(s):

Maher Albitar ◽

Marina Y Konopleva ◽

Ivan De Dios ◽

Jeffrey Justin Estella ◽

Spiraggelos Antzoulatos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Allele Frequency ◽

Research Funding ◽

Variant Allele ◽

Wild Type ◽

Sequencing Data ◽

Variant Allele Frequency ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dna And Rna ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Mutant Idh1

Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) are homodimeric enzymes that play an important role in cellular metabolism, epigenetic regulation, and DNA repair. Early studies suggested that mutations in IDH1/2 were loss of function mutations associated with a tumor suppressor function. However, biallelic mutations are extremely rare, and studies demonstrate that mutant IDH1/2 enzymes are responsible for NADPH-dependent reduction of αKG to the oncometabolite d-2-hydroxyglutarate (D2HG), suggesting an oncoprotein. Cellular RNA levels are tightly regulated by very complex cellular processes, and the regulation of mutant mRNA in cancer cells is rarely studied. We explored the effects of IDH1/2 mutations on mRNA levels in patients with Acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using next generation sequencing (NGS) and variant allele frequency (VAF) of mutant RNA, we compared relative mutant mRNA or variant allele frequency (RNA-VAF) with variant allele frequency of mutant DNA (DNA-VAF) in the same samples from patients with AML. Methods: RNA and DNA were extracted from 48 bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from patients with confirmed AML, including 12 patients with IDH1 mutations, 2 with IDH2 mutation and 34 samples from AML without IDH1/2 mutations. Samples were collected pretherapy as well as while on therapy. We sequenced the DNA using 177 gene panel and the RNA using 1408 gene panel. The DNA sequencing is based on Single Primer Extension (SPE) library preparation with unique molecular identifier (UMI) (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). Average coverage of DNA sequencing was >1000X. The RNA sequencing is based on hybrid capture and the number of reads ranged from 5 to 10 million. Sequencing data of DNA is analyzed using the DRAGEN Platform. Sequence duplicates were removed before calculating VAF. The RNA sequencing data is analyzed using Illumina basespace. RNA VAF is calculated also after removing duplicates using Isaac variant caller. Only mutations detected by both DNA and RNA variant callers are compared. Results: A total of 176 mutations were detected using the DNA panel and 122 mutations using the RNA panel. Some mutations were called by RNA variant caller, but not by DNA variant caller and vice versa. All mutations detected in IDH1 and IDH2 were detected in both DNA and RNA. When the IDH1/2 mutations are considered (#14), the VAF in RNA (median: 41%, range: 13%-74%) was significant higher (P=0.006, Wilcoxon matched pairs test ) as compared with DNA (median:28%, range: 13%-74%). The VAF of the other 31 mutations that were detected in both DNA and RNA varied dependent on the gene. ASXL1, DNMT3A, RUNX1, PTPN11, SRSF2, STAG2 and U2AF1 mutations showed no significant difference between DNA and RNA in VAF (P=0.71). Although the number is small, mutations in NRAS and NPM1 showed significantly higher VAF in RNA as compared with with that of DNA (P=0.008). Conclusion: This data suggests that, in general, stability of mutant RNA varies between genes and between the mutations in the same gene. Mutant IDH1/2 RNA is significantly more stable in myeloid leukemic cells a compared with the wild-type mRNA. Most likely this reflects increased levels of mutant IDH1/2 as compared with wild-type IDH1/2, confirming that IDH1/2 is oncoprotein and may explain the efficacy of therapeutic inhibition of IDH1/2 in treating cancers. Furthermore this suggests that mRNA testing might be more sensitive in monitoring minimal residual disease in patients with IDH1/2 mutations. Figure Disclosures Albitar: Genomic Testing Ccoperative: Employment, Equity Ownership. Konopleva:Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Ablynx: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding. Loghavi:GLG Consultants: Consultancy; AlphaSights: Consultancy; MDACC: Employment. Takahashi:Symbio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding. DiNardo:medimmune: Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jazz: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Cell of Origin Classification of DLBCL Using Targeted NGS Expression Profiling and Deep Learning

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126927 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2891-2891

Author(s):

Maher Albitar ◽

Zijun Yidan Xu-Monette ◽

Babak Shahbaba ◽

Ivan De Dios ◽

Yingjun Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Deep Learning ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Rna Sequencing ◽

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Expression Profiling ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Tree Model ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Targeted RNA sequencing using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has significant advantages over transcriptome sequencing. In addition to information on mutations, fusion and alternative splicing, RNA quantification using targeted RNA sequencing is sensitive, reproducible and provides better dynamic range. We used targeted RNA sequencing for RNA profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and explored its utility in the sub-classification of DLBC to ABC and GCB. Method: RNA extracted from 441 FFPE lymphnode samples with DLBC lymphoma and sequenced targeting 1408 genes. These cases were previously subclassified as ABC vs GCB using expression profiling and immunohistochemistry. We first normalized RNA expression data to PAX5 expression, then we tried to narrow down important markers using univariate significance tests. Setting the cutoff for false discovery rate at 0.0001, 48 variables remained significant, including 46 RNA levels and two genes (MYD88 and EZH2) mutation status. Using 60% of samples as training set, we used multiple statistical approaches for classification. Deep learning emerged as the best approach. We used autoencoder with 5 hidden layers and developed a model for classification of ABC vs GCB. To further improve on classification, we divided patients in each subgroup based on survival using simple tree model. In this tree model, expression level of CD58 emerged as a powerful prognostic marker for the ABC group and RLTPR expression in the GCB group. Results: Using probability of scoring developed based on deep learning and logestic regression, approximately 30% of the cases had a score between 0.5 and 0.75. For the remaining 70% of patients, the ABC vs GCB classification showed sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 97% for the testing set. We also applied the same approach to 60 independent cases classified using NanoString (Lymph2Cx). Our model showed sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 97% in the NanoString independent cases. Using the tree model for further classification of the ABC and GCB classes, CD58 mRNA levels separated the ABC group into two subgroups (ABC1 and ABC2) and RLTPR mRNA separated the GCB into two subgroups (GCB1 and GCB2) with significant difference in overall survival (P=0.0010) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.0027). Conclusion: Targeted RNA sequencing is very reliable and practical for the subclassification of DLBCL and can provide clinical-grade reproducible test for prognostically subclassification of DLBCL. Figure Disclosures Albitar: Genomic Testing Ccoperative: Employment, Equity Ownership. De Dios:Genomic Testing Ccoperative: Employment. Tam:Takeda: Consultancy; Paragon Genomics: Consultancy. Hsi:Abbvie: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cleveland Clinic&Abbvie Biotherapeutics Inc: Patents & Royalties: US8,603,477 B2; Jazz: Consultancy. Ferreri:Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Piris:Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture Fees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture Fees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Ariad: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122393 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2898-2898

Author(s):

Vania Phuoc ◽

Leidy Isenalumhe ◽

Hayder Saeed ◽

Celeste Bello ◽

Bijal Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117871 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 804-804 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Mark Bustoros ◽

Chia-jen Liu ◽

Kaitlen Reyes ◽

Kalvis Hornburg ◽

Kathleen Guimond ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Rna Sequencing ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Easix As Prediction Score before CAR-T Cells Vs Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) for Relapsed/Refractory (r/r) Large B Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139615 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-12

Author(s):

Felix Korell ◽

Thomas Luft ◽

Michael Schmitt ◽

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Anita Schmitt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Tumor Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Educational Activities ◽

Bulky Disease ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we have shown that CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells do not appear to be inferior to alloHCT when used as standard cellular immunotherapy (CI) for patients with multiply r/r LBCL (EBMT 2020). The purpose of the present follow-up analysis was to further compare the risk profile of the 2 cohorts by applying the EASIX score (lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)/thrombocytes (109 cells per L)), and to assess if EASIX could be used as outcome predictor in patients with r/r LBCL undergoing CAR-T and alloHCT, respectively. METHODS: Eligible were all patients referred to our institution with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and a tumor board decision recommending treatment with CAR-T cells between 07/2018 and 02/2020 and those recommending allogeneic donor search between 2004 and 2019. Patients with DLBCL transformed from CLL were excluded. EASIX was evaluated retrospectively using uni- and multivariable analyses (with regards to age, gender and number of failed therapy lines) and mortality using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: 41 patients intended for CAR-T cells and 60 patients intended for alloHCT were included. In both cohorts nearly all patients had active disease at indication. Cohorts were comparable for sex, time from diagnosis, ZUMA1 eligibility, and PS, but CAR-T patients tended to be older (median 56 vs 51 years, p=0.093), and had more often primary refractory and bulky disease (p=0.004 and p=0.04, respectively). Median EASIX score across both cohorts was 1.50 (0.27-70.5), with significantly higher scores in the CART group both at indication (EASIX-ind; median 1.79 and 1.22 for CAR-T and alloHCT, respectively, p=0.031) and at conditioning for CI (EASIX-pre, median 2.24 vs 1.26, p=0.005). Median OS from indication was 475d for the CAR-T cohort vs 285d for the alloHCT cohort (p=0.88). On multivariate analysis, EASIX-ind was significantly associated with adverse OS if alloHCT was intended (HR per 2fold increase 1.43, 95%CI 1.08-1.90, p=0.013), but not if CAR-T was intended (HR per 2fold increase 1.16, 95%CI 0.88-1.53, p=0.3). After CI, 12-month estimates for NRM, relapse incidence, PFS, and OS for CAR-T vs alloHCT were 3% vs 21% (p=0.04), 59% vs 44% (p=0.12), 39% vs 33% (p=0.97), and 68% vs 54% (p=0.32). EASIX-pre predicted overall survival (OS) in both CAR-T (HR per 2fold increase 2.11, 95%CI 1.21-3.7, p=0.009) and alloHCT (HR per 2fold increase 3.69, 95%CI 1.54-8.31, p=0.003) cohorts. In the alloHCT group, the EASIX effect was largely driven by higher NRM risk with increasing EASIX-pre, while in the CAR-T group poorer OS with increasing EASIX-pre was largely relapse-related. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CI for r/r LBCL, EASIX measured prior to conditioning can predict mortality after both CAR-T and alloHCT. If applied already at indication for CI, the predictive capacity of EASIX is weaker and no longer significant if CAR-T is intended. Further studies for validation of this data appear to be warrantable. Disclosures Schmitt: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: PI of clinical trials on letermovir; TolerogenixX Ltd: Other: Co-Founder and shareholder; Hexal: Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Apogenix: Research Funding; Kite: Other: Travel grants, educational activities and conferences; Novartis: Other: educational activities and conferences, Research Funding. Dietrich:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schmitt:Hexal: Other: Travel grants ; TolerogenixX LtD: Other: Co-founder, Part-time employee ; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel grants . Dreger:Neovii: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study Of Anti-CD19 Antibody Drug Conjugate (SAR3419) In Combination With Rituximab: Clinical Activity and Safety In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (NCT01470456)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4395.4395 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4395-4395 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

Catherine Thieblemont ◽

Sophie de Guibert ◽

Jehan Dupuis ◽

Vincent Ribrag ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1518.1518 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1518-1518 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jackie Vandermeer ◽

Allison M Winter ◽

Ajay K. Gopal ◽

Ryan D. Cassaday ◽

Brian T. Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/Ib Study of the Novel Immunotoxin MT-3724 in Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5112.5112 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5112-5112

Author(s):

Paul A Hamlin ◽

Catherine S. Diefenbach ◽

David J. Valacer ◽

Jack Higgins ◽

Michelle A. Fanale

Keyword(s):

B Cells ◽

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dose Cohort ◽

Mixed Response

Abstract Background CD20 is selectively expressed on the surface of early pre-B-cells, remains throughout B-cell development, and is then lost from plasma cells. Because CD20 is present on the majority of B-cell lymphomas, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy is widely employed in the treatment of NHL. However a majority of NHL patients eventually become refractory to CD20 MAb(s). Resistance mechanisms may include increased MAb catabolism, initial or post treatment selection of low CD20 expressing tumor cells, trogocytosis of surface CD20, failure of MAb effector mechanisms and/or impaired patient immune cell function. MT-3724 is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of a CD20 binding variable fragment (scFv) fused to the enzymatically active Shiga-like toxin-I A1 subunit (SLT-I A1). SLT-I A1 is an N-glycosidase that catalytically inactivates 60S ribosomal subunits causing inhibition of protein synthesis. Upon its scFv binding to cell surface CD20 in vitro, SLT-I A1 forces MT-3724 internalization which then routes in a predictable fashion to the cytosol and irreversibly inactivates the cell ribosomes triggering cell death. MT-3724 has been shown to specifically bind and kill CD20+ malignant human B-cells in vitro and non-human primate (NHP) B-cells in vivo. MT-3724 was tested for safety in healthy NHPs: 6 intravenous (IV) doses of MT-3724 were given over 12 days at doses of 50, 150, and 450 mcg/kg. There were no deaths or effects on serum chemistries in the NHP studies. The major observed toxicity (inappetence) resolved within 48 hours of last dose. There was a significant, dose-dependent NHP B-cell depletion by Day 3 at all doses. Given the preclinical activity and mechanism of action, a Phase I/Ib study of MT-3724 was initiated in NHL. Methods MT-3724 is being tested for safety and tolerability in a first-in-human, open label, ascending dose study (3 + 3 design) in sequential cohorts of 5, 10, 20 and 50 mcg/kg/dose. Eligible subjects who previously responded to a CD20 MAb containing therapy followed by relapse/recurrence of NHL receive 6 doses by 2 hour IV infusions over the first 12 days of a 28 day cycle (first cycle). With continued safety, tolerability and lack of tumor progression, subjects may receive up to 4 additional 6-dose cycles (21 days) with tumor assessments after cycles 2, 4 and 5. Dose escalation is based on < 33% dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the first 28 day cycle. Results Three NHL subjects (2 transformed DLBCL, 1 FL) have completed at least one cycle in the 5 mcg/kg/dose cohort with no protocol DLTs or infusion related reactions and are evaluable for safety. Non-DLTs included grade (Gr) 2-3 transient hyperglycemic episodes related to pre-infusion corticosteroid therapy (n=1); transient Gr 4 neutropenia, possibly related to MT-3724 during cycle 1, week 4 (n=1); Gr 4 hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury with Gr 3 hypophosphatemia during cycle 1, week 4 due to leukemic disease progression (n=1). Subject 1 completed 5 cycles of therapy, with a partial response achieved post cycle 2 sustained through cycle 5; Subject 3 had a mixed response (both subjects had transformed DLBCL). Three subjects have now initiated treatment in the 10 mcg/kg/dose cohort with updated data to be presented at the meeting. Conclusions MT-3724 at 5 mcg/kg/dose has been safely administered for up to 5 cycles in this first-in-human study in relapsed/refractory NHL subjects. Treatment with the 10 mcg/kg cohort has commenced with continuing dose ascension planned. There is early evidence of clinical activity. Disclosures Diefenbach: Gilead: Equity Ownership, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen Oncology: Consultancy; Idera: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Valacer:Molecular Templates: Employment. Higgins:Molecular Templates: Employment. Fanale:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An International Collaborative Study of Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Secondary CNS Involvement By Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1874.1874 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1874-1874 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly ◽

Chan Yoon Cheah ◽

Mette Dahl Bendtsen ◽

Gita Thanarasjasingam ◽

Roopesh Kansara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Systemic Disease ◽

Performance Status ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Cns Involvement ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Background: Secondary CNS involvement (SCNS) is a detrimental complication seen in ~5% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with modern immunochemotherapy. Data from older series report short survival following SCNS, typically <6 months. However, data in patients that develop SCNS following primary therapy that contains a rituximab-based-regimen as well as the impact of more intensified treatment for SCNS are limited. Aims: The aims of this study were to i) describe the natural history of SCNS in a large cohort of patients treated with immunochemotherapy, and ii) determine prognostic factors after SCNS. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with SCNS during or after frontline immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP or equivalently effective regimens). SCNS was defined as new involvement of the CNS (parenchymal, leptomeningeal, and/or eye) in patients without known CNS involvement at the time of first pathologic diagnosis of DLBCL. Patients were identified from local databases and/or regional/national registries in Denmark, Canada (British Columbia), Australia, Israel, US (University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE), and England (Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London). Clinico-pathologic and treatment characteristics at the time of SCNS were collected from medical records. Results: In total, 281 patients with SCNS diagnosed between 2001 and 2016 were included. Median age at SCNS was 64 (range 20-93) years and male:female ratio was 1.3. SCNS occurred as part of first relapse in 244 (87%) patients and 112 (40%) had documented concurrent systemic disease at the time of SCNS. The median time from initial DLBCL diagnosis to SCNS was 9 months, which was similar for patients treated with (N=76, 27%) or without upfront CNS prophylaxis (N=205, 73%) (10 vs 9 Mo; P=0.3). The median post-SCNS OS was 4 months (interquartile range 2-13) and the 2yr survival rate was 20% (95% CI 15-25) for the entire cohort. Associations between clinicopathologic features, management strategy, and post-SCNS survival are shown in Table 1, which excludes patients who did not receive any treatment against SCNS, patients treated with steroids alone, and a patient with unavailable treatment information (n=43, 15%). In multivariable analysis, performance status >1, concurrent leptomeningeal and parenchymal involvement, SCNS developing before completion of 1st line treatment, and combined systemic and CNS involvement by DLBCL were associated with inferior outcomes. Upfront CNS prophylaxis did not influence post-SCNS OS. High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and/or platinum based treatment regimens (i.e. ICE, DHAP, or GDP [+/- IT treatment and/or radiotherapy], N=163) for SCNS were associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.45 [0.32-0.62, P<0.01]). The 2yr post-SCNS survival for patients treated with HDMTX and/or platinum-based regimens (N=163) was 29% (95% CI 22-37). For patients with isolated parenchymal SCNS, single modality treatment with radiotherapy resulted in 2-yr OS of 19% (95% CI 8-35). For the subgroup of 49 patients treated with HDMTX- and/or platinum-based regimens for isolated SCNS after 1st line DLBCL treatment and with performance status 0 or 1, the 2yr post-SCNS survival was 46% (95% CI 31-59). Overall, 9% of the patients received HDT with ASCT as part of salvage therapy at the time of SCNS. Amongst 36 SCNS patients without systemic involvement and in CR following intensive treatment (HDMTX and/or platinum-based treatments), 11 patients consolidated with HDT had similar outcomes to 25 patients treated without consolidating HDT (P=0.9, Fig 1) Conclusions: Outcomes for patients with SCNS remain poor in this large international cohort of patients from the immunochemotherapy era. Combined parenchymal and leptomeningeal disease, presence of systemic disease concurrent with SCNS, performance status >1, and SCNS developing during first line treatment were independently associated with inferior OS. However, a significant fraction of patients with isolated SCNS after first line DLBCL treatment and with good performance status may achieve long-term remissions after intensive regimens for SCNS. Disclosures El-Galaly: Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel funding. Cheah:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker's Bureau. Kansara:Celgene: Honoraria. Connors:Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding. Seymour:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Villa:Celgene: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

First Analysis of an International Double-Blind Randomized Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Maintenance in Elderly Patients with DLBCL Treated with R-CHOP in First Line, the Remarc Study from Lysa

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.471.471 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 471-471 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Catherine Thieblemont ◽

Hervé Tilly ◽

Maria Gomez da Silva ◽

Rene-Olivier Casasnovas ◽

Christophe Fruchart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase Iii ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Double Blind

Abstract Background. R-CHOP is the standard first-line treatment for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However 30% of patients will relapse and 70% of relapsed patients will die within 2 years of diagnosis. The REMARC study (clinicalTrials.gov NCT01122472) is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, phase III trial that assessed the benefit of lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance after response to R-CHOP in patients aged 60 to 80 years with untreated DLBCL, FL3b or transformed lymphoma. Patients achieving CR or PR at the end of 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP21 or R-CHOP14 were stratified by CR/PR status and country and randomized 1:1 to receive 2 years of LEN maintenance (25 mg/day for 21 of every 28 days) or placebo (PBO). The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, PR to CR conversion rate, and overall survival (OS). Diagnosis was retrospectively centrally reviewed. In patients with adequate samples, GCB/nonGCB profile was assessed by the Hans algorithm and GCB/ABC/unclassified profile was assessed using NanoString gene expression profiling technology. Methods. From 05/2009 to 05/2014, 784 patients were enrolled either before R-CHOP (n= 437) or after completion of 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP (n= 347). At the end of R-CHOP therapy, 650 patients were randomized to maintenance, either in CR (n= 495) or in PR (n= 152). Central review found that 3 patients were randomized in SD or PD, all in LEN arm. At time of diagnosis, median age was 68 y (range 58-80), 43.5% were older than 70 y, and 56% were male. aaIPI was low in 38.5% and high in 57.5% of patients (missing data 4%). COO analyses are ongoing for both Hans algorithm and NanoString technology. Results. With a median follow-up of 40 months, median PFS (according to independent centralized radiology review) was not reached in the LEN group versus 68 months in the PBO group (hazard ratio favoring the LEN group, 0.708 (95% CI 0.537-0.932; p=0.0135))(See Figure). In the LEN group, 18 patients (21%) converted from PR to CR during maintenance compared to 13 patients (14%) in the PBO group. Immature overall survival data did not show any benefit for LEN arm, a lack of difference not attributable to an excess of lymphoma relapse, secondary cancer or safety problems in LEN arm. Deaths generally occurred off study drug (median time from last dose of study drug to death was 277 days (range 20, 1291) in LEN arm and 334 (41, 1594) in control arm. During maintenance, the most common observed grade 3 or 4 AEs were neutropenia (56% vs. 22%), rash (5% vs. 1%), infections (8% vs. 6%), and thrombocytopenia (2.5% vs. 0.6%) in LEN and PBO arms, respectively. Dose adjustments were necessary in 72% of the LEN patients and 42% of PBO patients. 59% of patients stopped LEN and 40% stopped PBO for toxicity (p<0.001). Median number of cycles was 15 in LEN and 25 in PBO (p<0.001). Secondary primary malignancies occurred in 33 patients receiving LEN and in 42 patients on PBO. Conclusion. This analysis of the REMARC study shows that 2 years of LEN maintenance in patients responding to R-CHOP significantly improved PFS (primary endpoint) without an early significant impact on OS. The COO analysis is currently ongoing. This is the first report finding that using an immunomodulatory agent as maintenance therapy prolongs PFS for patients with DLBCL after first line treatment with R-CHOP. Figure 1. Progression-free survival of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in response to R-CHOP treated in maintenance with either lenalidomide or placebo Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Thieblemont: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; Bayer healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gomez da Silva:Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria. Haioun:Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cabecadas:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Salles:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Coiffier:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text