Model Based Approach to Evaluate Isatuximab Monthly Dosing Regimen in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Hoai-Thu Thai ◽  
Nadia Gaudel-Dedieu ◽  
Marc Cerou ◽  
Bernard Sebastien ◽  
Helgi van de Velde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
Protein Kinetics ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monthly Dosing ◽  
Using Data

Background: Isatuximab (Isa) is a CD38 monoclonal antibody with multiple modes of action for killing tumor cells through direct tumor targeting and immune cell engagement (Moreno, Clin Cancer Res, 2019). The addition of Isa to pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d) was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) (ICARIA-MM, NCT02514668) (Attal, Lancet, 2019). Isa, in combination with Pd, is approved in the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, and Japan for the treatment of adult patients with RRMM who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Aim: The objectives were to characterize the relationship between serum M-protein kinetics and PFS in RRMM using data from the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM study and to simulate expected longitudinal serum M-protein and PFS when switching to a hypothetical monthly dosing regimen after 6 months. Methods: A joint model of serum M-protein dynamics and PFS was developed using data from 256 evaluable ICARIA-MM patients. Patients received Isa intravenously at 10 mg/kg once weekly (QW) for 4 weeks, then every other week (Q2W) for 28-day cycles in combination with standard Pd (Isa-Pd) or Pd alone in the control arm. A tumor growth inhibition model was used to describe the serum M-protein kinetics under treatment effects of Isa-Pd or Pd alone, in which Isa exposure was predicted using individual PK parameters obtained from the population PK analysis (Fau, Population Approach Group in Europe, 2019) and Pd exposure was predicted from K-PD model using dosing history. Trial simulations were then performed using individual PK/PD parameters of ICARIA-MM patients to evaluate whether efficacy is maintained after switching to a monthly dosing regimen. Results: The joint model identified the instantaneous changes (slope) in serum M-protein as the best on-treatment predictor for PFS and also identified baseline patient characteristics impacting serum M-protein kinetics (serum albumin and serum β2 microglobulin on the baseline serum M-protein levels and the non-IgG type on the serum M-protein growth rate, the serum M-protein slope), and PFS (presence of plasmacytomas). Non-IgG MM patients have similar behavior on serum M-protein kinetics for the first 60 weeks even with higher exposure and similar progression free survival compared to IgG MM patients supporting the non-dose adjustment based on IgG status. Clinical trial simulation of the ICARIA-MM Isa-Pd regimen demonstrated that switching all patients on treatment at 6 months to a monthly Isa regimen would shorten the median time to progression (TTP) (i.e. increase in serum M-protein greater than 25% and an absolute increase greater than 5 g/L compared to nadir) by 4.1 weeks and would shorten median PFS by 2.3 weeks (from 14.03 to 13.45 months). Based on TTP criteria, patients with no risk of earlier progression (57.7%) due to 6 months switch tend to have lower baseline tumor burden (lower serum M-protein and lower percent of bone marrow plasma cell) and better prognostic factors (higher glomerular filtration rate, higher albumin, lower β2 microglobulin). At 6 months, 85% of these patients had predicted stable "at least" VGPR status. Conclusions: Trial simulations supported the choice of the approved isatuximab 10 mg/kg QW/Q2W regimen and showed that switching to a monthly Isa regimen after 6 months may reduce clinical benefit in overall population. However, a subpopulation of patients with good prognosis and obtaining stable at least VGPR status by 6 months may switch to a monthly regimen after 6 months without compromising disease progression risk; this hypothesis will be tested in a prospective clinical trial. Model-based drug development has been successfully applied to support treatment decisions in RRMM patients. Disclosures Thai: Sanofi: Current Employment. Gaudel-Dedieu:Sanofi: Current Employment. Cerou:Sanofi: Current Employment. Sebastien:Sanofi: Current Employment. van de Velde:Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Semiond:Sanofi: Current Employment. Veyrat-Follet:Sanofi: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Early M‐Protein Dynamics Predicts Progression‐Free Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1345-1354
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Yan ◽  
Xu Steven Xu ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Maria‐Victoria Mateos ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Protein Dynamics ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 772-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Mohamad Hussein ◽  
James Berenson ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, toxicities from dexamethasone can be dose limiting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Patients (N = 222) received lenalidomide 30 mg/day once daily (days 1-21 every 28 days) until disease progression or intolerance. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Overall, 67% of patients had received 3 or more prior treatment regimens. Partial response or better was reported in 26% of patients, with minimal response 18%. There was no difference between patients who had received 2 or fewer versus 3 or more prior treatment regimens (45% vs 44%, respectively). Median values for TTP, PFS, and OS were 5.2, 4.9, and 23.2 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and anemia (20%), which proved manageable with dose reduction. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 4% of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed and refractory MM with acceptable toxicities. These data support treatment with single-agent lenalidomide, as well as its use in steroid-sparing combination approaches. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00065351.

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior thalidomide exposure

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (12) ◽  
pp. 4445-4451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
M. Teresa Cibeira ◽  
Michel Attal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Survival Studies

AbstractThis analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with thalidomide. Of 704 patients, 39% were thalidomide exposed. Thalidomide-exposed patients had more prior lines of therapy and longer duration of myeloma than thalidomide-naive patients. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone led to higher overall response rate (ORR), longer time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + dexamethasone despite prior thalidomide exposure. Among lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients, ORR was higher in thalidomide-naive versus thalidomide-exposed patients (P = .04), with longer median TTP (P = .04) and PFS (P = .02). Likewise for dexamethasone alone-treated patients (P = .03 for ORR, P = .03 for TTP, P = .06 for PFS). Prior thalidomide did not affect survival in lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients (36.1 vs 33.3 months, P > .05). Thalidomide-naive and thalidomide-exposed patients had similar toxicities. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone resulted in higher rates of venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, and infections versus placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Lenalido-mide + dexamethasone was superior to placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Although prior thalidomide may have contributed to inferior TTP and PFS compared with thalidomide-naive patients, these parameters remained superior compared with placebo + dexamethasone; similar benefits compared with placebo + dexamethasone were not evident for thalidomide-exposed patients in terms of overall survival. Studies were registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00056160 and NCT00424047.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib Based Treatment Strategies in the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Extramedullary Disease

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Patricia Flüchter ◽  
Katharina Nickel ◽  
Katharina Meckel ◽  
Janin Messerschmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Serological Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Extramedullary Disease ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients

Published experience with carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and extramedullary disease (EMD) is still limited. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib containing therapy regimens in EMD. We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with extramedullary RRMM treated with carfilzomib from June 2013 to September 2019. The median age at the start of carfilzomib was 64 (range 40–80) years. Twenty (44%) and 25 (56%) patients had paraosseous manifestation and EMD without adjacency to bone, respectively. The serological overall response rate (ORR) was 59%. Extramedullary response was evaluable in 33 patients, nine (27%) of them achieved partial remission (PR) (ORR = 27%). In 15 (33%) patients, we observed no extramedullary response despite serological response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were five (95% CI, 3.5–6.5) and ten (95% CI, 7.5–12.5) months, respectively. EMD without adjacency to bone was associated with a significantly inferior PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.04) compared to paraosseous lesions. Carfilzomib based treatment strategies showed some efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with extramedullary RRMM but could not overcome the negative prognostic value of EMD. Due to the discrepancy between serological and extramedullary response, evaluation of extramedullary response using imaging is mandatory in these patients.

Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2759-2759
Author(s):  
Sabine Gerull ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Martin Goerner ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Thomas Moehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Patients with recurrent and refractory multiple myeloma have a very limited survival expectance. Allogeneic transplantation might offer an option for cure in myeloma and the recent development of non-myeloablative conditioning regimens has reduced transplant related morbidity and mortality and rendered this treatment feasible in elderly patients. The role of non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma however, has not yet been defined. We have analyzed the results of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated at our institution. Between 08/1999 and 02/2004, 56 patients with relapsed (n=54) or refractory (n=2) myeloma were treated with non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation. The median beta2microglobulin at the time of diagnosis was 2.75 mg/l, and median age at the time of transplant was 54.5 years (39.2–67.8). The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 3.6 years. Prior to allogeneic transplantation, patients received reinduction chemotherapy which included an autologous transplantation for 30 patients. The median number of previous cycles of conventional chemotherapy was 9. The conditioning regimen was 2 Gy TBI with (n=43) or without (n=3) fludarabin 3 x 30 mg/m² for 46 patients, the remaining 10 patients received a melphalan containing regimen. Acute toxicity was low with a WBC < 500/μl and platelets < 50/μl for a median of 0 days. Engraftment was prompt with 90 % of patients having achieved > 90 % donor chimerism by day 56. Acute GvHD Grade II-IV occurred in 36 % of patients with 22 % Grade III-IV, and 61 % experienced chronic GvHD. Total transplant related mortality reached 20 %, with a day 100 TRM of 5 %. 32 patients experienced relapse or progressive disease, and 32 % of patients died due to relapse. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and progression free survival at 18 months was 40 % and 25 %, respectively, with a median follow up of survivors of 21 months. Patients who experienced cGvHD had a significantly higher overall survival estimate (60 % vs. 20 % at 18 months, p=0.03). The number of cycles of pretreatment before allogeneic transplantation had a statistically significant negative influence on overall (p=0.02) and progression free survival (p=0.006). We conclude that non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation is feasible in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. The significant poor prognostic factors we identified were absence of chronic GvHD and number of cycles of pretreatment. Allogeneic transplantion should therefore be considered as an option earlier in the course of the disease.

Efficacy of Single-Agent Bortezomib Versus Thalidomide in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5160-5160
Author(s):  
Miles Prince ◽  
Michael Adena ◽  
Dell Kingsford Smith ◽  
Judy Hertel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
One Year ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Aim: To perform a systematic review of the efficacy of monotherapy with bortezomib versus thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: Published English literature from 1966 to June 2005 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library), publication reference lists, Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd data-on-file, and abstracts from recent multiple myeloma conferences were reviewed. Prospective studies containing at least a single arm of any treatment group with n ≥ 30 and using continuing or variable thalidomide dosing were included. Studies adding dexamethasone for non-responders were excluded. Outcomes were analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. Statistical pooling was performed where possible for the following outcome measures: primary outcome of response rate, defined by a serum M-protein reduction ≥50% (A) and strict (e.g. EBMT) criteria (B), and for the secondary outcomes of overall survival and progression-free survival. Results: One bortezomib (n=333, APEX, NEJM2005, 352; 2487–98) and 15 thalidomide (n=1007) studies were included. Patient baseline characteristics including age, gender, IgG:IgA, disease duration and β2M were well matched, except that 48% of bortezomib patients had received prior thalidomide. On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall estimate for response rate (A) was 53% for patients receiving bortezomib versus 32% for thalidomide (p<0.001, n=10 studies). For response rate (B) the estimate was 36% for patients receiving bortezomib versus 22% for thalidomide (p<0.001, n=4 studies). One-year survival was 81% for patients receiving bortezomib versus 67% for thalidomide (p<0.001, n=6 studies). Due to differences in disease monitoring and definitions of progression, it was not possible to compare results for progression-free survival. Conclusion: In patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, bortezomib achieved significantly higher response rates and longer one-year survival than thalidomide, despite 48% of bortezomib-treated patients having received prior thalidomide.

Thalidomide Based Regimens (TBR) for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients: Long Term Follow Up, Unmaintained Remissions and Disease Control after Subsequent Treatments.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4812-4812
Author(s):  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Evangelos Eleftherakis-Papaiakovou ◽  
Charis Matsouka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Group A ◽  
Pulse Dexamethasone ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction: The effectiveness of thalidomide based regimens (TBR) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is well established. However, there are still limited data regarding the long term follow up after such regimens and the outcome of patients when they progress and they receive further treatment. In order to answer these questions we evaluated a series of 114 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were treated with TBR. None of these patients had previously received thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide. Patients and Methods: All patients were treated with thalidomide and dexamethasone with or without other oral agents. More specifically 41 patients had received continuous thalidomide and pulse dexamethasone, 25 patients clarithromycin, continuous thalidomide and pulse dexamethasone, 43 patients intermittent thalidomide, pulse dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide and 5 patients continuous thalidomide, pulse dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide. Type of treatment at the time of progression after TBR, response to this treatment and progression free survival were recorded for each patient. Moreover, patients who received novel agents after progression to TBR, were divided into 2 subgroups, according to their resistance to thalidomide. In group A, patients had refractory or progressive myeloma while on TBR or within 2 months after discontinuation of TBR. In group B, myeloma progressed more than 2 months after discontinuation of TBR. Results: Among the 114 patients, 41 had not responded to TBR and 73 (64%) had achieved at least a partial response. The median PFS for all patients was 8 months. As of June 2007, 10 patients remain without progression from 28 to 81 months (median 54 months). Eight patients remain off treatment and without progression for a median of 56 months (range 28–81). Patients who did not respond to or progressed after TBR were analyzed for further treatment and outcome. Thirty eight patients (37%) died before receiving further treatment, 23 patients (23%) received conventional chemotherapy and 41 patients (40%) received continuous thalidomide and dexamethasone +/− clarithromycin or cyclophosphamide (17 patients), bortezomib and dexamethasone (7 patients), melphalan-bortezomib-dexamethasone and intermittent thalidomide (12 patients) or lenalidomide with dexamethasone (5 patients). Among these 41 patients, 24 were classified in group A (thalidomide resistant) and 17 in group B. Overall 17 (41%) achieved at least partial response after retreatment with novel agent-based regimens. A response was observed in 46% of patients in group A and in 35% of patients in group B. The median progression free survival of the 41 patients who received retreatment with novel agents was 9.2 months and the median survival was 17 months. Among the 23 patients who received conventional chemotherapy only five (21%) patients responded and the progression free survival and the median survival were 5.3 and 10.2 months, respectively. Conclusions: After an oral TBR regimen 6 (5%) patients remain without treatment and free of progression for more than 4 years. A significant number of patients who progressed after TBR and who received further treatment which included a novel agent achieved a response, including several patients who were resistant to TBR.

Polymorphisms in the Multiple Drug Resistance Protein 1 and in P-Glycoprotein 1 Are Associated with Time to Event Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Gabriele Buda ◽  
Deborah Ricci ◽  
Nadine Cohen ◽  
Reyna Favis ◽  
C. Chris Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Gene Polymorphism ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multiple Drug Resistance ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Ortho Biotech

Abstract Abstract 109 Background: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene encoding multiple drug resistance protein 1 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C member 1 (ABCC1) influence its ability to act as a mediator of anthracycline resistance. The same is true for SNPs in P-glycoprotein 1 (ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1)), and the latter have been associated with outcome in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma treated with anthracycline-based therapy. We therefore sought to evaluate the role of SNPs in ABCC1 and ABCB1 in the outcome of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: The DOXIL-MMY-3001 study was an international, randomized, phase III trial comparing the efficacy of single-agent bortezomib to that of bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients treated with bortezomib received this proteasome inhibitor at 1.3 mg/m2 as an intravenous push on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of every 21-day cycle, while patients on the combination arm received this dose and schedule of bortezomib along with PLD as an infusion at 30 mg/m2 on day 4. Genomic DNA samples were obtained from all subjects in the intention-to-treat cohort who consented to DNA testing under Part 1 of the pharmacogenomic component of the clinical trial protocol. Samples that produced at least one useable genotype were included in this pharmacogenomic analysis. SNPs in ABCC1 (R723Q) and ABCB1 (1236 C>T, 2677 G>W (W = T or A), and 3435 C>T) were correlated with the overall response rate (complete + partial), time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Genetic transmission patterns differ among racial groups, and since usable genotype and clinical data were available for 301 subjects, 279 of whom were Caucasians, this analysis focused on that group. The ABCC1 gene polymorphism R723Q was not represented in the bortezomib arm, and found in 5 subjects (3.5%) who received bortezomib + PLD. Its presence was significantly associated with a longer time to progression (median of 330 days vs. 129 days; p = 0.0008), a longer progression-free survival (median of 338 days vs. 129 days p = 0.0006), and a superior overall survival (p = 0.0045) in these patients. The ABCB1 gene polymorphism at 3435 (C>T) was associated with progression-free survival (p = 0.0578), response rate (p = 0.0782) and time to progression (p = 0.0923) in patients receiving bortezomib + PLD, though not at the level of statistical significance, and no correlation was found in the bortezomib alone arm. However, in a recessive genetic model, the ABCB1 gene polymorphism at 3435 T allele was significantly associated with a better clinical outcome, specifically time to progression (p = 0.0405), and progression-free survival (p = 0.0186) in patients receiving bortezomib + PLD. Haplotype analysis indicated that the three most frequent haplotypes for ABCB1 may have been associated with response rate in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma who received bortezomib + PLD treatment (p = 0.0775), though not at the level of statistical significance. Diplotypes that contained 3435T may have been associated with a superior time to progression (p = 0.0819) and progression-free survival (p = 0.0891) in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma who received bortezomib + PLD when compared to the most frequent diplotype containing 3435C, though not at the level of statistical significance. Conclusions: These findings indicate a potential role for SNPs in both ABCC1 and ABCB1 in modulating the long-term outcome of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with the combination of bortezomib + PLD. Moreover, they support additional prospective studies to determine if such data could be incorporated into an algorithm by which therapy in the relapsed and/or refractory setting could be tailored to each individual patient's own genetic make-up. Disclosures: Ricci: Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.: Employment. Cohen:Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Employment. Favis:Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Employment. Huang:Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.: Employment. Rackoff:Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.: Employment. Zhuang:Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.: Employment. Sonneveld:Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Final Results from the Phase IIa Study of the Anti-CXCL12 Spiegelmer® Olaptesed Pegol (NOX-A12) in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2111-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
Anna Maria Cafro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Protein Change

Abstract Background Olaptesed, an L-stereo-isomer RNA aptamer, binds and neutralizes the chemokine CXCL12. By interaction with the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, CXCL12 is responsible for trafficking and homing of normal and malignant blood cells to the bone marrow. Preclinical studies have shown synergistic activity of CXCL12-targeting and anti-myeloma agents, specifically bortezomib (BTZ). Thus, targeting the myeloma niche may increase treatment efficacy. Aims This open label single arm study was conducted to assess the activity and safety of olaptesed when added to the combination of BTZ and dexamethasone (DEX) in patients with relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods Twenty-eight relapsed or refractory MM patients (males:females 14:14) were enrolled and treated according to a dose titration design. Olaptesed was administered intravenously at doses increasing from 1 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively, at 1 hour prior to bortezomib administration. During cycles 4 to 8, olaptesed was dosed at the highest individually titrated dose. BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) was given on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 as intravenous injection. Oral DEX (20 mg) was added on the day of and on the day after BTZ administration. Response was evaluated based on the uniform IMWG response criteria (Rajkumar SV et. al. Blood 2011; 117: 4691-5). Plasma cell mobilization was studied after a pilot dose of 1 to 4 mg/kg olaptesed administered to the initial 10 patients before start of the regular treatment regimen. Results From Aug 2012 to Feb 2014 we enrolled 28 patients who had received a median of 2 (range 1-6) lines of prior therapy. Pretreatments were lenalidomide (LEN) in 20, BTZ in 14 and carfilzomib in 1 patient. Ten patients had autologous stem cell transplantations prior to entering this study. The patient population enrolled presented predominantly with advanced disease and with adverse outcome predictors. Ten patients had ISS stage III. High-risk cytogenetics were identified in 9 of the 20 patients (45%) with FISH testing available for t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del17p. Eleven patients were refractory to their last prior treatment, which contained BTZ in 8 cases. After two early withdrawals, 26 patients were available for outcome evaluations. The median number of completed cycles was 8. Progression led to treatment termination in 8 patients. The dose of olaptesed was titrated to 4 mg/kg in all 18 patients treated for 3 or more cycles. The single dose of olaptesed administered to 10 pilot-patients effectively mobilized plasma cells, which increased by approximately 200% for up to 3 days. Based on “best response” of the 26 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 73%: Two patients (8%) achieved a complete response (CR), 6 patients (23%) a very good partial response (VGPR) and 11 patients (42%) a partial response (PR). Minimal response was recorded in 2 patients (8%), 4 patients (15%) had stable disease and 1 patient (4%) progressive disease. In the 9 evaluable patients with high-risk cytogenetics, the clinical responses were similar. The ORR was 67% with VGPR in 3 (33%) and PR in 3 (33%) patients. Of the 14 patients pre-treated with BTZ, 1 had a CR and 8 a PR (ORR 64%). M-protein decreased rapidly from treatment cycle 1 to cycle 4 with a decrease of ≥50% being observed in 15 of the 26 evaluable patients. Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the maximum observed decrease in M-protein. Figure 1: Waterfall Plot of Maximum M-Protein Change Figure 1:. Waterfall Plot of Maximum M-Protein Change Median progression-free survival (PFS) of the evaluable population was 6.5 months. It was also 6.5 months in the 9 patients with high-risk cytogenetics and 6.3 months in the 14 patients pre-treated with BTZ (Figure 2). The median follow-up was 6.3 months. Figure 2: Progression-Free Survival Figure 2:. Progression-Free Survival Treatment with olaptesed in combination with BTZ-DEX was safe and well tolerated without any appreciable increase in adverse events. Conclusions A single dose of olaptesed effectively mobilized plasma cells. Olaptesed in combination with BTZ and DEX resulted in an ORR rate of 73% and PFS of 6.5 months. Response rates and PFS were similar in patients with or without high risk cytogenetic features or with or without previous exposure to BTZ. The combination regimen was well tolerated. These findings merit further exploration of this strategy in randomized trials. Disclosures Weisel: NOXXON Pharma AG: Consultancy. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria; Jannsen-Cilag: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Leleu:Janssen, Celgene, leopharma, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laurent:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kruschinski:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Dümmler:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Riecke:NOXXON Pharma AG: Employment. Engelhardt:NOXXON Pharma AG: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document