A Phase I/II Study (JACKPOT8) of DZD4205, a Selective JAK1 Inhibitor, in Refractory or Relapsed Peripheral T- Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Won-Seog Kim ◽  
Dok-Hyun Yoon ◽  
Hyeon-Seok Eom ◽  
Youngil Koh ◽  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
...  

Background: Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) is an aggressive malignancy which lacks effective treatment. Emerging data suggests that the JAK-STAT pathway may play an important role in mediating pathogenesis of PTCL. DZD4205 (AZD4205) is an orally available, potent and highly selective JAK1 inhibitor. In T-cell lymphoma cell lines, DZD4205 modulates pSTAT3 pathway and suppresses cell proliferation, and in tumor xenograft models, DZD4205 exhibits dose-dependent anti-tumor activities, with good correlation with drug exposure and modulations of pSTAT3 in tumor tissues. A phase I/II study (JACKPOT8) was initiated to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor efficacy of DZD4205 in patients with refractory/relapsed (r/r) PTCL. Methods: The JACKPOT8 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04105010) included two parts: Part A, dose escalation and Part B, dose expansion. In Part A, patients with r/r PTCL who have progressed on or were refractory to systemic therapy will be enrolled and treated with DZD4205 at two different dose levels, 150 mg or 250 mg once daily. In Part B, patients will receive DZD4205 treatment at a defined dose. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of DZD4205, and the secondary objectives include anti-tumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Evaluation of safety/tolerability and tumor response will be based on the CTCAE version 5.0 and 2014 Lugano classification, respectively. Patients will be treated until disease progression, intolerance to adverse events, or withdrawal of consent. Results: As of June 30, 2020, a total of 23 patients with r/r PTCL were enrolled and received DZD4205 at 150 mg (n = 19) or 250 mg (n = 4) once daily. Patient characteristics: median age (range): 65.0 years (34-79); median prior systemic therapies (range): 2 lines (1-8). Four patients had undergone prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Six patients had bone marrow involvement at the study entry. Histological subtypes included peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n = 10, 43.5%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) (n = 10, 43.5%), ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL ALK-) (n = 2, 8.7%) and extra-nodal nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) (n = 1, 4.3%) . Preliminary data showed that 20 patients experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), among whom 13 (56.5%) had ≥ grade 3 TEAEs. Based on local investigators' assessment, eight patients (34.8%) had ≥ grade 3 TEAEs which were considered to be related to DZD4205. The most common (> 5% incidence) DZD4205-related TEAEs (any grade) included thrombocytopenia (n = 6, 26.1%), neutropenia (n = 4, 17.3%), decreased appetite (n = 3, 13.0%), nausea (n = 2, 8.7%), interstitial lung disease (n = 2, 8.7%) and pneumonia (n = 2, 8.7%). Most TEAEs were manageable with dose interruption and reduction. Preliminary PK data is available in 20 patients (n = 19 at 150 mg, n = 1 at 250 mg). Exposure at 250 mg is higher than 150 mg following a single and multiple dose. As expected from long t1/2 of DZD4205, accumulation of about 3 folds in AUC was observed. DZD4205 had flat PK profile with small difference between Css,max and Css,min after 22 days of once daily dosing, which is an optimal PK profile to maintain DZD4205 concentrations above effective levels throughout the dosing interval. As of June 30, 2020, 22 patients (n = 19 at 150 mg, n = 3 at 250 mg) had at least one post-treatment Lugano assessment. In 150 mg cohort, 8 out of 19 patients showed tumor response, with objective response rate (ORR) of 42%, among whom 4 (21%) had complete response (CR) and another 4 (21%) partial response (PR). In 250 mg cohort, 1 out of 3 patients showed tumor response, with ORR of 33%. Tumor response was observed in subtypes including AITL, PTCL-NOS, ALCL (ALK-) and NKTCL. At the data cut-off date, the longest duration on treatment was > 8 months. Patient enrolment is ongoing. Updated clinical data will be shared at the meeting. Conclusion: DZD4205 shows good tolerability, pharmacokinetic profiles and promising anti-tumor efficacy in patients with r/r PTCL, indicating its potential as a therapeutic option for this unmet medical need. Disclosures Kim: Donga: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding. Yoon:Celltrion: Honoraria; Samyang: Research Funding; Amgen, Chongkundang, Celgene, Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Wang:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Li:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Huang:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Deng:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chen:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Yang:Dizal Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Youn Kim ◽  
Jasmine M Zain ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 591-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
H. Miles Prince ◽  
Francine M. Foss ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 591FN2 Background: Romidepsin is a potent class 1 selective histone deacetylase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy and patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who have received at least 1 prior therapy. Approval for use in patients with PTCL was based in part on results from the phase 2, single-arm, open-label registration study GPI-06-0002, which demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability of romidepsin in patients with recurrent or refractory PTCL. The aim of this subanalysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of romidepsin on GPI-06-0002 in the three major subtypes of PTCL: PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-1–negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-1–negative ALCL). Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed PTCL who failed or were refractory to ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy received romidepsin 14 mg/m2 as a 4-hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles; treatment could be extended for patients achieving stable disease (SD) or better. The primary efficacy endpoint was rate of confirmed/unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu); secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR: CR/CRu + partial response [PR]) and duration of response (DOR). Because of the aggressive nature of PTCL, prolonged disease stabilization can provide patient benefit, thus ORR + SD ≥ 90 days was used as an overall measure of disease control. Efficacy assessments were made by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) and consisted of an initial radiographic review of images (CT, MRI) followed by an overall clinical assessment based on the radiology evaluations, photographs, and relevant clinical parameters. Results: Of the 131 enrolled patients, 130 patients had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review, with a median of 2 (range 1–8) prior systemic therapies for PTCL. The majority of patients (117/130) had PTCL-NOS (n = 69), AITL (n = 27), or ALK-1–negative ALCL (n = 21). Responses assessed by the IRC and the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) for the 3 major subtypes are noted in the table. ORR was similar across subtypes, including 30% in patients with AITL, with 19% CR/CRu. With a median duration of follow-up of 10.9 months, the median DOR for all responders was 17 months for patients with PTCL-NOS and 12 months for patients with ALK-1–negative ALCL. Median DOR was not yet evaluable for patients with AITL, who had the longest DOR ongoing at 34 months. Overall, 66% of patients experienced at least 1 grade ≥ 3 AE; 78% in patients with AITL, 67% in patients with PTCL-NOS, and 48% in patients with ALK-1–negative AITL. Eighteen of 117 patients (15%) experienced grade ≥ 3 infection; however infections led to discontinuation in only 4 of 117 patients (3%), 1 with PTCL-NOS and 3 with ALK-1–negative ALCL. Infection rates were higher in patients whose disease had bone marrow involvement or who had received prior monoclonal antibody therapy. Conclusions: Similar CR/CRu rates were observed across the 3 major PTCL subtypes (PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALK-1–negative ALCL). Romidepsin induced durable responses in patients with the major subtypes of PTCL, with nearly half (46%) of these patients experiencing disease control. These data support the use of single-agent romidepsin to treat relapsed or refractory PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALK-1–negative ALCL as well as the development of romidepsin-based combination regimens and front-line therapies in these histologies Disclosures: Coiffier: Celgene: Consultancy; Gloucester: Consultancy. Pro:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Prince:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Foss:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy. Sokol:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gloucester: Research Funding. Caballero:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser:Bayer: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pinter-Brown:Celgene: Consultancy; Allos: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Spectrum: Honoraria; Genetech: Speakers Bureau. Padmanabhan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shustov:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Nichols:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Carroll:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Balser:Celgene: Contracted Consultancy. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Merck: Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding.


Author(s):  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Won-Seog Kim ◽  
Toshiki Uchida ◽  
Naokuni Uike ◽  
Youko Suehiro ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Two phase I studies of darinaparsin including Japanese and Korean patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma were performed to evaluate its safety (primary purpose), efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01435863 and NCT01689220). Methods Patients received intravenous darinaparsin for 5 consecutive days at 200 mg/m2/day in 4-week cycles, 300 mg/m2/day in 4-week cycles or 300 mg/m2/day in 3-week cycles. Results Seventeen Japanese and 6 Korean patients were enrolled and treated. Drug-related adverse events developed in 18 patients (78%). Dose-limiting toxicity, grade 3 hepatic dysfunction, was reported on Day 15 of cycle 1 in 1 Japanese patient who received 300 mg/m2/day. The most common drug-related, grade ≥ 3 adverse events were lymphopenia (9%), neutropenia (9%) and thrombocytopenia (9%). No deaths occurred. In 14 evaluable patients, 1 and 3 patients had complete response and partial response, respectively. The plasma concentration-time profiles of arsenic, a surrogate marker for darinaparsin, were similar between Japanese and Korean patients. No significant difference was found in its pharmacokinetic profile. Conclusions These data indicate the good tolerability and potential efficacy of darinaparsin in patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Darinaparsin 300 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days in 3-week cycles is the recommended regimen for phase II study.


Author(s):  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
Vincent Camus ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
David Sibon ◽  
René-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) as a single agent. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used as first-line treatment of PTCL; however, it has limited efficacy. Results from a phase Ib and II study showed the feasibility of combining romidepsin with CHOP (Ro-CHOP). METHODS This study is a randomized phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP in adult patients with previously untreated PTCL. All patients received CHOP in 3-week cycles for six cycles. Romidepsin, 12 mg/m2, was administered intravenously over a 4-hour period on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to International Working Group 1999 criteria. RESULTS Between January 2013 and December 2017, 421 patients were enrolled (Ro-CHOP, n = 211; CHOP, n = 210). The median PFS for Ro-CHOP versus CHOP was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 25.8) versus 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 13.2) with a hazard ratio of 0.81 ( P = .096). In the Ro-CHOP versus CHOP arms, the median overall survival was 51.8 versus 42.9 months and the objective response rate was 63% versus 60% with complete response plus unconfirmed complete response rates of 41% versus 37% ( P > .1 in all comparisons), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients in the Ro-CHOP arm included thrombocytopenia (50% v 10% in the Ro-CHOP v CHOP arms, respectively), neutropenia (49% v 33%), anemia (47% v 17%), and leukopenia (32% v 20%). CONCLUSION The addition of romidepsin to CHOP did not improve PFS, response rates, nor overall survival and increased the frequency for grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Ro-CHOP does not represent a significant advance in the standard of care for patients with previously untreated PTCL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
Amanda F. Cashen ◽  
Petros G. Nikolinakos ◽  
Anne W. Beaven ◽  
Stefan Klaus Barta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Belinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for relapsed refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of belinostat combined with CHOP (Bel-CHOP). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and belinostat pharmacokinetics (PK). Methods Patients were ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated PTCL. Patients received belinostat (1000 mg/m2 once daily) + standard CHOP for 6 cycles with varying schedules using a 3 + 3 design in Part A. Part B enrolled patients at MTD dose. Results Twenty-three patients were treated. One patient experienced DLT (Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity) on Day 1–3 schedule, resulting in escalation to Day 1–5 schedule (n = 3). No DLTs were observed and Day 1–5 schedule with 1000 mg/m2 was declared as MTD. Twelve additional patients were enrolled in Part B using MTD. Median relative dose intensity was 98%. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), including nausea (78%), fatigue (61%), and vomiting (57%). Serious AEs occurred in 43%, with febrile neutropenia (17%) and pyrexia (13%). Overall ORR was 86% with 71% reported CR at MTD. Belinostat PK parameters were similar to single-agent. Conclusions Bel-CHOP was well tolerated and MTD in CHOP combination was the same dose and schedule as single agent dosing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01839097.


Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2938-2942 ◽  
Author(s):  
BG Gordon ◽  
PI Warkentin ◽  
DD Weisenburger ◽  
JM Vose ◽  
WG Sanger ◽  
...  

Abstract We report nine children with relapsed (n = 8) or high-risk (n = 1) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who underwent autologous (n = 6) or allogeneic (n = 3) bone marrow transplantation (BMT). These children received transplants as part of a prospective phase I/II study of thioTEPA (TT) and total body irradiation (TBI) with escalating doses of VP-16. The median age of these patients at time of BMT was 6.5 years (range 2.5 years to 14 years). Three were transplanted with active disease after failing salvage chemotherapy. Of the other six, one was transplanted in first complete remission (CR) and five in second or subsequent CR. Of these nine patients, eight are free of disease a median of 25 months after BMT (range, 6 to 48 months), with an estimated 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of 89%. Six of these eight patients have been followed for 12 or more months after BMT, and in each their current remission exceeds their longest previous remission duration. The toxicity of the TT/TBI +/- VP-16 regimens was significant but manageable, predominantly consisting of severe mucositis. For a comparison, we reviewed retrospective data on the six additional children and adolescents with PTCL who underwent BMT during the 3-year period preceding this phase I/II study. The median age at BMT of these six patients was 19 years (range 15.5 years to 20 years). These patients were prepared for BMT with a variety of other regimens. One had no response to BMT and the other five relapsed at 1.5 to 5 months after BMT (median, 3 months) with an RFS of 0%. Our data suggest that thioTEPA plus TBI, with or without VP-16, is an effective preparative regimen for BMT for young patients with relapsed or high-stage PTCL and leads to prolonged RFS.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
Milos D. Miljkovic ◽  
Kevin C Conlon ◽  
Jennifer Albert ◽  
Deborah Allen ◽  
Thomas A. Waldmann

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a member of the 4-α helix bundle family of cytokines. Administration of single-agent IL-15 to patients with cancer produced substantial increases and activation of natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells, but no clinical responses. Subsequent studies showed that IL-15 enhances the efficacy of anti-tumor monoclonal antibodies that work through antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, a process mediated by NK cells. In the MET-1 xenograft mouse model, the combination of IL-15 and the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab led to significantly more durable responses than each agent by itself. Here we report the final results of the phase I trial of IL-15 and alemtuzumab in patients with relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphoma (NCT02689453). METHODS: In this phase I single-center trial IL-15 was given subcutaneously 5 days per week for 2 weeks in a standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme (DL1: 0.5μg/kg, DL2: 1μg/kg, DL3: 2μg/kg), followed by alemtuzumab 30mg intravenously three times weekly for 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were type and frequency of adverse events and the maximum tolerated dose of IL-15. RESULTS: A total of eleven patients (pts) were treated at DL1 (3), DL2 (4) and DL3 (4). Seven pts had acute adult T-cell leukemia (ATL), two had chronic ATL, and two had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). There were no dose-limiting toxicities through the maximum planned dose of 2μg/kg/day. Two pts both with acute subtype ATL were unable to complete treatment due to rapidly progressive disease early in their treatment course, but there was no evidence tumor simulation or expansion of circulating ATL cell numbers during the period of IL-15 administration Hematologic AEs included lymphopenia (all 11 pts, 7 with grade 3/4), neutropenia (8 pts, 2 with grade 3), anemia (10 pts, 1 with grade 3), and thrombocytopenia (4 pts, 1 with grade 3). The most common non-hematologic AEs were infusion-related reactions experienced by 10 of the 11 pts during alemtuzumab infusion, and urticaria (4, pts, 2 with grade 3, both of whom at MTD). Two pts had incidental findings of a catheter-associated thrombus and pulmonary emboli, necessitating institution of prophylactic anticoagulation for subsequent pts after which no additional thromboembolic events were seen. Infectious adverse events included one case each of CMV reactivation without end-org involvement, HSV reactivation, Zoster, bacterial sinusitis, and cellulitis (in a patient with ATL and skin involvement), all grade 2. There was no evidence of graft versus host disease in two pts with previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and there were no serious adverse events attributable to IL-15. Administration of IL-15 resulted in a median 2.1-fold increase (range 1.2-3.4) in absolute lymphocyte count, 2.5-fold (1-5.9) increase in the number of circulating CD8+ T cells, and 7.2-fold (1.1-17.1) increase in NK cells across all dose levels (Figure 1A). At the MTD, the median ALC, CD8+ T cell, and NK cell increases were 2, 2.1, and 15.3-fold respectively. The overall response rate was 45% with 2/11 complete responses (CR) and 3/11 partial responses (PR) (Figure 1B). Notably, all pts with leukemic disease attained CR in the blood (Figure 1C), with varying response in other compartments. A patient with acute ATL had a CR at first restaging but developed central nervous system relapse after four weeks; this remained the only site of disease until the patient's death 8 months later. A patient with PTCL-NOS had a delayed response, with a PR at 3 and CR at 5 months which was ongoing at 12-month follow-up. Two pts with chronic ATL had PRs which lasted 10 and 4 months, and a patient with acute ATL had a PR at first restaging which was ongoing at the end of treatment. In all pts, response was correlated with normalization of serum LDH and soluble CD25. Analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from responders and non-responders using single-cell RNA-seq is under way and will be presented. CONCLUSION: Combination of IL-15 and alemtuzumab was safe at all dose levels administered with no evidence of treatment related disease stimulation. The contribution of IL-15 to the known clinical efficacy of alemtuzumab in relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies needs to be assessed in a randomized trial. Further evaluation of IL-15 in the post-allogeneic transplant setting, particularly prior to donor lymphocyte infusion, is also planned. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: alemtuzumab for T-cell lymphoma


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Monica Mead ◽  
Henrik Cederleuf ◽  
Thomas Relander ◽  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Fredrik Ellin ◽  
...  

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphoid neoplasms with poor outcomes. Many patients are elderly with increased comorbidities. Single-center retrospective studies describe outcomes in elderly PTCL patients and suggest comorbidity adversely affects outcomes. Little is known about the treatment, outcomes and impact of comorbidity in a large cohort of elderly PTCL patients. This study aims to describe outcomes of elderly PTCL patients in a large unselected international patient cohort. Methods: Patients with PTCL age ≥ 70 diagnosed from January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2015 in the Swedish Lymphoma Registry (SLR) and California Cancer Registry (CCR) were identified. The SLR covers ~ 95% of adult lymphoma patients in Sweden and the CCR includes information on all cancers diagnosed in California. Patients with precursor T-cell malignancies, primary cutaneous lymphomas, and leukemic subtypes were excluded. Data on comorbidity at diagnosis were retrospectively collected according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and clinical outcomes of the cohort were extracted. Statistical analysis: Patient characteristics, clinical variables and outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS stratified by groups were calculated and presented in figures. Median OS was reported with 95% confidence interval (CI). Comparisons between groups for OS were done by log-rank test. Univariate and multiple Cox proportional hazards models provided hazards ratio estimates and 95% CI for risk factors. Tests for significance were two-tailed and a p-value less than the 0.05 significance level was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using software SAS version 9.4 (2013). Results: A total of 839 patients were included (SLR, n = 176, CCR, n = 663). Median age was 78 (SLR) and 79 (CCR) years, respectively. Included subtypes were AITL, n = 226; ALCL, n = 122; EATL, n = 31; Hepatosplenic TCL, n = 7; NK/T-cell lymphoma, n = 10; and PTCL NOS, n = 443. ECOG performance status was not available. CCI data was available in 731 patients (87 %), and CCI scores were divided into groups = 0-1 (61 %) and CCI > 1 (39 %). Male patients more often had a CCI score > 1 (p = 0.024). No other significant baseline differences were seen between the 2 groups (Table 1). Patients in the SLR more often received multiagent treatment compared to the CCR (63 % vs 44 %, p < 0.001). Age > 80 years, CCI > 1 and advanced Ann Arbor stage (III-IV) were significant prognostic factors for worse outcome. No difference in survival was seen between men and women nor the SLR and CCR (Table 2). Patients with a CCI >1 had a statistically significant worse survival compared to patients with a CCI =0-1 (0.36 years v 0.91 years, p=0.0001). Of the PTCL subtypes, AITL patients had a significantly better outcome (median OS = 1.26 years) compared to ALCL (OS = 0.57 years) and PTCL NOS (OS = 0.66 years). Patients receiving multiagent therapy had improved survival compared to patients not receiving multiagent therapy. When comparing OS in patients diagnosed in 2010-2012 with 2013-2015, no improvement was seen for the later period (Figures 1-4). Lymphoma was the most common cause of death with > 70 % of deaths related to lymphoma irrespective of CCI score (Table 3). Discussion: At the time of submission, this study presents the largest international cohort of elderly patients with PTCL. Prognosis is poor and comorbidity seems to further worsen . In contrast to younger patient series, patients with AITL had a better survival than patients with PTCL NOS and ALCL, and were more common in the CCR than in the SLR. Multiagent treatment was associated with improved outcome. A possible confounder could be that fit patients are also the ones receiving treatment, and it is a setback that adjustment for ECOG was not possible, making treatment data somewhat difficult to interpret. As expected, advanced stage (Ann Arbor III-IV) was associated with worse survival. Conclusion: We believe this is one of the largest cohorts presented in elderly patients with PTCL. Comorbidity is an important adverse factor in this group, whereas treatment seems to improve outcome. The majority of these patients die of lymphoma within a year from diagnosis, and development of new treatments represents an unmet clinical need. Disclosures Jerkeman: Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1614-1614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francine M. Foss ◽  
Kenneth R. Carson ◽  
Lauren Pinter-Brown ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Steven T. Rosen ◽  
...  

Abstract 1614 Background: Registries can be invaluable for describing patterns of care for a population of patients. COMPLETE is a registry of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients designed to identify the lymphoma-directed treatments and supportive care measures that PTCL patients receive. We report here the first detailed findings of initial therapy. Methods: This is a prospective, longitudinal, observational registry that is led by a global steering committee. Patients with newly diagnosed PTCL and providing written informed consent are eligible. Patients are entered into the registry from time of initial diagnosis and followed for up to 5 years. Only locked records are reported. Results: As of July 2012, 330 patients have been enrolled from the United States. The first patient was enrolled in February 2010. Locked baseline and treatment records are available for 124 and 81 patients, respectively. Of the 124 patients with locked baseline records, 67 patients (54%) were male, the mean age was 59 (range: 19–89), and race/ethnicity was recorded as: White (87 patients; 70%), Black (19; 15%), Asian (5; 4%) and other/unknown (13; 11%). Histology was reported as follows: PTCL-not otherwise specified (27%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma-primary systemic type (18%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (17%), transformed mycosis fungoides (7%), T/NK-cell lymphoma-nasal and nasal type (6%), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, HTLV 1+ (6%) and other (19%). 25 patients (20%) had received another diagnosis, including B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and other T-cell lymphomas, prior to their current diagnosis of PTCL. 49 patients (40%) had B symptoms, 102 patients (82%) had an Ann Arbor stage of III/IV, 116 patients (94%) had ECOG performance status of 0–1, and international prognostic index (IPI) score was distributed as follows: IPI 0 (7% of patients), 1 (15%), 2 (43%), 3 (26%), and 4 (9%). Of the 81 patients with locked treatment records, details on initial treatment can be found in table below. Conclusions: This first detailed analysis of primary treatment of PTCL indicates that this disease is still largely being treated with regimens derived primarily from studies of B-cell lymphomas and that a single standard of care does not exist. The fact that a meaningful proportion of patients were initially diagnosed with something other than their current diagnosis of PTCL points out the challenges of diagnosing the disease. While the intent of initial treatment for most patients is to affect a cure, more than 20% of patients were noted as deceased at the end of initial treatment, underscoring the need for more effective, disease-specific therapy. Disclosures: Foss: Merck: Study Grant, Study Grant Other; Celgene: Study Grant, Study Grant Other; Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Allos: Consultancy. Carson:Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pinter-Brown:Allos: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosen:Allos: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pro:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Allos: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Allos: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hsi:Allos: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding; Cellerant Therapeutics: Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document