scholarly journals High Frequency of CNS Involvement in Transformed Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2526-2526
Author(s):  
Eric Durot ◽  
Lukshe Kanagaratnam ◽  
Saurabh Zanwar ◽  
Elise Toussaint ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Myd88 L265p Mutation ◽  
Myd88 L265p

Abstract INTRODUCTION Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a challenging situation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). High CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), activated B-cell (ABC) subtype and MYD88 L265P mutation, features often found in transformed Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), are associated with a higher risk for developing CNS relapse. This study was aimed to describe CNS involvement in a large cohort of transformed WM. METHODS This international multicenter retrospective study included patients with a diagnosis of WM and a concurrent or sequential histological diagnosis of DLBCL. CNS disease was diagnosed by detection of DLBCL cells in the cerebrospinal fluid and/or by brain biopsy. Patients with CNS involvement by lymphoplasmacytic cells (Bing-Neel syndrome) were excluded. Of 254 identified patients with a diagnosis of histological transformation (HT) between 1988 and 2020, 19 were excluded due to lack of data on extranodal involvement. The first part of the analysis focused on baseline CNS involvement. Clinicobiological characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests or Mann Whitney tests as appropriate. We analyzed CNS recurrence in the second part of the study. Forty-eight additional patients were excluded due to baseline CNS involvement (n = 25), absence of treatment at HT (n = 14) and lack of details on follow-up (n = 9). Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was analyzed using competing-risk models that accounted for other events like systemic relapse or death from any cause, reporting sub-hazard ratio (SHR). RESULTS Baseline CNS involvement was present in 25 patients (11%) with transformed WM, including 10 (4%) with parenchymal disease, 10 with leptomeningeal, 4 (2%) with both, and 1 with unspecified CNS involvement. Characteristics associated with baseline CNS involvement were performance status 2-4 (P=0.03) and ≥2 extranodal sites (P=0.02). Median survival after HT was 1 year [0.7-2.5], comparable to the one of patients without CNS disease (1.8 year [1.2-2.6], P=0.74). We observed no difference in survival based on isolated CNS involvement (n = 10) compared to CNS and systemic involvement (n = 15) (P=0.94). Twenty-three CNS relapses occurred (12%). The 2-year and 3-year rates of CNS relapse were 9% (95% CI, 6-14) and 11% (95% CI, 7-16) (Figure 1). The median time to relapse in the CNS was 11 months (95% CI, 7-25). Thirteen CNS recurrences (57%) occurred during the first year of follow-up. Seventy percent were isolated CNS relapses. The location was leptomeningeal in 43% of cases, parenchymal in 35%, both in 17%, and unspecified in 4%. According to CNS-IPI risk groups (data available for 20 patients), 9 patients (45%) belonged to the high-risk group, 10 (50%) to the intermediate-risk group and 1 (5%) to the low-risk group. Prior to CNS relapse, 87% of patients had received rituximab, and 39% had received CNS prophylaxis (30% intrathecal chemotherapy, 4% high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), and 4% both). After CNS recurrence, 96% of patients received salvage treatment: combination of HD-MTX and HD-cytarabine (48%), HD-MTX alone (30%), or HD-cytarabine alone (9%). Four patients underwent consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. The median survival after CNS relapse was 5.6 months. Factors associated with 3-year cumulative incidence of CNS recurrence in univariate analysis were involvement of kidney/adrenal glands (HR, 4.4; P=0.01) and MYD88 L265P mutation (P=0.01) (Figure 2A and B). Of note, among 74 patients (over 187, 40%) with data available for MYD88 mutation status, 11 CNS relapses occurred in patients with MYD88 L265P mutation (n = 54, 20%) whereas no relapse were observed in MYD88 WT cohort (n = 20). A trend toward higher risk of CNS relapse for ≥2 extranodal sites (HR, 2.3, 95% CI 0.98-5.3; P=0.06) was observed. Cumulative incidence according to CNS-IPI risk groups (0% in the low-risk, 9% in the intermediate-risk and 14% in the high-risk group) was not statistically significant (P=0.47). CONCLUSION CNS involvement occurs frequently in transformed WM. Rate of CNS relapse seems similar to DLBCL patients belonged to the CNS-IPI high-risk group. Special attention should be paid to patients with kidney/adrenal involvement and MYD88 L265P mutation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vos: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: Travel reimbursement. Treon: X4: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Current Employment; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Self: Patents & Royalties: Holder of multiple patents related to testing and treatment of MYD88 and CXCR4 mutated B-cell malignancies; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dimopoulos: Janssen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kapoor: Cellectar: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Castillo: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Risk-Tailored CNS Prophylaxis In 194 Patients With Diffuse Large B-CELL Lymphoma (DLBCL) Treated In The Rituximab ERA: Risk Definition By Clinical Variables and Ontogenic Stratification

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4365-4365
Author(s):  
Marta Bruno Ventre ◽  
Marco Foppoli ◽  
Giovanni Citterio ◽  
Giovanni Donadoni ◽  
Maurilio Ponzoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
First Line ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Cns Relapse

Abstract Background CNS dissemination is an uncommon but lethal event in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Early detection of CNS disease and a timely and effective CNS prophylaxis are the main strategies to reduce related mortality. However, both the criteria for recognition of lymphoma patients (pts) with increased risk of CNS involvement and the most effective prophylaxis modality remain important, unmet clinical needs. Some international guidelines recommend intrathecal chemotherapy by lumbar injection as exclusive prophylaxis; however, this strategy results in erratic, short-lived drug bioavailability and does not prevent brain parenchymal relapses. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of the value of clinical variables and immunohistochemical ontogenic stratification in predicting CNS dissemination and of risk-tailored CNS prophylaxis in a mono-institutional series of 194 pts with DLBCL treated in the rituximab era. Methods Consecutive HIV- adults with DLBCL without CNS involvement at diagnosis treated with first-line rituximab-CHOP or similar ± radiotherapy were considered. Primary CNS, mediastinal and cutaneous leg-type lymphomas were excluded. ‘High risk’ of CNS relapse was defined by the involvement of the testis, spine, skull, orbit, nasopharynx, kidney, and/or breast or by IPI ≥2 (including two among extranodal sites ≥2, advanced stage and high serum LDH). DLBCLs were ontogenically subclassified in ‘germinal-centre B-cell-like’ (GCB) and ‘non-germinal-centre B-cell-like’ (non-GC) by immunohistochemistry following the Hans algorithm. Results 194 patients were analyzed (median age 65, range 18-89; M:F ratio 1.1). Risk of CNS relapse was low in 90 pts and high in 104. Low-risk pt did not receive CNS prophylaxis, while 40/104 (38%) high-risk pts received 3-4 courses of methotrexate 3 g/m2 ± intrathecal (IT) liposomal cytarabine (n=30), cytarabine 16 g/m2 in 4 days (n=2) or IT chemotherapy (n=8). In the high-risk group, IPI ≥2 was more common among pts who did not receive prophylaxis (89% vs. 68%; p=0.006), while “high-risk” extranodal lymphomas were more common among pts who did (88% vs. 33%; p= 0.0001). One hundred and forty-one cases were assessable for Hans algorithm: 74 (52%) were GCB and 67 (48%) were non-GCB DLBCL. GCB DLBCLs were significantly associated with low CNS risk (55% vs. 31%; p= 0.004), and normal LDH levels (57% vs. 36%; p= 0.02); ontogenic stratification was not associated with high-risk extranodal sites, IPI ≥2, bone marrow infiltration, stage and systemic symptoms. After first-line treatment, 160 pts achieved a CR (82%; 95%CI= 77-87%), 34 pts had PD. At a median follow-up of 60 months (13-156), a single low-risk pt and 9 high-risk pts (1% vs. 9%; p= 0.016) experienced CNS relapse (exclusive site in all cases; brain in 5 pts, meninges in 5), with a median TTP of 12 months (7-55). CNS relapses occurred in 3 pts with IPI ≥2, in 1 pt with extranodal disease (testis) and in 5 pts with both features (kidney 3; testis, orbit). Ontogenic stratification was not associated with CNS recurrence, which was 5% for GCB and 6% for non-GCB; these figures were confirmed when analysis was limited to high-risk pts managed without prophylaxis. In the high-risk group, CNS relapses occurred in 7/64 (11%) pts who did not receive prophylaxis, in 2/8 (25%) pts who received only IT chemotherapy, whereas no CNS relapses were detected in the 32 pts treated with intravenous (IV) prophylaxis. CNS relapse rate was 13% for pts treated with “inadequate” prophylaxis (none or IT only) and 0% (p= 0.03) for pts managed with IV prophylaxis. Eight pts with CNS relapses died of lymphoma after 7-37 months (median 12), which represented 28% of all lymphoma-related deaths (n=29) in the high-risk group. Pts treated with IV prophylaxis had a significantly better OS than the other high-risk pts (5-yr: 94 ± 7% vs. 49 ± 6%; p= 0.001). Conclusions Stratification by specific extranodal sites and IPI is superior to ontogenic stratification to recognize CNS risk groups in DLBCL. However, the low sensitivity of predictive clinical variables suggests that molecular studies focused on the predictive and pathogenic role of molecules involved in CNS tropism will contribute to a more accurate definition of lymphoma candidates for CNS-directed strategies. In this context, IV high-dose methotrexate-based prophylaxis may significantly reduce CNS failures in high-risk pts. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A 70% cut-off for MYC protein expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma identifies a high-risk group of patients

Haematologica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (11) ◽  
pp. 2667-2670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Stefano Lazzi ◽  
Raffaella Santi ◽  
Federica Vergoni ◽  
Massimo Granai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Central Nervous System Relapse in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Analysis of Incidence and Prognostic Factors

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1666-1666
Author(s):  
Masahiro Uni ◽  
Yuki Kagoya ◽  
Yasuhito Nannya ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Mineo Kurokawa
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract The addition of rituximab to CHOP (R-CHOP; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) has significantly improved the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its secondary involvement in the central nervous system (CNS) is still a fatal event, and optimal therapeutic strategies have remained to be established. Combined immunochemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose cytarabine is currently in use for patients with CNS relapse, though treatment outcome has not been evaluated enough. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the incidence and prognosis of CNS relapse of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in comparison with those of systemic relapse in the era of rituximab-containing regimens. We also estimated the risk factors and prognostic factors for CNS relapse. We retrospectively analyzed 278 consecutive adult patients (≥16 years old) who were diagnosed as DLBCL or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBL) at The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from August 2003 through August 2013. We excluded patients who had CNS or intraocular involvement at diagnosis since those patients had received high-dose methotrexate-based therapy instead of R-CHOP. Four to six courses of intrathecal administration of methotrexate were performed in patients with adrenal gland, testis or breast involvement as prophylaxis for CNS relapse. The median follow-up period was 42 months, and the median age was 66 years (range, 23-91). Overall, 67 patients (24.1%) had relapse at any site, of which 24 patients (35.8%) had CNS involvement. The median interval between initial diagnosis and the occurrence of secondary CNS involvement was 212 days, and 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%) had CNS relapse within 1 year from the initial diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple or diffuse extranodal involvement at initial diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-10.91; P<0.01) was associated with the development of CNS relapse against non-CNS relapse. Chromosomal abnormality was investigated in 112 patients, of which 38 had abnormal karyotypes as identified by G-banding analysis for lymph nodes. Patients with CNS relapse more frequently harbored chromosomal abnormalities compared with those without relapse in univariate analysis (P=0.01). We also analyzed the survival of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) as a control. Only two (7%) of 27 patients with PCNSL died during the follow-up period. Five-year OS from initial diagnosis was 92.3% (95% CI: 82.5-100.0%), and was significantly better than that for patients with CNS relapse (33.9%, 95% CI: 17.3-66.3%, P<0.01). Among 24 patients with CNS relapse, eight (33%) had systemic lesions other than CNS when diagnosed as CNS relapse, and four (17%) patients newly developed systemic lesions while treated for CNS relapse. Patients without concurrent systemic lesions attained a rather good prognosis by chemo-radiotherapy, while those harboring concurrent systemic lesions had dismal outcome (one-year OS after the diagnosis of relapse: 74.0% versus 12.4%, P<0.01, Figure 1, systemic relapse was treated as a time-dependent covariate). These results indicate that controlling systemic lesions as well as CNS ones is essential for treating patients with secondary CNS involvement of DLBCL. CNS lesions would be well controlled with R-MPV implementation as salvage therapy, nevertheless we should be careful for concurrent systemic lesions which might require different therapeutic strategies. Disclosures Nannya: Chugai Pharmaceutical　CO., LTD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kurokawa:Chugai Pharmaceutical　CO., LTD: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding.

Lack of Influence of Rituximab and CNS Directed Prophylactic Therapy on CNS Relapse in High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1711-1711
Author(s):  
Mahender Yellu ◽  
Ehsan Malek ◽  
Berry Thavalathil ◽  
Tahir Latif
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Intrathecal Methotrexate ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract Background/method: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) although uncommon, can be devastating. Conflicting reports have been published regarding the reduction in incidence of CNS relapse in post-rituximabera.We retrospectively identified all the patients with DLBCL who has received rituximab-based chemotherapy at initial presentation in our institute between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups, ‘high risk’ group and ‘standard risk’ group, based on following definition. High risk group will have at least one of the following risk factors 1) LDH ≥ 650 U/L 2) Age adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) of ≥ 4 3) Involvement of > 1 extra nodal site 4) Involvement of testis 5) Breast 6) Bones 7) Kidneys 8) Adrenal glands 9) Retroperitoneal lymph nodes 10) Para-meninges or 11) Bone marrow. Patients without any of these risk factors were deemed standard risk. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the incidence of CNS relapse, patient and disease characteristics. Historically reported incidence rates were used for comparison. Results:One hundred and forty two consecutive patients with DLBCL were included in our study. One hundred and twenty two patients received rituximab-based therapy at the initial diagnosis. Forty-nine patients (40%) met the criteria for ‘high risk’ based on the above definition. Seventy-three patients (60%) qualified for standard risk group. Standard risk group received no CNS directed prophylaxis and none of these patients had CNS relapses. Thirty-one of 49 ‘high risk’ patients received CNS prophylaxis, mainly intrathecal methotrexate. Total 5 patients (4.09%) developed CNS relapse. CNS relapse in high-risk group was 10.2% (5/49). Median age at diagnosis in patients with CNS relapse was 53 years. Median time to relapse was 8.76 months. Median survival after the CNS relapse was 9.16 months. Four out of 5 patients received CNS prophylaxis with intrathecal methotrexate or systemic methotrexate or systemic cytarabine or a combination of them. Average number of doses of prophylaxis received by each patient was 3.2 (range 1-7). Only one patient who developed CNS relapse did not receive any CNS directed therapy as prophylaxis. Conclusion:No significant reduction in the incidence of CNS relapse was noted with upfront use of rituximab. Our study confirms that majority of the DLBCL patients do not need CNS directed therapy. For high risk DLBCL patients, we not only need to develop better predictive markers for CNS relapse but also need better CNS directed therapies to prevent this fatal complication of highly curable disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Application of a Validated Predictive Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer to Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 534-534
Author(s):  
Natasha Catherine Edwin ◽  
Jesse Keller ◽  
Suhong Luo ◽  
Kenneth R Carson ◽  
Brian F. Gage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Discriminative Ability ◽  
Blood Institute ◽  
C Statistic

Abstract Background Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have a 9-fold increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients with MM receiving an immunomodulatory agent in the presence of additional VTE risk factors (NCCN 2015, ASCO 2014, ACCP 2012). However, putative risk factors vary across guidelines and no validated VTE risk tool exists for MM. Khorana et al. developed a VTE risk score in patients with solid organ malignancies and lymphoma (Blood, 2008). We sought to apply the Khorana et al. score in a population with MM. Methods We identified patients diagnosed with MM within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) between September 1, 1999 and December 31, 2009 using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-03 code 9732/3. We followed the cohort through October 2014. To eliminate patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering myeloma, we excluded patients who did not receive MM-directed therapy within 6 months of diagnosis. We also excluded patients who did not have data for hemoglobin (HGB), platelet (PLT) count, white blood count (WBC), height and weight, as these are all variables included in the Khorana et al. risk model. Height and weight were assessed within one month of diagnosis and used to calculate body mass index (BMI). We measured HGB, PLT count, and WBC count prior to treatment initiation: within two months of MM diagnosis. A previously validated algorithm, using a combination of ICD-9 code for VTE plus pharmacologic treatment for VTE or IVC filter placement, identified patients with incident VTE after MM diagnosis (Thromb Res, 2015). The study was approved by the Saint Louis VHA Medical Center and Washington University School of Medicine institutional review boards. We calculated VTE risk using the Khorana et al. score: We assigned 1 point each for: PLT ≥ 350,000/μl, HGB < 10 g/dl, WBC > 11,000/μl, and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Patients with 0 points were at low-risk, 1-2 points were considered intermediate-risk and ≥3 points were termed high-risk for VTE. We assessed the relationship between risk-group and development of VTE using logistic regression at 3- and 6-months. We tested model discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (concordance statistic, c) with a c-statistic range of 0.5 (no discriminative ability) to 1.0 (perfect discriminative ability). Results We identified 1,520 patients with MM: 16 were high-risk, 802 intermediate-risk, and 702 low-risk for VTE using the scoring system in the Khorana et al. score. At 3-months of follow-up, a total of 76 patients developed VTE: 27 in the low-risk group, 48 in the intermediate-risk group, and 1 in the high-risk group. At 6-months of follow-up there were 103 incident VTEs: 41 in the low-risk group, 61 in the intermediate-risk group, and 1 in the high-risk group. There was no significant difference between risk of VTE in the high- or intermediate-risk groups versus the low-risk group (Table 1). The c-statistic was 0.56 at 3-months and 0.53 at 6-months (Figure 1). Conclusion Previously, the Khorana score was developed and validated to predict VTE in patients with solid tumors. It was not a strong predictor of VTE risk in MM. There is a need for development of a risk prediction model in patients with MM. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Carson: American Cancer Society: Research Funding. Gage:National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: Research Funding. Kuderer:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sanfilippo:National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival and Risk of Central Nervous System Recurrence in Burkitt or High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma in the DA-EPOCH-R Era

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2983-2983
Author(s):  
Dominic Decker ◽  
Pamela C Egan ◽  
Diana O Treaba ◽  
Adam J Olszewski
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Cns Relapse

Abstract Background: The 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification distinguished new categories of high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL). Treatment of these lymphomas is in flux, as some were historically classified as DLBCL and treated with the RCHOP regimen, while others, akin to Burkitt lymphoma (BL), were treated using high-intensity regimens (e.g. CODOX-M/IVAC or hyper-CVAD) that include systemic high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) as central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis . Recently, the less intensive DA-EPOCH-R regimen has been increasingly applied for BL or HGBCL with concurrent MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements based on phase 2 data (Dunleavy et al., NEJM 2013). We examined progression-free survival (PFS) and risk of CNS relapse among HGBCL/BL patients treated in our institution. Methods: In this retrospective series from an academic center, we integrated cancer registry and electronic medical records for all patients treated for BL or HGBCL at Lifespan Cancer Institute in 2005-2017. We designated as "HGBCL" all cases with concurrent MYC and BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements, or those previously diagnosed as "B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and BL" (per WHO 2008). We compared characteristics of patients treated with intensive regimens or with DA-EPOCH-R, as well as their PFS (using log-rank test) and cumulative incidence function (CIF) of CNS relapse (using Gray's test). Results: Among 64 patients with BL (n=38) and HGBCL (n=26), those with BL were somewhat younger (median age 52 versus [vs.] 61 years), more often male (84% vs. 58%), HIV-positive (29% vs. 8%), or with CNS involvement at baseline (21% vs. 4%). Among HGBCLs, 58% had a MYC rearrangement, whereas 31% had concurrent MYC and BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements. Eight patients who did not receive chemotherapy (median age, 78 years) were excluded from outcome analysis. Compared with patients with BL, those with HGBCL more often received DA-EPOCH-R (41% vs. 15%) or R-CHOP (27% vs. 12%), and less often high-intensity regimens (32% vs. 73%, P=.027). Compared with patients treated using high-intensity regimens, those treated with DA-EPOCH-R were significantly older (61 vs. 49 years, P=.023), with high/high-intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI, 86% vs. 50%, P=.027), or diagnosis after 2010 (86% vs. 53%, P=.049). There was no difference in baseline CNS involvement (P=.68) or receipt of intrathecal prophylaxis (P=.16) between DA-EPOCH-R and high-intensity regimens. After median follow-up of 5.7 years, we observed 12 recurrences, including 5 (42%) in the CNS. Median PFS was not reached, whereas 3-year PFS was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-68%), numerically better in BL than in HGBCL (63% vs. 45%, P=.33, Fig. A). Overall survival at 3 years was also 56% (95%CI, 41-68%). Factors associated with shorter PFS included age >60 years (log-rank P=.017), poor performance status (P<.001), high/high-intermediate IPI (P=.0003), and lack of CNS prophylaxis (P=.021). Treatment with DA-EPOCH-R rather than a high-intensity regimen was also associated with worse PFS (P=.001), but not when stratified by histology and age (P=.14). HIV status (P=.53) or CNS involvement at baseline (P=.15) were not prognostic. Survival after recurrence was dismal (median, 1 month, 95%CI, 0.2-3.4), despite 58% of patients receiving salvage therapy. The 3-year CIF of CNS recurrence was 9% (95%CI, 3-18%), and higher in patients with CNS involvement at baseline (P=.002). All CNS recurrences occurred during the first year of follow-up and were among patients receiving DA-EPOCH-R (35.7% vs. 0% for other regimens, P=.0004). Administration of HDMTX for CNS prophylaxis was associated with a numerically lower risk of CNS recurrence (3% vs. 16% without, P=.09, Fig. B). Conversely, we observed no difference in CNS relapse with or without intrathecal prophylaxis (9% vs. 8%, P=.84, Fig. C). Conclusions: The high proportion of CNS recurrences despite prophylaxis, and very poor outcomes at relapse, indicate persistent major areas of need in BL/HGBCL. Outcomes of DA-EPOCH-R were heavily influenced by selection bias (as evidenced by unfavorable characteristics of patients selected for this regimen), so evaluation of this regimen in comparison with high-intensity approaches is warranted in a larger sample. However, our data suggest that in BL/HGBCL systemic HDMTX may be essential for effective CNS prophylaxis. Disclosures Olszewski: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Central nervous system relapse in malignant lymphomas: risk factors and implications for prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1249-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
JP Litam ◽  
F Cabanillas ◽  
TL Smith ◽  
GP Bodey ◽  
EJ Freireich
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Malignant Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Central Nervous System Relapse ◽  
Cns Relapse

Abstract The records of 292 patients with malignant lymphoma other than Hodgkin's disease, registered in our protocols from 1967 to 1977, were reviewed to identify those with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Thirty-one patients were encountered with this complication, an incidence of 11%. Patients with a diffuse histology had a higher frequency of CNS recurences (27/174 = 16%) in contrast to only 4/118 (3%) for those with nodular types. However, if only patients with diffuse histology in CR are considered, the frequency of CNS relapse is 13.5% (13/98). The risk factors that predict for the development of this complication were studied using multivariate analysis. Diffuse poorly differentiated lymphocytic and diffuse undifferentiated lymphomas were found to be associated with a high risk of CNS relapse. Prior chemotherapy, bone marrow involvement, age less than 35, and extranodal disease were also identified as high-risk factors. Using the information generated by a logistic regression model, patients with malignant lymphoma of diffuse type can be classified into three categories when first seen: low-risk group, intermediate, and high-risk group. CNS prophylaxis is recommended for the intermediate and high-risk group, while only close follow-up is advised for the low-risk group patients who have one adverse characteristic.

Treatment stratification in B-cell PTLD after solid organ transplantation (SOT) by international prognostic index (IPI) and response to rituximab: Interim results from the PTLD-2 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8045-8045
Author(s):  
Ralf Ulrich Trappe ◽  
Christian Koenecke ◽  
Martin H. Dreyling ◽  
Christiane Pott ◽  
Ulrich Duehrsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Very High

8045 Background: The PTLD-1 trials have established risk-stratified sequential treatment of B-cell PTLD. After rituximab induction, patients (pts) in complete remission (25 %) received rituximab consolidation, while all others received R-CHOP. The PTLD-2 trial tests modified risk-stratification including clinical risk factors. These are the results of the 2nd scheduled interim analysis (40/60 planned pts). Methods: The prospective, multicenter phase II PTLD-2 trial (NCT02042391) enrols treatment-naïve adult SOT recipients with CD20-positive PTLD. Key exclusion criteria are CNS involvement, ECOG > 2, pregnancy, and severe organ dysfunction or severe, active infection. Treatment consists of rituximab (1400 mg SC; first application 375 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. After restaging, pts in CR as well as those in PR with ≤ 2 IPI risk factors at diagnosis (low-risk group) continue with four three-weekly courses of rituximab. Most other pts (high-risk group) receive 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21, while thoracic SOT recipients who progress under rituximab (very-high-risk group) receive six cycles of alternating R-CHOP-21 and R-DHAOx. The primary endpoint (event-free survival in the low-risk group) is not analyzed here. Secondary endpoints presented here are response and overall response (ORR) by computed tomography, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) overall and by risk group. Results: 40 pts were recruited at 12 centers (2015 – 2019). 21/40 were kidney, 11 lung, 4 liver, 3 heart, and 1 liver/kidney transplant recipients. Median age was 54 years. 38/40 PTLD were monomorphic and 15/40 EBV-associated. 38 pts were evaluated for response at interim staging: 13 were allocated to the low-risk, 17 to the high-risk and 8 to the very-high-risk group. ORR was 28/30 (93 %, CR: 16/30 [53 %]). With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the 1-year/3-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of TTP and OS in the intention-to-treat population (40 pts) were 85 %/80 % and 70 %/70 %, respectively. In the low-risk group, the 2-year KM estimate of OS was 100 %. The frequency of infections (all grades) was 50 %, and TRM occurred in 3/40 pts (8 %). Conclusions: One third of enrolled pts were treated in the low-risk group and the recruitment goal for evaluation of the primary endpoint will likely be reached. Interim efficacy and toxicity data with rituximab SC and modified risk-stratification are encouraging despite the inclusion of 35 % thoracic SOT recipients. Clinical trial information: NCT02042391 .

Molecular Correlates of Central Nervous System Relapse in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2763-2763
Author(s):  
Robert Kridel ◽  
Keren Isaev ◽  
Daisuke Ennishi ◽  
Brian Skinnider ◽  
Karen Mungall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Systemic Relapse

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a rare phenomenon in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), occurring in less than 5% of all patients, but is associated with disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Indeed, the median survival of patients diagnosed with CNS relapse is as low as 2-4 months. Individual risk factors for CNS relapse are well established, and include clinical parameters such as stage, number/type of extranodal sites and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. These and other clinical risk factors have been integrated into a risk score that is reproducible and easy to calculate (CNS International Prognostic Index). Moreover, molecular attributes such as double-hit translocation status, MYC/BCL2 dual protein expression and the activated B-cell-like subtype have been associated with a higher risk of CNS relapse. However, while experts recommend prophylactic interventions for high-risk patients, the major shortcoming of available risk tools is their limited sensitivity. Herein, we evaluated whether gene expression and/or mutational profiles can identify those patients that will ultimately experience CNS relapse, and whether intratumoral heterogeneity impedes accurate prognostication. Methods: We accrued diagnostic FFPET samples from 230 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, selected to fall into 3 clinical groups: 1) cases with CNS relapse/CNS involvement at diagnosis (n=58); 2) cases with systemic relapse but without CNS relapse (n=64) and 3) cases without any relapse (n=108). These 230 samples were subjected to microarray-based gene expression profiling and differential gene expression analysis. Pathway analysis was performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis on ranked gene lists. We assembled a partially overlapping dataset with mutation data of 45 genes in 213 diagnostic samples (n=65 with CNS relapse, 62 with systemic relapse and 86 without relapse). Lastly, we performed exome sequencing in 5 pairs (peripheral and CNS parenchymal tumors) of patients with CNS relapse or CNS involvement at diagnosis, and reconstructed clonal phylogenies using PyClone. Results: Focusing on gene expression data at first, we did not observe significant differential expression between CNS relapse and non-relapse cases at the individual gene level. This was in contrast to the comparison between systemic relapse vs. non-relapse cases where 368 genes were differentially expressed (adjusted P<0.05). In terms of pathway analysis, minimal gene set enrichment was seen in CNS relapse cases, whereas functional annotations such as translation, ribosome biogenesis and MYC targets were significantly enriched in cases with systemic relapse. In keeping with these observations, the percentage of cases that were positive for the recently published double hit signature was highest in cases with systemic relapse (64% vs. 39% in CNS relapse cases and 27% in cases without relapse, P=0.012). However, CNS relapsing cases were defined by down-regulation of numerous immune signatures (e.g. interferon and multiple T cell signatures), suggesting that an intact immune response may have a protective effect on CNS relapse. Considering mutation data, we found that TP53 and SGK were most commonly mutated in systemic relapse cases, while TNFRSF14 and KTM2D were most commonly mutated in non-relapse cases (all adjusted P<0.05). The only gene mutation with a borderline significant trend for enrichment in CNS relapse cases was MYD88 (adjusted P=0.05). We then performed exome sequencing of 5 tumor pairs. A subset of high-confidence somatic variants and tumor purity were used as input for PyClone to infer clonal population structures. In all pairs, we documented the existence of common ancestral mutations, as well as significant clonal divergence, with CNS-exclusive mutations not identified in diagnostic specimens. Conclusion: In summary, we have documented that CNS and systemic relapse result from distinct biological processes that, in part, may be associated with the underlying taxonomy of DLBCL. Our findings further show that CNS relapse results from the dissemination of sub-clones that may not be readily sampled at the time of diagnosis, and that intratumoral heterogeneity may limit our ability to predict CNS relapse. Large-scale, integrative analyses and in-depth characterization of clonal trajectories hold the promise to increase our ability to predict dissemination of DLBCL into the CNS. Disclosures Kridel: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Villa:Roche, Abbvie, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Nanostring, Janssen, Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Steidl:Nanostring: Patents & Royalties: Filed patent on behalf of BC Cancer; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Tioma: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Savage:BMS, Merck, Novartis, Verastem, Abbvie, Servier, and Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoSting [Institution], Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Varying Importance of Prognostic Factors in Subgroups of Myelodysplastic Syndromes Defined by Blast Count, Cytogenetic Risk Group, or WHO Classification.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2776-2776
Author(s):  
Andrea Kuendgen ◽  
Corinna Strupp ◽  
Kathrin Nachtkamp ◽  
Barbara Hildebrandt ◽  
Rainer Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Blast Count

Abstract Abstract 2776 Poster Board II-752 Introduction: We wondered whether prognostic factors have similar relevance in different subpopulations of MDS patients. Methods: Our analysis was based on patients with primary, untreated MDS, including 181 RA, 169 RARS, 649 RCMD, 322 RSCMD, 79 5q-syndromes, 290 RAEB I, 324 RAEB II, 266 CMML I, 64 CMML II, and 209 RAEB-T. The impact of prognostic variables in univariate analysis was compared in subpopulations of patients defined by medullary blast count, namely <5%, ≥5% (table), ≥10%, and ≥20% (not shown), as well as 3 subpopulations defined by the cytogenetic risk groups according to IPSS (table). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed for cytogenetically defined subgroups and WHO-subtypes. Results: Strong prognostic factors in all blast-defined subgroups were hemoglobin, transfusion dependency, increased WBC, age, and LDH. However, all variables became less important in patients with ≥20% blasts (RAEB-T) and increased WBC was rare. Platelet count and cytogenetic risk groups were relevant in patients with <5%, ≥5%, and ≥10% marrow blasts, but not in RAEB-T. Marrow fibrosis was important in patients with <5% or ≥5% blasts, but not ≥10%. Gender and ANC <1000/μl were significant only in patients with a normal blast count. Furthermore, we looked for the effect of the karyotypes, relevant for IPSS scoring (-Y, del5q, del20q, others, del7q/-7, complex), and found a comparable influence on survival, irrespective whether patients had < or ≥5% marrow blasts. In subpopulations defined by cytogenetic risk groups, several prognostic factors were highly significant in univariate analysis, if patients had a good risk karyotype. These included hemoglobin, sex, age, LDH, increased WBC, transfusion need, and blast count (cut-offs 5%, 10%, and 20%). In the intermediate risk group only LDH, platelets, WBC, and blasts were significant prognostic factors, while in the high risk group only platelets and blast count remained significant. Multivariate analysis was performed for the cytogenetic risk groups and for subgroups defined by WHO subtypes. The analysis considered blast count (</≥5%), hemoglobin, platelets, ANC, cytogenetic risk group, transfusion need, sex, and age. In the subgroup including RA, RARS, and 5q-syndrome, LDH, transfusion, and age in descending order were independent prognostic parameters. In the RCMD+RSCMD group, karyotype, age, transfusion, and platelets were relevant factors. In the RAEB I+II subgroup, the order was hemoglobin, karyotype, age, and platelets, while in CMML I+II only hemoglobin had independent influence. In RAEB-T none of the factors examined was of independent significance. Looking at cytogenetic risk groups, in the favorable group, several variables independently influenced survival, namely transfusion, blasts, age, sex, and LDH (in this order). Interestingly, in the intermediate and high risk group, only blast count and platelets retained a significant impact. Conclusion: Univariate analysis showed prognostic factors (except ANC) included in IPSS and WPSS are relevant in most subgroups defined by marrow blast percentage. However, they all lose their impact if the blast count exceeds 20%. Regarding cytogenetic risk groups, several prognostic factors lose their influence already in the intermediate risk group. This underscores the prognostic importance of MDS cytogenetics. Multivariate analysis showed MDS subpopulations defined by WHO types also differ with regard to prognostic factors. In particular, CMML and RAEB-T stand out against the other MDS types. Disclosures: Kuendgen: Celgene: Honoraria. Hildebrandt:Celgene: Research Funding. Gattermann:Novartis: Honoraria, Participation in Advisory Boards on deferasirox clinical trials. Germing:Novartis, Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document